scholarly journals Requirements Identification for Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Industrie 4.0 Machine Groups: A Structured Literature Review

Author(s):  
Philip Stahmann ◽  
Bodo Rieger
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 101-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Mengelkamp ◽  
Julius Diesing ◽  
Christof Weinhardt

Abstract We conduct a structured literature review on the concept of local energy markets (LEMs). LEMs have gained increasing attention in the last two decades. Yet, a holistic definition and clear demarcation of LEMs is still missing. The review shows current works to shift their focus from conceptual implementation and design to increasingly realistic applications of LEMs. Secure access to (near) real-time smart meter data is a prerequisite for LEMs. Current research gaps, e. g. the inclusion of network constraints, agent-centric LEM designs or a comparison of market mechanisms, are identified.


Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 4237
Author(s):  
Hoon Ko ◽  
Kwangcheol Rim ◽  
Isabel Praça

The biggest problem with conventional anomaly signal detection using features was that it was difficult to use it in real time and it requires processing of network signals. Furthermore, analyzing network signals in real-time required vast amounts of processing for each signal, as each protocol contained various pieces of information. This paper suggests anomaly detection by analyzing the relationship among each feature to the anomaly detection model. The model analyzes the anomaly of network signals based on anomaly feature detection. The selected feature for anomaly detection does not require constant network signal updates and real-time processing of these signals. When the selected features are found in the received signal, the signal is registered as a potential anomaly signal and is then steadily monitored until it is determined as either an anomaly or normal signal. In terms of the results, it determined the anomaly with 99.7% (0.997) accuracy in f(4)(S0) and in case f(4)(REJ) received 11,233 signals with a normal or 171anomaly judgment accuracy of 98.7% (0.987).


IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 22528-22541
Author(s):  
Ruifeng Duo ◽  
Xiaobo Nie ◽  
Ning Yang ◽  
Chuan Yue ◽  
Yongxiang Wang
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document