Word Learning: Concrete vs Abstract Acquisition
1977 ◽
Vol 45
(1)
◽
pp. 292-294
◽
Keyword(s):
Concrete vs abstract word learning was investigated in first grade subjects on a trials-to-criterion basis. Eight four-letter words were selected (four concrete, four abstract) from a list of common words and presented mechanically to subjects. Subjects were divided into groups high and low in reading readiness. A 2 × 2 analysis of variance indicated that contrary to previously published research, there is no difference in the ability to learn concrete or abstract words. Further, low-readiness subjects did not perform with any significant degree of difference from subjects high in readiness. It was concluded that concreteness or abstractness may not be a significant factor in word learning, as previously assumed.
2020 ◽
Vol 29
(3)
◽
pp. 1574-1595
Keyword(s):
1993 ◽
Vol 76
(3_suppl)
◽
pp. 1147-1152
◽
2018 ◽
Vol 373
(1752)
◽
pp. 20170140
◽
2011 ◽
Vol 23
(1)
◽
pp. 106-118
◽
Keyword(s):
1976 ◽
Vol 69
(9)
◽
pp. 338-340
◽
Keyword(s):
1971 ◽
Vol 2
(1)
◽
pp. 50-64
◽