Precision Medicine: Current Practice and Future Perspective in the U.S.

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-67
Author(s):  
S. Ikeda
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. FSO478
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Halil Sahin

As cancer management evolves into precision medicine national/international cancer meetings bring novel therapeutic approaches and potentially practice-changing results of clinical studies are presented. This year, the ASCO GI Symposium 2020 had also several updates from ongoing and finalized clinical trials. Although there were no groundbreaking results that impact the daily practice directly, several highly important data from ongoing studies were shared with the audience. In this report, the highlights of the ASCO GI Symposium 2020 are presented with a future perspective.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinjiang Li ◽  
Mary E. Krause ◽  
Xiaodong Chen ◽  
Yuan Cheng ◽  
Weiguo Dai ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Pulsifer-Anderson ◽  
Ronnie Guillet

ARETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF data from 11,000 preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the U.S. found that infants receiving H2 blockers such as Zantac, Tagamet, Pepcid, and Axid were more likely to develop necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).1 The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). As a result of the findings of this study, Elias A. Zerhouni, MD, Director of the National Institutes of Health, issued a press release in February, 2006, stating, “This study strongly suggests that the current practice of prescribing H2 blockers to prevent or treat acid reflux in premature infants needs to be carefully reevaluated by all concerned in light of these new findings.”2


Author(s):  
Gregg Vanderheiden ◽  
Jim Tobias

As electronic technologies become more integrated into education and employment, the ability to access and use these new technologies becomes critical to people with disabilities (40 million people in the U.S. alone) if they are to be able to participate in these environments. A key strategy for ensuring access to these emerging technologies is the practice of universal design - designing products so that they can be directly used by as many people as possible. Universal design is a practice that depends on the standard, mass-market product manufacturers for its implementation. Although there are key examples of universal design practices in the electronic and communication industries, they do not represent the majority of current practice. Little is known or documented about the reasons why universal design is, or is not, practiced. This paper reports on the first phase of a three-year project to explore the practice of universal design of products, including key factors, motivators, disincentives, and barriers to its practice, as well as what activities external to the company would facilitate (or hinder) practice within companies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 243 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten B Goldberg ◽  
Gideon M Blumenthal ◽  
Amy E McKee ◽  
Richard Pazdur

In January 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) formally established the Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) to streamline the development of cancer therapies by uniting experts from FDA product centers to conduct expedited review of drugs, biologics, and devices. In May 2017, the FDA approved a cancer treatment based on a biomarker, without regard to the tumor’s site, by granting accelerated approval to pembrolizumab for patients with solid tumors that have the microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient biomarker. We describe here the OCE’s role in this first site-agnostic approval and OCE programs for further advancement of oncology-related regulatory science and policy. In addition, the FDA’s four expedited review programs that enable transformative therapies to reach patients with life-threatening malignancies earlier in the development process are key to the continued rapid development of safe and effective therapies for patients with few or no other treatment options. These changes at FDA are taking place in the context of recent progress in the understanding of the genetic and immunologic foundations of cancer, resulting in the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapies. The traditional system of phased clinical trials has evolved as early trials of breakthrough therapies use expansion cohorts in a process known as seamless drug development. Increasingly, FDA approvals of targeted therapies are likely to have contemporaneous approvals of companion diagnostics to identify patients whose cancers harbor actionable abnormalities. Impact statement This publication describes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) first site-agnostic oncology drug approval, a landmark event in the history of cancer drug development. The role of the FDA’s newly established Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) in this approval is described, as are several OCE programs to advance excellence in regulatory science in the era of precision medicine. Also provided is an overview of FDA’s expedited drug review programs, which are important to the continued acceleration of therapeutics development for patients with life-threatening diseases and few or no other treatment options.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document