LAWYER AS A SUBJECT OF PROFESSIONAL LEGAL AID IN CIVIL PROCEDURE OF UKRAINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-126
Author(s):  
M.V. SHPAK
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
Unified Approach ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Identical Structure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
Legislative Initiative ◽  
Civil Procedures

The revised version of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine was a consequence of the implementation of ideas on the unification of civil procedures. Now the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine, the Economic Procedure Code of Ukraine have largely received an identical structure with the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. It is noteworthy that the aforementioned legislative acts have adopted a unified approach by the legislator, which has been enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine, regarding the implementation of the so-called “advocate monopoly” in providing legal assistance to the participants of a muzzle considered by a court. “Advocate monopoly” was not perceived unambiguously in legal science. The approaches to this phenomenon are described in the article. Particularly it is noted a change in the positions of the subjects of the legislative initiative regarding the change of wearing and the legislative consolidation of the “advocate monopoly” in the direction of its restriction. Some ideas are assessed, which are set out in the draft Law of Ukraine No. 1013 “On Amending the Constitution of Ukraine (Regarding the Abolition of the Lawyer Monopoly)” dated 29 August 2019. Conclusions are given regarding the possible consequences if legislative novelties come into force that are proposed in the draft Law of Ukraine No. 1013 “On Amending the Constitution of Ukraine (Regarding the Abolition of the Lawyer Monopoly)” dated 29 August 2019. It is alleged that the abolition of the so-called “advocate monopoly” will positively affect the development of free law help in Ukraine. The author offers to provide new provisions to the content of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, which will address in more detail the issue of participation of representatives in civil procedure.

scholarly journals GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CIVIL JURISDICTION

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (86) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nataliia Ryzhenko ◽  
◽  
Olena Korolova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Unified Approach ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Territorial Jurisdiction ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Procedural Code ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Definition Of

From the moment of becoming valid the law of Ukraine «On amendments to the Commercial procedural code of Ukraine, Civil procedural code of Ukraine the Code of administrative procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts» of 3 October 2017 jurisdiction of courts courts is defined through the concept of «jurisdiction». This article considers the practical and theoretical significance of the amendments made by this legislative act to the current Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. The significance of civil jurisdiction and its classification are revealed. To date, the science of civil procedural law has not developed a unified approach to the definition of «jurisdiction» and «civil jurisdiction». With regard to substantive and subjective jurisdiction, it is emphasized that these aspects should be taken into account together. Territorial jurisdiction is defined in the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine as jurisdiction. The instance jurisdiction determines the scope of powers of the court of each link of the judicial system of Ukraine, and the territorial (jurisdiction) determines the limits of powers between courts within one judicial link to hear cases in the first instance. In general, the rules of territorial jurisdiction are less strict than the rules of substantive jurisdiction, as the level of the court is considered appropriate, but violations of the rules of territorial jurisdiction may create additional inconveniences, which, however, usually do not objectively affect the content of the decision. The difficulty of establishing the jurisdiction of the court at this stage of updating the judicial system of Ukraine is due to significant changes in procedural law. The process of harmonization of procedural legislation has contributed to the consolidation of a single conceptual apparatus, which has so far been used mostly at the theoretical level. Thus, at the legislative level, the jurisdiction of the courts of Ukraine is determined exclusively by the jurisdiction, which in the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine is divided into substantive and subjective, instance, territorial. However, the analyzed provisions of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine demonstrate the need to further improve the rules of civil jurisdiction.

scholarly journals PASAL 54 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA DALAM ELABORASI HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-69
Author(s):  
Diah Ratri Oktavriana ◽  
Nasiri Nasiri
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Service ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

This research is a normative research. One of the fulfillment of human rights is justice in equalizing the position of every citizen before the law, as stated in Article 27 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The right to equality before the law or what is commonly referred to as equality before the law is a principle that provides recognition and protection of human rights for every individual regardless of one's background. Therefore, it is true that Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid for People Who Are Less Capable to Guarantee Constitutional Rights of Citizens for Justice and Equality before the Law emerged. Legal aid is a legal service provided by advocates to the community seeking justice In the realm of criminal cases, the provision of legal assistance is described in Article 54 of the Criminal Procedure Code which explains that in the interests of defense, a suspect or defendant has the right to receive legal assistance from one or more legal advisers during the time and at each level of examination. The provision of legal assistance must be based on the principle of equality before the law as stated in the explanation of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law. From the various analyzes that have been carried out, in the perspective of Islamic criminal law it can be concluded that the principle of equality before the law as described in Article 54 of the Criminal Procedure Code is equivalent to an order to provide legal aid which in Islamic criminal law is spelled out in Surah Al-Maidah verse 2 which states that as a fellow humans are ordered to help each other as a form of horizontal worship to fellow humans (habl minan-nas). In addition there are many more both in the Al Qur'an and the hadith of the prophet regarding the application of the principle of equality before the law.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PASAL 56 KUHAP TENTANG BANTUAN HUKUM DI TIAP TINGKAT PEMERIKSAAN TERSANGKA (Studi Kasus Pada Penyidikan Polres Metro Tangerang Kota)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Dwi Saleha ◽  
Imran Bukhari Razif
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Many ◽  
Police Level ◽  
City Police

ABSTRAK Bantuan hukum yang berjudul penerapan pasal 56 KUHAP tentang bantuan hukum ditiap tingkat pemeriksaan tersangka (studi kasus pada penyidikan Polres Metro Tangerang Kota). Dengan rumusan masalah bagaimana penerapan pasal 56 KUHAP tentang bantuan hukum pada tingkat pemeriksaan di Polres Metro Tangerang Kota serta menganalisis upaya Polres Metro Tangerang Kota dalam sosialisasi pasal 56 KUHAP kepada masyarakat kurang mampu. pendekatan metode penelitian dilakukan secara normatif empiris dengan subjek penelitian direskrimum Polres Metro Tangerang Kota dan ketua Pusat Bantuan Hukum Peradi Tangerang, bantuan hukum merupakan suatu hak yang harus diperoleh tersangka sebagai suatu implementasi Negara hukum untuk menjamin hak asasi warga negaranya dalam mencapai suatu keadilan dan bantuan hukum merupakan hal fundamental yang harus di dapatkan oleh tersangka melihat banyak nya realitas ketimpangan hukum bagi seorang tersangka utnuk mendapatkan haknya. Bantuan hukum di upayakan secara optimal dibuktikan dengan adanya penurunan jumlah jenis tindak pidana pada periode tahun 2016 sampai 2018 yang terdiri dari 10 jenis tindak pidana, upaya Polres Metro Tangerang Kota dalam penerapan dan sosialisasi nya dengan memberikan informasi kepada tersangka, keluarga tersangka dengan cara mengedukasi pentingnya bantuan hukum pada tingkat pemeriksaan tersangka serta upaya pemberian papan informasi tentang hak tersangka yang wajib untuk mendapatkan bantuan hukum di tingkat kepolisian sehingga dalam pelaksanaannya bisa berjalan dengan baik untuk mencapai suatu keadilan. Kata kunci: Bantuan Hukum, penerapan, Jenis tindak pidana. ABSTRACT Legal aid entitled the application of article 56 of the Criminal Procedure Code on legal assistance at each level of examination of suspects (case study in the investigation of Tangerang City Police Resort). With the formulation of the problem of how the application of article 56 of the Criminal Procedure Code on legal assistance at the level of inspection in the Tangerang City Metro Police as well as analyzing the efforts of the Jakarta Metro City Police in the socialization of article 56 Criminal Procedure Code to underprivileged people. approach to the research method is carried out empirically normatively with research subjects reskrimum Tangerang City Police Precinct and chairman of the Peradi Tangerang Legal Aid Center, legal aid is a right that must be obtained by the suspect as an implementation of the rule of law to guarantee the rights of its citizens in achieving justice and legal assistance is a fundamental thing that must be obtained by the suspect seeing the many reality of legal inequality for a suspect to get his rights. Legal assistance is optimally sought as evidenced by a decrease in the number of types of criminal acts in the period 2016 to 2018 consisting of 10 types of criminal acts, the efforts of the Metro Tangerang City Police in its application and outreach by providing information to suspects, suspects' families by educating the importance legal assistance at the suspect's investigation level and efforts to provide information boards about the rights of suspects who are required to obtain legal assistance at the police level so that in its implementation it can go well to achieve justice.Keywords: Legal Aid, application, type of crime

scholarly journals TERSANGKA PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA MENDAPATKAN BANTUAN HUKUM DALAM PROSES PENYIDIKAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Agung Mustakim
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Drug Abusers ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Investigation Process

ABSTRAKHak tersangka perkara penyalahgunaan Narkoba untuk mendapatkan bantuan hukum dalam proses penyidikan merupakan asas dan komponen penting dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang dapat melindungi hak asasi tersangka dalam pelaksanaan proses peradilan yang tidak memihak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui, memahami dan mengkaji apakah bantuan hukum wajib diberikan kepada tersangka penyalahgunaan Narkoba dalam proses penyidikan sebagai perlindungan HAM, dan mengkaji bagaimanakah fungsi advokat menurut UU No. 18 Tahun 2003 dihubungkan dengan kewajiban memberikan bantuan hukum kepada tersangka perkara penyalahgunaan Narkoba. Spesifikasi penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis, guna memberikan gambaran tentang hak tersangka untuk mendapatkan bantuan hukum dalam proses penyidikan dan fungsi advokat serta kewajibannya memberikan bantuan hukum kepada tesangka penyalahgunaan Narkoba. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah normatif kualitatif yaitu pemaparan dan penggambaran pengaturan perundang-undangan secara kualitatif yuridis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, bantuan hukum masih sekedar hak bukan kewajiban, padahal bantuan hukum bersifat imperatif dan sebagai perlindungan HAM karenanya bila bantuan hukum tidak diberikan adalah bertentangan dengan KUHAP, kemudian dengan tidak adanya sanksi atau lemahnya aturan hukum karena kepada penegak hukum yang lalai dan menghindar untuk tidak memberikan hak tersangka untuk mendapatkan bantuan hukum padahal ancaman hukuman diatas lima tahun dengan adanya surat pernyataan tersangka yang dibuat penyidik.  ABSTRACTThe right of suspects in drug abuse cases to obtain legal assistance in the investigation process is an important principle and component of the criminal justice system that can protect the suspect's human rights in the implementation of an impartial judicial process. This study aims to find out, understand and examine whether legal aid must be given to suspects of drug abuse in the investigation process as a protection of human rights, and to examine how the function of advocates according to Law no. 18 of 2003 is related to the obligation to provide legal assistance to suspects in drug abuse cases. The specifications of this research are descriptive and analytical, in order to provide an overview of the rights of suspects to obtain legal assistance in the investigation process and the function of advocates and their obligations to provide legal assistance to suspected drug abusers. The data analysis technique used is normative qualitative, namely the presentation and description of legal arrangements in a qualitative juridical manner. According to the study's findings, legal aid is still just a right, not an obligation, even though it is an imperative and a protection of human rights; if legal aid is not provided, it is contrary to the Criminal Procedure Code, in the absence of sanctions or weak legal rules due to negligent law enforcers, and avoiding giving the suspect the right to obtain legal assistance; if legal aid is not provided, it is contrary to the Criminal Procedure Code, in the absence of sanctions or weak legal rules due to negligent law enforce.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT BERBASIS ACCESS TO JUSTICE PADA LEMBAGA BANTUAN HUKUM KAMPUS NEGERI PASCA PEMBERLAKUAN UNDANG-UNDANG BANTUAN HUKUM

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Fachrizal Afandi
Keyword(s):  
Community Service ◽  
Academic Community ◽  
State Universities ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
State University ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
The Law

<p>Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Perguruan Tinggi Negeri (LBH PTN) selama beberapa dekade turut mewarnai proses penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Sejak diundangkannya Undang-Undang (UU) Advokat, mewajibkan pemberi bantuan hukum memiliki lisensi kepengacaraan, sehingga LBH PTN tidak bisa lagi leluasa bergerak, meski kemudian terdapat putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) yang membatalkan pasal pemidanaan dalam UU Advokat tersebut. Secara praktis, posisi LBH PTN harus dipahami sebagai bagian upaya dari para civitas akademika dalam melakukan pengabdian masyarakat dan pengembangan keilmuan hukum. Lahirnya UU No. 16 Tahun 2012 tentang Bantuan Hukum, memberikan angin segar dalam mereposisi LBH PTN dalam melakukan pemberian bantuan hukum yang menjamin akses keadilan. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan sosio legal ditemukan bahwa UU Bantuan Hukum mereposisi peran pengabdian masyarakat LBH PTN setelah vacuum akibat tidak adanya aturan yang jelas dan tegas yang mengakomodir peran mereka selama puluhan tahun bergerak di bidang bantuan hukum pro masyarakat miskin . UU Bantuan Hukum memperluas de fi nisi Pemberi Bantuan Hukum, sehingga memberikan peluang bagi para dosen PTN, paralegal dan mahasiswa hukum yang tergabung dalam LBH untuk melakukan pengabdian masyarakat sekaligus pengembangan keilmuan hukum. Implementasi jaminan access to justice yang dilakukan LBH PTN dapat dilakukan secara lebih optimal pasca diberlakukannya UU Bantuan Hukum. Proses pemberian pelayanan bantuan hukum dapat dilakukan dengan cara melakukan pendampingan secara litigasi maupun non litigasi, dengan bantuan pendanaan dari negara.</p><p>Access to Jus tice Abstract Legal Aid Institution of State Universities (LBH PTN) in fl uence process of law enforcement in Indonesia for several decade. Since the enactment of law on advocate which requires advocate license for legal aid provider, so that LBH PTN could not more move freely, even then there is the Constitutional Court (MK) decision who cancel article punishment in the Advocates ActIn practically, posi Ɵ on of LBH PTN should be understood as part of academic community e ff ort to perform community service and legal science development. The enactment of law number 16 year 2012 on legal assistance has given a fresh breeze in repositioning LBH-PTN to do some legal assistance that guaranteed access to justice. By using socio legal approach founded that law on legal assistance has been repositioning the role of community service in LBH-PTN aer vacuum caused by the lack of obvious and assertive rules that accommodates their roles for decades to legal assistance which is pro poor society. The expansion of definition legal aid provider in the law on legal aid have been giving an opportunity for state university, paralegals and students who are members of legal aid institution to perform community service together with development of legal science. Implementation of guaranteed access to justice is doing by LBH-PTN could be made optimally post enactment the law on legal aid.Awarding process of legal assistance could be done by accompaniment litigation and non-litigation, dissemination, legal consultation, and other program which related to the implementation of legal assistance with the help of state funds.</p>

scholarly journals Principles of legal proceedings in the Code of administrative proceedings and in the Civil procedure code

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-147
Author(s):  
Lydia A. Terekhova
Keyword(s):  
Characteristic Feature ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Independent System ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Rules Of Evidence ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The subject. The system of principles of legal proceedings is one of the indicators of the independence of the type of legal proceedings. The article analyzes the general and distinctive features of the principles enshrined in the Russian Civil Procedure Сode and the Code of Administrative Procedure. The purpose of the article is confirmation or confutation of the hypothesis that there is no independent system of principles of administrative proceedings that differs from the system of principles of civil proceedings. The methodology of the study includes the formal legal method, analysis, synthesis. The main results. All of the principles enshrined in the Code of Administrative Procedure are also enshrined in the Civil Procedure Code except some minor characteristics. So, the active role of the court, involving a number of exceptions to the usual rules of evidence, was also characteristic of the regulation of the consideration of cases arising from public legal relations in the Code of Civil Procedure. The court’s active actions to determine the subject of evidence, to recover evidence are general rules of evidence for all types of proceedings. These rules existed both before the adoption of the Code of Administrative Procedure and after it. But the specifics of the execution of judicial acts adopted in cases of administrative proceedings require special attention. A characteristic feature in the consideration and resolution of most administrative cases is the immediate execution of decisions enshrined directly in the Code of Administrative Procedure. Such a rule can be considered as a priority of immediate execution, which is a characteristic feature of administrative proceedings. The author doubts about the need for normative consolidation of the principles, as well as the need for a special list of principles of administrative legal proceedings in separate article of the procedural code. Conclusons. The absence of an independent system of administrative procedural principles confirms the thesis that administrative proceedings cannot be considered an independent branch of law separated from civil proceedings law. However, the priority of immediate execution of a court decision is a characteristic feature (perhaps even a principle) of administrative proceedings.

KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERAN PEMERINTAH KOTA SAMARINDA DALAM PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Abdul Mukmin Rehas
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 which is the country's constitution has given recognition, guarantees, protection and legal certainty as well as equal treatment of all citizens before the law (equality before the law). In fact, the application of the principle of Equality Before The Law in Indonesia is still lacking. In the Code of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Procedure Code) only for the granting of legal aid free of charge only if the crime committed is punishable by imprisonment of 5 years or more, while if it is less than 5 years, while if the penalties are less than 5 years then the public will not get legal aid free of charge. The enactment of Law No. 16 of 2011 on the Legal Aid eliminating restrictions as stipulated in the Criminal Code, so that people can obtain legal assistance free of charge to the entire process of both the Criminal and Civil law for the sake of the implementation of the principle of Equality Before The Law.

scholarly journals Intersectoral principles of procedural branches of Armenian law

2020 ◽  
pp. 17-22
Author(s):  
Vera Ilyuhina
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Understanding

Based on the analysis of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia, the Code of criminal procedure of the Republic of Armenia, the Civil procedure code of the Republic of Armenia and the Code of administrative procedure of the Republic of Armenia, based on a positivist legal understanding, the author identifies intersectoral principles of the procedural branches of Armenian law. Attention is drawn to the fact that intersectoral principles of law are enshrined not only in industry codes, but also in the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia.

scholarly journals Problems of correlation and distinctions of types of court proceedings, judgment and competence of civil and administrative cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 133-137
Author(s):  
S. V. ZAVITOVA ◽  
◽  
YU. S. ARTAMONOVA ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The article analyzes the problem of correlation and distinction of types of legal proceedings, in particular, it considers how civil and administrative proceedings are qualified when considering certain categories of cases by courts of general jurisdiction at different stages of the process. In modern domestic legislation there are no clear criteria for distinguishing the type of legal proceedings when choosing a procedure for protecting violated rights, freedoms 134 IUS PUBLICUM ET PRIVATUM В 2015 г. вступил в силу Кодекс административного судопроизводства Российской Федерации (КАС РФ) – процедура защиты прав, законных интересов граждан и организаций от нарушений со стороны органов государственной власти была регламентирована и зафиксирована как самостоятельная правовая основа1 . Нельзя не заметить, что юридическое закрепление порядка рассмотрения дел и разрешения споров, возникших из административно-правовых отношений, в принятом КАС РФ спровоцировало появление коллизий при применении норм Гражданского процессуального кодекса Российской Федерации (ГПК РФ)2 и КАС РФ в процессе рассмотрения дел различных категорий. Кроме того, встал принципиальный вопрос: как правильно разграничить виды судопроизводства в целях должной защиты нарушенных прав? КАС РФ содержит перечень дел, подлежащих рассмотрению по правилам административного судопроизводства, но не дает разъяснения, в чем состоит отличие от дел, рассматриваемых в порядке гражданского судопроизводства. Верховным Судом Российской Федерации сформулированы правила определения вида судопроизводства для судов общей юрисдикции. Так, в первую очередь выделяется разграничение характера публичных и непубличных правоотношений. В данном случае во внимание берется наличие или отсутствие властных полномочий у субъектов административных правоотношений. Вовторых, Верховный Суд Российской Федерации рекомендует учитывать последствия, к которым приводят споры о признании решений, действия (бездействия) органов власти недействительными3. Изучение судебной практики показывает, что в некоторых случаях у судов возникали сложности при разрешении вопроса о том, в порядке какого судопроизводства следует рассматривать и разрешать дела об оспаривании решений, действий (бездействия) органов государственной власти, органов местного самоуправления, организаций, наделенных отдельными государственными или иными публичными полномочиями, должностных лиц, государственных и муниципальных служащих. Так, например, гражданин Р. обратился в Вологодский городской суд с административным исковым заявлением к БУЗ ВО «Вологодский областной наркологический диспансер № 1» о признании незаконными действий врача учреждения по проведению медицинского освидетельствования на состояние опьянения и акта медицинского освидетельствования на состояние опьянения. В обосновании требований истец указал, что медицинское освидетельствование в отношении него проведено в отсутствие законных оснований, акт медицинского освидетельствования не содержит сведений о концентрации каннабиноидов в исследованной пробе, копия акта незаконно направлена работодателю, что послужило основанием для увольнения. Определением Вологодского городского суда от 24.12.2018 гражданину Р. отказано в принятии административного искового заявления, поскольку акт медицинского освидетельствования на состояние опьянения не влечет самостоятельных последствий для лица, в отношении которого он составлен, следовательно, не может быть предметом самостоятельного оспаривания в суде. Также судом указано, что требования истца о признании незаконными действий врача по проведению медицинского освидетельствования на состояние опьянения подлежат рассмотрению в порядке, предусмотренном ГПК РФ. Суд апелляционной инстанции в своем определении от 06.03.2019 № 33а-1227/2019 and legitimate interests. The article analyzes the norms of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation in determining the jurisdiction of cases to courts of general and arbitration jurisdiction and also touches on the issue of transition to consideration of cases according to the rules of civil and (or) administrative proceedings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document