scholarly journals Rekam Jejak Dosen Sebagai Model Pengambilan Keputusan Dalam Pemilihan Dosen Berprestasi

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Safrizal Safrizal
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Social Awareness ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Complex Situation ◽  
Track Record ◽  
Decision Taking ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Sistem pendukung keputusan merupakan sistem informasi komputer yang digunakan oleh para pembuat keputusan untuk mendapatkan hasil keputusan terbaik dari beberapa alternatif keputusan sehingga memberikan hasil akhir yang tepat dan akurat. Salah satu metode pengambilan keputusan dalam situasi yang kompleks adalah dengan menggunakan metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Di STMIK Potensi Utama rekam jejak dosen dilakukan setiap semester yang meliputi administrasi dosen, metode proses belajar mengajar, kegiatan dosen, penelitian dan pengabdian masyarakat yang dilaksanakan oleh dosen. Sulitnya menemukan dosen yang mempunyai prestasi pada rekam jejak tersebut, maka penulis melakukan penelitian dalam hal pemanfaatan rekam jejak dosen sebagai keputusan dalam pemilihan dosen berprestasi menggunakan metode AHP. Hasilnya adalah Administrasi Dosen (0.513 atau 51,3%), Metode PBM (0.261 atau 26,1%), Seminar/Kegiatan Dosen (0.063 atau 6,3%), Penelitian (0.129 atau 12,9%), Pengabdian Masyarakat (0.033 atau 3,3%). Kriteria Administrasi Dosen merupakan kriteria terpenting diantara kriteria yang lain. Sedangkan hasil evaluasi rekam jejak dosen yang memiliki bobot prioritas yang paling tinggi dalam pemilihan dosen berprestasi adalah prioritas pertama dimiliki oleh Dosen A dengan bobot 0,349 atau 34,9%, prioritas kedua dimiliki oleh Dosen A dengan nilai bobot 0,0337 atau 33,7% dan Dosen B memiliki perioritas ketiga dengan nilai bobot nilai 0,314 atau 31,4%.Decision support system is an interactive information system used by the decision makers in order to obtain the best decision result among some other alternatives. One of the decision taking methods in complex situation is Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). At STMIK POTENSI UTAMA is done regularly every semester including lecture’s administration learning teaching method, lecture’s activities, research and social awareness done comprehensively by lecture’s. However, it is difficult to find the lectures who have full filled those qualification, the written to write about a lecturer track record as model of decision taking in selecting lecturer performance by applying AHP Method. The finding are Lecture’s Administration (0.513 or 51,3%), PBM Method (0.261 or 26,1%), seminary/lecture’s Activities (0.063 or 6,3%), Research (0.129 or 12,9%), and social awareness (0.033 or 3,3%). It implies that lecture’s administration criteria is the most important among others. While the evaluation of lecture’s track recording that have high priority in lectures a with 0,349 or 34,9%, the second priority goes on lectures A with 0,0337 or 33,7% and lectures B is the third priority with 0,314 or 31,4%.

DETERMINING THE DESALINATION UNIT COMPOSITION FOR COSTAL AREAS AND SMALL ISLANDS USE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imam Setiadi ◽  
Dinda Rita K. Hartaja
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Energy Demand ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Small Islands ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Comparison Research ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of

Selection of the appropriate composition desalination units can be done with a variety of method approaches, one of the method is the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In determining the desalination unit with AHP method to consider is setting a goal, an alternative criteria and pairwise comparison. Research for the determination of the exact composition of the desalination unit in order to achieve sustainable drinking water suppy in coastal areas and small islands has been conducted. The results of the study are as follows, the energy demand of 50.83%, operator costs of 26.64%, maintenance costs of 14.13% and chemical requirement 8.4%. For an alternative composition desalination unit of RO 10 m3 / day is the best alternative composition with value of 59.61%, the composition of the next alternative is RO 20 m3/ day of 30.40% and the last alternative of the desalination unit composition is RO 120 m3/ day of 09.99%.Key words : Desalination, Mukti Stage Flash Composition, AHP

scholarly journals Decision Support System Budget Allocation Fund Village With AHP method (Analytic Hierarchy Process) In the village of beehive

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62
Author(s):  
Ilham Pramuja Nasution ◽  
Arjon Samuel Sitio
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Support System ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Budget Allocation ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
The Village

The budget allocation of a village fund is very important and take big effect to village progress Because the office to distribute the tax result for village development. But, that allocation is not accurately. Therefore there was design a system to support a decision a budget allocation of village funds by using an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. This research done to the make-easy an office village in budgeting is the allocation of village funds. An method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of a method known as important as the highest level. An AHP method is look for the best alternative

Some Conflicting Results in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 465-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ardalan Bafahm ◽  
Minghe Sun
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Unexpected Result ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Preference Relations ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been believed to be one of the most pragmatic and widely accepted methods for multi-criteria decision making. However, there have been various criticisms of this method within the last four decades. In this study, the results of AHP contradicting common expectations are examined for both the distributive and ideal modes. Specifically, conflicting priorities, conflicting decisions, and conflicting preference relations are investigated. A decision-making scenario is used throughout the paper and an illustrative example constructed from the decision-making scenario is provided to demonstrate each of the conflicting results recommended by AHP. With a parametric formulation of each unexpected result, the possibility of unexpected results of AHP is generalized irrespective of applying the distributive or ideal mode. The logic and causes of these contradictions are also analyzed. This study shows that AHP is not always reliable, and could lead the decision makers towards incorrect decisions.

The Problem of Adequacy of the Analytic Hierarchy Process

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 79-87
Author(s):  
V.M. Romanchuk
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Measurement Procedure ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Calculation Algorithm ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Rating Method ◽  
Simple Measurement ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a popular method for solving multi-criteria problems. However, the problem of the adequacy of the AHP method is not solved. Opponents of the Analytic hierarchy process believe that the AHP as a whole is erroneous and cannot be applied in practice. Proponents of the method believe that the disadvantages of the method are compensated by a simple measurement procedure. In this paper, a modification of the AHP method is proposed. A mathematical model of measurement is formulated, which contains a built-in mechanism for checking adequacy. moreover, the measurement method is preserved, and the calculation algorithm becomes even simpler. The fact is that the Analytic hierarchy process is based on the assumption that the scale of relations can be obtained by pairwise comparison using numerical judgments based on the absolute scale of numbers. Fechner’s psychophysical law is considered as a justification for the existence of the scale of relations. But there are not one, but two psychophysical laws. The existence of two psychophysical laws is a problem of psychophysics. This problem can be solved by the rating method. To overcome the disadvantages of the Analytic hierarchy process, it is also proposed to use the rating method. The use of the rating method makes it possible to use the fundamental scale of the AHP method. As an example, the problem is solved using the traditional AHP scale.

scholarly journals Simulation of hybrid GSHP systems utilizing radiant ceiling terminal and system evaluation with analytic hierarchy process method

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1202-1213
Author(s):  
Lu Xing ◽  
Pingfang Hu
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Energy Saving ◽  
Hybrid System ◽  
Economic Cost ◽  
System Evaluation ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Ground Source ◽  
Indoor Comfort ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Hybrid ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems which utilize capillary radiant ceiling are promising to provide a better building comfort while reducing energy consumption. We have developed a GSHP model and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method for evaluating the system feasibility. The hybrid GSHP system provides heating/cooling for an office in Wuhan, China. A conventional HVAC system – water chiller + gas boiler (WB) system was also simulated. The results showed that the hybrid system would provide a better indoor comfort and remains at the thermal comfort class I, and the hybrid system would incur a 14.5% lower cost but would provide 43.2% more energy saving. The hybrid GSHP system could reduce 20.23 tons of CO2 emission, while 1.39 tons more SO2, 0.39 tons more NOx and 9.70 tons more Ash emissions could be produced. Overall, the hybrid system performance evaluation result (SPER) was 0.966, and the WB system was 0.746. These SPERs were quantified system evaluation results calculated using the AHP method, which have considered the impacts of the various factors – economic cost, energy saving and environmental impact. The hybrid GSHP system is more adaptable than the WB system and has a good application prospect in this climate region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document