Researching the public procurement system: An analysis of unscrupulous suppliers

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.G. Kogdenko
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Dominant Group ◽  
The Public ◽  
Data Registry ◽  
Scientific Principles ◽  
Industry Affiliation ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Procurement System

Subject. The article addresses issues of prequalification in the public procurement system. Objectives. The study analyzes the registry of unscrupulous suppliers and substantiates proposals for assessing the reputation of suppliers in the public procurement system for the purpose of prequalification. Methods. The study employs general scientific principles and research methods, like abstraction, generalization of approaches of domestic and foreign authors on issues of prequalification and reputation assessment. Results. The paper presents a methodology for analyzing a set of suppliers, which includes two stages. At the first stage, it examines a set of suppliers by industry affiliation, form of ownership, legal status, affiliation of participants, and degree of competition. At the second stage, it assesses the reputation of suppliers in the public procurement system by four components: corporate, financial, market, and social. The methodology was tested on unscrupulous suppliers data registry, which was formed on the basis of SPARK-Interfax information resource. Calculations show that the sampled population of unscrupulous suppliers includes three groups according to industry affiliation, i.e. trade, construction, and all other industries. In the legal status category, limited liability companies prevail. In the form of ownership category, the dominant group of unscrupulous suppliers is private business. The population is characterized by a low degree of concentration. Conclusions. Unscrupulous suppliers have negative reputation characteristics by which it is possible to identify them at the prequalification stage and debar from bidding.

Researching the public procurement system: An analysis of winning organizations

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 860-884
Author(s):  
V.G. Kogdenko ◽  
A.A. Sanzharov
Keyword(s):  
Public Procurement ◽  
The Public ◽  
Debt Capital ◽  
Scientific Principles ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Marketing Information ◽  
High Level ◽  
Return On Sales ◽  
Procurement System ◽  
Social Components

Subject. The article deals with the analysis of suppliers in the public procurement system based on reasonable prequalification parameters. Objectives. The aim is to test the hypothesis about strong reputation characteristics of the winners in the public procurement system and develop a methodology for assessing the reputation of suppliers for prequalification purposes. Methods. We employ general scientific principles and methods of research, like abstraction, generalization of approaches used by domestic and foreign authors for prequalification and assessment of reputation of public procurement participants. Results. To test the hypothesis, we calculated four groups of indicators on corporate, financial, market, and social components of reputation. The methodology was tested on the data obtained from SPARK-Interfax and SPARK-Marketing information resources. Conclusions. The study revealed that not all reputational characteristics of public procurement winners can be regarded as high level. In terms of the corporate component, it is the low level of share capital, indicating the mistrust on the part of owners and their reluctance to invest in the business, and the low percentage of non-current assets. In terms of the market component, it is a low sales growth rate, as well as low return on sales. As to the financial component, it is a low capitalization of winners, low share of long-term debt capital and low credit limit. With respect to the social component, it is a below-average tax burden.

scholarly journals Accounting and Analytical Support of Public Procurement in the Electronics Industry in the Digitalization

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-61
Author(s):  
V. G. Kogdenko
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Its Region ◽  
Electronics Industry ◽  
Legal Form ◽  
The Public ◽  
Third Stage ◽  
Scientific Principles ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Procurement System

The article deals with the problems of accounting and analytical support of public procurement in the electronics industry; one of the objectives of the study is to substantiate the criteria for assessing suppliers' reputation; evaluations of persons filing procurement complaints; procurement monitoring indicators. In the process of research, the author used such general scientific principles and methods as abstraction, generalization, as well as statistical methods of data processing. As a result, there has been developed a methodology for assessing the suppliers' reputation including three stages. At the first one — participating companies are assessed according to the criteria of size, industry, ownership, organizational and legal form, data transparency for subsequent calculations. At the second stage — the economic viability of the subjects is assessed in terms of the availability of financial, material and human resources, as well as the effectiveness of companies and the dynamics of their growth. At the third stage — the conscientiousness of the participants is assessed according to the criteria of the authorized capital, credit limit, tax burden, the Spark-Risk lists inclusion. The technique has been tested on data from the register of unscrupulous suppliers supplying products for the electronics industry; the data for analysis has been generated on the basis of 1360 companies. Calculations have shown that the overwhelming majority of unscrupulous suppliers are micro-enterprises that do not belong to the production related industries, repair, and in electronics trade; the significant part of them are registered in Moscow and its region. There is found out some companies which are unscrupulous suppliers of electronic products. They do not have sufficient financial, material and human resources and are characterized by low reputation characteristics. The proposed changes in the legislation in the introduction of prequalification terms require an adequate accounting and analytical support that would help to control the admittance of only participants with high reputational characteristics that can and should be allowed in the public procurement system.

scholarly journals FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN REGULATING THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yernur Mukhtar ◽  
Yuri Toluev
Keyword(s):  
System Analysis ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Economic Assessment ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Regional Institutions ◽  
The Public ◽  
Foreign Experience ◽  
The Government ◽  
Procurement System

The relevance of this research topic lies in the fact that public procurement requires in-depth consideration and comprehensive analysis, including the scientific and methodological level of analysis. The use of special legal documents in public procurement and the specific procedure for the execution of these documents is not a factor in the full understanding of this direction, including the economic assessment of the entire process. An economic and statistical approach using system analysis is required, which was used by the authors of the scientific article as the proposed research methodology. One of the main parts of the progressive process of commodity exchange in the economies of the analyzed countries is the mechanism for building public procurement. Currently, the problem of material and technical support of public needs in developed countries is solved as a result of logistics processes in the system of public procurement through the acquisition and supply of goods, works, and services, tangible and intangible resources. The article submits a review of foreign experience in building a public procurement system with special features characteristic of this region of the world, presented as an object of research. Country aspects in the object under study and allowed the authors to formulate the relevant main results and conclusions concerning various parties in the public procurement system, which determined the further strategy to improve the procurement system of the government and international integration union. Key words: public procurement (PP), regulation of the public procurement system, government orders, entrepreneurship, international regional institutions, regulation of the public procurement system, procurement, USA, European Union (EU), Poland, Germany, World Bank.

scholarly journals Upgrade the Saudi Arabian Procurement System Delivery Method

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Ahmed Alofi ◽  
Yasir Alhammadi ◽  
Dean Kashiwagi ◽  
Kenneth Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Construction Projects ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Saudi Arabian ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Projects ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Low Performance ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Procurement System

Saudi Arabia has had many issues in delivering mega construction projects, such as delays, high costs, and low customer satisfaction. Some studies show that around 70% of public projects in Saudi Arabia are delayed. One factor that might be causing these performance issues is the traditional low bid contracting system in Saudi Arabia, or the Saudi procurement system. In Saudi Arabia, owners select contractors based only upon the lowest price. This paper researched ways to modify the current Saudi procurement system and show quick and simple modifications that can be done to improve the low performance. This research proposes that by adding the clarification phase from the Performance Information Procurement System (PIPS) to the Saudi traditional procurement process could greatly improve construction performance. The clarification phase requires the selected contractor to submit a project scope, detailed and milestone schedule, potential risks that they do not control, and performance measurement before a contract is awarded. The PIPS system is one of the most successful systems around the world, which shows success rate of 98% in six different countries with risk and cost reduction up to 30%. The clarification phase has been identified as the most important step in the PIPS to ensuring a successful project. This paper conducted a survey among construction professionals in Saudi Arabia, including 157 engineers, 33 consultants 9 owners, 5 vendors, 13 academics, and 28 architects, in order to develop the public procurement system in Saudi Arabia. The participants work in government sectors with an interest in the Saudi Arabian procurement system. The survey confirmed that professionals in the Saudi construction industry believe that the procurement system should be changed and that the inclusion of the clarification phase to the procurement system is a way to improve the procurement system.

scholarly journals Risk-based assessment model of the state and municipal procurement system

2019 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 02090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Karanina ◽  
Ksenia Kartavyh
Keyword(s):  
Public Procurement ◽  
The State ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Government Contracts ◽  
Loss Minimization ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Public Funds ◽  
The Public ◽  
Funds Management ◽  
Procurement System

Every year, the volumes of funding in the sphere of provision of state and municipal demand increases significantly. Achieving the effectiveness of government contracts is one of the main and “eternal” problems of public funds management. For public procurement to be effective, it is necessary to meet the needs of the relevant actors, i.e. society, the state, and the private sector. In order to make a qualitative forecast of the results of public procurement placement, the development and implementation of measures aimed at improving the public procurement system, it is necessary to assess the current situation of manifestation of risks arising from the procurement of goods, works and services for state and municipal needs. For this purpose, a risk-based model for assessing the system of state and municipal procurement has been developed, which allows disclosing the nature of the risks of the procurement cycle fully and identifying a case scenario for choosing a way to loss minimization.

scholarly journals Level of satisfaction and issues with procurement systems used in the Malaysian public sector

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mastura Jaafar ◽  
Nurhidayah Mohd Radzi
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Construction Industry ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Public Attention ◽  
Traditional System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Traditional Work ◽  
Procurement System

Since the declaration of Malaysian independence, the public sector has significantly contributed to the country’s development. In the 1990s, a new procurement system was developed due to CIBD various changes in the construction industry. Since that period, the poor quality of public sector projects has started to attract public attention. This paper describes a study that was conducted to identify the dominant public procurement systems in place, the problems associated with these systems, and the satisfaction level of the industry players in the Malaysian construction industry. The results were drawn from 84 survey responses and interviews with industry players. The public sector is using a traditional system inherited from the British, with an intention to adopt new procurement systems. Aside from the disputes that are present in most systems, the public sector seems to encounter particular problems in relation to capabilities, time, and cost of the major procurement systems used. Traditional work culture and the industry environment influence public sector practice, which accounts for the modifications of each procurement system used. Thus, the full advantages of using an alternative procurement system may not be realised in public sector organizations. This produces an average level of satisfaction gained from the procurement system adopted. As a developing country, Malaysia needs to exert significant efforts to improve the public procurement system. 

Infusing value for money (VfM) into the public procurement system in botswana

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-341
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Botlhale
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Improvement ◽  
Six Sigma ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Document Analysis ◽  
Public Budget ◽  
Value For Money ◽  
Main Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Procurement System

Public procurement accounts for a big proportion of public budget outlays, hence, it is important that there be demonstrated Value for Money (VfM) in public purchases. To ensure VfM in public procurement, Botswana introduced a modern public procurement system in early 2001. The system is yet to be subjected to VfM analysis. Using document analysis, this paper explores two main research questions: (i) what are key public procurement challenges in Botswana?; and (ii) how can public procurement in Botswana be improved? It is concluded that the public procurement system in Botswana is not constructed on a VfM basis. It is consequently suggested that there is a need for public procurement reforms and the adoption of various private sector continuous improvement tools such as Lean, Kaizen and Six Sigma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document