GEDUNG PERTANIAN HORTIKULTURA MASA DEPAN DI KAMPUNG MUKA

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1005
Author(s):  
Bryan Wesley ◽  
Fermanto Lianto
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Food Products ◽  
Food Assistance ◽  
Healthy People ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Government Assistance ◽  
Assistance Program ◽  
Government Program ◽  
Food Assistance Program

Because of the covid-19 virus pandemic in 2020, Indonesia is implementing large-scale social restrictions (PSBB) to protect healthy people from contracting the covid-19 virus. So most residents of Kampung Muka losing their jobs and unable to buy food for their daily needs. So they have to rely on the government’s non-cash food assistance program (BPNT). During the covid-19 pandemic occurred, the residents of Kampung Muka could not survive in their village and had to rely on government assistance to survive. The design method is the everydayness approach, by adding new daily activities in Kampung Muka, namely horticultural agriculture so that the residents can get a new source of livelihood. Also, horticultural agriculture is a source of food for residents during emergencies such as PSBB. Meanwhile, the commercial section is used as a place to sell food products and makes the view of horticultural agriculture a commercial attraction. Keywords: Commercial; Future; Government program; Horticultural agriculture Abstrak Dengan adanya pandemi virus Covid-19 pada tahun 2020, Indonesia memberlakukan pembatasan sosial berskala besar (PSBB) untuk melindungi orang yang sehat agar tidak tertular virus covid-19. Mengakibatkan kebanyakan warga Kampung Muka kehilangan pekerjaannya dan tidak dapat membeli pangan untuk kebutuhan hidup mereka sehari hari. Sehingga mereka harus bergantung pada program bantuan pangan non tunai (BPNT) pemerintah. Pada kondisi yang terjadi saat pandemi covid-19, warga Kampung Muka tidak dapat bertahan hidup di dalam kampung mereka sendiri dan harus bergantung pada bantuan pemerintah untuk bertahan hidup. Metode perancangan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan everydayness, dengan menambah aktivitas keseharian yang baru di Kampung Muka yaitu pertanian hortikultura, agar para warga mendapatkan sumber pencaharian yang baru. Selain itu, pertanian hortikultura juga sebagai sumber pangan para warga saat kondisi darurat seperti PSBB. Sedangkan bagian komersial, dimanfaatkan sebagai tempat untuk menjual hasil pangan dan menjadikan view pertanian hortikultura sebagai daya tarik komersial.

IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM BANTUAN PEMERINTAH ASURANSI NELAYAN BPAN DI KECAMATAN TANGGETADA KABUPATEN KOLAKA

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudi Agusman ◽  
Lode Asrun ◽  
Puji Prio Utomo
Keyword(s):  
Natural Resources ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Critical Factors ◽  
Government Assistance ◽  
Insurance Claim ◽  
Assistance Program ◽  
Government Program ◽  
The Third ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Insurance Card

     AbstractThe purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of the Fisherman Insurance Government Program in Tanggetada District, Kolaka Regency. This study uses a qualitative descriptive type of research that provides an overview of all the problems regarding the implementation of the Fisherman Insurance Government Assistance (BPAN) program in Tanggetada District, Kolaka Regency. The results, discussion and conclusions of this study indicate that there are four critical factors that affect the success of the implementation process. The first is communication, where the socialization of BPAN has not gone well, because information about the BPAN program has not been distributed properly to all fishermen in Tanggetada sub-district. Second, natural resources, where there is no socialization budget incentive for employees or extension workers. The third disposition, where the implementation of the Fisherman Insurance Government Assistance program, from the service is not committed because they have not felt the benefits as promised to provide welfare for themselves and their families, there is no democratic nature of the implementer because there are still fishermen who do not get a fisherman insurance card. The fourth is the bureaucratic structure, where the Fisherman Insurance Government Assistance program has SOPso that the implementation has a reference, namely the service is expected to be able to cooperate in the issuance process and the fishermen's insurance claim process.Keywords: Fisherman Insurance; Government Assistance; Implementation  AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis Implementasi Program Pemerintah Asuransi Nelayan di Kecamatan Tanggetada Kabupaten Kolaka. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian deskriptif kualitatif yaitu memberikan gambaran seluruh permasalahannya tentang implementasi program Bantuan Pemerintah Asuransi Nelayan (BPAN) di Kecamatan Tanggetada Kabupaten Kolaka. Hasil penelitian, pembahasan dan kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa terdapat empat critical factors yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan proses implementasi. Pertama komunikasi, dimana dalam sosialisasi BPAN belum berjalan dengan baik, karena informasi tentang program BPAN belum tersalurkan dengan baik kepada seluruh nelayan di kecamatan tanggetada. Kedua sumber daya alam, dimana dalam insentif anggaran sosialisasi yang dilakukan oleh pegawai maupun penyuluh tidak ada. Ketiga disposisi, dimana pelaksanaa program Bantuan Pemerintah Asuransi Nelayan, dari dinas tidak bersikap komitmen karena belum merasakan manfaat seperti yang dijanjikan memberikan kesejahtraan bagi dirinya dan keluarganya, tidak adanya sifat demokratis dari pelaksana karena masih ada nelayan yang tidak mendapatkan kartu asuransi nelayan. Keempat struktur birokrasi, dimana program Bantuan Pemerintah Asuransi Nelayan memiliki SOP agar pelaksanaannya memiliki acuan, yaitu dinas diharpakan dapat menjalin kerjasama dalmam proses penerbitan dan proses klaim asuransi nelayan.    Kata Kunci:   Asuransi Nelayan; Bantuan Pemerintah; Implementasi

scholarly journals Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education Improves Food Security Independent of Food Assistance and Program Characteristics

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2636
Author(s):  
Heather A. Eicher-Miller ◽  
Rebecca L. Rivera ◽  
Hanxi Sun ◽  
Yumin Zhang ◽  
Melissa K. Maulding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Security ◽  
Food Assistance ◽  
Household Food Security ◽  
Program Participation ◽  
Assistance Program ◽  
Program Delivery ◽  
Linear Regression Modeling ◽  
Nutrition Assistance ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Food Assistance Program

The purpose of this project was to determine whether consistent food assistance program participation or changes in participation over time mediated or moderated the effect of federal nutrition education through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) on food security and determine the associations of SNAP-Ed program delivery characteristics with change in food security. This secondary analysis used data from a randomized controlled trial from September 2013 through April 2015. SNAP-Ed-eligible participants (n = 328; ≥18 years) in households with children were recruited from 39 counties in Indiana, USA. The dependent variable was one year change in household food security score measured using the United States Household Food Security Survey Module. Assessment of mediation used Barron-Kenny analysis and moderation used interactions of food assistance program use and changes over time with treatment group in general linear regression modeling. Program delivery characteristics were investigated using mixed linear regression modeling. Results showed that neither consistent participation nor changes in food assistance program participation over time mediated nor moderated the effect of SNAP-Ed on food security and neither were SNAP-Ed program delivery characteristics associated with change in food security over the one year study period. SNAP-Ed directly improved food security among SNAP-Ed-eligible Indiana households with children regardless of food assistance program participation and changes over time or varying program delivery characteristics.

scholarly journals Who really counts in Iran’s National Food Assistance Program? Lessons from multi-stakeholder processes in the wicked policy area of food security

2022 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Pourghaderi ◽  
Nasrin Omidvar ◽  
Amirhossein Takian ◽  
Arlette Saint Ville ◽  
Hannaneh Mohammadi Kangarani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Security ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Security Policy ◽  
Food Assistance ◽  
Assistance Program ◽  
Nutrition Research ◽  
Food And Nutrition ◽  
Multi Stakeholder ◽  
Food Assistance Program

Abstract: Multi-stakeholder processes - as a necessary part in the development of public policies - can provide diverse perspectives to inform and to improve food security policy-making. Iran’s National Food Assistance Program (NFAP) is one of the major welfare programs in Iran that reduces food insecutiry to low-income households. This study aimed to identify and to categorize actual and potential stakeholders in NFAP using the stakeholder salience model. According to Mitchell’s theory, stakeholders’ attributes (power, legitimacy, and urgency) were assessed based on the nature of their interactions, roles, and level of engagement. Results revealed a number of significant but marginalized stakeholders, including Iranian Ministry of Health (office of community nutrition improvement), academia, center for food and nutrition research, target group, charities, and international organizations, who have not received any targeted organizational attention and priority to their claims. The unbalanced attention provided to some stakeholder groups characterized as “definitive” and “dominant” and ignoring some important ones will jeopardize long-term viability and undermine support for the program with inevitable declines in legitimacy. Understanding the change in the stakeholders’ characteristics is the main variable to determine the allocation of organizational resources in response to different and rising stakeholders’ demands and possibly the projects outcomes. This will facilitate and enhance the possibility of knowledge exchange and learning, and greater trust among stakeholders during the food and nutrition policy-making process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document