scholarly journals Pencegahan Penodaan Agama Perspektif Fiqh Jinâyah

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-251
Author(s):  
Ahmad Habibullah
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Punishment ◽  
Legal Sanction ◽  
Other Hand

Abstract: This article discusses the Islamic criminal Law (fiqh jinâyah) analysis on prevention of blasphemy in Indonesia. Law No. 1 Year 1965 concerning with prevention of religion abuse and/or blasphemy and Criminal Code which see criteria regarding the banned or misguided sects or organizations that are also stipulated in the provisions of MUI (Indonesian Ulama Council) in 2007. The laws state that the legal sanction against the perpetrators of the desecration of religion is imprisoned for ever five years. In Islamic criminal Law, the detailed criteria of blasphemy can only slightly be met due to the absence of the text of either al-Qur’an or al-Hadith that explain in detail about the legal sanction of blasphemy. Application of the legal punishment which based on the wisdom of judge can be used against blasphemy. Such a legal punishment is in line with the existing legal sanction in UUPNPS. This is when the offense of blasphemy committed is rated light. On the other hand, if the offense of blasphemy is considered very heavy and has a very great effect, it can be the opposite.Keywords: Blasphemy, legal sanction, Islamic criminal law. Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas tentang analisis fikih jinâyah tehadap pencegahan penodaan agama di Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1965 Tentang Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan dan atau Penodaan Agama maupun KUHP, melihat kriteria mengenai aliran/organisasi yang terlarang atau sesat yang tertuang dalam ketentuan hukum tersebut yang dikuatkan pula oleh fatwa MUI pada tahun 2007, dinyatakan bahwa sanksi hukum terhadap pelaku penodaan agama adalah dengan pidana penjara selama-lamanya lima tahun. Dalam Fiqh Jinâyah, kriteria penodaan agama secara terperinci dapat ditemui meskipun hanya sedikit, dikarenakan tidak adanya nash al-Qur’an maupun Hadis yang menjelaskan secara detail mengenai penodaan agama beserta sanksi hukumnya. Penerapan hukuman ta’zîr yang berdasarkan kearifan hakim, digunakan untuk menjerat pelaku penodaan agama. Hukuman ta’zîr ini sejalan dengan sanksi hukum yang ada dalam UUPNPS, hal ini bila delik penodaan agama yang dilakukan dinilai ringan. Tetapi di sisi lain akan sangat bertolak belakang, apabila delik penodaan agama dinilai sangat berat dan besar pengaruh yang ditimbulkan.Kata Kunci: Penodaan agama, sanksi, fiqh jinâyah.

scholarly journals TINJAUAN TENTANG SISTEM PEMIDANAAN DALAM PERBARENGAN TINDAK PIDANA MENURUT KUHP

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi ◽  
Abdul Rahman Salman Paris
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Joint Crime

This study discusses the forms of crime in the context of criminal acts or the comparison of criminal acts (same loop) that occur in society. This happens where one person commits a crime, but it is not uncommon for one person to commit several functional crimes at the same time in the same place. On the other hand, there is also one person who determines the number of crimes at different times in different locations which in criminal law is known as the term of criminal acts or sharing criminal acts (same loop) or in Dutch is same loop van Strafbare Feiten. This study uses a normative method using qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate that there are three forms of criminal acts namely Concursus Idialis, continuing actions and realist Concursus while the penal system in the proportion of criminal acts can be applied to three methods, namely Stelsel absorption, cumulative Stelsel, and limited cumulative Stelsel.Keywords: criminal code; criminal system; joint crime. AbstrakPenelitian ini membahas tentang bentuk-bentuk kejahatan perbarengan perbuatan pidana atau perbarengan tindak pidana (samenloop) yang terjadi di dalam masyarakat. Hal tersebut bisa terjadi dimana satu orang melakukan satu kejahatan tapi tidak jarang terjadi satu orang melakukan beberapa kejahatan baik dalam waktu yang sama di tempat yang sama. Disisi lain, ada juga satu orang yang melakukan beberapa kejahatan pada waktu yang berbeda di tempat yang berbeda pula yang dalam hukum pidana dikenal dengan istilah perbarengan perbuatan pidana atau perbarengan tindak pidana (samenloop) atau dalam bahasa belanda ialah sameloop van strafbare feiten. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif, dengan menggunakan analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Adapun hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ada tiga bentuk perbarengan tindak pidana yaitu concursus idialis, perbuatan berlanjut dan concursus realis sedangkan sistem pemidanaan dalam perbarengan tindak pidana dapat diterapkan tiga stelsel yaitu stelsel absorpsi, stelsel kumulasi dan stelsel kumulasi terbatas.Kata kunci: KUHP; sistem pemidanaan; perbarengan tindak pidana.

Should a Criminal Code Distinguish Between Justification and Excuse?

1992 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Gur-Arye
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Extreme Pressure ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Lesser Evils ◽  
Special Circumstances ◽  
Self Defence

Criminal law defences may be classified as either “justification” or “excuse”. A justification negates the wrongfulness of the conduct. The following are considered justifications: law enforcement, self-defence and lesser evils. An excuse, on the other hand, negates only the culpability of the actor for wrongful conduct. Under special circumstances, such as extreme pressure, it is considered unfair to blame the actor for the violation of the norm. Insanity and duress are typical excuses.

scholarly journals HUKUM ISLAM DALAM KERANGKA PEMBARUAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA, DILIHAT DARI PERSPEKTIF TEORI HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN MOCHTAR KUSUMAATMADJA

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Aris Irawan
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Way Of Life ◽  
Other Hand

<p><em>Development Law Theory refers to the life view (way of life) of Indonesian society based on the principle of Pancasila which encourages kinship then to norms, principles, institutions and rules. Updating laws is part of and at the same time implements punishment. Islamic Judicial Law, specifically concerning Role Law, stoning law for adulterers, as well as qishash, often gets a sharp spotlight from Non-Islamic societies such as Orientalists, as well as research, principles, legal laws and others required in the substance of the Criminal Code, actually regulated and applied in Islamic Law. On the other hand Islamic law in transition is not as rigid as imagined by Orientalists, but is instead flexible and can be used as a source of renewal of the National Criminal Law.</em></p>

scholarly journals Urgensi Pengaturan Kejahatan Korporasi dalam Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi Menurut RKUHP

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-254
Author(s):  
Ikka Puspitasari ◽  
Erdiana Devintawati
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Law ◽  
Near Future

Artikel ini ingin menjawab bagaimana tindak pidana korporasi dipertanggungjawabkan secara pidana di Indonesia menurut Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Di samping itu bagaimana kebijakan formulasi sistem pemidanaan dalam menanggu-langi tindak pidana korporasi pada masa yang akan datang. Artikel ini mengungkapkan bahwa eksistensi suatu korporasi memiliki andil yang cukup besar baik bagi kepentingan manusia ataupun bagi kepentingan negara. Suatu korporasi sering diikuti oleh pelanggaran-pelanggaran atau bahkan perbuatan melanggar hukum termasuk pelanggaran hukum pidana. Tindak pidana korporasi dapat pula dikategorikan sebagai kejahatan transnasional yang bersifat terorganisir.Pada masa sekarang ini Korporasi sebagai Subyek Hukum dapat dikenai pidana.Pengaturan pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam hukum pidana di Indonesia diatur dalam RUU KUHP.  The Urgency of  Regulating Corporate Crimes Under Corporate Crime Liability According to Draft of Criminal Code Procedures The aims of this article, firstly, to answer the question on how coorporate crime liability to be considered as a crime under Indonesian criminal law based on Draft of Criminal Code  Procedures (RKUHP). Secondly, to understand the policy of sentencing system for coorporate crime in the near future. This article argue that the existence of coorporates  gives a significance constribution not only for human life but also for state interest. On the other hand, its also found that a coorporate that againts the law, both in private and criminal law. Coorporate crimes also categorized as well- organized trans-national crime. Nowdays, as a legal instituion, coorporates could be sentenced based on coorporate liability under Indonesian criminal law that regulated under RUU KUHP.

MAIN SPECIFICATIONS OF ASSESSING ACTIVITIES OF MINOR IMPORTANCE OF IN MODERN CRIMINAL LAW

Law and World ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-95
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Minor Importance ◽  
Detailed Review

The research includes the full and the detailed overview of assessing activities of minor importance in Georgian Criminal Law. The Article 7 of the Criminal Code of Georgia states the following: a crime shall not be an action that, although formally containing the signs of a crime, has not produced, for minor importance, the prejudice that would require criminal liability of its perpetrator, or has not created the risk of such harm. The research includes the main criteria of defining activities as activities of minor importance. The detailed review of Georgian case law is also introduced, as well as, legislation, judicial literature and experience of the other European countries.

Distinction between Dolus and Culpa with reference to Arson in Zakon Sudnyj LJudem, the Vinodol Law and the Statute of Senj

De Jure ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Haman ◽  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Documents ◽  
The Third ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The World ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Different Levels ◽  
Better Than

The difference between intent (dolus) and negligence (culpa) was rarely emphasized in codified medieval laws and regulations. When compared to the legal statements related to intent, negligence was mentioned even more rarely. However, there are some laws that distinguished between the two concepts in terms of some specific crimes, such as arson. This paper draws attention to three medieval Slavic legal documents – the Zakon Sudnyj LJudem (ZSLJ), the Vinodol Law and the Statute of Senj. They are compared with reference to regulations regarding arson, with the focus being on arson as a crime committed intentionally or out of negligence. The ZSLJ as the oldest known Slavic law in the world shows some similarities with other medieval Slavic legal codes, especially in the field of criminal law, since most of the ZSLJ’s articles are related to criminal law. On the other hand, the Vinodol Law is the oldest preserved Croatian law and it is among the oldest Slavic codes in the world. It was written in 1288 in the Croatian Glagolitic script and in the Croatian Chakavian dialect. The third document – the Statute of Senj – regulated legal matters in the Croatian littoral town of Senj. It was written in 1388 – exactly a century after the Vinodol Law was proclaimed. When comparing the Vinodol Law and the Statute of Senj with the Zakon Sudnyj LJudem, there are clear differences and similarities, particularly in the field of criminal law. Within the framework of criminal offenses, the act of arson is important for making a distinction between intent and negligence. While the ZSLJ regulates different levels of guilt, the Vinodol Law makes no difference between dolus and culpa. On the other hand, the Statute of Senj strictly refers to negligence as a punishable crime. Even though the ZSLJ is almost half a millennium older than the Statute of Senj and around 400 years older than the Vinodol Law, this paper proves that the ZSLJ defines the guilt and the punishment for arson much better than the other two laws.

Crime, Law and the Internet

2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Hilgendorf
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The World ◽  
At Will ◽  
Global Reach

AbstractAfter some introductory remarks on the German legal system and German legal politics, the main forms of datanet crime on the Internet are sketched. After that, one of the most important Internet-cases of the last decade, the CompuServe case, is discussed in some detail. One of the main problems of datanet crime is its global reach. The world-spanning nature of the cyberspace significantly enlarges the ability of offenders to commit crimes that will affect people in a variety of other countries. On the other hand, the jurisdiction of national criminal law cannot be expanded at will by any single nation. A transnational criminal law for the Internet is possible but should be restricted to the defence of universally (or nearly universally) accepted interests and values. In effect, it seems that the problems of computer-related crime on the Internet cannot be solved by criminal law alone.

For a Negative, Normative Model of Consent, With a Comment on Preference-Skepticism

Legal Theory ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Dripps
Keyword(s):  
External Force ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Normative Model ◽  
Bodily Movement ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Nervous Disorder ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Freedom And Responsibility

Let me begin by admitting that I am wary of any comprehensive definition of consent. This bias stems from my professional concentration on criminal law, in which nouons of freedom and responsibility play vital roles in a wide range of contexts. In each context, however, one discovers that freedom means something different. A voluntary act is any bodily movement not caused by external force or nervous disorder. On the other hand, a voluntary act, however horrific its results, ordinarily may be punished only if the actor was subjectively aware that the act was wrong. In any event, a voluntary act may be excused as the product of duress if another person procures the actor's cooperation in the crime by an illegal threat that would overcome the resistance of a person of ordinary firmness.

scholarly journals The Protection of Bank and Customer Secrets by Criminal Law

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Çetin Arslan ◽  
Didar Özdemir
Keyword(s):  
Central Bank ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Credit Cards ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Turkish Republic ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Legal Justification ◽  
General Norm ◽  
Definition Of

The Turkish Penal Code (TPC) no.5237 embodies “the reveal of bank and customer secrets” as a crime. However, neither article 6 of the TPC titled “definitions” nor the legal justification of the article contains the definition of the bank or customer secret. On the other hand, the bank or customer secrets are under guarantee of four different codes. These dispositions can be counted as the article 239 of the TPC, the articles 35 and 68/II/a of the Turkish Republic Central Bank Code dated 14.01.1970 and numbered 1211, the articles 73 and 159 of the Banking Code dated 19.10.2005 and numbered 5411 and also the articles 8, 23 and 31 of the Bank Cards and Credit Cards Code dated 23.02.2006 and numbered 5464. Though, these two special codes do not make a connection to the article 239 of the TPC which constitutes the general norm nor the TPC makes a reference to those dispositions. In this study, we will try to explain first the notions of bank and customer secrets, then the penal norms protecting the bank and customer secrets and last, the elements of the crime disposed in the article 239 of the TPC.

scholarly journals CRIMINAL LAW CONSIDERATIONS (Ratio Decidendi)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Prayitno Iman Santosa
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Objective Measures ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Ratio Decidendi

Judicial practice in Indonesia, judging from the decisions of criminal cases, generally judges give legal considerations only to prove the elements of a criminal offense. In contrast, the determination of the crime is not objectively considered, and most are merely considerations of incriminating and mitigating matters. On the other hand, the judge has absolute authority in imposing a crime; the judge's freedom is guaranteed by law. The supreme power of judges who are used freely without objective measures has the potential to produce corrupt decisions and injustices. Criminal objectives must be aligned with legal goals, namely to realize penalties that guarantee legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Ideally, good sentences reflect the three purposes of the law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document