Kedudukan Kesaksian Polisi Penangkap Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkoba

Putusan No. 1531 K/Pid.Sus/2010 Mahkamah Agung memutus bebas terdakwa tindak pidana narkotikabernama Ket San.Salah satu pertimbangan utama Mahkamah Agung adalah perihal kedudukan 2 (dua) orang polisi yang menangkap Ket San yang kemudian juga hadir sebagai saksi dipersidangan. Permasalahan yang perlu dikaji yaitu hubungan antara tersangka dengan polisi penangkapdan pembuktian kesaksian polisi penangkap dalam perkara tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkoba.Tujuan penulisan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara tersangka dengan polisi penangkap dan bagaimana kekuatan pembuktian saksipolisi penangkap dalam perkara penyalahgunaan narkoba.Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa selama proses pemeriksaan berlangsung, seseorang yang disangka atau didakwa melakukan sesuatu tindak pidana dilindungi oleh hukum sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 50 sampai Pasal 68 KUHAP. Polisi Penangkap boleh bersaksi sepanjang memenuhi kualifikasi saksi sebagaimana diatur Pasal 1 angka 26 dan 27 KUHAP dan tidak dapat dipertimbangkan apabila keterangan saksi tersebut bertentangan dengan Pasal 185 ayat (6) KUHAP, secara formal kehadiran polisi penangkap di persidangan pada saat memberi keterangan yang sifatnya verbalisan. Disarankan bagi instansi penegak hukum untuk profesionalisme, wajib menghormati hak orang yang melakukan tindak pidana dalam memperoleh hak-haknya danketerangan saksi yang berasal dari Polisi Penangkap saja dalam satu perkara pidana sebaiknya dihindari kecuali Penuntut Umum memiliki alat bukti lain yang untuk mendukung pembuktian di persidangan.Ruling No. 1531 K/Pid. Sus/2010 Supreme Court break free of narcotics crime defendants named Ket San. One of the main considerations of the Supreme Court is about the position of two policemen who arrested Ket San which is then also present as witness in the courts. Problems that need to be examined are; the relationship between the suspect with police catcher and the strength of police testimony in the case Crime Catcher drug abuse. The purpose of writing to find out the relationship between the suspect and catcher with the police how the strength of police testimony in the case Crime Catcher drug abuse. The research method used i.e. empirical juridical. The results of the research it is known that during the review process progresses, a person who is suspected or claimed to do something criminal acts are protected by law as set forth in article 50 to Article 68 Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP). Police Capture may testify all meet the qualifications of the witness as provided for article 1 numbers 26 and 27 Code of Criminal Procedure and cannot be taken into consideration when the witnesses are contrary to Article 185 paragraph (6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, formally capture police presence is used at the time of giving the information to its verbalisan. Recommended for law enforcement agencies to work are professionalism, respect the right of the person obligated to perform criminal acts in obtaining his rights. And witnesses who came from the police only Catcher in one criminal cases should be avoided unless the Prosecutor has evidence sufficient to support another proof in court.

Download Full-text

KAJIAN HUKUM KEWENANGAN PENYELIDIKAN ANTARA KEPOLISIAN, KPK DALAM PEMBERANTASAN PIDANA KORUPSI DARI KELEMBAGAAN NEGARA

SPEKTRUM HUKUM ◽

10.35973/sh.v17i1.1477 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 17 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sumiaty Adelina Hutabarat

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Supreme Court ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Law Enforcement Agencies ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

The Law ◽

The Republic ◽

The Right ◽

National Police ◽

The Relationship

There are two law enforcement agencies combating corruption, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Police, having the same authority, but in implementing authority there are differences, for example in the application of laws that govern the two institutions.The problem that becomes the study of this research is how the problem of the existence of the KPK as an institution to eradicate corruption has the authority regulated in RI Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, whose authority lies with the Police regulated in RI Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia which refers to the Criminal Code The results of the study showed that the resolution of the dispute between the Police and the Corruption Eradication Commission in the investigation of corruption was carried out by coordinating the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Police in Corruption Criminal Investigations. Law number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission regulates the relationship between the performance of the KPK and the Police regarding investigations, investigations and prosecutions.Settlement of authority disputes between the Police and the KPK should be the authority of the Supreme Court, due to judicial review under the Supreme Court Law. The right to test the law is the application of a balanced and balanced government. The Corruption Eradication Commission was formed by the Law 30/2002 whereas the Indonesian Police was formed by the 1945 Constitution, article 30 paragraph 4.Keywords : Authority, investigation, KPK

Download Full-text

Some psychological impacts on judging in criminal cases within the Supreme Court of Cassation of the Republic of Serbia

Nauka bezbednost policija ◽

10.5937/nabepo25-29274 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 25 (2) ◽

pp. 13-28

Author(s):

Dragutin Avramović

Keyword(s):

Public Opinion ◽

Supreme Court ◽

Criminal Cases ◽

Judicial Decisions ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Psychological Impacts ◽

The Republic ◽

The Relationship ◽

Media Pressure

Following hypothesis of Andrew Watson, American professor of Psychiatry and Law, the author analyses certain psychological impacts on behavior of judges and examines the relationship between their idiosyncrasies and their judicial decisions. The survey encompasses the judges of Criminal Department of the Supreme Court of Cassation of the Republic of Serbia and, also, for comparative reasons, the judges of Criminal Department of the First Basic Court in Belgrade. Considering the main issues there is no great discrepancy between answers given by the judges of the Supreme Court and those of the Basic Court. Most responses of the Serbian judges deviate from Watson's conclusions, namely: they do not admit that they feel frustrated due to heavy caseloads, the significant majority of judges are reluctant to acknowledge their prejudices and influence of biases on their ruling, the significant majority of judges are not burdened with the idea of possible misuse of their discretion, they nearly unanimously deny that public opinion and media pressure affect their rulings, etc. Generally, the judges in Serbia are not willing to admit that they cannot always overcome their own subjectivities.

Download Full-text

The use of digital communication technologies in the context of a pandemic as a way to improve the effectiveness of justice

Juridical Journal of Samara University ◽

10.18287/2542-047x-2021-7-1-95-101 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. 95-101

Author(s):

E. V. Smakhtin

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Russian Federation ◽

Information Technologies ◽

Criminal Procedure ◽

Criminal Proceedings ◽

Criminal Cases ◽

Judicial Practice ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Federal Constitutional ◽

The Russian Federation

The article deals with the peculiarities of the activity of courts in making judicial decisions in the context of a pandemic. First of all, we are talking about the wider use of digital and information technologies in criminal proceedings, which have previously been repeatedly recommended by forensic science for implementation in judicial practice. Some recommendations of criminalistics are currently accepted by the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in its Decision dated April 08, 2020 № 821 and Review on certain issues of judicial practice related to the application of legislation and measures to counteract the spread of a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in the territory of the Russian Federation № 2, which provided appropriate explanations for their use in practice. In particular, we are talking about the possibility of using video conferencing systems for certain categories of criminal cases and materials that are considered urgent, although this is not provided for in criminal procedure legislation. It is concluded that it is necessary to change the current criminal procedure legislation, bring it into line with the Constitution of the Russian Federation, federal constitutional laws, federal laws and subordinate regulatory legal acts, including orders of the Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

Download Full-text

9 Criminal Justice

The Irish Supreme Court ◽

10.1093/law/9780198793731.003.0009 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Dickson Brice

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Supreme Court ◽

Final Section ◽

Common Law ◽

Criminal Court ◽

Criminal Cases ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

The Right

This chapter selects five issues within the sphere of criminal justice to exemplify how the Irish Supreme Court has made its mark in the field. It looks first at the Court’s approach to the principle that prosecutions should be ended if they are unfair to the defendant and then moves to related issues surrounding use of the Special Criminal Court. It considers whether the Supreme Court has done enough to police the Special Criminal Court and whether reforms are necessary in that domain. In examining the Supreme Court’s views on the right to bail and on the admissibility of evidence which has been obtained unconstitutionally or otherwise illegally (with particular reference to the Damache and JC cases), comparisons are made with other common law jurisdictions. A final section looks at the Supreme Court’s position regarding the retrospectivity of declarations of incompatibility in criminal cases.

Download Full-text

ASPEK HUKUM PENINJAUAN KEMBALI LEBIH DARI SATU KALI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA (PERSPEKTIF PENEGAKAN KEADILAN, KEPASTIAN DAN KEMANFAATAN HUKUM)

JURNAL HUKUM DAN PERADILAN ◽

10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.335-350 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

pp. 335

Author(s):

Budi Suhariyanto

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Criminal Procedure ◽

Legal Aspects ◽

Criminal Case ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

State Agencies ◽

Criminal Cases ◽

Procedure Code ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Criminal Matters

Constitutional Court Decision No. 34 / PUU-XI / 2013 has opened the space PK is not just one time as provided for by the Article 268 paragraph (3) Criminal Procedure Code so that PK can be done many times during found and submission of PK Novum although it has done previously. Perspective is the basis of this decision is justice. Responding to the verdict of the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court publishes SEMA No. 7 Year 2014 on Reconsideration Request Submission In Criminal Case. Through the SEMA Supreme Court warned that provisions PK only once outside the Article 268 Criminal Procedure Code which was canceled by the Constitutional Court, therefore, PK criminal cases (in a similar case) is more than 1 (one) can not be accepted. Restrictions on the desired PK criminal case the Supreme Court is to provide legal certainty in the process of final settlement of criminal matters. Government through Minister of Law and Human Rights take strategic steps in resolving the legal expediency vision polemic filing legal remedies PK criminal cases, by coordinating state agencies and relevant ministries so as to produce an agreement that filing PK many times can not be executed until the issuance of PP. Therefore still valid set forth in the Judicial Authority Law and the Law on the Supreme Court.Keywords : Legal Aspects, Reconsideration, Criminal Case

Download Full-text

Features of informatization of the criminal process in the context of the pandemic: New challenges

Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University Law ◽

10.21638/spbu14.2021.304 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 (3) ◽

pp. 544-554

Author(s):

Evgenii V. Smakhtin ◽

◽

Irina G. Smirnova ◽

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Supreme Court ◽

Russian Federation ◽

Information Technologies ◽

Criminal Procedure ◽

Digital Data ◽

Law Enforcement Agencies ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Coronavirus Infection ◽

The Russian Federation

The article analyses the features of the application of the current criminal procedural legislation in practice in the context of the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) after recognizing it as a disease that poses a danger to others, the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of April 08, 2020 and Reviews on certain issues of judicial practice related to the application of legislation and measures to counter the spread of the new coronavirus infection in the Russian Federation of April 21, 2020 and April 30, 2020. However, the difficulties that have arisen in law enforcement practice, also assessed in the article, indicate that criminal procedural legislation will be adjusted in the near future since the number of Decisions of the Presidium and the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation are not sufficient to eliminate ambiguities and contradictions in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. In particular, the article reflects such key problems as the emerging system of procedural decisions at the pre-trial and trial stages in a pandemic, the possibility of considering not only criminal cases but also case materials using videoconferencing systems as well as the prevailing and optimal understanding by law enforcement agencies of the category “urgency” of such consideration. The authors pay special attention to the absence in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation of the concepts introduced by paragraph “m” Art. 7 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation such as “information technologies” and “digital data turnover”. The results of the study make it possible to formulate proposals for improving criminal procedural regulation in terms of the described problems.

Download Full-text

To the question of the peculiarities of the protection of the rights of spouses in cases of establishing the regime of separate residence of spouses

Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law ◽

10.24144/2307-3322.2021.64.29 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 154-158

Author(s):

O.А. Oksanyuk

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Physical Violence ◽

Scientific Article ◽

Criminal Cases ◽

Common Life ◽

Joint Management ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

The Family ◽

Legal Position ◽

The Right

In the scientific article the author conducted a scientific study of the peculiarities of protection of property and personal non-property rights of spouses in cases of establishing a regime of separate residence. Based on the above research, the author notes that the importance of the legal position in cases of establishing a regime of separate residence of spouses is the decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine №11 of December 21, 2007 “On the practice of law enforcement, divorce, annulment and division of joint property of the spouses “, namely paragraph 12 of this resolution. Unfortunately, this document is the only legal position of the Supreme Court on the establishment of the legal regime of separate residence of spouses, so to determine the approaches of courts of general jurisdiction in considering this category of cases, you should refer to the analysis of individual court deci-sions. The analysis of the conducted case law allows to indicate that the main reasons that indicate the impossibility and / or unwillingness of the spouses to live together may indicate: lack of common life goals and family interests, which makes it impossible to live together and marital relations, long separate residence, lack of joint household , the presence of different views on life, lack of mutual understanding in the family, lack of joint management, lack of desire to continue living together, family disputes and conflicts that led to tense relationships, lack of intention to resume cohabitation, alcohol abuse, lack interest in raising one’s own child, quarrels and physical violence against the other spouse. The decision of the High Specialized Court of the Court of Ukraine on Civil and Criminal Cases in Case №6-27361, according to which the existence of property disputes concerning joint joint ownership of spouses does not deprive the right to establish a separate residence regime, also has a certain legal position.

Download Full-text

Optimalisasi Peran Hakim Agung dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali

Jurnal Konstitusi ◽

10.31078/jk1229 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 373

Author(s):

Dudu Duswara Machmudin

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Supreme Court ◽

Low Cost ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Criminal Cases ◽

Law Enforcement Agencies ◽

Judicial Process ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Before And After ◽

The One

This article aims to provide knowledge and understanding on the functions of the state law enforcement agencies in Indonesia. Differences of powers and functions of law enforcement agencies such as the Supreme Court, Attorney General’s Office and the Constitutional Court needs to be understood in depth. Furthermore, given the problems in all courts all over the world which is, among others, the slow settlement of cases, this article describes and analyses the role of Supreme Court Justices in resolving cassation and review cases before and after the issuance of the decree of the Chief Justice Number 119/KMA/SK/VII/2013 regarding the determination of the Day of Deliberation and Pronouncement and Number 214/KMA/SK/XII/2104 concerning Time Period for the Handling of Cases at the Supreme Court. However, when Constitutional Court pronounced Ruling Number 34/PUU-XI/2013 a problem arises in which the products of the two state judicial bodies seem to be inconsistent, especially in the framework for the resolution of criminal cases. On the one hand, the Supreme Court wants the creation of a judicial process that is simple, speedy, and low cost through the strengthening of the two products above, but on the other hand the Constitutional Court through its award extend the time span of litigation process for the settlement of review cases which can be done repeatedly. Thus, in order to provide legal certainty, the Supreme Court issued Supreme Court Circular Number 7 Year 2014 which essentially affirms that the petition for review in criminal cases is limited only one time based on other legal basis namely Judicial Authority Act and Supreme Court Act.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Subrogation With Cession and Regression

Law and World ◽

10.36475/7.4.1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (4) ◽

pp. 6-29

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Practical Significance ◽

Insurance Law ◽

Distinctive Features ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

The Difference ◽

The Right ◽

The Given ◽

The Relationship ◽

Legal Consequences

The purpose of this article is to present one of the most problematic issues in the Civil Code of Georgia, which is manifested in the confusion of the institution of subrogation in insurance law with such institutions as cession and the condition of regression. They are close in content to each other, and this fact makes it difficult to see differences between them. Seeing the difference in content between them has not only theoretical but also practical significance, as each institution is characterized by a different legal outcome, and in each specific case the proper qualification of the relationship is crucial. One of the most practical different legal consequences of the given institutions is revealed in the different terms of the statute of limitations. For example, until 2012, it was unknown to the Georgian court that the statute of limitation of a subrogation starts from the period when the insurer has the right to claim damages against the insurance underwriter. Before then, it was an unknown fact that, different from regression, only legal relationship is established with one obligation in subrogation. In this article, we have discussed the distinctive features of subrogation, cession, and the condition of regression, and the accompanying legal consequences. We have discussed the decisions of the Supreme Court of Georgia, which discuss the differences in the content and results of the above-mentioned institutions. As a result, it was revealed that the practice of the Civil Court of Georgia before 2012 was unknown about the institution of subrogation, which is a really significant problem. It can be said that a uniform practice of the Supreme Court has been established at the Subrogation Institute and the problems that existed before have been solved.

Download Full-text

Rights or Benefits? The Indian Supreme Court and Criminal Procedure

Journal of National Law University Delhi ◽

10.1177/2277401719870003 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 12-20

Author(s):

Abhinav Sekhri

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Due Process ◽

Criminal Procedure ◽

Criminal Process ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Scant Attention ◽

Indian Law ◽

Indian Supreme Court ◽

The Right ◽

Procedural Rights

This article suggests that the recent decisions by the Indian Supreme Court in Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab, and Varinder Kumar v. State of H.P., are perhaps indicative of a more pervasive trend that stretches back to the dawn of the due process era in Indian law. This trend is one where the Supreme Court is confronted with systemic issues in the criminal process while dealing with petitions brought by singularly oppressed litigants, and it treats the litigation itself as a means to solve the perceived problem. The tool to solve these problem in the criminal process is the creation of new criminal procedure rights through the vehicle of Article 21. In its reformist zeal, scant attention is paid to the several important questions of scope and consequential remedy that are inherent to any notion of rights. Over time though, the Court seems to realise that hard cases make bad law. And when cases involving seemingly undeserving litigants start invoking those procedural rights, the Court signals a retreat and transforms the ‘right’ into a ‘benefit’, that it can dole out in only the most deserving cases. This is not a definitive study, but only offers a different perspective to examine the Supreme Court’s contribution to the field of criminal procedure.

Download Full-text