Economic Burden and Cost-Effectiveness of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Treatment in Asian Region: A Systematic Review

Psoriasis poses a significant economic burden. A systematic review of psoriasis treatments cost and effectiveness has been performed extensively in the United States (US) and Europe, but such review is limited in Asia. This review aims to analyze all previous literature on the cost and effectiveness of systemic and biological treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis. Cost of illness and cost-effectiveness studies that examined the economic burden, cost, and effectiveness of psoriasis treatments (systemic and biological) in Asian region from 2010 to 2020 were published in English language. All costs were converted into 2020 US Dollar. All COIs included found that direct medical costs were greater than indirect costs. Adalimumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, secukinumab 150 mg were cost-effective treatments and of the lowest cost per PASI-75/PASI1 and/or QALY. When comparing the different treatments, topical and systemic psoriasis treatments were observed to be the most cost-effective compared with other modalities. Given the tremendous economic effects of psoriasis on patients and hospitals, economic analysis, clinicians, and policymakers should consider cost and effectiveness evidence, as this systematic literature review was conducted to analyze previous documentation regarding the cost and effectiveness of systemics and biologics in Asian countries.

Download Full-text

Systematic review of health economic studies in cranial neurosurgery

Neurosurgical FOCUS ◽

10.3171/2018.2.focus17792 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 44 (5) ◽

pp. E2 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Won Hyung A. Ryu ◽

Michael M. H. Yang ◽

Sandeep Muram ◽

W. Bradley Jacobs ◽

Steven Casha ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Life Years ◽

The Cost

OBJECTIVEAs the cost of health care continues to increase, there is a growing emphasis on evaluating the relative economic value of treatment options to guide resource allocation. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of cranial neurosurgery procedures.METHODSThe authors performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, focusing on themes of economic evaluation and cranial neurosurgery following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Included studies were publications of cost-effectiveness analysis or cost-utility analysis between 1995 and 2017 in which health utility outcomes in life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), or disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were used. Three independent reviewers conducted the study appraisal, data abstraction, and quality assessment, with differences resolved by consensus discussion.RESULTSIn total, 3485 citations were reviewed, with 53 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Of those, 34 studies were published in the last 5 years. The most common subspecialty focus was cerebrovascular (32%), followed by neurooncology (26%) and functional neurosurgery (24%). Twenty-eight (53%) studies, using a willingness to pay threshold of US$50,000 per QALY or LY, found a specific surgical treatment to be cost-effective. In addition, there were 11 (21%) studies that found a specific surgical option to be economically dominant (both cost saving and having superior outcome), including endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke, epilepsy surgery for drug-refractory epilepsy, and endoscopic pituitary tumor resection.CONCLUSIONSThere is an increasing number of cost-effectiveness studies in cranial neurosurgery, especially within the last 5 years. Although there are numerous procedures, such as endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke, that have been conclusively proven to be cost-effective, there remain promising interventions in current practice that have yet to meet cost-effectiveness thresholds.

Download Full-text

Abstract 200: Cost-Effectiveness of Newer Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes ◽

10.1161/circoutcomes.6.suppl_1.a200 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Brendan L Limone ◽

William L Baker ◽

Craig I Coleman

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Stroke Prevention ◽

Indirect Comparison ◽

Cost Effective ◽

The United States ◽

Base Case ◽

Treatment Comparison ◽

Newer Anticoagulants ◽

The Cost

Background: A number of new anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) have gained regulatory approval or are in late-stage development. We sought to conduct a systematic review of economic models of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for SPAF. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database and Health Technology Assessment database along with the Tuft’s Registry through October 10, 2012. Included models assessed the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran (150mg, 110mg, sequential), rivaroxaban or apixaban for SPAF using a Markov model or discrete event simulation and were published in English. Results: Eighteen models were identified. All models utilized a lone randomized trial (or an indirect comparison utilizing a single study for any given direct comparison), and these trials were clinically and methodologically heterogeneous. Dabigatran 150mg was assessed in 9 of models, dabigatran 110mg in 8, sequential dabigatran in 9, rivaroxaban in 4 and apixaban in 4. Adjusted-dose warfarin (either trial-like, real-world prescribing or genotype-dosed) was a potential first-line therapy in 94% of models. Models were conducted from the perspective of the United States (44%), European countries (39%) and Canada (17%). In base-case analyses, patients typically were at moderate-risk of ischemic stroke, initiated anticoagulation between 65 and 73 years of age, and were followed for or near a lifetime. All models reported cost/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, and while 22% of models reported using a societal perspective, no model included costs of lost productivity. Four models reported an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for a newer anticoagulant (dabigatran 110mg (n=4)/150mg (n=2); rivaroxaban (n=1)) vs. warfarin above commonly reported willingness-to-pay thresholds. ICERs (in 2012US$) vs. warfarin ranged from $3,547-$86,000 for dabigatran 150mg, $20,713-$150,000 for dabigatran 110mg, $4,084-$21,466 for sequentially-dosed dabigatran and $23,065-$57,470 for rivaroxaban. In addition, apixaban was demonstrated to be an economically dominant strategy compared to aspirin and to be dominant or cost-effective ($11,400-$25,059) vs. warfarin. Based on separate indirect treatment comparison meta-analyses, 3 models compared the cost-effectiveness of these new agents and reported conflicting results. Conclusions: Cost-effectiveness models of newer anticoagulants for SPAF have been extensively published. Models have frequently found newer anticoagulants to be cost-effective, but due to the lack of head-to-head trial comparisons and heterogeneity in clinical characteristic of underlying trials and modeling methods, it is currently unclear which of these newer agents is most cost-effective.

Download Full-text

The Cost-Effectiveness of Epilepsy Surgery and Surgical Evaluation in the United States

Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/neuros/nyz310_165 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Shehryar R Sheikh ◽

Michael P Steinmetz ◽

Michael W Kattan ◽

Mendel Singer ◽

Belinda Udeh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Monte Carlo ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Epilepsy Surgery ◽

Medical Management ◽

Cost Effective ◽

The United States ◽

Effective Strategies ◽

Surgical Evaluation ◽

The Cost

Abstract INTRODUCTION Surgery is an effective treatment for many pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy patients, but incurs considerable cost. It is unknown whether surgery and surgical evaluation are cost-effective strategies in the United States. We aim to evaluate whether 1) surgery is cost-effective for patients who have been deemed surgical candidates when compared to continued medical management, 2) surgical evaluation is cost-effective for patients who have drug-resistant temporal epilepsy and may or may not ultimately be deemed surgical candidates METHODS We use a Monte Carlo simulation method to assess the cost-effectiveness of surgery and surgical evaluation over a lifetime horizon. Patients transition between two health states (‘seizure free’ and ‘having seizures’) as part of a Markov process, based on literature estimates. We adopt both healthcare and societal perspectives, including direct healthcare costs and indirect costs such as lost earnings by patients and care providers. We estimate variability of model predictions using probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS 1) Epilepsy surgery is cost effective in surgically eligible patients by virtue of being cost saving and more effective than medical management in the long run, with 95% of 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations favoring surgery. From a societal perspective, surgery becomes cost effective within 3 yr. At 5 yr, surgery has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $31,600, which is significantly below the societal willingness-to-pay (∼ $100,000/quality-adjusted life years (QALY)) and comparable to hip/knee arthroplasty. 2) Surgical evaluation is cost-effective in pharmacoresistant patients even if the probability of being deemed a surgical candidate is low (5%-10%). Even if the probability of surgical eligibility is only 10%, surgical referral has an ICER of $96,000/QALY, which is below societal willingness-to-pay. CONCLUSION Epilepsy surgery and surgical evaluation are both cost-effective strategies in the United States. Pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy patients should be referred for surgical evaluation without hesitation on cost-effectiveness grounds.

Download Full-text

Nutrient Cost-Effectiveness of Fortified Blended Food Aid Products

Food and Nutrition Bulletin ◽

10.1177/0379572119846331 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (3) ◽

pp. 326-339 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Gregory K. Regier ◽

Brian L. Lindshield ◽

Nina K. Lilja

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Transportation Cost ◽

Cost Effective ◽

The United States ◽

Food Aid ◽

African Countries ◽

Nutrient Value ◽

Nutritional Data ◽

The Cost ◽

Blended Food

Background: Sorghum-Soy Blend (SSB) and Sorghum-Cowpea Blend (SCB) fortified blended food aid porridge products were developed as alternatives to Corn-Soy Blend Plus (CSB+) and Super Cereal Plus (SC+), the most widely used fortified blended food aid products. However, the cost and nutrient cost-effectiveness of these products procured from different geographical areas have not been determined. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the nutrient cost-effectiveness of SSB and SCB compared to existing fortified blended foods. Methods: Nutritional data as well as ingredient, processing, and transportation cost for SSB, SCB, and existing fortified blended foods were compiled. Using the omega value, the ratio of the fortified blended food’s Nutrient Value Score to the total cost of the fortified blended food divided by an identical ratio of a different fortified blended food or the same fortified blended food produced in a different country and the nutrient cost-effectiveness of each of the fortified blended foods procured in the United States and several African countries were determined. Results: Both CSB+ and SC+ are less expensive than SSB and SCB, but they also have lower Nutrient Value Scores of 7.7 and 8.6, respectively. However, the omega values of CSB+ and SC+ are all above 1 when compared to SSB and SCB, suggesting that the existing fortified blended foods are more nutrient cost-effective. Conclusions: Comparing the nutrient cost-effectiveness of various food aid products could provide valuable information to food aid agencies prior to making procurement decisions.

Download Full-text

TECHNIQUES FOR DIAGNOSING OSTEOPOROSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS STUDIES

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care ◽

10.1017/s0266462314000257 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 30 (3) ◽

pp. 273-281 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Davide Minniti ◽

Ottavio Davini ◽

Maria Rosaria Gualano ◽

Maria Michela Gianino

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Postmenopausal Women ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Economic Evaluations ◽

Clear Cut ◽

Step Procedure ◽

Database Research ◽

The Cost ◽

Effectiveness Studies

Objectives:The study question was whether dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) alone is more cost-effective for identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis than a two-step procedure with quantitative ultrasound sonography (QUS) plus DXA. To answer this question, a systematic review was performed.Methods:Electronic databases (PubMed, INAHTA, Health Evidence Network, NIHR, the Health Technology Assessment program, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Research Papers in Economics, Web of Science, Scopus, and EconLit) were searched for cost-effectiveness publications. Two independent reviewers selected eligible publications based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Quality assessment of economic evaluations was undertaken using the Drummond checklist.Results:Seven journal articles and four reports were reviewed. The cost per true positive case diagnosed by DXA was found to be higher than that for diagnosis by QUS+DXA in two articles. In one article it was found to be lower. In three studies, the results were not conclusive. These articles were characterized by the differences in the types of devices, parameters and thresholds on the QUS and DXA tests and the unit costs of the DXA and QUS tests as well as by variability in the sensitivity and specificity of the techniques and the prevalence of osteoporosis.Conclusions:The publications reviewed did not provide clear-cut evidence for drawing conclusions about which screening test may be more cost-effective for identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Download Full-text

COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ADHERENCE INTERVENTIONS FOR HIGHLY ACTIVE ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care ◽

10.1017/s0266462313000317 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 29 (3) ◽

pp. 227-233 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Tim Mathes ◽

Dawid Pieper ◽

Sunya-Lee Antoine ◽

Michaela Eikermann

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Antiretroviral Therapy ◽

Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Baseline Scenario ◽

Highly Active ◽

Adherence Interventions ◽

The Cost

Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions aiming to increase the adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-infected patients in developed countries (WHO stratum A).Methods: A systematic search for comparative health economic studies was conducted in the following databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, CINAHL, HEED, and EconLit. The identified publications were selected by two reviewers independently according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Furthermore, these were evaluated according to a standardized checklist and finally extracted, analyzed, and summarized.Results: After reviewing the abstracts and full texts four relevant studies were identified. Different educational programs were compared as well as the Directly Observed Therapy (DOT). A critical aspect to be considered in particular was the poor transparency of the cost data. In three cost-utility analyses the costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in the baseline scenario were each under USD 15,000. The sensitivity analyses with a presumed maximum threshold of USD 50,000/QALY showed a predominantly cost-effective result. In one study that examined DOT the costs add up to over USD 150,000/QALY.Conclusions: It seems that adherence interventions for HAART in HIV-infected patients can be cost-effective. Nevertheless, the quality of the included studies is deficient and only a few of the possible adherence interventions are taken into consideration. A final assessment of the cost-effectiveness of adherence interventions in general is, therefore, not possible.

Download Full-text

Can polygenic risk scores contribute to cost-effective cancer screening? A systematic review

10.1101/2021.11.26.21266911 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Padraig Dixon ◽

Edna Keeney ◽

Jenny C Taylor ◽

Sarah Wordsworth ◽

Richard Martin

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Health Economic ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Cancer Screening ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Risk Scores ◽

Polygenic Risk ◽

The Cost ◽

Economic Studies

Polygenic risk is known to influence susceptibility to cancer. The use of data on polygenic risk, in conjunction with other predictors of future disease status, may offer significant potential for preventative care through risk-stratified screening programmes. An important element in the evaluation of screening programmes is their cost-effectiveness. We undertook a systematic review of papers evaluating the cost-effectiveness of screening interventions informed by polygenic risk scores compared to more conventional screening modalities. We included papers reporting cost-effectiveness outcomes in the English language published as articles or uploaded onto preprint servers with no restriction on date, type of cancer or form of polygenic risk modelled. We excluded papers evaluating screening interventions that did not report cost-effectiveness outcomes or which had a focus on monogenic risk. We evaluated studies using the Quality of Health Economic Studies checklist. Ten studies were included in the review, which investigated three cancers: prostate (n=5), colorectal (n=3) and breast (n=2). All study designs were cost-utility papers implemented as Markov models (n=6) or microsimulations (n=4). Nine of ten papers scored highly (score >75 on a 0-100) scale) when assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies checklist. Eight of ten studies concluded that polygenic risk informed cancer screening was likely to be more cost-effective than alternatives. However, the included studies lacked robust external data on the cost of polygenic risk stratification, did not account for how very large volumes of polygenic risk data on individuals would be collected and used, did not consider ancestry-related differences in polygenic risk, and did not fully account for downstream economic sequalae stemming from the use of polygenic risk data in these ways. These topics merit attention in future research on how polygenic risk data might contribute to cost-effective cancer screening.

Download Full-text

Pegylated versus non-pegylated interferon beta 1a in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Iranian Journal of Neurology ◽

10.18502/ijnl.v17i3.371 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Amir Hashemi-Meshkini ◽

Hedieh Sadat Zekri ◽

Hasan Karimi-Yazdi ◽

Pardis Zaboli ◽

Mohammad Ali Sahraian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Sclerosis ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Interferon Beta ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Pegylated Interferon ◽

The United States ◽

Health States ◽

Payer Perspective ◽

Cost Effective Treatment ◽

The Cost

Background: Pegylated (PEG) interferon beta 1a has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) as an alternative to interferon beta 1a for multiple sclerosis (MS). Due to its higher price, this study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PEG-interferon beta 1-a compared with interferon beta 1a from an Iranian payer perspective. Methods: A Markov model was designed according to health states based on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and one-month cycles over a 10-year time horizon. Direct medical and non-medical costs were included from a payer perspective. Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated around 11111 US dollars (USD) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for the PEG-interferon versus interferon regimen [with currency rate of 29,000 Iranian Rial (IRR) to 1 USD in 2016]. Conclusion: Considering the cost-effectiveness threshold in Iran [three times of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita or 15,945 USD], PEG-interferon beta 1-a could be considered as a cost effective treatment for Iranian patients with MS.

Download Full-text

A Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Recombinant Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) and Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (aPCC) in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Bleeding Episodes for Haemophilia Patients with Inhibitors

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.4678.4678 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 4678-4678

Author(s):

Chris Knight ◽

Anne Møller Danø ◽

Tessa Kennedy-Martin

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Factor Viia ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Primary Treatment ◽

Cost Utility ◽

Economic Consequences ◽

Modelling Framework ◽

The Cost

Abstract Objectives: Although haemophilia patients with inhibitors are rare, the clinical, humanistic and economic consequences associated with this disorder are considerable. The primary treatment for such patients is either rFVIIa or aPCC. The aim of this study was to identify, review and evaluate the quality of the published literature on the relative cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa and aPCC in treating haemophilia patients with inhibitors. Methods: The review concentrates on the model type, the model design, model assumptions, and results. Results: The results of this study suggest that rFVIIa may be the cost-effective alternative to treatment with aPCC due to the superior efficacy of rFVIIa and hence the avoidance of subsequent lines of treatment. In 7 of the 9 studies, rFVIIa had the lower average treatment cost. The adapted modelling framework is similar in all the economic models reviewed, suggesting clinical acceptability of the approach used. The estimates of efficacy varied between the models, especially for aPCC. The efficacy for aPCC derived from retrospective studies was lower than reported in the literature. Sensitivity analysis had been undertaken in the majority of the economic analyses and the results were found to be robust to realistic parameter variations. Only one of the studies was a cost-utility study, showing the lack of measuring health status within this area. The results showed the large impact appropriate treatment can have on the quality of life for haemophilia patients with inhibitors. Conclusions: Ideally, there should be a systematic approach to identifying the relevant data and the lack of data from relevant randomized head-to-head trials is a contributing factor to the variation in efficacy rates and average dosages assumed. However, this systematic review has shown that despite differences in the estimates of efficacy, average dosage required, and unit costs the overall results are robust and appear to favour rFVIIa as the cost-effectiveness treatment for haemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Download Full-text