scholarly journals Keberadaan Corporate Governance Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Pengaruh Financial Distress Terhadap Earnings Management

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Dody Hapsoro ◽  
Adrianus Billy Hartomo

<p align="center"><em>The objective of this research is to provide empirical evidence of the effect of financial distress toward earnings management and the effect of financial distress toward earnings management that moderated by corporate governance. Financial distress consists of DISTRESS1, DISTRESS2 and DISTRESS3. Earnings management was measured by discretionary accruals using Jones Model, and corporate governance consists of three variables (board of directors, independent commissioner, and audit committee). Board of directors was measured by total board of directors in the firm included chief executive officer (CEO)</em>.<em> I</em><em>ndependent commissioner was measured by the proportion of independent commissioner that is total independent commissioner divided by total board of commissioner and audit committee was measured by total member of audit committee. Control variable in this research is firm size that was measured by logarithm of asset total. The population of this research is 423 non-financial companies were listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). The research data were collected from non-financial companies annual report for the period of 2014. Based on purposive sampling method, there are 62 samples. The research hypothesis were tested by using multiple regression analysis. The results of this research in Model 1 show that firm size variable has significant relationship with earnings management, while DISTRESS1 variable, DISTRESS2 variable, and DISTRESS3 variable have no significant relationship with earnings management. The result of this research in Model 2 show that DISTRESS3 variable, independent commissioner variable, and interaction between financial distress with corporate governance variable have significant relationship with earnings management, while DISTRESS1 variable, DISTRESS2 variable, board of directors variable, audit committee variable, and firm size variable have no significant with relationship earnings management.</em></p><p><em><br /></em></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p align="center"><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan bukti empiris pengaruh kesulitan keuangan terhadap manajemen laba dan pengaruh kesulitan keuangan terhadap manajemen laba yang dimoderasi oleh tata kelola perusahaan. Kesulitan keuangan terdiri dari DISTRESS1, DISTRESS2 dan DISTRESS3. Manajemen laba diukur dengan menggunakan akrual diskresioner yang mengaplikasikan Model Jones, dan tata kelola perusahaan terdiri dari tiga variabel (dewan direksi, komisaris independen, dan komite audit). Direksi diukur dengan menggunakan jumlah dewan direksi di dalam perusahaan termasuk chief executive officer (CEO). Komisaris independen diukur dengan menggunakan proporsi komisaris independen dimana total komisaris independen dibagi dengan total dewan komite komisaris, dan komite audit diukur dengan menggunakan jumlah anggota komite audit. Variabel kontrol dalam penelitian ini adalah ukuran perusahaan yang diukur dengan menggunakan logaritma total aset. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah 423 perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Data penelitian dikumpulkan dari laporan tahunan perusahaan non-keuangan untuk periode 2014. Berdasarkan metode purposive sampling terdapat  62 sampel penelitian. Hipotesis dalam penelitian ini diuji dengan menggunakan analisis regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian pada Model 1 menunjukkan bahwa ukuran perusahaan memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan manajemen laba, sedangkan variabel DISTRESS1, variabel DISTRESS2, dan variabel DISTRESS3 tidak memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan manajemen laba. Hasil penelitian pada Model 2 menunjukkan bahwa variabel DISTRESS3, komisaris independen, dan interaksi antara kesulitan keuangan dengan tata kelola perusahaan memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan manajemen laba, sedangkan variabel DISTRESS1, variabel DISTRESS2, dewan direksi, komite audit, dan ukuran perusahaan tidak memiliki hubungan signifikan dengan manajemen laba.<em><br /></em></p>

Author(s):  
Rina Mudjiyanti ◽  
Arini Hidayah ◽  
Erny Rachmawati

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of institutional ownership, board of directors, and audit committee, which are proxies of corporate governance structure, and firm size on firm performance. Company performance is measured using profitability. The sample of this study, companies listed in the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) from 2017 to 2018. The ROA data in this study ignores the positive and negative ROA values. Hypothesis testing using regression analysis found empirical evidence that institutional ownership and board of directors variables do not affect ROA. While the audit committee variable has a positive effect on ROA, the firm size variable negatively impacts ROA. Keywords                    : Institutional Ownership; Board Of Directors; Audit Committee; Company  Size; ProfitabilityCorrespondence to      : [email protected] Tujuan penelitian ini menguji pengaruh kepemilikan institusional, dewan direksi, dan komite audit yang merupakan proksi struktur corporate governance, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Kinerja perusahaan diukur menggunakan profitabilitas. Sampel penelitian ini, perusahaan yang terdaftar dalam Jakarta Islamic Indeks (JII) selama periode 2017 sampai 2018. Data ROA dalam penelitian ini mengabaikan nilai ROA positif dan negatif. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan analisis regresi ditemukan bukti empiris bahwa variabel kepemilikan institusional dan dewan direksi tidak berpengaruh terhadap ROA. Sedangkan variabel komite audit berpengaruh positif terhadap ROA, dan variabel ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh negatif terhadap ROA.Kata kunci      : Kepemilikan Institusional; Dewan Direksi; Komite Audit; Ukuran Perusahaan; Profitabilitas


Author(s):  
Emita W. Astami ◽  
Rusmin Rusmin

This study investigates the association between corporate governance and earnings management practices of Australian’s financially distressed firms. Based on a sample of 164 firm-year incorporating non-financial firmsexperiencing financial distress, the cross-sectional modified Jones (1991) model is used to measure discretionary accruals (the proxy for earnings management). Board of directors and audit committee characteristic variables are employed as the key predictor variables for measuring the effectiveness of corporate governance. This study finds that the companies are seeking to reduce their reported earnings to increase the likelihood of making a profit in the following year with the goal of avoiding bankruptcy;a larger number of directors on a board is less effective in detecting and constraining the practices of earnings management by managers of distressed firms; an active audit committee plays a positive role in detecting and reducing the probability of earnings management. The findings of this study have implications especially to regulators and corporate governance reformists that determine corporate governance rules. This is primarily in regard to the efforts made by listed companies in maintaining their sustainability through more emphases on the process for monitoring and selection of board of directors and audit committee members to reinforceeffectiveness in managerial performance evaluation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Rowland Pasaribu ◽  
Dionysia Kowanda ◽  
Muhammad Firdaus

ABSTRACT This reseach amied at knowing the influence of audit quality, propotion of independent commissioner, audit committe, firm size, managerial ownership and leverage. It used purposive sampling technique or choosing samples based on certain criteria. The sample of this research was 25 companies of banking industry in indonesia stock exchange period 2008-2012. Descriptive analysis, classical test, as well as multiple linear regression by examining the hypothesis using SPSS 20.0 were used to analyzed the data. The result shows that (1) all independent variables simultaneously hasinfluence on earnings management; (2) however partially audit committee, audit quality, managerial ownership and leverage do not affect significantly to earnings management; (3) only firm size and independent commissioner that affect significantly to earning management. Keywords: Earning Management, Good Corporate Governance, Firm Size, BankingABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan menguji secara empiris signifikansi parsial dan simultan dari kualitas audit, komisaris independensi audit, komite audit, ukuran perusahaan, struktur kepemilikan, dan leverage terhadap manajemen laba pada emiten perbankan di bursa efek Indonesia periode 2008-2012. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah multiregresi. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa secara simultan seluruh variabel independen berpengaruh signifikan sedangkan secara parsial hanya ukuran perusahaan dan komisi independensi audit yang berpengaruh signifikan terhadap manajemen laba. Kata Kunci: Manajemen Laba, Mekanisme Tata Kelola, Ukuran Perusahaan, Perbankan,


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepa Mangala ◽  
Neha Singla ◽  
Neha Singla

Purpose This study aims to investigate the role of corporate governance practices in restraining earnings management in Indian commercial banks. Design/methodology/approach Estimation of earnings management is based on discretionary loan loss provision and discretionary realised security gains and losses using Beatty et al. (2002) model. The effect of corporate governance on earnings management is examined by performing two-way least square dummy variable regression. Data for a period of five years (2016–2020) is collected from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy ProwessIQ database, Reserve Bank of India website, annual report of banks, National Stock Exchange and bank’s website. Findings Regression results exhibit that number of board committees, size and independence of audit committee and joint audit are significantly effective in curbing earnings management. Other board-related variables (size, independence, meetings and diligence) and audit committee variables (meetings and diligence) are not effective in restraining earnings management in Indian banks. Practical implications The findings may prove to be helpful to regulators, board of directors and investors. It shows the weak area of corporate governance in India that is lack of autonomy to independent directors, which needs regulators attention and it also suggests that the number of independent auditors should be adequate for audit purposes. The board of directors must ensure the formulation of an adequate number of committees, which perform their own super specialised functions. This study brings an alarm to investors not to rely on reported earnings alone as they may be manipulated. Originality/value This paper substantiates the scant literature on the role of corporate governance practices in restraining earnings management in banks of emerging markets and to the best of the authors’ knowledge impact of joint audits on earnings management is previously unexplored in Indian banks, which are examined in this study.


2019 ◽  
pp. 2154
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Shinta Oktaviani ◽  
Dodik Ariyanto

This study aims to determine the effect of financial distress, company size, and corporate governance on audit delay. This research was conducted at mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2017. The number of samples taken was 32 companies so that there were 96 observations, with a purposive sampling method. The analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression. Based on the results of the analysis found that financial distress and independent board of commissioners have positive effect on audit delay. Firm size, audit committee and institutional ownership have negative effect on audit delay. Keywords: Financial distress, firm size, corporate governance, audit delay


Author(s):  
Mayang Sekar Pembayun Khamisan ◽  
Silvy Christina ◽  
Silvy Christina

One of the biggest state's income is tax. In Indonesia, almost all activities carried out by the public are taxable, for example; grocery for daily activities, electronic equipment purchased, and employee income tax. Taxes have a very important role on state revenue because of taxes were main sources in contributing funds used to finance government spending and national development, but for the tax company is a burden that reduces the company's net profit, so the company will try to reduce the tax burden. To control the amount of tax payments is through tax avoidance, known as tax avoidance which is part of tax planning. Therefore this study aims to determine the effect of financial distress, loss compensation, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, audit quality, company size, and return on assets to tax avoidance actions. The companies used in this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with a research period of 2016-2018. The number of research samples used were 162 data. The method of sampling used purposive sampling and this research used multiple regression analysis to test the hypothesis. This research shows that financial distress, tax loss carried forward, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, audit quality, firm size, and return on asset have no influence on tax avoidance. This research shows that financial distress, tax loss carried forward, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, audit quality, firm size, and return on asset have no influence on tax avoidance. Suggestions for further research to extend the study period of more than 3 years. In addition, it is hoped that further researchers can replace or add other independent variables such as sales growth. Keywords: Financial Distress, Tax Loss Carried Forward, Corporate Governance, Tax Avoidancae


2021 ◽  
pp. 220-225
Author(s):  
Jova Yolanda ◽  
Dian Efriyenti

Earnings management practice is the decision to choose a particular accounting method that can achieve the goal of increasing reported profits or reducing investment losses. Misappropriation of financial statements by management can affect the amount of reported income. This study aims to determine whether ownership structure and good corporate governance have a significant influence on earnings management. The study was conducted on pharmaceutical sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in a row for the 2016-2020 period. The sample technique used is purposive sampling, so as many as 7 samples of companies are used. The data testing method uses multiple linear analysis. The results of the data test show that partially institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on earnings management, independent commissioners, the audit committee, and the board of directors has a negative but not significant effect on earnings management. Simultaneously the results state that institutional ownership, independent commissioners, audit committees, and the board of directors have an effect but not significantly on earnings management.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Robi Ridhayatul Gaos ◽  
Rina Mudjiyanti

This study aims to find empirical evidence of the influence of corporate governance and firm size on financial distress. The sample used in this study is a banking company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) for the 2017-2019 period. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling and obtained a sample of 40 samples that met the criteria. The data analysis technique used is multiple regression analysis. The financial distress criteria in this study measured using the Z-score in Altman's financial distress prediction model. Based on the study results, it can be concluded that managerial ownership, the board of commissioners, and the audit committee have no effect on financial distress, while the board of directors has a positive and significant effect on financial distress and firm size has a negative and significant effect on financial distress.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuraddeen Usman Miko ◽  
Hasnah Kamardin

Oil and gas industry is considered as the sector that contributes a big share to the Nigeria economy. This study investigated the effects of corporate governance mechanisms, sensitive factors on earnings management of quoted oil and gas firms in Nigeria using the sample of nine (9) listed oil and gas firms for the period of ten years (2004-2013). Discretionary current accruals was used as the proxy for earnings management. Corporate governance mechanisms (boards size, chief executive officer (CEO) duality, directors’ ownership, audit committee size, audit committee independence), sensitive factors (corporate tax, corporate profit, corporate social responsibility) served as independent variables. The study concludes that corporate governance mechanisms curves earnings management while sensitive factors increase earnings management. The study recommends that corporate governance regulations should be strengthened to reflect present challenges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document