scholarly journals Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: The Role of Board of Directors and Audit Committee in Financially Distressed Firms

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Emita W. Astami ◽  
Rusmin Rusmin
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Distressed Firms ◽  
Financially Distressed

This study investigates the association between corporate governance and earnings management practices of Australian’s financially distressed firms. Based on a sample of 164 firm-year incorporating non-financial firmsexperiencing financial distress, the cross-sectional modified Jones (1991) model is used to measure discretionary accruals (the proxy for earnings management). Board of directors and audit committee characteristic variables are employed as the key predictor variables for measuring the effectiveness of corporate governance. This study finds that the companies are seeking to reduce their reported earnings to increase the likelihood of making a profit in the following year with the goal of avoiding bankruptcy;a larger number of directors on a board is less effective in detecting and constraining the practices of earnings management by managers of distressed firms; an active audit committee plays a positive role in detecting and reducing the probability of earnings management. The findings of this study have implications especially to regulators and corporate governance reformists that determine corporate governance rules. This is primarily in regard to the efforts made by listed companies in maintaining their sustainability through more emphases on the process for monitoring and selection of board of directors and audit committee members to reinforceeffectiveness in managerial performance evaluation.

Financial Distress, Earnings Benchmark and Earnings Management Practices

2021 ◽  
pp. 097226292110109
Author(s):  
Karan Gandhi
Keyword(s):  
Panel Data ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Real Earnings Management ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Large Panel ◽  
Distressed Firms ◽  
Contradictory Evidence ◽  
Financially Distressed

Prior research exhibits contradictory evidence on earnings management practices, both accrual and real, undertaken by the firms in state of financial distress. This study uniquely examines the issue in the presence of earnings-increasing earnings management motivation- meeting earnings benchmark of avoiding losses. For examining the issue, this study analyzes large panel data of Indian public companies for the period 2000–2016. The findings indicate prevalence of earnings-decreasing real earnings management practices, that is, decrease in overproduction and increase in spending on discretionary expenses, in financially distressed firms despite there being motivation to increase earnings to avoid losses. No evidence of accrual earnings management practices has been observed in such firms.

Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: Empirical Evidence of the Distress and Non-Distress Companies

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 23-30
Author(s):  
Theresia Theresia ◽  
Dewi Kurnia Indrastuti ◽  
Nico Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Negative Effect

Objective - The purpose of this research is to obtain empirical research on the effect of corporate governance on earnings management in distressed and non-distressed companies. Corporate governance in this research is measured by independent board, audit committee, board of commissioners, institutional ownership and number of board commissioner meetings. The research predicts that corporate governance has a negative effect on earnings management either both in distressed and non-distressed companies. Methodology/Technique - This research uses 309 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange and the data was obtained using purposive sampling method during 2016 until 2018. Of the 309 respondents in the sample, 287 are distressed companies and 22 are non-distressed companies. The data was analyzed using a multiple regression method. Findings - The empirical results show that commissioner board and institutional ownership have a negative effect on earnings management in non-distressed companies but in distressed companies, corporate governance does not have an effect on earnings management. This research shows that distressed companies, corporate governance cannot minimize earnings management practices because to maintain the company as a going concern, management will do earnings management to ensure stakeholders’ trust to encourage further investment in the company. In non-distressed companies, corporate governance can minimize earnings management practices because the company is in a good financial condition, so they don’t need to do earnings management. Additionally, in order to ensure stakeholders’ trust, the company will strengthen its’ corporate governance mechanisms. Type of Paper: Empirical. JEL Classification: M41, M43, G34, J33, K22. Keywords: Financial Distress; Earnings Management; Non-Financial Distress; Indonesia Stock Exchange. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Theresia; Indrastuti, D. K; Alexander, N. (2021). Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: Empirical Evidence of the Distress and Non-Distress Companies, Accounting and Finance Review, 5(4): 23 – 30. https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2021.5.4(3)

scholarly journals The effect of financial distress on earning management practices using classification shifting: The moderating effect of good corporate governance

Accounting ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cokorda Istri Eka Pratiwi ◽  
Herkulanus Bambang Suprasto ◽  
Maria Mediatrix Ratna Sari ◽  
Dodik Ariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Sampling Techniques ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Classification Shifting

The existence of good corporate governance is expected to minimize the occurrence of earnings management practices when the company is in financial distress condition. This research aims to provide empirical evidence on the influence of financial distress on earnings management practices as well as the existence of good corporate governance projected by the proportion of independent commissioners and the proportion of audit committees in weakening the influence of financial distress on earnings management practices. The population of this study is property, real estate, and building construction sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2015-2019. Sampling techniques used are purposive sampling techniques and obtained samples as many as 185 samples. The earnings management tool used in this study was classification shifting. The data analysis techniques in this study used Eviews 10. The results of the analysis provide evidence that financial distress affects earnings management practices, while the proportion of independent commissioners is unable to moderate, and the audit committee strengthens the influence of financial distress on earnings management practices.

scholarly journals Keberadaan Corporate Governance Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Pengaruh Financial Distress Terhadap Earnings Management

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Dody Hapsoro ◽  
Adrianus Billy Hartomo
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chief Executive Officer ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Chief Executive ◽  
Size Variable

<p align="center"><em>The objective of this research is to provide empirical evidence of the effect of financial distress toward earnings management and the effect of financial distress toward earnings management that moderated by corporate governance. Financial distress consists of DISTRESS1, DISTRESS2 and DISTRESS3. Earnings management was measured by discretionary accruals using Jones Model, and corporate governance consists of three variables (board of directors, independent commissioner, and audit committee). Board of directors was measured by total board of directors in the firm included chief executive officer (CEO)</em>.<em> I</em><em>ndependent commissioner was measured by the proportion of independent commissioner that is total independent commissioner divided by total board of commissioner and audit committee was measured by total member of audit committee. Control variable in this research is firm size that was measured by logarithm of asset total. The population of this research is 423 non-financial companies were listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). The research data were collected from non-financial companies annual report for the period of 2014. Based on purposive sampling method, there are 62 samples. The research hypothesis were tested by using multiple regression analysis. The results of this research in Model 1 show that firm size variable has significant relationship with earnings management, while DISTRESS1 variable, DISTRESS2 variable, and DISTRESS3 variable have no significant relationship with earnings management. The result of this research in Model 2 show that DISTRESS3 variable, independent commissioner variable, and interaction between financial distress with corporate governance variable have significant relationship with earnings management, while DISTRESS1 variable, DISTRESS2 variable, board of directors variable, audit committee variable, and firm size variable have no significant with relationship earnings management.</em></p><p><em><br /></em></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p align="center"><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan bukti empiris pengaruh kesulitan keuangan terhadap manajemen laba dan pengaruh kesulitan keuangan terhadap manajemen laba yang dimoderasi oleh tata kelola perusahaan. Kesulitan keuangan terdiri dari DISTRESS1, DISTRESS2 dan DISTRESS3. Manajemen laba diukur dengan menggunakan akrual diskresioner yang mengaplikasikan Model Jones, dan tata kelola perusahaan terdiri dari tiga variabel (dewan direksi, komisaris independen, dan komite audit). Direksi diukur dengan menggunakan jumlah dewan direksi di dalam perusahaan termasuk chief executive officer (CEO). Komisaris independen diukur dengan menggunakan proporsi komisaris independen dimana total komisaris independen dibagi dengan total dewan komite komisaris, dan komite audit diukur dengan menggunakan jumlah anggota komite audit. Variabel kontrol dalam penelitian ini adalah ukuran perusahaan yang diukur dengan menggunakan logaritma total aset. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah 423 perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Data penelitian dikumpulkan dari laporan tahunan perusahaan non-keuangan untuk periode 2014. Berdasarkan metode purposive sampling terdapat  62 sampel penelitian. Hipotesis dalam penelitian ini diuji dengan menggunakan analisis regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian pada Model 1 menunjukkan bahwa ukuran perusahaan memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan manajemen laba, sedangkan variabel DISTRESS1, variabel DISTRESS2, dan variabel DISTRESS3 tidak memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan manajemen laba. Hasil penelitian pada Model 2 menunjukkan bahwa variabel DISTRESS3, komisaris independen, dan interaksi antara kesulitan keuangan dengan tata kelola perusahaan memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan manajemen laba, sedangkan variabel DISTRESS1, variabel DISTRESS2, dewan direksi, komite audit, dan ukuran perusahaan tidak memiliki hubungan signifikan dengan manajemen laba.<em><br /></em></p>

scholarly journals FINANCIAL CONDITION MODERATED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AUDIT COMMITTEETOREDUCE EARNINGSMANAGEMENT

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michella Maria Virgine Prayogo ◽  
Yie Ke Feliana ◽  
Aurelia Carina Christanti Sutanto
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Score Test ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Financial Condition ◽  
Activity Frequency ◽  
Distressed Firms ◽  
The Impact

Some cases of financial fraud invite inquiries about the effectiveness of corporategovernance mechanism in financial distress companies. This study empiricallyexamines whether the financial distress moderate the impact of corporate governancemechanism to earnings management. The sample of this study is manufacturingcompanies listed at Indonesia Stock Exchange for period 2010 -2012. Discretionaryaccruals are used as a proxy for earnings management, while financially distressed andnon-distressed firms are identified based on Altman Z-score test. Corporate governancemechanism is measured by four characteristics of the audit committee, i.e. size (totalnumber of audit committee members), independence (audit committee composition),activity(frequency of audit committee meeting), and expertise (the number of auditcommittee have finance or accounting background).This study finds that (1) financialdistress does not moderate the impact of total members of audit committee to earningsmanagement; (2) financial distress does not moderate the impact of frequency of auditcommittee meeting to earnings management; (3) financial distress does not moderatethe impact of audit committee composition to earnings management; (4)financialdistress moderates the impact of audit committee finance/accounting knowledge toearnings management. These results suggestthat the effectiveness corporate governanceis low, and finance/accounting literacy of audit committee should be alert.Beberapa kasus manipulasi keuangan pada perusahaan yang mengalami kesulitankeuangan mengundang pertanyaan terkait efektifitas mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan.Penelitian ini secara empiris menguji apakah kondisi kesulitan keuangan dapatmemoderasi pengaruh mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan terhadap manajemen laba.Sampel dari penelitian ini adalah perusahaan sektor manufaktur yang terdaftar di BursaEfek Indonesia periode 2010-2012.Discretionary accruals digunakan sebagai proksiuntuk manajemen laba, sedangkan kondisi kesulitan keuangan diidentifikasimenggunakan uji Altman Z-score. Mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan diukur dengan 4karakteristik komite audit, yaitu ukuran (jumlah anggota komite audit), independensi(komposisi komite audit), aktivitas (frekuensi pertemuan komite audit), dan keahlian(jumlah anggota komite audit yang memiliki latar belakang keuangan atau akuntansi).Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa (1) kondisi kesulitan keuangan tidak memoderasipengaruh jumlah anggota komite audit terhadap manajemen laba; (2) kondisi kesulitankeuangan tidak memoderasi pengaruh frekuensi pertemuan komite audit terhadapmanajemen laba; (3) kondisi kesulitan keuangan tidak memoderasi pengaruh komposisikomite audit terhadap manajemen laba; (4) kondisi kesulitan keuangan memoderasi pengaruh jumlah anggota komite audit yang memiliki latar belakang keuangan atauakuntansi terhadap manajemen laba. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa efektifitas tatakelola perusahaan masih rendah dan anggota komite audit yang memiliki latar belakangkeuangan atau akuntansi harus mewaspadainya.

Do corporate governance practices restrain earnings management in banking industry? Lessons from India

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepa Mangala ◽  
Neha Singla ◽  
Neha Singla
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Loan Loss ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Governance Practices ◽  
Indian Banks

Purpose This study aims to investigate the role of corporate governance practices in restraining earnings management in Indian commercial banks. Design/methodology/approach Estimation of earnings management is based on discretionary loan loss provision and discretionary realised security gains and losses using Beatty et al. (2002) model. The effect of corporate governance on earnings management is examined by performing two-way least square dummy variable regression. Data for a period of five years (2016–2020) is collected from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy ProwessIQ database, Reserve Bank of India website, annual report of banks, National Stock Exchange and bank’s website. Findings Regression results exhibit that number of board committees, size and independence of audit committee and joint audit are significantly effective in curbing earnings management. Other board-related variables (size, independence, meetings and diligence) and audit committee variables (meetings and diligence) are not effective in restraining earnings management in Indian banks. Practical implications The findings may prove to be helpful to regulators, board of directors and investors. It shows the weak area of corporate governance in India that is lack of autonomy to independent directors, which needs regulators attention and it also suggests that the number of independent auditors should be adequate for audit purposes. The board of directors must ensure the formulation of an adequate number of committees, which perform their own super specialised functions. This study brings an alarm to investors not to rely on reported earnings alone as they may be manipulated. Originality/value This paper substantiates the scant literature on the role of corporate governance practices in restraining earnings management in banks of emerging markets and to the best of the authors’ knowledge impact of joint audits on earnings management is previously unexplored in Indian banks, which are examined in this study.

Corporate Governance Factors and Auditor Going Concern Assessments

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 5-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Parker ◽  
Gary F. Peters ◽  
Howard F. Turetsky
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Going Concern ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
Auditing Standards ◽  
Distressed Firms ◽  
The Impact

When making going concern assessments, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 59 (Auditing Standards Board 1988) directs auditors to consider the nature of management's plans and ability to mitigate periods of financial distress successfully. Corporate governance factors reflect attributes of control, oversight, and/or support of management's plans and actions intended to overcome financial distress. Correspondingly, this study investigates the impact of certain corporate governance factors on the likelihood of a going concern modification. Using survival analysis techniques, we examine a sample of 161 financially distressed firms for the time period 1988–1996. We find that auditors are twice as likely to issue a going concern modification when the CEO is replaced. We also find that going concern modifications are inversely associated with blockholder ownership. We also confirm Carcello and Neal's (2000) findings with respect to the association between an independent audit committee and an increased likelihood of modification. In a repeated events setting, we find that insider ownership and board independence are inversely associated with repeated going concern modifications. Our study concludes by proposing implications for the current financial reporting environment (including the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002) and future research avenues.

scholarly journals MEKANISME CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DALAM PERUSAHAAN YANG MENGALAMI PERMASALAHAN KEUANGAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Christina Dwi Astuti ◽  
Fajar Eka Yuniarto
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Governance Structure ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Corporate Governance Structure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Distressed Firms ◽  
Financially Distressed ◽  
The Difference

<p><em>The objective of this research is analyzing the influence of Corporate Governance mechanism to the probability of financial distressed firms and the difference influence of Corporate Governance' structure between financially and non financially distressed firms in manufacturing companies listed at Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2004 - 2006. This research data obtained 148 companies, in which is consisted of 55 financially distressed firms and 93 non financially distressed firms using judgment purposive sampling method. By</em>a<em>= 5%, this research using Logistic Test and Mann-Whitney Test and One sample T -test to analyze the hypothesis. The result shows that the board of commisioner, board of directors, audit committee, independent commissaries, turnover of directors, institutional ownership, and total asset doesn't have influence to probability of financially distressed firms. Meanwhile to see the difference Corporate Governance structure between financially distressed firm and non financially distressed firm shows that only the size of board directors has significant difference between two groups.</em></p>

scholarly journals Analisis Struktur Kepemilikan dan Good Corporate Governance terhadap Manajemen Laba pada Perusahaan di Bursa Efek Idonesia

2021 ◽  
pp. 220-225
Author(s):  
Jova Yolanda ◽  
Dian Efriyenti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Management Practice ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors

Earnings management practice is the decision to choose a particular accounting method that can achieve the goal of increasing reported profits or reducing investment losses. Misappropriation of financial statements by management can affect the amount of reported income. This study aims to determine whether ownership structure and good corporate governance have a significant influence on earnings management. The study was conducted on pharmaceutical sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in a row for the 2016-2020 period. The sample technique used is purposive sampling, so as many as 7 samples of companies are used. The data testing method uses multiple linear analysis. The results of the data test show that partially institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on earnings management, independent commissioners, the audit committee, and the board of directors has a negative but not significant effect on earnings management. Simultaneously the results state that institutional ownership, independent commissioners, audit committees, and the board of directors have an effect but not significantly on earnings management.

Earnings Management and Corporate Governance in Family Firms

2019 ◽  
pp. 127-153
Author(s):  
Elisabete Vieira ◽  
Mara Madaleno
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Corporate Board ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Big 4 ◽  
Ownership Effect ◽  
And Control

Earnings management and corporate governance relationships are examined for a sample of 49 Portuguese listed firms considering an unbalanced panel for the period 2002-2017, using panel corrected standard errors models and considering the family ownership effect. Empirical findings reveal that there is a positive relationship between corporate board independence and earnings management and that the presence of women on board decreases earnings management practices. Results are consistent with the hypothesis that earnings management practices are lower in family firms than in non-family firms. Size, being audited by the Big 4 companies, return on assets, loss, and the existence of an audit committee on board influence positively earnings management, but leverage, age, and ownership control are negatively related to earnings management. Results indicate that further auditing and control is necessary for Portuguese listed companies leading to strict recommendations to be followed by policymakers regarding control of these firms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document