scholarly journals Urgensi Pengaturan Kejahatan Korporasi dalam Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi Menurut RKUHP

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-254
Author(s):  
Ikka Puspitasari ◽  
Erdiana Devintawati
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Law ◽  
Near Future

Artikel ini ingin menjawab bagaimana tindak pidana korporasi dipertanggungjawabkan secara pidana di Indonesia menurut Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Di samping itu bagaimana kebijakan formulasi sistem pemidanaan dalam menanggu-langi tindak pidana korporasi pada masa yang akan datang. Artikel ini mengungkapkan bahwa eksistensi suatu korporasi memiliki andil yang cukup besar baik bagi kepentingan manusia ataupun bagi kepentingan negara. Suatu korporasi sering diikuti oleh pelanggaran-pelanggaran atau bahkan perbuatan melanggar hukum termasuk pelanggaran hukum pidana. Tindak pidana korporasi dapat pula dikategorikan sebagai kejahatan transnasional yang bersifat terorganisir.Pada masa sekarang ini Korporasi sebagai Subyek Hukum dapat dikenai pidana.Pengaturan pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam hukum pidana di Indonesia diatur dalam RUU KUHP.  The Urgency of  Regulating Corporate Crimes Under Corporate Crime Liability According to Draft of Criminal Code Procedures The aims of this article, firstly, to answer the question on how coorporate crime liability to be considered as a crime under Indonesian criminal law based on Draft of Criminal Code  Procedures (RKUHP). Secondly, to understand the policy of sentencing system for coorporate crime in the near future. This article argue that the existence of coorporates  gives a significance constribution not only for human life but also for state interest. On the other hand, its also found that a coorporate that againts the law, both in private and criminal law. Coorporate crimes also categorized as well- organized trans-national crime. Nowdays, as a legal instituion, coorporates could be sentenced based on coorporate liability under Indonesian criminal law that regulated under RUU KUHP.

scholarly journals TINJAUAN TENTANG SISTEM PEMIDANAAN DALAM PERBARENGAN TINDAK PIDANA MENURUT KUHP

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi ◽  
Abdul Rahman Salman Paris
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Joint Crime

This study discusses the forms of crime in the context of criminal acts or the comparison of criminal acts (same loop) that occur in society. This happens where one person commits a crime, but it is not uncommon for one person to commit several functional crimes at the same time in the same place. On the other hand, there is also one person who determines the number of crimes at different times in different locations which in criminal law is known as the term of criminal acts or sharing criminal acts (same loop) or in Dutch is same loop van Strafbare Feiten. This study uses a normative method using qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate that there are three forms of criminal acts namely Concursus Idialis, continuing actions and realist Concursus while the penal system in the proportion of criminal acts can be applied to three methods, namely Stelsel absorption, cumulative Stelsel, and limited cumulative Stelsel.Keywords: criminal code; criminal system; joint crime. AbstrakPenelitian ini membahas tentang bentuk-bentuk kejahatan perbarengan perbuatan pidana atau perbarengan tindak pidana (samenloop) yang terjadi di dalam masyarakat. Hal tersebut bisa terjadi dimana satu orang melakukan satu kejahatan tapi tidak jarang terjadi satu orang melakukan beberapa kejahatan baik dalam waktu yang sama di tempat yang sama. Disisi lain, ada juga satu orang yang melakukan beberapa kejahatan pada waktu yang berbeda di tempat yang berbeda pula yang dalam hukum pidana dikenal dengan istilah perbarengan perbuatan pidana atau perbarengan tindak pidana (samenloop) atau dalam bahasa belanda ialah sameloop van strafbare feiten. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif, dengan menggunakan analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Adapun hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ada tiga bentuk perbarengan tindak pidana yaitu concursus idialis, perbuatan berlanjut dan concursus realis sedangkan sistem pemidanaan dalam perbarengan tindak pidana dapat diterapkan tiga stelsel yaitu stelsel absorpsi, stelsel kumulasi dan stelsel kumulasi terbatas.Kata kunci: KUHP; sistem pemidanaan; perbarengan tindak pidana.

Should a Criminal Code Distinguish Between Justification and Excuse?

1992 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Gur-Arye
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Extreme Pressure ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Lesser Evils ◽  
Special Circumstances ◽  
Self Defence

Criminal law defences may be classified as either “justification” or “excuse”. A justification negates the wrongfulness of the conduct. The following are considered justifications: law enforcement, self-defence and lesser evils. An excuse, on the other hand, negates only the culpability of the actor for wrongful conduct. Under special circumstances, such as extreme pressure, it is considered unfair to blame the actor for the violation of the norm. Insanity and duress are typical excuses.

scholarly journals THE UNDERSTANDING OF ḤUDÛD ALLÂH IN THE QURAN: Study of Thematic-Contextual Interpretation

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-363
Author(s):  
Bakrei Mohammed Bakheet Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Waiting Period ◽  
Criminal Penalty ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Inductive Methods ◽  
The Law ◽  
General Meaning

The term ḥudûd Allâh is one of those written in al-Quran al-Karim used for clarifying the laws. However, some people do not quite comprehend this term that their understanding is only limited to the law related to criminal (penalty), meanwhile Quran does not limit the term only for penalty. Therefore, the author chose the title to explain the ḥudûd Allâh term mentioned in Quran and its meanings in some parts using empirical and inductive methods in quoting opinions of mufassir both in the classic and contemporary generations. In this article, the author divides it into four discussions related to the theme in the verses. The crucial conclusion of this article is that the ḥudûd Allâh term in Quran never refers to criminal law such as the penalty for adultery, liquor, and the like. On the other hand, the term is to explain the laws of family matters, ahwal shahsiyah e.g. divorce, ‘iddah (waiting period), filing divorce from the wife side, inheritance distribution, and general meaning on Allah’s orders and prohibitions.

scholarly journals HUKUM ISLAM DALAM KERANGKA PEMBARUAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA, DILIHAT DARI PERSPEKTIF TEORI HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN MOCHTAR KUSUMAATMADJA

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Aris Irawan
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Way Of Life ◽  
Other Hand

<p><em>Development Law Theory refers to the life view (way of life) of Indonesian society based on the principle of Pancasila which encourages kinship then to norms, principles, institutions and rules. Updating laws is part of and at the same time implements punishment. Islamic Judicial Law, specifically concerning Role Law, stoning law for adulterers, as well as qishash, often gets a sharp spotlight from Non-Islamic societies such as Orientalists, as well as research, principles, legal laws and others required in the substance of the Criminal Code, actually regulated and applied in Islamic Law. On the other hand Islamic law in transition is not as rigid as imagined by Orientalists, but is instead flexible and can be used as a source of renewal of the National Criminal Law.</em></p>

Dystopic Pleasure

2021 ◽  
pp. 234-258
Author(s):  
Deniz Yaman
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Science Fiction ◽  
Human Life ◽  
The Other ◽  
Space Theory ◽  
Production Of Space ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Artificial Intelligence Technology ◽  
The One ◽  
Near Future

In the 1980s and 1990s, there were indispensable elements for the science fiction movies: cyborgs. This half-biologic and half-machine species had fully developed intelligence. And there was such a future fiction that appeared in these films that, on the one hand, raised admiration for the technologies that have not yet emerged, and on the other hand raised serious future concerns. The purpose of this study is to discuss the interaction of fear, artificial intelligence, and humans. And it is also aimed to research the way of representation of this interaction via aestheticization. Because of this, The Lawnmower (1992) has been chosen and analyized within the context of Production of Space Theory by Lefebvre. The Lawnmower has an importance about the imagining of dystopic and aesthetic way artificial intelligence technology would affect human life in the near future.

scholarly journals Pencegahan Penodaan Agama Perspektif Fiqh Jinâyah

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-251
Author(s):  
Ahmad Habibullah
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Punishment ◽  
Legal Sanction ◽  
Other Hand

Abstract: This article discusses the Islamic criminal Law (fiqh jinâyah) analysis on prevention of blasphemy in Indonesia. Law No. 1 Year 1965 concerning with prevention of religion abuse and/or blasphemy and Criminal Code which see criteria regarding the banned or misguided sects or organizations that are also stipulated in the provisions of MUI (Indonesian Ulama Council) in 2007. The laws state that the legal sanction against the perpetrators of the desecration of religion is imprisoned for ever five years. In Islamic criminal Law, the detailed criteria of blasphemy can only slightly be met due to the absence of the text of either al-Qur’an or al-Hadith that explain in detail about the legal sanction of blasphemy. Application of the legal punishment which based on the wisdom of judge can be used against blasphemy. Such a legal punishment is in line with the existing legal sanction in UUPNPS. This is when the offense of blasphemy committed is rated light. On the other hand, if the offense of blasphemy is considered very heavy and has a very great effect, it can be the opposite.Keywords: Blasphemy, legal sanction, Islamic criminal law. Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas tentang analisis fikih jinâyah tehadap pencegahan penodaan agama di Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1965 Tentang Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan dan atau Penodaan Agama maupun KUHP, melihat kriteria mengenai aliran/organisasi yang terlarang atau sesat yang tertuang dalam ketentuan hukum tersebut yang dikuatkan pula oleh fatwa MUI pada tahun 2007, dinyatakan bahwa sanksi hukum terhadap pelaku penodaan agama adalah dengan pidana penjara selama-lamanya lima tahun. Dalam Fiqh Jinâyah, kriteria penodaan agama secara terperinci dapat ditemui meskipun hanya sedikit, dikarenakan tidak adanya nash al-Qur’an maupun Hadis yang menjelaskan secara detail mengenai penodaan agama beserta sanksi hukumnya. Penerapan hukuman ta’zîr yang berdasarkan kearifan hakim, digunakan untuk menjerat pelaku penodaan agama. Hukuman ta’zîr ini sejalan dengan sanksi hukum yang ada dalam UUPNPS, hal ini bila delik penodaan agama yang dilakukan dinilai ringan. Tetapi di sisi lain akan sangat bertolak belakang, apabila delik penodaan agama dinilai sangat berat dan besar pengaruh yang ditimbulkan.Kata Kunci: Penodaan agama, sanksi, fiqh jinâyah.

Why Omissions are Special

Legal Theory ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Simester
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Good Reason ◽  
Differential Treatment ◽  
The Other ◽  
Positive Interventions ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Positive Action ◽  
The Law ◽  
Better Than

The criminal law presently distinguishes between actions and omissions, and only rarely proscribes failures to avert consequences that it would be an offense to bring about. Why? In recent years it has been persuasively argued by both Glover and Bennett that,celeris paribus, omissions to prevent a harm are just as culpable as are actions which bring that harm about. On the other hand, and acknowledging that hitherto “lawyers have not been very successful in finding a rationale for it,” Tony Honoré has sought to defend the law's differential treatment. He proposes a “distinct-duties theory” that in addition to the general duties we owe to everyone (e.g., not to inflict harm), we also owe distinct duties to a more limited collection of people and associations, specified by features of our relationship with them (we owe, for instance, duties as parents to our own children). Where a distinct duty holds, breach by omission may well be no better than breach by positive action. But absent a distinct duty, omissions, per Honoré, are less culpable. They are mere failures to intervene and improve or rectify things, whereas actions are positive interventions which make things worse. And, thus, the law has good reason to differentiate between them.

scholarly journals PENYEBAB TERJADINYA TINDAKAN MAIN HAKIM SENDIRI ATAU EIGENRICHTING YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN (CONTOH KASUS PEMBAKARAN PELAKU PENCURIAN MOTOR DENGAN KEKERASAN DI PONDOK AREN TANGERANG)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 809
Author(s):  
Chandro Panjaitan ◽  
Firman Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
Research Data ◽  
The Other ◽  
Positive Opinion ◽  
Main Research ◽  
Emotional Factors ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Law

Cases of vigilante action are committed by a group of persons are not justified in the law. Those are cases which is unlawful, immoral, irresponsible and does not have an attitude that respects the law.Vigilante cases should have been reported to the authorities and the perpetrator should be punished in accordance to the existing law and regulations. There is no apparent regulations regarding the act of vigilante, instead there are some articles in Indonesian’s Criminal Code which can be used against the perpetrators. In this case Article 170 and 351 of Indonesian’s Criminal Code somehow has been used to deal with vigilante cases. It is important to learn what are the factors of the vigilante case in PondokAren, Tangerang which will be the main research in this thesis and also the prevention that should be done in order to avoid the same incident in the future. The research data shows that the factors behind perpetrators being vigilante is based on emotional factors, the lack of trust in the law and situation factor. On the other hand to prevent further case in the future the authorities need to improve their work from several aspects. Thus, creating a positive opinion on public.

scholarly journals Perbuatan pidana kesusilaan dalam rancangan undang-undang KUHP

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Hartini
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Social Philosophy ◽  
The Other ◽  
Statutory Rape ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Law

As an independent and sovereignty country, Indonesia should arrange KUHP (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana) to avoid loss of criminalities that have been increasing. The renewal of KUHP is very needed because it's not proper with the values of social politic, social philosophy, and social cultural of Indonesia people. It is the basic for sosial, criminal policy, and law enforcement. The urgency of revising of KUHP, specially putting susila crime put in draft criminal code (RUU KUHP) and almost the requirement still be formed widely, not distinguishing between criminal and people who break the rule, but the words "susila Crime” and the newly "statutory rape" and "incest’. According to the renewal, it's needed to direct it into the law development that is democratic and responsive, so that the law's function-that protect the society, can give fairness and as a development instrument will raise suitable with the principle of law country.  Although the draft criminal code (RUU KUHP) still need to be discussed again, remembering the effort to have national KUHP is very urgent, so it's better that draft criminal code (RUU KUHP) is not need more time to be UU, in the other hand, technically we will face difficulties in law enforcement because the representatives and experts are more free to say their thoughts.

scholarly journals Corporate Crime and Corporate Criminal Liability in Indonesia Positive Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-30
Author(s):  
Zulkarnain Zulkarnain ◽  
I Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
Ismail Navianto
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
The Relationship

Corporate crime is a unique crime against which excellent deterrence should be combated. However, these efforts are inversely proportional to the criminal law policies that serve as the basis for their implementation. The KUHP, the key pillar of the statute, merely acknowledges natural persons as subjects of criminal law. And they do not regard companies as criminal law topics. Crime laws must also be renewed. On this basis, a criminal policy will be discussed in Indonesia about the criminal liability scheme. The results of studies indicate that criminalization of all types of corporate crime was regarded as a crime according to positive criminal law in Indonesia. The relationship between one and the other criminal code differs however. The Criminal Code notes that the crime modes sometimes perpetrated by the companies were considered a criminal offense but should be performed by a normal individual. In other words, it may be claimed that companies have not been considered subjects of criminal law by the Criminal Code. However, in some criminal law laws out of the Criminal Code, companies have been treated as targets of criminal legislation and should be responsible for their acts. In Indonesia, the criminal liability scheme introduced by the Positive Legislation seeks to identify and delegate hypotheses where the errors and the source of authorities they have are assessed. The requirements in one criminal law and the other, however, are comprehensively different. For instance, a criminal must not be the manager, but someone who does anything in or for the sake of a company and the act is carried out within the framework of a corporation. It is not, however, expressly specified by the draft Law on the Criminal Code that the criminal is convicted so as to understand that the criminal is not liable for the crime he commits because criminal liabilities were transferred to the company. The draft Criminal Code Act (RKUHP) has accommodated companies as subjects of criminal law and arranged procedures for criminal liability. It can be seen from the principle of the renewal of criminal law that future criminal law would regard business offences as criminal actions and that penal penalties will be imposed on the company. The established provisions clearly show that the model and philosophy embraced are the doctrines of vicarious responsibility, even though there are shortcomings in the model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document