scholarly journals CLEAVAGE (Foreword to Ukrainian translation Michel Foucault’s interview with Jean-Pierre Elkabbach “Foucault Responds to Sartre”)

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-68
Author(s):  
Pavlo Bartusiak
Keyword(s):  

Michel Foucault’s interview with Jean-Pierre Elkabbach “Foucault Responds to Sartre” was published in October 1966. The text was translated into Ukrainian for the first time. In this interview, Michel Foucault responded to Jean-Paul Sartre's critical remarks on the book “The Order of Things”, published in April 1966. Here, Foucault diagnosed, in particular, the final end of Sartre’s era.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 307-312
Author(s):  
Pál Gerdesits

My essay focuses on the ontological crisis articulated in the film Blade Runner 2049, the sequel for Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner. This film is based on the conflict between humans and androids called replicants who would like to live equally to humans. In my opinion the root of their opposition lies on the inability to give a proper definition of what we normally call ‘human’. In this writing I present and analyse the nature of this conflict and also the philosophical questions (representation, freedom, self-identity etc.) arising from it based on the ideas of philosophers like Michel Foucault. Jean-Paul Sartre, Jacques Derrida and Ferdinand de Saussure.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Fernando Aguilar
Keyword(s):  

Hace 50 años, cuando se forjaba la era de los discursos revolucionarios, intelectuales y estudiantes se tomaron las calles de París para protestar contra la injusticia y la desigualdad que aún anidaba, no solo en Francia, sino en toda Europa. La historia recordaría aquella época de marchas y huelgas como Mayo del 68, el momento en que la política se hizo en la calle, en que la juventud decidió no callar más y en el que pensadores como Jean-Paul Sartre y Michel Foucault abandonaron las aulas universitarias para debatir en las calles, en las plazas públicas, en medio del sudor, la represión estatal y los gritos libertarios que convocarían nuevos movimientos alrededor del mundo.


Author(s):  
Michael A. Peters ◽  
Marek Tesar ◽  
Kirsten Locke

Michel Foucault was born in Poitiers in 1926 and died of AIDS in 1984 at the age of 57. In his short life span Foucault became an emblem for a generation of intellectuals: someone who embodied in his work the most-pressing intellectual issues of his time. In his inaugural lecture at the Collège de France, he named as his closest supports and models Georges Dumèzil, Georges Canguilhem (the philosopher of biology who succeeded Gaston Bachelard at the Sorbonne), and Jean Hyppolite. He was a student both of Louis Althusser and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. He grew up in the tradition of a history of philosophy that dominated the French university, a history that gave pride of place to Hegel and helped to legitimate the contemporaneous emphases on phenomenology and existentialism, especially as it developed in the thought of Jean-Paul Sartre. He was classified by the popular press as a member of the structuralist Gang of Four, along with Claude Lévi-Strauss, Jacques Lacan, and Roland Barthes. Foucault in 1964 indicated his intellectual debts in an early essay titled “Nietzsche, Freud, Marx,” yet his relationship to Marx and Marxism was more complex and problematic than his engagement with Nietzsche, whose Genealogy of Morals (originally published in 1887) provided a model for historical study. He came to Nietzsche through the writings of Georges Bataille and Maurice Blanchot, both of whom exercised tremendous influence on his work. Yet, it was Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger who helped Foucault to frame up his life’s work as the history by which human beings become subjects and to change the emphasis of his early work from political subjugation of “docile bodies” to individuals as self-determining beings continually in the process of constituting themselves as ethical subjects. In this article we focus on internationally published English editions to avoid confusion and to provide readers a balanced overview of top-quality sources currently available.


Author(s):  
Simone de Beauvoir ◽  
Sylvie Le Bon de Beauvoir

This book brings to English-language readers literary writings—several previously unknown—by the author. Culled from sources including various American university collections, the works span decades of the author’s career. Ranging from dramatic works and literary theory to radio broadcasts, they collectively reveal fresh insights into the author’s writing process, personal life, and the honing of her philosophy. Highlights of the volume include a new translation of the 1945 play The Useless Mouths, the unpublished 1965 short novel “Misunderstanding in Moscow,” the fragmentary “Notes for a Novel,” and an eagerly awaited translation of the author’s contribution to a 1965 debate among Jean-Paul Sartre and other French writers and intellectuals, “What Can Literature Do?” ALso available in English for the first time are prefaces to well-known works such as Bluebeard and Other Fairy Tales, La Bâtarde, and James Joyce in Paris: His Final Years, alongside essays and other short articles. A landmark contribution to Beauvoir studies and French literary studies, the volume includes informative and engaging introductory essays by prominent and rising scholars.


Author(s):  
Héctor Reynaldo Chávez Muriel ◽  
◽  
Kevin Brango ◽  

Jean-Paul Margot, nacido en Francia y nacionalizado colombiano, es profesor titular jubilado del Departamento de filosofía, y profesor distinguido de la Universidad del Valle. Doctor en filosofía por la Universidad de Ottawa, Canadá. Maestría/Magister en filosofía Université de Paris I (Pantheon-Sorbonne). Licenciado en filosofía Université de Paris I (Pantheon-Sorbonne). Licenciado en filosofía escolástica Instituto Católico de París. Publicó, con Lelio Fernández, una traducción, con estudio preliminar, notas y comentarios, del Tratado de la reforma del entendimiento y otros escritos de Baruch Spinoza, Madrid, Tecnos, 1989 (2003), y los libros: La función epistemológica de la filosofía, Universidad del Valle, Cali, 1980, La modernidad. Una ontología de lo incomprensible, Universidad del Valle, Cali, 1995, (2 ed. 2004), Modernidad, crisis de la modernidad y postmodernidad, Universidad del Valle, Cali, 1999 (2 ed. 2007), Estudios cartesianos, México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de investigaciones filosóficas, 2003, Estudios de filosofía antigua (editor), 2007, Ensayos filosóficos, México, Porrúa 2011, Perspectivas de la Modernidad. Siglos XVI, XVII, XVIII (Jean-Paul Mar-got & Mauricio Zuluaga eds.), Cali, Programa editorial Universidad del Valle, 2011, Leiser Madanes, Una alegría secreta. Ensayos de filosofía moderna (Jean-Paul Margot compilador), Cali, Programa editorial Universidad del Valle, 2012, Laura Benítez, La modernidad cartesiana: fundación, transformación y respuestas ilustradas (Jean-Paul Margot editor), Cali, Programa editorial Universidad del Valle, 2013, además de unos ochenta artículos, en libros y revistas nacionales e internacionales, sobre filosofía antigua y medieval, siglo XVII, filosofía francesa contemporánea, ética y literatura. Es miembro del Grupo de investigación Ágora: diálogo entre antiguos y modernos de la Universidad del Valle. Vicepresidente de la Sociedad colombiana de filosofía 2006-2008 y 2008-2010.


Author(s):  
Paul Earlie

This chapter explores a series of ‘creation myths’ in the reception of Freud’s work in France. In understanding myth as a fictive unity that conceals otherwise troubling ‘aporias’ (a term developed here in detail), Derrida’s work provides a useful lens through which to understand a number of recurrent gestures on the part of Freud’s French inheritors, from passionate devotion to forceful denials of indebtedness, from open hostility to bitter personal and professional rivalries. The resistance of Freud’s textual legacy to interpretation means that it is always accompanied by attempts to mythologize what remains irreducibly plural or undecidable in Freud’s writings, an argument tested here through readings of Claude Lévi-Strauss, Michel Foucault, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Jacques Lacan. If each of the latter seek to recuperate the singular meaning of Freud’s work for a particular concern of the present (anthropological, clinical, existentialist, or linguistic), for Derrida the legacy of psychoanalysis can never be appropriated without remainder, an impossibility which is also the paradoxical source of the rich possibilities generated by Freud’s thought.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-81
Author(s):  
Sonia Dayan-Herzbrun

Un texte n’existe que dans la mesure où il est lu et ses différentes lectures contribuent à en montrer la richesse et l’intérêt. En France on a longtemps lu et on continue encore à lire Fanon, en particulier Les damnés de la terre, à la lumière de la préface que Sartre avait rédigée, à la demande de Fanon lui-même, après une rencontre et d’intenses discussions entre les deux hommes au printemps 1961 à Rome. Le premier chapitre des Damnés de la terre, intitulé “De la violence” avait été publié séparément dans les Temps Modernes, la revue dirigée par Jean-Paul Sartre, comme s’il s’agissait là de l’essentiel de ce livre. Il y a eu depuis beaucoup d’autres lectures de l’œuvre de Fanon, et en particulier de ce livre difficile et complexe. Je voudrais m’attacher, dans les pages qui vont suivre, à la lecture faite par Edward Said des textes de Fanon tout au long de sa carrière, à partir du moment, où, à la suite de la guerre de 1967 entre Israël et les pays arabes, et l’occupation de la Cisjordanie et de Gaza, ainsi que l’annexion de la partie Est de Jérusalem, Said va mêler intimement élaboration théorique et agir politique. Il est d’autant plus intéressant, d’un point de vue français, de porter attention à cette lecture, que Fanon aussi bien que Said, sont largement marginalisés dans le champ intellectuel et universitaire. Ils sont l’un et l’autre le symptôme d’une tache aveugle dans la pensée française dominante, peu encline à analyser le phénomène colonial. Il ne s’agit pas seulement des lacunes de l’histoire coloniale, qui commence tout juste à se développer. Le regard porté par Frantz Fanon sur la colonisation française en Algérie est difficilement supportable dans un pays qui se veut la “patrie des droits de l’Homme” et des valeurs universelles, tout comme la mise en évidence du racisme dans la France des années 1950. Ce qui semble encore davantage difficile à admettre, c’est que la domination coloniale puisse concerner aussi les catégories intellectuelles, les productions de l’imaginaire, et la construction des subjectivités. Lors de la parution, en 1980, de la traduction française d’ Orientalism, la levée de boucliers contre l’ouvrage fut telle qu’il fallut attendre vingt-cinq ans pour une nouvelle édition du livre qui était devenu introuvable. Entre temps Edward Said était mort, et sa notoriété internationale telle qu’il était impossible de continuer à faire comme si cet ouvrage avait cessé d’exister. On peut naïvement s’étonner d’une telle réaction, en face d’un livre dans lequel il est largement question d’écrivains et de savants français, et qui surtout a été écrit en partie dans le sillage intellectuel de Michel Foucault. Said avait cependant déjà pris, à cette époque, des distances avec la théorie foucaldienne, en s’appuyant sur d’autres théoriciens, au premier rang desquels Fanon. L’importance qu’il accordait à Fanon était antérieure. En effet, dans Beginnings, son premier ouvrage important de théorie littéraire, qui précédait Orientalism, Said avait déjà situé Fanon parmi ceux qui, avec Freud, Orwell, Lévi-Strauss et Foucault, avaient contribué à la production d’un “langage mental commun.”


DoisPontos ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Constantino Yazbek
Keyword(s):  

Partindo do antagonismo representado pelas obras de Jean-Paul Sartre e Michel Foucault no horizonte da filosofia francesa contemporânea, este artigo procura divisar as linhas de força de alguns dos impasses e dilemas da teoria e da ação política no pensamento losó co e o papel atribuído ao intelectual na contemporaneidade. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
Michel Foucault ◽  
Mark G. E. Kelly ◽  

In this 1966 interview, published here in English translation for the first time, Michel Foucault positions himself as a representative of a ‘generation’ of French thinkers who turned towards the analysis of ‘structures’ and away from the phenomenological approaches that had previously dominated French philosophy. In this, Foucault claims inspiration not only from older French scholars—namely Georges Dumézil, Jacques Lacan, and Claude Lévi-Strauss—but also from the science of genetics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Dennis A. Gilbert ◽  
Diana L. Burgin

Sartre’s scattered commentaries and remarks on theater, published in a variety of media outlets, as well as in the most unlikely of essays (spanning philosophical texts, biographies, and literary criticism), were finally assembled late in Sartre’s career and published in one volume, Un Théâtre de situations (Sartre on Theater), put together by Michel Contat and Michel Rybalka in 1973. Inevitably, a number of later or missing theatrical documents then came to light, and an updated edition of Un Théâtre de situations appeared in 1992. There still remained, however, other documents on theater which for one reason or another were not included in the later volume. Two of these documents are published interviews that Sartre gave to the Russian theater journal, Teatr, in 1956 and 1962. It is those virtually unknown interviews by Sartre on theater that we are pleased to publish here for the first time in English translation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document