scholarly journals Behaviour of Retaining Wall Founded on Collapsible Soil – A Prototype Laboratory Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Safa Hussain Abid Awn ◽  
Waad Abdulsattar Zakaria
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Soil Layer ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Wall Structure ◽  
Prototype Model ◽  
Cement Dust ◽  
Collapsible Soil ◽  
Settlement Behavior ◽  
Backfill Soil ◽  
Gypseous Soil

Retaining walls may be required in a location where gypsum may present in soil in large percentages .The behavior of retaining walls on ordinary soils is well known but the behavior of retaining walls resting on gypseons soils may be not well understood as the case of ordinary soils.In this study it is intended to reflect the behavior of gravity retaining wall resting on collapsible soil. And to do so a small prototype model (600mm*500mm*200mm) is used with soil mixed in presumed percentages with different gypsum percentages (5%, 20%, 30%, 50%). In addition to a model with 30% gypsum and treated with 2.7% Cement dust mixed with soil founded retaining wall structure. After preparing the foundation gypseous soil, a small glass made retaining wall filled with sand, which represent gravity wall, is put over such bed and backfilled with ordinary sandy soil. Dial gauges are placed to side and top of wall to measure the rotation settlement behavior and collapse of system. 4kPa stress are applied to backfill soil as to accelerate collapse with leaching process commenced. Data are recorded and analyzed completely, which shows the behavior of such structures embedded with different gypsum content.The improvement in rotation settlement and collapse for the retaining wall model reaches more than 89%, was gained after treating the embedded gypseous soil layer, with 2.7% cement dust.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Role of Geofoam Properties in Reducing Lateral Loads on Retaining Walls: A Numerical Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 4754
Author(s):  
Muhammad Imran Khan ◽  
Mohamed A. Meguid
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Study ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Expanded Polystyrene ◽  
Wall Structure ◽  
Eps Geofoam ◽  
Lateral Earth Pressure ◽  
Backfill Soil

Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam is a lightweight compressible material that has been widely used in various civil engineering projects. One interesting application of EPS in geotechnical engineering is to reduce the lateral earth pressure on rigid non-yielding retaining walls. The compressible nature of the EPS geofoam allows for the shear strength of the backfill soil to be mobilized, which leads to a reduction in lateral earth pressure acting on the wall. In this study, a finite element model is developed and used to investigate the role of geofoam inclusion between a rigid retaining wall and the backfill material on the earth pressure transferred to the wall structure. The developed model was first calibrated using experimental data. Then, a parametric study was conducted to investigate the effect of EPS geofoam density, relative thickness with respect to the wall height, and the frictional angle of backfill soil on the effectiveness of this technique in reducing lateral earth pressure. Results showed that low-density EPS geofoam inclusion provides the best performance, particularly when coupled with backfill of low friction angle. The proposed modeling approach has shown to be efficient in solving this class of problems and can be used to model similar soil-geofoam-structure interaction problems.

scholarly journals Structural Behavior of Prefabricated Ecological Grid Retaining Walls and Application in a Highway in China

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 746
Author(s):  
Xinquan Wang ◽  
Cong Zhu ◽  
Hongguo Diao ◽  
Yingjie Ning
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Contact Point ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Wall Structure ◽  
Soil Arching ◽  
Finite Element Software ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Stress And Deformation ◽  
Asymmetrical Condition ◽  
Construction Efficiency

The retaining wall is a common slope protection structure. To tackle the current lack of sustainable and highly prefabricated retaining walls, an environmentally friendly prefabricated ecological grid retaining wall with high construction efficiency has been developed. Due to the asymmetrical condition of the project considered in this paper, the designed prefabricated ecological grid retaining wall was divided into the excavation section and the filling section. By utilizing the ABAQUS finite element software, the stress and deformation characteristics of the retaining wall columns, soil, anchor rods, and inclined shelves in an excavation section, and the force and deformation relationships of the columns, rivets, and inclined shelves in three working conditions in a filling section were studied. The study results imply that the anchor rods may affect the columns in the excavation section and the stress at the column back changes in an M-shape with height. Moreover, the peak appears at the contact point between the column and the anchor rod. The displacement of the column increases slowly along with the height, and the column rotates at its bottom. In the excavation section, the stress of the anchor rod undergoes a change at the junction of the structure. The inclined shelf is an open structure and is very different from the retaining plate structure of traditional pile-slab retaining walls. Its stress distribution follows a repeated U-shaped curve, which is inconsistent with the trend of the traditional soil arching effect between piles, which increases first and then decreases. For the retaining wall structure in the filling section, the numerical simulated vehicle load gives essentially consistent results with the effects of the equivalent filling on the concrete column.

Force and Compression Analysis for Rigid Retaining Walls with EPS Buffer

2011 ◽  
Vol 243-249 ◽  
pp. 959-962
Author(s):  
De Ling Wang ◽  
Li Guo
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Modulus ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Static Loads ◽  
Physical Test ◽  
Eps Geofoam ◽  
Backfill Soil ◽  
Vibration Loads ◽  
Simulation Results

In this paper, the force against rigid retaining walls from backfill soil under static loads and vibration loads is analyzed within three cases. The first case is an ordinary retaining wall without expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam buffer. In the second and the third case, a layer of vertical EPS buffer with different density and elastic modulus is placed between a rigid retaining wall and backfill soil. Numerical simulation results show that the force against the same retaining wall in the treated cases is less than that in the untreated case, under both static loads and vibration loads. Moreover, the compression of different EPS buffer is studied. Under vibration excitation, when the density and elastic modulus of EPS buffer decreases, its compression increases and more wall force is mitigated. Simulation results accord with the physical shaking table test data. Numerical results and physical test demonstrate that EPS geofoam seismic buffers hold great promise to reduce loads against rigid retaining wall structures, especially earthquake-induced dynamic loads.

Research on Calculation Formula of Retaining Wall for Structural Reliability Program Design

2013 ◽  
Vol 275-277 ◽  
pp. 1154-1157
Author(s):  
Yun Lian Song ◽  
Si Li ◽  
Jian Ran Cao
Keyword(s):  
Safety Factor ◽  
Structural Reliability ◽  
Program Design ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Wall Structure ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Material Parameters ◽  
Simplified Formula

Stability problem of gravity retaining wall structure was researched, and a simplified formula of the active earth pressure Ea was turned out for the convenience of the program design. The anti-slide safety factor K0 and anti-overturning safety factor Kc were derived based on different positions of slip plane of retaining wall. This work is the basis of the reliability calculating and program design, for these formulas must be used in anti-slide and anti-overturning safety failure mode in program compiling. On the basis of the known parameters such as wall type, wall dimensions, material parameters, external load, and so on, the program can automatically calculate K0 and Kc, their corresponding failure probability Pf and reliability index β can easily be calculated in later analysis. The research content provide a convenient calculation method, which is used to calculate the Ea and K0 and Kc and Pf and β of the actual retaining walls engineering.

Settlement Behavior of New Reinforced Earth Retaining Walls under Loading-Unloading Cycles

2012 ◽  
Vol 256-259 ◽  
pp. 215-219
Author(s):  
Yu Liang Lin ◽  
Yi He Fang
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Deformation ◽  
Elastic Deformation ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Secant Modulus ◽  
Loading Level ◽  
Settlement Behavior ◽  
Reinforced Earth ◽  
Earth Structures ◽  
Elastic And Plastic Deformation

Three new types of reinforced earth structures were introduced including reinforced gabion retaining wall, green reinforced gabion retaining wall and flexible wall face geogrid reinforced earth retaining wall. In order to study settlement behavior of these three retaining walls, lab tests were carried out. Cyclic loading-unloading of different levels (0~50kPa, 0~100kPa, 0~150kPa, 0~200kPa, 0~250kPa, 0~300kPa, 0~350kPa) were imposed. The settlement behaviors of retaining walls were analyzed, and secant modulus when loading and unloading was obtained. Results show that retaining walls present great elastic and plastic deformation, and plastic deformation is greater than elastic deformation. Secant modulus decreases with the increase of loading-unloading cycles under the same loading level. Unloading secant modulus is bigger than loading secant modulus in the same cycle. With the increase of loading level, both elastic and plastic deformation increase, and plastic deformation increases more quickly than elastic deformation.

PENGGUNAAN STARTER REBAR DENGAN CHEMICAL EPOXY PADA REKONSTRUKSI DINDING PENAHAN TANAH CANTILEVER

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentana Ardian Tarigan ◽  
Immanuel Panusunan Tua Panggabean
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Lateral Force ◽  
Wall Structure ◽  
Rolling Moment ◽  
Soil Parameter

The construction of cantilever retaining wall uses reinforcement as part of the retaining wall’ structure. Reinforcement of the construction of the Retaining Wall is carried out on construction if there is a need for additional reinforcement on the structure or carrying out reconstruction on the structure of the retaining wall. Research on the use of starter rebar uses chemical epoxy, which is used to reconstruct the retaining walls. Soil investigation is carried out because the soil in this structure acts as a load, then this soil parameter is calculated as a lateral force on the wall that makes the rolling moment, and sliding. The land load also acts as a counter weight behind the wall. The study of the use of back reinforcement on the structure of cantilever type retaining wall uses D19-170 as the main reinforcement in the tensile area and D16-170 in the compressed area. Reinforcement for used D13-170.

Crash Wall Design to Protect Mechanically Stabilized Earth Retaining Walls

2013 ◽  
Vol 2377 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-60
Author(s):  
Akram Y. Abu-Odeh ◽  
Kang-Mi Kim
Keyword(s):  
Structural Damage ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Wall Structure ◽  
Mechanically Stabilized Earth ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Wall Panels ◽  
Mse Wall ◽  
Mechanically Stabilized ◽  
Earth Fill

Mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining walls are used to provide roadway elevation for bridge approaches, underpass frontage roads, and other roadway elevation applications. Vehicular traffic may exist on the high (fill) side of the MSE retaining wall, the low side, or both sides. For traffic on the high side, a conventional traffic barrier might be placed on or near the top of the wall and mounted on a moment slab or a bridge deck. For traffic on the low side, a conventional traffic barrier might be installed adjacent to the wall or the wall itself may serve as the traffic barrier. Typical MSE wall panels are not designed to resist vehicle impacts. Therefore, structural damage to the wall panels and the earth fill would require complicated and expensive repairs. A simple reinforced-concrete crash wall constructed in front of the MSE wall panels could significantly reduce damage to the panels. It might prove practical to implement such a design to reduce costly repairs to the MSE wall structure. In this paper, LS-DYNA finite element analysis code was used to model and analyze a sacrificial crash wall design to determine its effectiveness in protecting an MSE retaining wall. Based on the LS-DYNA simulations, a crash wall that is 8 in. (0.2 m) thick is considered to be an adequate design to reduce damage to the MSE wall.

scholarly journals ENSURING THE STABILITY OF RETAINED WALLS IN SEISMIC AREAS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE BACKFILL SOIL CONDITIONS

2019 ◽  
pp. 284-288
Author(s):  
Zh.S. Bekbolotova ◽  
S.V. Krylova ◽  
R.D. Tokoev
Keyword(s):  
Large Deformations ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Research Model ◽  
Coupling Effects ◽  
Soil Stiffness ◽  
Backfill Soil ◽  
Combined Action ◽  
The Stability

During earthquakes retaining walls are exposed to combined action. The retaining walls in seismic areas must account for the displacements, for resistance to failure in bearing, sliding and overturning. Research model have to estimate to dynamic the combined action of sliding and rocking and takes into consideration, non-linear soil stiffness in sliding, and rocking, geometrical and material damping in sliding, and rocking, and coupling effects. The calculation of the retaining wall is given, the design and the method of strengthening the structure at large deformations are shown.

Perencanaan dinding penahan tanah untuk menanggulangi kelongsoran pada kompleks peternakan ayam di Kecamatan Kandangan, Kediri, Jawa Timur

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Mila K. Wardani ◽  
Felicia T. Nuciferani ◽  
Mohamad F.N. Aulady
Keyword(s):  
Natural Disasters ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Total Height ◽  
Safe Limit ◽  
Soil Retaining Walls

Landslide one of the natural disasters that caused many victims. Therefore, the landslide need a construction that can withstand landslide force. This study aims to plan retaining walls to prevent landslides in the farm area in Kandangan Subdistrict, Kediri Regency. The method used is to use slide analysis which is used to plan the retaining wall. In addition the planning of soil containment walls u ses several methods as a comparison. The results of this study indicate that the planning of ordinary soil retaining walls is still not enough to overcome slides. The minimum SF value that meets the safe limit of landslide prevention is 1.541 in the combination of 1/3 H terracing and the number of gabions as many as 7 with a total height of 2- 3 m .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document