scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Produk Indikasi Geografis dari Tindakan Peniruan

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Ngurah Tresna Adnyana
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Geographical Indication ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Empirical Law

Legal protection of Geographical Indications is necessary to determine whether there are communal or collective people. The communal community character means to belong to the community in the registered Geographical Indication area. This study aims to analyze legal certainty as well as the legal protection of product geographical indications of imitation actions. This research uses empirical law research method. In this case, the authors find that the TRIPs Agreement (Trade-related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) and the act no 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications are terms used to register. Perlindungan hukum terhadap Indikasi Geografis sangat perlu di perhatikan karena karakter kepemilikannya yang kolektif atau komunal. Karakter kepemilikan yang komunal memiliki arti menjadi milik bersama semua masyarakat dalam wilayah Indikasi Geografis yang telah didaftarkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum serta perlindungan hukum produk indikasi geografis dari tindakan peniruan. Dalam penelitian ini metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menemukan bahwa TRIPs Agreement (Trade Related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) dan Undang-Undang 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis mengatur secara khusus perlindungan bagi produk indikasi geografis yang telah didaftarkan.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS ATAS MEREK KOPI TORAJA DAN KOPI GAYO YANG DIDAFTARKAN OLEH NEGARA LAIN

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-49
Author(s):  
Ayu Kumala Sari Hamidi ◽  
Iyah Faniyah
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Director General ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Geographical Indication ◽  
Library Studies

The existence of IPR, especially Geographical Indications and Brands, is the basis of policy making in the world of Trade. Indonesia is a country that is rich in potential Geographical Indication products and then Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Geographical Indications and brands for National Regulations and in TRIPS as International Arrangements. but there are still violations of cases regarding Geographical Indications and Trademarks and occur in Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee. The formulation of the problem in this research is how is the trademark legal law for Geographical Indications in the case of Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee registered by other countries? How is the legal settlement of the Violation of Brand Geographical Indications carried out by other Countries against Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee?The specification of this study is Descriptive Analysis. The approach is a normative juridical approach using secondary data obtained through library studies. The data is then analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. Based on the results of research and analysis, answers can be obtained: 1) Legal protection against Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee registered by other countries, namely by registering the trademark to the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights and after obtaining a Geographical Indication certificate from the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights, the geographical indication of a product's brand it gets strong protection. 2) Legal settlement of brand violations and geographical indications of the brand of Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee are litigation methods carried out through the Commercial Court institution, for Toraja Coffee to be carried out at the Ujung Pandang Commercial Court and Gayo Coffee at the Medan Commercial Court.

scholarly journals PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION IN AFRICA: TOWARDS COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRIPS AGREEMENT

2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Cullet
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Member States ◽  
Plant Variety Protection ◽  
Plant Variety ◽  
Variety Protection

Plant variety protection has come to the fore in the wake of the adoption of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement). TRIPS generally imposes the patentability of inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology and specifically mandates the introduction of a form of legal protection on plant varieties. Article 27.3(b) thus states that member states “shall provide for the protection of plant varieties either by patents or by an effective sui generis system or by any combination thereof.”

scholarly journals ANALISIS KEKUATAN UNSUR ITIKAD BAIK PADA PELAKSANAAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK DI INDONESIA (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 364K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2014) BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 937
Author(s):  
Wilson Wijaya ◽  
Christine S.T. Kansil
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
District Court ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Geographical Indication ◽  
Brand Name ◽  
Bad Faith

Brand is one part of intellectual property rights. Brand is an identifying mark that distinguishes one's property with another's property. However, there are many parties who have bad faith and want to be a part of other people brand’s fame. So they use the same brand name in order to make the goods produced is well-known. Brand is regulated in law number 20 2016 about brand and Geographical Indication. Therefore we need to register our brand to avoid the parties who have bad faith. The authors want to discuss the issue of the strength of good faith element in the registration of trademarks in the implementation of registration in Indonesia and also the protection for brand holders whose registration are rejected in Indonesia. Author will use normative method and refer to scientific books. The strength of good faith element in registering can be seen in Article 4 of the Trademark and Geographical Indications. For protection, brand holder can register it in advance, if it has been approve, the brand holder can submit claim cancelation that regulated in Article 77 to the Central Jakarta District Court to be reviewed and decided who the trademark is and be prove who has the element of bad faith. It is suggested that the original trademark owner's to register their trademark at brand office Indonesia. For foreign trademark owner, they can also improve their trademark to be a well-known brand.

scholarly journals POLITIK HUKUM PELINDUNGAN HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL DI INDONESIA PASCA DI RATIFIKASINYA TRIPS AGREEMENT

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imam Wicaksono
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Intellectual Property Right ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
East Indies ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights Protection ◽  
Dutch East Indies

<p><em>Intellectual property rights actually not a new thing in Indonesia, since the Dutch East Indies Government, Indonesia has a law on Intellectual Property Rights. The regulation of Intellectual Property Right  enactment of the laws of the Dutch East Indies government , imposed in Indonesia as a Dutch colony based on the concordance principle. At that time regulation of Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia had just received three sector; Copyright, Trademarks, and Patents. Expansion of the regulation of Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia has only been carried out after the ratification of the TRIPS Agreement. In this study the author will analyze the legal politics of protecting intellectual property rights before the ratification of the TRIPS Agreement. And what is the legal policy of the protection of intellectual property rights after the ratification of the TRIPS Agreement. This legal research is normative legal research. The results showed that with the emergence of a new law replacing the old colonial-made law, the understanding and scope of intellectual property rights protection in Indonesia became wider. The amendment to the Intellectual Property Rights Act in Indonesia cannot be separated from the ratification of the TRIPS Agreement and Indonesia's involvement in world trade.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong><em><em>Legal Politics, Legal Protection, Intellectual Property Rights, TRIPS Agreement</em></em></p>

scholarly journals Enforcement of intellectual property rights within the scope of the TRIPS agreement (trademarks and geographical indications)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (5/S) ◽  
pp. 532-540
Author(s):  
Temurbek Mukhammedov ◽  
Iroda Yakubova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Geographical Indications

The article analyses the certain provisions of the TRIPS agreement related to the enforcement of intellectual property rights, in particular trademarks and geographical indications by giving legal commentaries as well as by comparing with the existent civil and civil-procedural laws of Uzbekistan.

scholarly journals Intellectual Property Rights Protection of Mandar Coconut Oil through Geographical Indications

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlika Sari ◽  
Hasbir Paserangi ◽  
Marwah ◽  
Achmad Zulfikar ◽  
Irmawati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Coconut Oil ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights Protection ◽  
Property Rights Protection ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Government

Intellectual property rights support the economic development of a country.Indonesia, with its extraordinary natural resources, has not been able to optimize protection of intellectual property rights. Only 65 kinds of geographical indications were recorded registered on the Directorate General of Intellectual Property by hundreds or even thousands of products with Indonesian characteristics. This article uses a type of socio legal research with data sourced from literature review. This article concludes that Mandar coconut oil is one of the Indonesia resources as the biggest producer coconut oil in the world. This oil has some advantages so it is worth to get the legal geographical indications. The steps which can take of community and the government refers to Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademark and Geographical Indications. The writers recommend that the government of West Sulawesi Province, PolewaliMandar Regency and Majene Regency Government providesupporttowardsMandar coconut oil, so it can get legal protection through geographical indications.

A closer look at the elephant in the room: the distinctiveness of geographical indications

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-46
Author(s):  
Song Xinzhe
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Not Given ◽  
Traditional Concept ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Protection Mechanisms

The term ‘distinctiveness’ is used in trademark law to refer to the capacity of a trademark to distinguish the goods of one undertaking from those of other undertakings. The importance of this concept can be seen in Article 15 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), which provides that any sign having distinctiveness shall be capable of constituting a trademark. Gradually, ‘distinctiveness’ has come to be used to describe the distinguishing capacity of other distinctive signs, including geographical indications (GIs). This article explores the distinctiveness of GIs. It begins with a discussion of the meaning of GI distinctiveness in the different GI protection contexts to reveal its particularity compared to the traditional concept of trademark distinctiveness. The second part of the discussion shows, however, that the concept of GI distinctiveness is not given sufficient importance in the protection of GIs, and is confused with the distinctiveness of collective or certification marks. This article therefore calls for an approach that recognizes the importance and the particularity of the distinctiveness of GIs in the design of GI protection mechanisms.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN PELANGGARAN HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-120
Author(s):  
Alfredo Juniotama Arifin ◽  
Ruth Elizabeth Marlamb Putri ◽  
Tiara Patricia
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Indonesian Government ◽  
Government Supervision ◽  
The Government

Abstract In running a business, every producer who has a work must be appreciated for his work. The form of appreciation can be done by registering his work to get intellectual property rights so that it can be protected by law. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are exclusive rights granted by a law or regulation to a person or group of people for their copyrighted works. In Indonesia IPR has not been implemented properly due to lack of socialization from the government and lack of concern from the community. This encourages the Indonesian government to be more concerned about copyright infringement. Along with the implementation process, it is undeniable that there are still many individuals who do not comply and use a work for commercial purposes. The research method used is the juridical-normative research method. For example, on January 13, 2020, Ruben Samuel Onsu sued I Am Geprek Bensu belonging to PT. Benny Sujono or abbreviated as I Am Geprek Bensu with a trademark abuse lawsuit. There is a need for government supervision of the use of other people's copyrighted works, good coordination between the government and the community so as to minimize the opportunity to commit fraud against a work. Based on the results of the study of cases that occurred, that victims of IPR violations are protected by law based on a first to file system.  Keywords : Intellectual Property Rights, Legal Protection, Intellectual Property Rights Violation Victims

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Karya Cipta Fotografi

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
I Kadek Candra Wisesa ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Digital Cameras ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Republic

The richness in the diversity of arts and cultures can be found in the Republic of Indonesia. Intellectual property rights obtain protection as stipulated in legislation, including Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The advancement in technology and the increasingly developing world of digital photography by means of digital cameras raises the legal issues of copyright in photographic works. The main issues examined in this paper are: the forms of legal protection of the rights of the creators of photographic works and the resolution of disputes of photographic works that are used without permission. The method used to examine this issue is the normative legal research method with a legislative approach. Copyright Protection of photographic works may be done in two ways, namely preventive in which legal protection given to the creator of photography which the creator shall done by registering the copyright, and repressive protection realised by filing a lawsuit in court if there is a violation of copyright in the photographic work. All rights reserved must always be appreciated by not committing violating actions which are arbitrarily committed especially if it relates to providing benefits for violators.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KARYA SENI BATIK YANG BELUM TERDAFTAR MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inggrit Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Work Of Art

Batik artwork is one of the treasures of the nation's cultural heritage. Batik artwork is currently experiencing rapid growth. The amount of interest and market demand for this art resulted batik artwork became one of the commodities in the country and abroad. Thus, if the batik artwork is not protected then the future can be assured of a new conflict arises in the realm of intellectual property law. Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright has accommodated artwork batik as one of the creations that are protected by law. So that this work of art than as a cultural heritage also have economic value for its creator. Then how the legal protection of the batik artwork yaang not registered? Does this also can be protected? While in the registration of intellectual property rights is a necessity so that it has the force of law to the work produced

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document