Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps management in the age of biologics

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 413-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Blaiss
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Polyp Size ◽  
Surgical Interventions

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis is one of the most common medical conditions seen in the U.S. population. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in adults has predominately a type 2 inflammatory endotype that usually is treated with medical management that consists of inhaled corticosteroids, saline solution irrigation, oral corticosteroid bursts, and, at times, leukotriene antagonists and antibiotics. If medical management fails, then surgical intervention is usually recommended. Various biologics that target type 2 inflammation are now available, which have been or will be approved for use in these patients. Objective: To determine where biologics that affect the type 2 pathway fit into the algorithm of treatment for CRSwNP. Methods: A review of the literature on standard-of-care measures and surgical interventions in CRSwNP and an analysis of recent studies on the efficacy and safety of biologics in this condition. Results: Standard of care with medication and surgical interventions fail in some patients with CRSwNP. Biologics that affect the type 2 inflammatory pathway led to a decrease in nasal polyp size, improved nasal congestion, and improved quality of life both in patients who had surgery and those who had not had surgery for CRSwNP. Also, they showed efficacy and safety in patients whether or not they had comorbid asthma. These agents do not cure the patient with CRSwNP, and will be required chronically for control. Conclusion: Shared decision-making should be used in determining the use of certain medications, surgical management, and biologics in patients with CRSwNP. In patients for whom surgery has already failed and in patients with moderate-to-severe CRSwNP who have other type 2 comorbidities, e.g., asthma, a trial of biologics is a rational course.

S290 – Sinonasal Pathology and Severity of Bronchiectasis

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P171-P172
Author(s):  
Jose Maria Guilemany ◽  
Isam Alobid ◽  
Centellas Silvia ◽  
Manuel S Bernal-Sprekelsen ◽  
Joaquim Mullol I Miret
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Nasal Polyposis ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Ethmoid Sinus ◽  
Polyp Size ◽  
Moderate Size ◽  
Nasal Symptoms ◽  
Ostiomeatal Complex

Objectives 1) To investigate the prevalence of nasal symptoms, nasal polyposis, and sinusal opacification in patients with bronchiectasis. 2) To investigate the association between the degree of sinusal opacification and the bronchiectasis extension. Methods 88 consecutive patients with stable non-cystic bronchiectasis were prospectively evaluated for nasal symptoms (RASP, 0–3), polyp size (nasal endoscopy, 0–3), sinusal occupation (CT, 0–24), and chest HRCT (0–18). Results Following EP3OS criteria, 77% of patients presented had chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Nasal congestion (incidence: 90%; score: 1.6±0.1) Anterior (99%; 1.9±0.1) and posterior (91%; 1.8±0.1) rhinorrhea, were reported by patients as the major complaints. Nasal polyps (NP) of a mild-moderate size (1.6±0.3) were found in 25% of patients. Sinonasal CT was abnormal in patients with CRS, with a CT score of 8.4±0.4, with predominance in maxillary sinus (2.1±0.1), anterior ethmoid sinus (1.9±0.1), and ostiomeatal complex (2.2±0.2). Patients with CRS had significantly worse scores on chest HRCT (CRS: 3.7±0.7; no CRS: 7.2±0.5). Conclusions More than 75% of patients affected with BQs fulfil EP3OS criteria of CRS and 25% of patients presented NP. Patients with CRS presented more affectation on chest HRCT scan. We conclude that patients with bronchiectasis should be evaluated to assess the presence of chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals for severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioana Agache ◽  
Yang Song ◽  
Pablo Alonso-Coello ◽  
Yasmin Vogel ◽  
Claudio Rocha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Oral Corticosteroid ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of biologicals for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) compared to the standard of care. Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs. Critical and important CRSwNP-related outcomes were considered. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. RCTs evaluated (dupilumab-2, omalizumab-4, mepolizumab-2, reslizumab-1) included 1236 adults, with follow-up 20-64 weeks. Dupilumab reduces the need for surgery (NFS) and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use (RR 0.28; 95%CI 0.20-0.39, moderate certainty) and improves with high certainty smell (mean difference (MD) +10.54; 95%CI +9.24 to +11.84) and quality of life (QoL) (MD -19.14; 95%CI -22.80 to -15.47), with fewer treatment-related adverse events (TAEs) (RR 0.95; 95%CI 0.89-1.02, moderate certainty). Omalizumab reduces NFS (RR 0.85; 95%CI 0.78 to 0.92, high certainty), decreases OCS use (RR 0.38; 95%CI 0.10-1.38, moderate certainty), improves with high certainty smell (MD +3.84; 95%CI +3.64 to +4.04) and QoL (MD -15.65; 95%CI -16.16 to -15.13), with increased TAE (RR 1.73; 95%CI 0.60-5.03, moderate certainty). There is low certainty for mepolizumab reducing NFS (RR 0.78; 95%CI 0.64 to 0.94) and improving QoL (MD -13.3; 95% CI -23.93 to -2.67) and smell (MD +0.7; 95%CI -0.48 to +1.88), with increased TAEs (RR 1.64; 95%CI 0.41-6.50). The evidence for reslizumab is very uncertain.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e047344
Author(s):  
Qingwu Wu ◽  
Lianxiong Yuan ◽  
Huijun Qiu ◽  
Xinyue Wang ◽  
Xuekun Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and to identify evidence gaps that will guide future research on omalizumab for CRSwNP.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesA comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library on 13 October 2020.Eligibility criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing omalizumab with placebo, given for at least 16 weeks in adult patients with CRSwNP.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent authors screened search results, extracted data and assessed studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were pooled using the inverse-variance method and expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed by the χ2 test and the I2 statistic.ResultsA total of four RCTs involving 303 participants were identified. When comparing omalizumab to placebo, there was a significant difference in Nasal Polyps Score (MD=−1.20; 95% CI −1.48 to −0.92), Nasal Congestion Score (MD=−0.67; 95% CI −0.86 to −0.48), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (MD=−15.62; 95% CI −19.79 to −11.45), Total Nasal Symptom Score (MD=−1.84; 95% CI −2.43 to −1.25) and reduced need for surgery (risk ratio (RR)=5.61; 95% CI 1.99 to 15.81). Furthermore, there was no difference in the risk of serious adverse events ((RR=1.40; 95% CI 0.29 to 6.80), adverse events (RR=0.83; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.15) and rescue systemic corticosteroid (RR=0.52; 95% CI 0.17 to 1.61).ConclusionsThis was the first meta-analysis that identified omalizumab significantly improved endoscopic, clinical and patient-reported outcomes in adults with moderate to severe CRSwNP and it was safe and well tolerated.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020207639.

Biological therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-114
Author(s):  
Zuzana Balatková ◽  
Zdeněk Knížek ◽  
Jan Vodička ◽  
Jan Plzák
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Immunoglobulin E ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Therapeutic Choice ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Intranasal Steroids

The aim of this paper is to present an up-to-date information about therapeutical options in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. First choice therapy is a long term regular application of intranasal steroids in combination with salinic solution douches. If this treatment is not eff ective enough, then the pulses of systemic steroids are indicated. If the sufficient control of the disease is not achieved, then surgery is a therapeutic choice; it means functional endoscopic sinus surgery in the extent corresponding to the extension of the sinus disease. However, there remains a certain group of patients in whom the results with this treatment are not optimal. The type 2 immunopathological response affects relevantly the course of the disease. Nowadays, the research is done in this field. Specific agents, which are able to block circulating inflammatory mediators or bind receptors for these mediators are developed and studied. The results of the studies having been completed by now are promising. Keywords: biological therapy – chronic rhinosinusitis – nasal polyps – dupilumab – immunoglobulin E – interleukin

scholarly journals Dupilumab Reduces Blood, Urine, and Nasal Biomarkers of Type 2 Inflammation in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps in the Phase 3 SINUS-52 Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. AB185
Author(s):  
Claus Bachert ◽  
Seong Cho ◽  
Tanya Laidlaw ◽  
Brian Swanson ◽  
Sivan Harel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Type 2 Inflammation

P505 DUPILUMAB EFFECT ON TYPE 2 INFLAMMATION BIOMARKERS IN CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS WITH NASAL POLYPS AND NSAID-ERD

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. S48
Author(s):  
A. White ◽  
S. Fujieda ◽  
T. Takabayashi ◽  
N. Daizadeh ◽  
Y. Deniz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Type 2 Inflammation

scholarly journals Nasal Polyposis: Insights in Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Differentiation of Polyp Mesenchymal Stem Cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (18) ◽  
pp. 6878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuela Chiarella ◽  
Nicola Lombardo ◽  
Nadia Lobello ◽  
Annamaria Aloisio ◽  
Teodoro Aragona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Inflammatory Process ◽  
Nasal Polyposis ◽  
Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Alternative Source ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a common inflammatory disease of paranasal sinuses, which causes rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and hyposmia. The genetic predisposition or the exposure to irritants can sustain the inflammatory response and the development of nasal polyposis. Nasal polyps are benign and teardrop-shaped growths that project in the nasal cavities, and originate from the ethmoid sinuses. This inflammatory process is associated with high expression of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 and IgE. Antibodies targeting these cytokines or receptors represent a therapeutic strategy in the treatment of nasal polyposis in combination with corticosteroids. The molecular pathogenesis of nasal polyps in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients is associated with remodeling transition, a process in which epithelial cells lose their typical phenotype, acquiring a mesenchymal-like aspect. TGFβ/SMAD, ERK, and Wnt/β-catenin pathways are altered during the nasal tissue remodeling. miRNA and inhibitor molecules targeting these signaling pathways are able to interfere with the process; which could lead to alternative therapies. Nasal polyps are an alternative source of mesenchymal stem cells, which can be isolated from surgical biopsies. A molecular understanding of the biology of PO-MSCs will contribute to the delineating inflammatory process underlying the development of nasal polyps.

scholarly journals Dupilumab: new opportunities for the treatment of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-31
Author(s):  
Miramgul E. Dyneva ◽  
Gulyumkhan E. Aminova ◽  
Oksana Kurbacheva ◽  
Natalya I. Il'ina
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Nasal Polyps ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Cytokine Signaling ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Receptor Complexes ◽  
Target Individual ◽  
Type 2 Inflammation

Airway inflammation plays a key role in asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The inflammatory process can vary in intensity thus affecting the clinical picture of the disease and, most importantly, the effectiveness of therapy. Today, there is still a high rate of growth in the incidence of asthma and CRSwNP and dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of existing therapy for severe forms of asthma, especially when asthma is associated with CRSwNP, so the main task is to find new approaches to diagnosis and therapy. The development of biologics is a promising step forward in achieving control of severe and poorly controlled asthma and recurrent CRSwNP that target individual and specific components of inflammation. One of the latest monoclonal antibodies is Dupilumab that has shown significant success in the treatment of asthma and CRSwNP. Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the -subunit of the Il-4 interleukin receptor (IL-4R), common to both IL-4 and IL-4/IL-13 receptor complexes. This contributes to the suppression of type 2 cytokine signaling (IL-4 and IL-13), since the IL-4/IL-13/STAT6 signaling pathway plays a crucial role in type 2-inflammation. Currently, Dupilumab is approved for the treatment of severe asthma and CRSwNP, so this article summarizes the main information about Dupilumab and its effectiveness in these diseases, as well as presents the results of clinical observation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document