scholarly journals Identifying competencies for future graphic design graduates in Malaysia: A Delphi study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-23
Author(s):  
Shaw-Chiang Wong ◽  
◽  
Muhammad Zaffwan Idris ◽  
Wee-Chuen Tan ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graphic Design ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Work Performance ◽  
Effective Work ◽  
Entry Level ◽  
Ethical Competence ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Modified Delphi Technique ◽  
Technical Production

Traditionally, graphic design (GD) education focuses on the training of technical production skills to prepare graduates for entry-level employment. However, due to the new challenges and the expanding opportunities of emerging practices, GD graduates are expected to master a wide range of additional competencies beyond traditional scope. The study aims to identify the competencies required by future GD graduates in the context of Malaysia. A two-round modified Delphi technique was used to gain consensus from a panel of experts consisted of design educators and industry practitioners regarding the competencies needed by the graduates for effective work performance. A total of 108 competencies were generated. All accepted competencies were ranked ‘very important’ and ‘extremely important’ by at least 75 percent of the respondents in Round Two. These competencies could be classified into 29 subdomains under five components, i.e., cognitive competence, functional competence, personal competence, ethical competence, and meta-competencies. The findings of this study are useful for enhancing the education and employability of graphic designers as they provide a common vocabulary to relevant stakeholders about the standards of performance for new entrants to the GD profession.

scholarly journals Determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified Delphi method

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charle Andre Viljoen ◽  
Rob Scott Millar ◽  
Kathryn Manning ◽  
Vanessa Celeste Burch
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Delphi Technique ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Curriculum Specialists

Abstract BackgroundAlthough electrocardiography is considered a core learning outcome for medical students, there is currently little curricular guidance for undergraduate ECG training. Owing to the absence of expert consensus on undergraduate ECG teaching, curricular content is subject to individual opinion. The aim of this modified Delphi study was to establish expert consensus amongst content and context experts on an ECG curriculum for medical students.MethodsThe Delphi technique, an established method of obtaining consensus, was used to develop an undergraduate ECG curriculum. Specialists involved in ECG teaching were invited to complete three rounds of online surveys. An undergraduate ECG curriculum was formulated from the topics of ECG instruction for which consensus (i.e. ≥75% agreement) was achieved. ResultsThe panellists (n=131) had a wide range of expertise (42.8% Internal Medicine, 22.9% Cardiology, 16% Family Medicine, 13.7% Emergency Medicine and 4.6% Health Professions Education). Topics that reached consensus to be included in the undergraduate ECG curriculum were classified under technical aspects of performing ECGs, basic ECG analysis, recognition of the normal ECG and abnormal rhythms and waveforms and using electrocardiography as part of a clinical diagnosis. This study emphasises that ECG teaching should be framed within the clinical context. Course conveners should not overload students with complex and voluminous content, but rather focus on commonly encountered and life-threatening conditions, where accurate diagnosis impacts on patient outcome. A list of 23 “must know” ECG diagnoses is therefore proposed.ConclusionA multidisciplinary expert panel reached consensus on the ECG training priorities for medical students.

Determining Highly Desirable Traits of an Effective Emotional Freedom Techniques Practitioner: A Delphi Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-25
Author(s):  
Peta Stapleton ◽  
Hannah Chatwin
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Delphi Technique ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Modified Delphi Technique ◽  
Emotional Freedom Techniques ◽  
Many Core

Due to the distinct lack of definition surrounding the desirable attributes of an effective Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) practitioner, this study utilized a modified Delphi technique to explore this. This method is designed to achieve a consensus amongst skilled panelists when an accepted body of literature is lacking. A three-round modified Delphi approach was used and participants were skilled in delivering EFT as a practitioner (N = 22). The first round was an open-ended series of questions derived from the literature, and responses to these initial questions were analyzed using content analysis (nVivo), with common themes identified and grouped together. These themes were then utilized to develop more specific quantitative questions (Likert format) to be used in the subsequent rounds. Consensus was set at 75% agreement on an item and was reached for 11 out of the 15 traits of an effective EFT practitioner identified in round 1. Consensus was also reached for seven out of the eight traits of an ineffective EFT practitioner, but was not reached for many core elements in training. These included adequate training, knowledge of other energy techniques, and the use of structured interviews, among other issues. Consensus was also not reached for the use of screening processes prior to training. These results are discussed in terms of standardization in EFT

scholarly journals Population Health, Prevention, Health Promotion, and Wellness Competencies in Physical Therapist Professional Education: Results of a Modified Delphi Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (9) ◽  
pp. 1645-1658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn M Magnusson ◽  
Zachary D Rethorn ◽  
Elissa H Bradford ◽  
Jessica Maxwell ◽  
Mary Sue Ingman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Promotion ◽  
Population Health ◽  
Professional Education ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Health Prevention ◽  
Entry Level ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Physical Therapist Education

Abstract Objective Physical therapists are well positioned to meet societal needs and reduce the global burden of noncommunicable diseases through the integration of evidence-based population health, prevention, health promotion, and wellness (PHPW) activities into practice. Little guidance exists regarding the specific PHPW competencies that entry-level clinicians ought to possess. The objective of this study was to establish consensus-based entry-level PHPW competencies for graduates of US-based physical therapist education programs. Methods In a 3-round modified Delphi study, a panel of experts (N = 37) informed the development of PHPW competencies for physical therapist professional education. The experts, including physical therapists representing diverse practice settings and geographical regions, assessed the relevance and clarity of 34 original competencies. Two criteria were used to establish consensus: a median score of 4 (very relevant) on a 5-point Likert scale, and 80% of participants perceiving the competency as very or extremely relevant. Results Twenty-five competencies achieved final consensus in 3 broad domains: preventive services and health promotion (n = 18), foundations of population health (n = 4), and health systems and policy (n = 3). Conclusions Adoption of the 25 accepted competencies would promote consistency across physical therapist education programs and help guide physical therapist educators as they seek to integrate PHPW content into professional curricula. Impact This is the first study to establish consensus-based competencies in the areas of PHPW for physical therapist professional education in the United States. These competencies ought to guide educators who are considering including or expanding PHPW content in their curricula. Development of such competencies is critical as we seek to contribute to the amelioration of chronic disease and transform society to improve the human experience.

scholarly journals Determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified Delphi method

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charle Andre Viljoen ◽  
Rob Scott Millar ◽  
Kathryn Manning ◽  
Vanessa Celeste Burch
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Delphi Technique ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Established Method ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Curriculum Specialists

Abstract Background Although electrocardiography is considered a core learning outcome for medical students, there is currently little curricular guidance for undergraduate ECG training. Owing to the absence of expert consensus on undergraduate ECG teaching, curricular content is subject to individual opinion. The aim of this modified Delphi study was to establish consensus amongst content and context experts on an ECG curriculum for medical students. Methods The Delphi technique, an established method of obtaining consensus, was used to develop an undergraduate ECG curriculum. Specialists involved in ECG teaching were invited to complete three rounds of online surveys. An undergraduate ECG curriculum was formulated from the topics of ECG instruction for which consensus (i.e. ≥75% agreement) was achieved amongst the expert panel. Results The panellists (n = 131) had a wide range of expertise (42.8% Internal Medicine, 22.9% Cardiology, 16% Family Medicine, 13.7% Emergency Medicine and 4.6% Health Professions Education). Topics that reached consensus to be included in the undergraduate ECG curriculum were classified under technical aspects of performing ECGs, basic ECG analysis, recognition of the normal ECG and abnormal rhythms and waveforms and using electrocardiography as part of a clinical diagnosis. This study emphasises that ECG teaching should be framed within the clinical context. Course conveners should not overload students with complex and voluminous content, but rather focus on commonly encountered and life-threatening conditions, where accurate diagnosis impacts on patient outcome. A list of 23 “must know” ECG diagnoses is therefore proposed. Conclusion A multidisciplinary expert panel reached consensus on the ECG training priorities for medical students.

scholarly journals Developing a hospital accreditation model: a Delphi study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad ◽  
Fatemeh Ghazanfari
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Study ◽  
Process Management ◽  
Accreditation Body ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Senior Managers ◽  
Hospital Accreditation ◽  
University Professors ◽  
Military Hospitals ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Modified Delphi Technique

Abstract Background Hospital accreditation (HA) is an external evaluation of a hospital’s structures, processes and results by an independent professional accreditation body using pre-established optimum standards. The Iranian hospital accreditation system faces several challenges. The overall aim of this study was to develop a model for Iran national hospital accreditation program. Methods This research uses the modified Delphi technique to develop and verify a model of hospital accreditation. The first draft of the HA model was introduced through a critical review of 20 pioneer accreditation models and semi-structured interviews with 151 key informants from Public, private, semi-public, charity and military hospitals in Iran. Three rounds of Delphi were conducted with 28 experts of hospital accreditation to verify the proposed model. Panel members were selected from authors of research articles and key speakers in the area of hospital accreditation, senior managers of the country’s health system, university professors in the fields of health policy and management across the country. Results A comprehensive model for hospital accreditation was introduced and verified in this study. The HA model has ten constructs of which seven are enablers (“Management and leadership”, “Planning”, “Education and Research”, “employee management”, “patient management”, “resource management”, and “process management”) and three are the results (“employee results”, “patient and society results” and “hospital results”). These constructs were further broken into 43 sub-constructs. The enablers and results scored 65 and 35% of the model’s total scores respectively. Then, about 150 accreditation standards were written and verified. Conclusions A comprehensive hospital accreditation model was developed and verified. Proper attention to structures, processes and outcomes and systemic thinking during the development of the model is one of the advantages of the hospital accreditation model developed in this study. Hospital accreditation bodies can use this model to develop or revise their hospital accreditation models.

Curriculum Viability Indicators: A Delphi Study to Determine Standards and Inhibitors of a Curriculum

2020 ◽  
pp. 016327872093416
Author(s):  
Rehan Ahmed Khan ◽  
Annemarie Spruijt ◽  
Usman Mahboob ◽  
Mohamed Al Eraky ◽  
Jeroen J. G. van Merrienboer
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Study ◽  
Curriculum Evaluation ◽  
Working Environment ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Leadership Assessment ◽  
Faculty Leadership ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Modified Delphi Technique ◽  
Two Phases ◽  
Communication And Technology

Curriculum evaluation is typically done by using quality standards defined by accrediting bodies. This does not include inhibitors that hinder the achievement of standards. Hence, to address both standards and inhibitors, we have coined the new concept of “curriculum viability.” This study establishes consensus among experts on curriculum viability indicators, i.e. standards and inhibitors, and aims to provide a framework for evaluating the curriculum viability. The study was done in two phases. In the first phase, a consensus was established on the curriculum viability indicators using the Modified Delphi Technique using two rounds. In the first round of the Delphi process, 25 experts participated, which were reduced to 19 in the second round. After two rounds, experts developed a consensus on 40 out of 44 items. These included 27 standards and 13 inhibitors. In the second phase, 18 experts rank-ordered the indicators according to their relative importance in the areas of educational content and strategies, faculty, leadership, assessment, students, educational/working environment, communication, and technology. The list of indicators provides a framework for evaluating the curriculum viability, and their ordering enables curriculum managers to prioritize them during curriculum evaluation.

Classification of Patients for whom benefit no longer outweighs harm of long-term opioid therapy: Protocol for a Delphi study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Van Cleve ◽  
Sara Edmond ◽  
Jennifer Snow ◽  
Anne Black ◽  
Jamie Pommeranz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Opioid Dependency ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Modified Delphi Technique

UNSTRUCTURED Introduction: Patients with chronic pain who have been prescribed long term opioid therapies often come to a point where the benefits of their therapy are out weighted by the risks associated with taking such a high dose of opioid medication. These patients need to taper off their opioid therapy while simultaneously treating their chronic pain. At the 2019 Veterans' Health Administration State of the Art Conference, there was an acknowledgment of a lack of clinical guidance with regards to treating this subset of patients. Some of the participants believed clinicians and patients would both benefit from a new diagnostic entity describing this situation where patients needed to have their opioid dependency and chronic pain simultaneously treated. Given the ability of a Delphi method to synthesize input from a broad range of experts, we felt this technique could be used to determine if a new diagnostic entity was needed and what the criteria of the diagnostic entity would be. Methods: This would be a modified Delphi technique involving three rounds. The first round would be a series of open ended questions asking about the necessity of this diagnostic entity, how this condition is different from OUD, and what it's possible diagnostic criteria would be. After synthesizing the responses collected, a second round would be conducted to ask participants to rate the different responses offered by their peers. These ratings would be collected, analyzed, and would generate a final potential definition for this clinical phenomena. In the third round we would circulate this definition and would hopefully gain consensus. Dissemination: This protocol has been approved by the Internal Review Board at the Connecticut VA and the study is in process. We hope that other researchers can use this protocol to conduct similar studies and further explore how patients with concurrent chronic pain and opioid dependency can be best served.

scholarly journals Current research priorities for UK occupational physicians and occupational health researchers: a modified Delphi study

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 830-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drushca Lalloo ◽  
Evangelia Demou ◽  
Julia Smedley ◽  
Ira Madan ◽  
Kaveh Asanati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Occupational Health ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Research Strategy ◽  
Occupational Physicians ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Modified Delphi Technique ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Effectiveness Studies

ObjectivesStudies identifying national occupational health (OH) research priorities have been conducted in several countries to establish where OH research should be focused and where funding should be targeted. However, the UK findings are now over 20 years old, and OH practice is continuously evolving. The aim of this study was to identify current research priorities for UK occupational physicians (OPs) and occupational health researchers (OHRs).MethodsCurrent research priorities in OH were identified using a modified Delphi technique. This was conducted in two rounds to achieve consensus. Research priorities were rated, and then ranked using questionnaires developed from expert panel discussions, key research topics identified from the medical literature and participant feedback. Overall and intergroup comparisons were completed for the ranking scores.ResultsConsensus among OPs and OHRs was high with almost all (9/10) primary domains rated as ‘very important’ or ‘absolutely necessary’ by more than 54% of respondents. The research priority areas ranked highest were jointly economic evaluation/cost effectiveness studies and disability management followed by occupational disease/injury/illness. Occupational health policy was ranked lowest after sickness absence management and health promotion. The secondary domain analysis identified priority emphasis on mental health and psychosocial hazards within the workplace and the need to further develop evidence-based guidance for clinical OH practice.ConclusionsWe identified the current research priorities for UK OPs and OHRs. The findings will inform future national OH research strategy and support research that addresses important knowledge gaps within OH and other interdisciplinary specialties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document