scholarly journals Analisis Hubungan Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (Sofa) Score Dengan Mortalitas Pasien Sepsis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 168
Author(s):  
Agustin Iskandar ◽  
Fran Siska
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
The Third ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Sepsis merupakan kondisi disfungsi organ mengancam nyawa yang diakibatkan oleh disregulasi sistem imun pejamu terhadap infeksi dan Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score merupakan suatu skoring untuk menilai kegagalan organ terkait sepsis. Peningkatan SOFA score diasosiasikan dengan outcome pasien yang lebih buruk.  Tujuan: Menganalisis korelasi SOFA score dengan mortalitas pada pasien sepsis. Metode: Desain penelitian adalah kohort prospektif yang dilakukan di RSU Dr Saiful Anwar dari Maret 2018 hingga Juni 2019. Kriteria diagnosis sepsis ditegakkan berdasarkan The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). Perhitungan SOFA score dilakukan dalam 2 hari pertama perawatan pasien sepsis di rumah sakit. Analisis data dilakukan pada p < 0,05. Hasil: Didapatkan 85 pasien sepsis dengan luaran meninggal sebanyak 72,94% sedangkan 28,06% membaik. Terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara SOFA score yang meninggal dan yang hidup (p=0,015).  SOFA score dipakai untuk memprediksi kematian, didapatkan area under the curve (AUC) 0,74 (p=0,009), dengan cut off point optimum 7. Pada total SOFA score lebih tinggi dari sama dengan 7, didapatkan RR= 3.8, p=0.028. SOFA score merupakan parameter untuk menilai kegagalan organ pada pasien sepsis, dimana total SOFA score yang lebih tinggi dikaitkan dengan peningkatan risiko kematian. Simpulan: SOFA score pada kelompok yang meninggal lebih tinggi daripada yang sembuh. Pasien sepsis dengan SOFA score lebih besar sama dengan 7 memiliki risiko 3,8 kali lebih besar untuk meninggal.Kata kunci: risiko kematian, sepsis, SOFA score

scholarly journals Diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma adrenomedullin compared to other biomarkers using Sepsis-3 definitions for sepsis and septic shock

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsu Yonaha ◽  
Toyoaki Maruta ◽  
Go Otao ◽  
Koji Igarashi ◽  
Sayaka Nagata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Diagnosis And Prognosis ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock ◽  
Monitoring Treatment

Abstract Background Sepsis-3, the recent sepsis definitions, was modified based on a scoring system focused on organ failure; however, it would remain a time-consuming process to detect septic patients using these definitions. Adrenomedullin (AM) is a biomarker for diagnosing sepsis and septic shock, monitoring treatment efficacy, and prognosis. We conducted a study to assess the accuracy of AM for diagnosing and prognosing sepsis and septic shock based on the Sepsis-3 definitions.Methods This is a prospective observational single-center study. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were retrospectively categorized as non-sepsis, sepsis, or septic shock by Sepsis-3 definitions. Total AM (tAM) and mature AM (mAM) were measured upon ICU admission. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were performed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) for diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis and septic shock.ResultsA total of 98 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. Among these, 42, 22, and 34 patients were assigned to non-sepsis, sepsis, and septic shock, respectively. tAM and mAM levels significantly increased according to the severity of sepsis. The AUCs of tAM/mAM for diagnosing sepsis and septic shock were 0.879/0.848 and 0.858/0.830, respectively, whereas those of procalcitonin (PCT)/presepsin (PSEP) were 0.822/0.682 and 0.811/0.661, respectively. The AUCs of tAM/mAM on Day 1 and 3 for predicting 28-day mortality of septic patients were 0.669/0.5741 and 0.931/0.892, respectively, whereas those of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score/lactate were 0.669/0.824 and 0.922/0.794, respectively.Conclusions Both tAM and mAM are reliable, early biomarkers to diagnose sepsis and septic shock according to the Sepsis-3 definitions, and are comparable to PCT. Furthermore, AM level on Day 3 is a reliable biomarker to predict 28-day mortality due to sepsis, which is comparable to that of the SOFA score and lactate level.

The Association Between Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores and Mortality in Patients With Sepsis During the First Week: The JSEPTIC DIC Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 656-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Nakashima ◽  
Kyohei Miyamoto ◽  
Toshio Shimokawa ◽  
Seiya Kato ◽  
Mineji Hayakawa
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Assessment Scores ◽  
Coagulation Study ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
The Relationship

Objective: Predicting prognosis is a complex process, particularly in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. This study aimed to determine the relationship between the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores for individual organs during the first week of admission and the in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis. Methods: This study was a post hoc evaluation of the Japan Septic Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation study and included patients admitted to 42 intensive care units in Japan for severe sepsis or septic shock, between January 2011 and December 2013. We assessed the relationship between the organ and total SOFA scores on days 1, 3, and 7 following admission and the in-hospital mortality using logistic regression analysis. Results: We evaluated 2732 patients and found the in-hospital mortality rate was 29.1%. The mean age of the patients (standard deviation) was 70.5 (14.1) years, and the major primary site of infection was the abdomen (33.6%). The central nervous system (CNS) SOFA score exhibited the strongest relationship with mortality on days 1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-1.59), 3 (aOR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.62-1.89), and 7 (aOR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.77-2.10). The coagulation SOFA scores showed a weak correlation with mortality on day 1, but a strong correlation with mortality on day 7 (aOR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.87-2.24). Conclusions: The CNS SOFA scores were associated with mortality in patients with severe sepsis on days 1, 3, and 7 following hospitalization. The coagulation SOFA score was associated with mortality on day 7. In clinical situations, the CNS SOFA scores during the acute phase and the CNS SOFA and coagulation SOFA scores during the subsequent phases should be evaluated in order to determine patient prognosis.

Prognostic evaluation of severe sepsis and septic shock: Procalcitonin clearance vs Δ Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 219.e9-219.e12 ◽  
Author(s):  
José R.A. de Azevedo ◽  
Orlando J.M. Torres ◽  
Rafael A. Beraldi ◽  
Carmen A.P.M. Ribas ◽  
Osvaldo Malafaia
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Prognostic Evaluation ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

scholarly journals Comparison of accuracy in three versions of simplified sequential organ failure assessment scores to predict prognosis of septic patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
qifang shi ◽  
Ying Xu ◽  
Bing-yu Zhang ◽  
Wei Qu ◽  
Shu-yun Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Assessment Scores ◽  
Academic Hospitals ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Higher Power ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Background: Evidence shows that simplified SOFA scoring system has better clinical practice. Objective: This study aimed to compare the scores acquired with the simplified sequential organ failure assessment (sSOFA), simplified organ dysfunction criteria optimized for electronic health records (eSOFA), and simplified and accurate sequential organ failure assessment (sa-SOFA) for their accuracies in predicting the prognosis of septic patients. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at three major academic hospitals. Clinical data from 574 patients diagnosed with sepsis following the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)were retrospectively retrieved and analyzed. Scores from the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) were used as reference scores. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare the accuracies of eSOFA, sSOFA, and sa-SOFA scores in predicting in-hospital mortality. Results: AUROC analysis demonstrated the predictability of the five scoring systems for sepsis surveillance, listed in descending order as: sa-SOFA,0.790 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.754-0.822); SOFA, 0.774 (95% CI: 0.738-0.808); eSOFA,0.729 (95% CI: 0.691-0.765); sSOFA,0.681 (95% CI: 0.641- 0.719); and qSOFA,0.618(95% CI: 0.577-0.658). Moreover, sa-SOFA and SOFA scores (Z= 1.950, p = 0.051) did not significantly differ from each other in discriminatory power, but the sa-SOFA score had a higher power than either the sSOFA or eSOFA scores (p values <0.001). Conclusion: sa-SOFA showed the highest accuracy in predicting in-hospital fatality of septic patients when compared with sSOFA and eSOFA.

scholarly journals SEPSIS-3.0 – Ist die Intensivmedizin bereit für die ICD-11?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Schmoch ◽  
Michael Bernhard ◽  
Andrea Becker-Pennrich ◽  
Ludwig Christian Hinske ◽  
Josef Briegel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
The Third ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
High Care ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Qsofa Score ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Im Januar 2022 wird die 11. Revision der International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) in Kraft treten. Unter anderem wird darin die SEPSIS-3-Definition implementiert sein, in der Sepsis als „lebensbedrohliche Organdysfunktion, hervorgerufen durch eine fehlregulierte Wirtsantwort auf eine Infektion“ definiert wird. Ziel der vorliegenden Sekundärauswertung einer Umfrage zum Thema „Sepsis-induzierte Koagulopathie“ war es zu evaluieren, ob die SEPSIS-3-Definition (engl. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock) 4 Jahre nach ihrer internationalen Einführung im klinischen Alltag anästhesiologisch geführter Intensivstationen in Deutschland angekommen ist und so die Voraussetzungen für die Verwendung des ICD-11 gegeben sind. Methoden Im Rahmen einer deutschlandweiten Umfrage unter ärztlichen Leitern von Intensivstationen, die zwischen Oktober 2019 und Mai 2020 durchgeführt wurde, wurde in einem gesonderten Fragenblock nach der verwendeten Sepsisdefinition gefragt. Zusätzlich wurde gefragt, ob der quick-Sequential (Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Score zum Screening auf Sepsis in dem Krankenhaus, zu dem die teilnehmende Intensivstation gehört, verwendet wird. Ergebnisse Insgesamt nahmen 50 ärztliche Leiter von anästhesiologisch geführten Intensivbereichen an der Umfrage teil. In Summe gaben die ausgewerteten Intensivstationen an, etwa 14,0 % der in Deutschland registrierten High-Care-Betten zu führen. An 78,9 % der Universitätsklinika und 84,0 % der teilnehmenden Lehrkrankenhäuser ist die SEPSIS-3-Definition im klinischen Alltag integriert. Im Gegensatz dazu wird der Screening-Test „qSOFA“ nur von 26,3 % der teilnehmenden Universitätsklinika, aber immerhin von 52,0 % der Lehrkrankenhäuser und 80,0 % der „sonstigen“ Krankenhäuser verwendet. Schlussfolgerung Unsere Daten zeigen, dass sowohl SEPSIS‑3 als auch qSOFA im klinischen Alltag deutscher Krankenhäuser angekommen sind. Die zurückhaltende Verwendung des qSOFA an Universitätsklinika bei gleichzeitiger breiter Akzeptanz der SEPSIS-3-Definition kann als Indiz interpretiert werden, dass die Suche nach einem geeigneten Screeningtest für Sepsis noch nicht abgeschlossen ist.

scholarly journals Establishment of a prognostic model based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for patients with first-time acute myocardial infarction

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052110119
Author(s):  
Shuai Zheng ◽  
Jun Lyu ◽  
Didi Han ◽  
Fengshuo Xu ◽  
Chengzhuo Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
First Time

Objective This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors of patients with first-time acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to establish a nomogram for prognostic modeling. Methods We studied 985 patients with first-time AMI using data from the Multi-parameter Intelligent Monitoring for Intensive Care database and extracted their demographic data. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine outcome-related variables. We also tested a new predictive model that includes the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and compared it with the SOFA-only model. Results An older age, higher SOFA score, and higher Acute Physiology III score were risk factors for the prognosis of AMI. The risk of further cardiovascular events was 1.54-fold higher in women than in men. Patients in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit had a better prognosis than those in the coronary heart disease intensive care unit. Pressurized drug use was a protective factor and the risk of further cardiovascular events was 1.36-fold higher in nonusers. Conclusion The prognosis of AMI is affected by age, the SOFA score, the Acute Physiology III score, sex, admission location, type of care unit, and vasopressin use. Our new predictive model for AMI has better performance than the SOFA model alone.

scholarly journals SOFA Score, Hemodynamics and Body Temperature Allow Early Discrimination between Porcine Peritonitis-Induced Sepsis and Peritonitis-Induced Septic Shock

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 164
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Al-Obeidallah ◽  
Dagmar Jarkovská ◽  
Lenka Valešová ◽  
Jan Horák ◽  
Jan Jedlička ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Body Temperature ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Porcine Model ◽  
Venous Blood ◽  
Mixed Venous Blood ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Multiple Parameters ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Porcine model of peritonitis-induced sepsis is a well-established clinically relevant model of human disease. Interindividual variability of the response often complicates the interpretation of findings. To better understand the biological basis of the disease variability, the progression of the disease was compared between animals with sepsis and septic shock. Peritonitis was induced by inoculation of autologous feces in fifteen anesthetized, mechanically ventilated and surgically instrumented pigs and continued for 24 h. Cardiovascular and biochemical parameters were collected at baseline (just before peritonitis induction), 12 h, 18 h and 24 h (end of the experiment) after induction of peritonitis. Analysis of multiple parameters revealed the earliest significant differences between sepsis and septic shock groups in the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, systemic vascular resistance, partial pressure of oxygen in mixed venous blood and body temperature. Other significant functional differences developed later in the course of the disease. The data indicate that SOFA score, hemodynamical parameters and body temperature discriminate early between sepsis and septic shock in a clinically relevant porcine model. Early pronounced alterations of these parameters may herald a progression of the disease toward irreversible septic shock.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document