scholarly journals Dimensional changes of alginate impression by using perforated and non-perforated ring trays

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumadhi Sastrodihardjo
Keyword(s):  
Dimensional Change ◽  
Base Diameter ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Base Area ◽  
Change Mechanism ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Materials Used

Dimensional changes are a common occurrence in impressions, either during or after impression taking. It produces a difference in the dimensions of the object and the model, which leads to the restoration being ill-fitted. Several causal factors have been proposed such as friction between the impression material and the teeth, the bulk of the impression material, the type of impression materials used, the impression technique, the pouring time and many others. The exact causal factor is still unknown and the dimensional change mechanism is still poorly understood. The objective of this research was to investigate the role of the perforation on the ring trays in producing dimensional changes in the impression by using perforated and non-perforated ring trays. Alginate impressions were made on the frustum of cone metal master die with a 7.08 mm base diameter, 7.03 mm top diameter and 9.23 mm height using perforated and non-perforated ring trays with 9.40 mm in diameter and 14.17 mm in height. The dimensional change was determined by comparing the dimension of the dental stone die and its metal master die. The results showed that the percentage of dimensional changes that occurred by using perforated ring tray were (+) 0.56±0.40 on the top area, (-) 3.54±2.92 on base area and (+) 1.54±0.83 in height, respectively. As compared to using non-perforated ring trays, the percentage of dimensional changes that occurred were (-) 0.49±0.49 on top area, (-) 8.76±3.95 on base area and (+) 1.19±0.71 in height, respectively. There was a significant difference in the direction of the dimensional changes on both the top areas, but not in the base areas and height.

scholarly journals Perobahan dimensi hasil cetakan alginat berbentuk balok

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Sumadhi Sastrodihardjo
Keyword(s):  
Glass Plate ◽  
T Test ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Made In

There are several causal possibilities developing dimensional changes on impressionsuch as type of impression materials used, impression taking technique, bulk ofimpression material or size of impression tray. In this study investigation was done onthe size of impression material used to elucidate the possibilities role of impressionmaterial in gaining dimensional changes of impression. Rectangle shape alginateimpressions were made in 29.57 mm length, 19.45 mm width and 9.67 mm thicknessmold of metal master die covered by glass plate and dimensional changes aremeasured on alginate impression itself. Then data were analyzed with T-test (pairedsamples test)to compare dimension changing between alginat height anddimension changing on length and width. Measured results show the dimensionalchanges occur 3.16% ± 0.63% on length side, 3.35% ± 0.42% on width side and10.87% ± 1.01% on thickness side, respectively. There are significantly differences ofdimensional changes on thick ness side covered by glass plate compared withdimensional changes on length and width sides surrounding by metal of master die.

Dimensional change of impression materials used in implantology

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. e66
Author(s):  
F. Martins ◽  
E.O.B. Martins ◽  
R.M.P. Machado
Keyword(s):  
Dimensional Change ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Materials Used

scholarly journals Elastomeric Impression Materials: A Comparison of Accuracy of Multiple Pours

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dheeraj Kumar ◽  
Anand U Madihalli ◽  
K Rajeev Kumar Reddy ◽  
Namrataa Rastogi ◽  
NT Pradeep
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Dimensional Stability ◽  
Central Hole ◽  
Central Incisor ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Maxillary Central Incisor ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
The Third ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Time Periods

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of the present study is to compare the various elastomeric impression materials in terms of accuracy and dimensional stability, with respect to obtaining multiple casts from a single elastomeric impression at various times of pours. Materials and methods Three master dies were prepared for the impression making, two of these were made of brass containing a central hole with undercuts. The third die simulated a conventionally prepared typodont maxillary central incisor. Three elastomeric impression materials were chosen for the study. Each impression was poured at various time periods. Casts thus obtained were evaluated under a traveling microscope to evaluate various dimensional changes. Results Addition silicones provided dies which were shorter in height and bigger in diameter. Polyethers provided dies which were shorter in both height and diameter. Condensation silicones showed insignificant changes from the master die at the immediate pour but deteriorated rapidly after that in subsequent pours. Conclusion None of the impression material showed a consistent behavior up to the fourth pour. They occasionally showed deviation from the pattern, but all these values were statistically insignificant. Polyethers showed lesser ability than both the addition silicones as well as the condensation silicones to recover from induced deformation. Clinical significance Addition silicones as well as the condensation silicones have better ability to recover from induced deformation when compared to polyether. How to cite this article Kumar D, Madihalli AU, Reddy KRK, Rastogi N, Pradeep NT. Elastomeric Impression Materials: A Comparison of Accuracy of Multiple Pours. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(4):272-278.

scholarly journals Does immediate dentin sealing influence the polymerization of impression materials?

2014 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. 366-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Cristine Ghiggi ◽  
Arno Kieling Steiger ◽  
Maurem Leitão Marcondes ◽  
Eduardo Gonçalves Mota ◽  
Luiz Henrique Burnett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Camera ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Oxygen Inhibition ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT Objectives: The objective of the following study is to evaluate the interaction between the resin materials used in immediate dentin sealing (IDS) techniques and impression materials with two different techniques to eliminate the oxygen-inhibition layer. Materials and Methods: The occlusal dentin surface of 35 human molars was exposed. The teeth were used in two Groups: Group 1 – Impression with Express XT; Group 2 – Impression with Impregum. Groups 1 and 2 were divided into 14 subgroups: Groups 1a and 2a – Control groups; 1b and 2b – IDS with Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); 1c and 2c – IDS with CSE + additional polymerization with glycerin jelly; 1d and 2d – IDS with CSE + alcohol; 1e and 2e – IDS with CSE and Protect Liner F (PLF); 1f and 2f – IDS with CSE and PLF + additional polymerization with glycerin jelly; and 1g and 2g – IDS with CSE and PLF + alcohol. Five teeth were used in each experimental group, and the tooth surface was photographed using a digital camera. Results: Small quantity of unpolymerized impression material remained attached to the CSE or to the PLF in Groups 1b and 1e. Groups 1c and 1d prevented the interaction. Small quantity of polymerized impression material remained attached to the CSE or to the PLF for Groups 2b and 2e. The same interaction was observed for Groups 2c and 2d. For Groups 2c and 2f, no interactions were observed. Conclusion: Resin materials interacted with impression materials. The application of glycerin jelly and alcohol prevented the interaction of CSE with Express XT and PLF with Impregum; however, these treatments were not completely effective in preventing the interaction of CSE with Impregum and PLF with Express XT.

scholarly journals Dimensional Stability and Accuracy of Silicone – Based Impression Materials Using Different Impression Techniques – A Literature Review

PRILOZI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borjan Naumovski ◽  
Biljana Kapushevska
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Dimensional Stability ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Elastic Recovery ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Impression Technique ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Scientific Papers ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Stability And Accuracy

Abstract A quality-made dental impression is a prerequisite for successful fixed-prosthodontic fabrication and is directly dependent on the dimensional stability, accuracy and flexibility of the elastomeric impression materials, as well as on the appropriately used impression techniques. The purpose of this paper is to provide a literature review of relevant scientific papers which discuss the use of various silicone impression materials, different impression techniques and to evaluate their impact on the dimensional stability and accuracy of the obtained impressions. Scientific papers and studies were selected according to the materials used, the sample size, impression technique, storage time, type of measurements and use of spacer for the period between 2002 and 2016. In the reviewed literature several factors that influence the dimensional stability and accuracy of silicone impression molds, including the choice of the type of viscosity, impression material thickness, impression technique, retention of the impression material on the tray, storage time before the casting, number of castings, hydrophilicity of the material, release of byproducts, contraction after polymerization, thermal contraction and incomplete elastic recovery were presented. The literature review confirmed the lack of standardization of methodologies applied in the research and their great diversity. All findings point to the superiority of the addition silicone compared to the condensation silicone.

scholarly journals Extended-pour and conventional alginates: effect of storage time on dimensional accuracy and maintenance of details

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro Basso BITENCOURT ◽  
Isabela Araguê CATANOZE ◽  
Emily Vivianne Freitas da SILVA ◽  
Karina Helga Leal TURCIO ◽  
Daniela Micheline dos SANTOS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dimensional Stability ◽  
High Stability ◽  
Digital Camera ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Dimensional Change ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Plastic Bags ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Student’S T

ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the dimensional stability and maintenance of details of conventional and high stability alginates up to 5-day storage. Methods: Two types of alginates were selected (n=10) for this study, conventional (Hydrogum) and high stability alginates (Hydrogum 5), which were produced with the aid of a cylindrical metal block and a ring-shaped metal mold (Specifications 18, 19, and 25, ANSI/ADA). Ten images were obtained from the molds for the dimensional stability test, which were taken immediately after their production and at each different storage periods (15 min, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, and 120 h) by a digital camera. The specimens were kept hermetically sealed in plastic bags (23°C) and then used to obtain 140 (n=70) dental stone models, used in the detail reproduction test, in which the angular accuracy of three grooves (20 µm, 50 µm, and 75 µm) was observed at each period. The details reproduction accuracy was classified using a predetermined score classification. Measurements of dimensional changes were made in the Corel DRAW X6 program. The data were submitted to the Student’s t-test (α?#8197;= 0.05). Results: A statistically significant difference concerning the size of the matrix was observed after 24h for both alginates, and a statistically significant negative linear dimensional change (contraction) was verified after 24 h of storage (1.52% for the high stability alginate, and 1.32% for the conventional alginate). The high stability alginate kept the full details for 72 hours, while the conventional alginate, for 24 h. Both alginates reproduced the 75 µm groove at all storage periods. Conclusion: Impressions made with both alginates presented satisfactory clinical results when the alginates were immediately poured.

scholarly journals A Comparative study of Different Impression Materials and Techniques of Dental Implant at The Second Stage of Procedure

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
Hussameldien Hussien ◽  
◽  
Natashekara Mallesh ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference

Background of the study: Dental implants are one of the most sought-after choice of treatment for restoration and rehabilitation of missing teeth. However, the accuracy of the removable or fixed superstructures over the dental implants is influenced for a major proportion by the impression techniques and materials. This paper discusses the comparison of the accuracy of different impression materials and techniques used in the second stage of the dental implant treatment in vivo. Objective: The objective of the paper is to study the comparison of the accuracy of different impression materials and techniques used in the second stage of the dental implant’s treatment in vivo. Search methodology: Electronically key searched in scientific literature databases. Selection criteria: Based on the set inclusion and exclusion criteria such as studies conducted in partial edentulous arches, in the age group of 30 to 55 years. Data collection and analysis: A total of 248 literatures were found to be relevant to the framed topic and were scrutinised based on the dejected criteria and 18 kinds of literature obtained were taken into consideration. Main Result: Among the different impression materials taken into the comparative study, it was observed that polyvinyl siloxane exhibited a dimensional accuracy slightly greater than polyether. However, light body putty exhibited greater accuracy than medium body putty. Various impression techniques were compared to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of the impression. It was observed that the open tray technique and splinted impression technique produced a more dimensionally stable impression than the other techniques. Authors Conclusion: this study to assess the accuracy of various impression material and methods has concluded that while impression techniques influence the accuracy of the impression, the impression materials namely the Polyvinyl siloxane and polyether exhibit no significant difference with a slight preference to the polyvinyl siloxane. Hence the choice of impression material is at the discretion of the dentist performing the treatment and also this area requires further studies to establish conclusive evidence.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study on Accuracy and Reproducibility of Alginate and Addition Reaction Silicone as an Impression Materials.

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Shakila Fatema ◽  
Sheikh Md Shahriar Quader ◽  
Mohammad Shamsuzzaman ◽  
Mirza Md Arifur Rahman ◽  
Nasima Khan
Keyword(s):  
Addition Reaction ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Horizontal Line ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Surface Detail

Background: To achieve accuracy and exact reproduction of prosthesis, choosing a perfect impression material is essential. Especially to make the prosthesis as accurately as possible, impression material should possess some essential properties, like; minimum dimensional changes, good flow ability and easy removal. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and surface detail reproduction of Alginate and Addition Reaction Silicone as an impression materials. Method: This is an experimental in vitro study. In this study Impression by Alginate and Addition Reaction Silicone were made using a round stainless steel test block with three horizontal lines and two vertical lines. The horizontal lines were used for evaluating the surface detail reproduction, and vertical lines were provided for the dimensional accuracy. For dimensional accuracy the length of the middle horizontal line in between vertical lines and the distance between the top and bottom horizontal line was measured using travelling microscope. And for surface detail reproduction three horizontal line of one segment were observed under stereomicroscope. Result: According to study results Addition Reaction Silicone is better than Alginate regarding quality of impression. Conclusion: In comparison to Alginate, Addition Reaction Silicone might have better performance about accuracy and surface detail reproduction. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/updcj.v3i2.17996 Update Dent. Coll. j: 2013; 3 (2): 28-33

Evaluation of Accuracy of Casts of Multiple Internal Connection Implant Prosthesis Obtained From Different Impression Materials and Techniques: An In Vitro Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malesh Pujari ◽  
Pooja Garg ◽  
D. R. Prithviraj
Keyword(s):  
Reference Model ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Internal Connection ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Multiple Comparison Procedures

Movement of impression copings inside the impression material using a direct (open tray) impression technique during clinical and laboratory phases may cause inaccuracy in transferring the 3-dimensional spatial orientation of implants intraorally to the cast. Consequently, the prosthesis may require corrective procedures. This in vitro study evaluated the accuracy of 3 different impression techniques using polyether and vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression material to obtain a precise cast for multiple internal connection implants. A reference acrylic resin model with 4 internal connection implants was fabricated. Impressions of the reference model were made using 3 different techniques and 2 different impression materials. The study consisted of 24 specimens divided into 6 groups of 4 each. Impressions were poured with ADA type IV stone (Kalrock, Kalabhai Karson Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India). All casts were evaluated for the positional accuracy (mm) of the implant replica heads using a profile projector. These measurements were compared to the measurements calculated on the reference resin model, which served as a control. Data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison procedures to evaluate group means. The results revealed significant difference for anterior implant distance between the 2 impression materials (P < .01) and also among the 3 different techniques (P < .05). The lowest mean variation was found with the polyether impression material and the splinted technique. For posterior implants, the results suggested no significant difference between the 2 impression materials (P ≥ .05). Although results were not statistically significant, the polyether impression material showed the lowest mean variation as compared to the VPS impression material. However, there was a significant difference among the 3 different techniques (P < .05). Among the 3 different techniques, the lowest mean variation between 2 posterior implants was found in the splinted technique. Casts obtained from impression techniques using square impression copings splinted together with autopolymerizing acrylic resin prior to the impression procedure were more accurate than casts obtained from impressions with nonmodified implant impression copings and with airborne particle–abraded, adhesive-coated copings. Casts obtained from polyether impression material were more accurate than casts obtained from vinyl polysiloxane impression material.

scholarly journals Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e191603
Author(s):  
Camilla Lopes Cerqueira ◽  
Roniel Kappler ◽  
Andrea Araújo Nobrega Cavalcanti ◽  
Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima
Keyword(s):  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Tukey Test ◽  
Prosthetic Materials ◽  
Acrylic Resins ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Direct Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Irreversible Hydrocolloid ◽  
Marginal Discrepancy ◽  
Materials Used

Aim: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials. Methods: a metal die and a matrix applied through a direct technique were used to fabricate the specimens. The impression materials used as a matrix were divided into four groups: Irreversible hydrocolloid
(IH), laboratory silicone (LS), condensation silicone (CS), and addition silicone (AS). After the impression procedures, each matrix was loaded with the provisional prosthetic materials, Alike, Duralay, Protemp 4, and Structur 3 (n = 12). Marginal discrepancy was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at ×45 magnification. The images obtained were transferred to the Corel Draw X7 program, and the distances from the cervical margins of the specimen to the reference lines at the metal die were measured vertically. The data were analyzed by using 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (α=.05). Results: the acrylic resins had higher values ​​of marginal discrepancy compared to the bisacrylic resins. A statistically significant difference was found between all impression materials, and the irreversible hydrocolloid presented higher values of discrepancy (303.28–613.31 μm), whereas addition silicone had the lowest (48.61–190.06 μm). Conclusions: the bisacrylic resins had a better marginal adaptation compared to the acrylic resins. The addition silicone promoted a better marginal adaptation of the provisional prosthetic materials tested, followed by condensation silicone, laboratory silicone, and irreversible hydrocolloid.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document