scholarly journals Adult Cancer Survivors’ Patterns of Smoking and Current Smoking-related Factors: Analysis on 2007-2011 Korea Medical Institute (KMI) Data

Author(s):  
Jung Ae Byun ◽  
Yeunsoo Yang ◽  
Heejin Kimm ◽  
Ji Eun Yun ◽  
Sun Ha Jee
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1553-1553
Author(s):  
Yannan Zhao ◽  
Binbin Zheng-Lin ◽  
Biyun Wang ◽  
Xi-Chun Hu ◽  
Changchuan Jiang

1553 Background: Smoking rates have been decreasing in the U.S over the last decade. Smoking cessation is a critical part of cancer treatment and survivorship care. However, little is known about the trend of smoking rates in U.S. cancer survivors and how it varied by individuals’ insurance coverages. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the temporal trend of smoking rates using the National Health Interview Survey from 2008 through 2017. Adult cancer survivors (n = 20122) were included in the analysis. The outcomes were self-reported current smoking behavior. Insurance coverage was categorized into any private (age ≤65), other coverage (age ≤65), uninsured (age ≤65), Medicare + any private (age > 65), and other coverage (age > 65). We combined every two years data to improve statistical power in the subgroup analysis. Weighted analyses were performed with SAS 9.4 to account for the complex design. Results: The smoking rates in cancer survivors decreased from 18.4% in 2008 to 12.5% in 2017. However, the smoking rates varied remarkably by insurance status (p < 0.001). There was a decreasing trend of smoking rates in participants with any private (age ≤65) (17.3% in 2008/2009 to 12.0% in 2016/2017), Medicare + any private (age > 65) (7.5% in 2008/2009 to 5.9% in 2016/2017), and other coverage (age > 65) (13.2% in 2008/2009 to 9.2% in 2016/2017) whereas the current smoking rates remains high in cancer survivors with other coverage (age ≤65) (40.1% in 2008/2009 to 34.4% in 2016/2017) and uninsured (age ≤65) (43.4% in 2008/2009 to 43,1% in 2016/2017). Conclusions: Cancer survivors report less smoking behaviors over the last decade which is similar to the general population. However, the smoking rate remains dangerously high in non-elderly cancer survivors without any private insurance.


2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Comis ◽  
Jon D. Miller ◽  
Diane D. Colaizzi ◽  
Linda G. Kimmel

Purpose: To examine the attitudes of the public and cancer survivors toward their health-related decisions and cancer clinical trials (CCT) with a particular emphasis on the role of the physician, building on a 2003 report in Journal of Clinical Oncology. Methods: An Internet-based survey was performed in March through April 2005, using a subsample from Knowledge Networks' national probability sample of adults. One sample of 1,027 adults was selected to reflect a cross-section of the public. A second sample of 2,027 cancer survivors was selected from the Knowledge Networks adult panel, representing a probability sample of adult cancer survivors in 2005. Results: Both the public and cancer survivors rely mainly on their physicians as a key source of health-related information; their physicians are the most trusted health-care professional source of health information, although other sources such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and professional societies are also rated highly. All three sources rank significantly higher than the other 20 sources examined (P < .05). Only approximately 10% of survivors reported that they were aware of the possibility of CCT participation at the time of their diagnosis, and only 3% reported participation in a CCT. Seventy-three percent of patients aware of a CCT were made aware by a physician. Participation in a CCT was directly related to the level of physician involvement reported by the survivor (P < .01). Conclusion: The physician plays a critical role in CCT recruitment. Future increases in patient participation in a CCT will depend on the willingness of physicians to present, explain, and encourage patient enrollment when a CCT is a clinically relevant treatment approach.


Author(s):  
Spencier Ciaralli ◽  
Gary T. Deimling ◽  
Dyanna L. Burnham

This paper compares disability perceptions of Black with white older cancer survivors’ to document racial disparities in these perceptions and the factors that contribute to them. The data are from a randomly selected tumor registry sample of 321 older adult cancer survivors from an NCI funded study. OLS regression models of disability perceptions, nested by race, examined the effects cancer and non-cancer health factors along with important covariates. Black older adult cancer survivors perceived themselves to be more disabled than did white survivors. Multivariate analyses showed a strong relationship between functional difficulties and disability perceptions for both Black and white survivors. However cancer-related factors such as continuing symptoms of the illness or treatment were relatively more important for Blacks. The findings suggest that race and cancer are both important factors in our understanding of disability in later life. These findings can then inform clinical best practices among minority older adults.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengxi Du ◽  
Jeffrey B. Blumberg ◽  
Zhilei Shan ◽  
Gail Rogers ◽  
Fan Chen ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (11) ◽  
pp. 1908-1917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler G. Ketterl ◽  
Karen L. Syrjala ◽  
Jacqueline Casillas ◽  
Linda A. Jacobs ◽  
Steven C. Palmer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document