scholarly journals EFFECT OF DEBT POLICY, DIVIDEND POLICY AND OWNERSHIP OF COMPANY PERFORMANCE

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Frendi Frendi

The background of this research is prior empirical researches about firm performance analysis have no consistent result. This research is based on the research in Kuala Lumpur by Ahmed<br />(2008). The objectives of this research are to analyze the impact of debt policy, dividend policy, and corporate ownership which consist of management ownership and institutional ownership<br />on firm performance. The design of this research applies the impact of independent variable on dependent variable. The independent variable in this study are debt policy, dividend policy,<br />managerial ownership, and institutional ownership. The dependent variable is firm performance. This study based on a sample of 13 firms that listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ-45 during 2005 – 2008. This research uses ratio scale. Data analysis applied measuring method on multiple regression model and uses SPSS for windows to examine the impact of independent variables on dependent variable. The result of result indicated that dividend policy has significant impact on firm performance, whereas debt policy and corporate ownership have no significant impact on firm performance

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Apit Susanti ◽  
Sekar Mayangsari

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of insider ownership, institutional ownership, dividend policy, asset structure, profitability, firm growth, and business risk to debt policy. This research is developed based on the previous research carried out by Murni and Andriana (2007). Data were taken from all companies are listed at Indonesian Stock Exchange for three years (2009-2011) except financial, insurance, and other financial industries. Sample selection were based on purposive sampling. Only 45 companies meet the criteria and taken as sample. For this study SPSS 11.5 program is used to find out the effect from all independent variable above to dependent variable. The statistical used in this research was multiple regression. The research showed that institutional ownership, asset structure, profitability, and firm growth had effect to debt policy but insider ownership, dividend policy, and business risk had no effect to debt policy.


Author(s):  
Mateus Xavier Da Costa Cabral ◽  
Arsono Laksamana ◽  
Mudjilah Rahayu

Companies that go public, in general, have been managed professionally that can be tailored to the consumers’ needs under applicable regulations. Management within a company's business entity involves an agency relationship. The purpose of this study is to examine: a) a reciprocal relationship between institutional ownership, debt policy, dividend policy and company performance of manufacturing companies of the Indonesian Stock Exchange, b) the influence of institutional ownership, debt policy, dividend policy on the company performance of the manufacturing companies of the Indonesian Stock Exchange. This type of research includes associative research with a quantitative approach. The samples of this research as many as 98 manufacturing companies listed at the Indonesian Stock Exchange of the period of 2006-2015 with the technique of determining purposive samplings. Data analysis technique used in this research is Granger Causality test. The results of this study are: a) there is no reciprocal relationship between institutional ownership and debt policy, b) there is no reciprocal relationship between institutional ownership with dividend policy, c) no reciprocal relationship between debt policy and dividend policy, d) there is no reciprocal relationship between institutional ownership and company performance; e) there is no reciprocal relationship between debt policy and company performance; f) there is no reciprocal relationship between dividend policy and company performance; g) institutional ownership has a positive and partially significant influence on company performance, h) debt policy has a positive and partially significant influence on company performance, and i) dividend policy has positive and partially significant influence to companies performance on manufacturing company listed at the Indonesian Stock Exchange


Jurnal Ecogen ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 977
Author(s):  
Zahratul Aziz Aini ◽  
Tri Kurniawati ◽  
Efni Cerya

Investors have a goal to get maximum returns by anticipating the impact they will face in the future. In this study the return meant is dividend policy. There are 4 factors that influence dividend policy, namely: (1) debt policy, (2) liquidity, (3) company size, (3) profitability. This type of research is causative with secondary data, where this study analyzes how the influence of one variable with another variable or how a variable affects other variables. The sampling technique in this study used a purposive sampling method. Purposive sampling is the determination of the cellphone and population based on the criteria desired by the researcher in order to obtain a representative sample according to the criteria. The object of this study is a company listed on the LQ-45 Index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange with a period of 2013-2016. The data analysis technique uses multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS version 21.0. The results of this study indicate that (1) debt policy has a negative and not significant effect on dividend policy in the LQ-45 index company listed on the Stock Exchange in 2013-2016, (2) liquidity has a negative and not significant effect on dividend policy on LQ-index companies 45 which are listed on the IDX in 2013-2016, (3) the size of the company has a negative and not significant effect on dividend policy on LQ-45 index companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2016, and (4) Profitability has a negative and not significant effect on policy dividends on LQ-45 index companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2016.Keyword: Dividend Policy, Debt Policy, Liquidity, Company Size, and Profitability


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-126
Author(s):  
ANWAR HARSONO

The objective of the research is to obtain empirical evidence on the effect of independent variables of firm size, cash, capital expenditure, dividend policy, debt policy, return on asset, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership to firm value.The population used in this study are non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2013-2016. Intake of data in this research using purposive sampling method. There are 54 non-financial companies that fit the criteria and were selected as the final sample. This study uses multiple regression analysis to test the hypothesis. The value of firms in this study was measured using Tobins'Q.The empirical results of this study indicate that the variables independent debt policy and return on assets have an influence on firm value, while the variables of firm size, cash, capital expenditure, dividend policy, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership have no effect on firm value.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-36
Author(s):  
Abdul Rafay Abdul Rafay ◽  
Ramla Sadiq ◽  
Mobeen Ajmal

IAS-24 of the International Financial Reporting Standards focuses on the concept and disclosures of related party transactions (RPTs) for a reporting entity. This study examines the interrelationship between RPTs (as disclosed under IAS-24), agency theory, ownership structures and firm performance. Our sample includes nonfinancial companies indexed by the KSE-100 of the Pakistan Stock Exchange during 2006–15. To run the regression models, we determine the regression assumptions, normality, heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation and multicollinearity. We investigate the impact of different RPTs, including cash inflows and outflows, whereas other studies generally look at the impact of RPTs on firm performance in totality. The empirical analysis suggests that institutional ownership has a positive, significant impact on firm performance. Related party purchases have a significant, negative impact on performance, resulting in the expropriation of institutional ownership. RPTs that generate revenues have a significant, positive impact on performance, such that institutional ownership has a propping-up effect with respect to the related parties. In practice, institutional ownership leads to strong corporate governance and contributes to firm performance. While other studies find family ownership responsible for the expropriation effect, we argue that institutional ownership has a propping-up and expropriation effect on related parties. Our study also suggests that certain ownership structures lead to weaker corporate governance mechanisms, resulting in greater agency problems. This, in turn, badly affects company performance and leads to the exploitation of minority shareholders.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrena Novita Santoso ◽  
Werner R. Murhadi ◽  
Endang Ernawati

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the following corporation’s variables: value, size, debt policy, growth, liquidity, dividend policy on managerial and  institutional ownership in the base and chemical industry sector listed on the Indonesia stock exchange during 2010 through 2014. The findings showed that: (i) Corporation’s value and size variables have significant negative effect on managerial ownership; liquidity variable has significant positive effect on managerial ownership. On the other hand, debt policy, growth and dividend policy variables have non-significant negative effect on managerial ownership. (ii) Corporation’s value and size variables have significant positive effect on institutional ownership; debt policy variable has significant negative effect on institutional ownership, while growth, liquidity and dividend policy variables have non-significant positive effect on institutional ownership.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-167
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sadil Ali ◽  
Lubna Riaz ◽  
Wasif Anis

The study aims to examine the relationship between individual ownership, institutional ownership and firm performance. Further it comparatively analyses the impact of both institutional and individual ownership on firm performance. For this purpose, data have been collected from 64 firms listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) for the period of 10 years (2011 - 2020). Random effects model has been employed to test the research hypotheses. This study compares the effect of individual and institutional ownership on firm performance. Result of the study shows that both institutional and individual ownership significantly affect firm performance. However, the degree of the effect is different for both individual and institutional investors. The institutional ownership influences the firm performance twice than the individual investors influence the performance. The results also reveal that the firm performance is positively associated with the firm size while negatively related with the financial leverage. Findings of the study are important for shareholders, managers, academicians and decision makers. They can use information to frame investors’ friendly policies and guide shareholders in taking right financial decisions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Nirina Tahir ◽  
Asrudin Hormati ◽  
Zainuddin Zainuddin

This study is designed based on problems related to debt policy. The debt policy in every company has a direct effect on the financial position. The use of debt that which too high provides great risk, but if the companies are able to manage debt properly; then the use of debt shall increase profits for shareholders. The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze the effects of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, free cash flow, assets structure, and dividend policy on companies indexed LQ-45 wich listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling technique of this study is purposive sampling which produced 85 observations. This study uses secondary data in the form of annual reports. The tool of analysis of this study is multiple regression with support of statistical package for social scientists (SPSS) software. The results show that: (1) managerial ownership has no effect on debt policy; (2) institutional ownership has a negative effect on debt policy; (3) free cash flow has a negative effect on debt policy; (4) assets structure has a negative effect on debt policy and (5) dividend policy has no effect on debt policy.


In some public companies, sometimes the shareholders were also becomes management, this situation is called institutional ownership. The aim to our research is acquired empirical result regarding effect of management stock owner on the company, dividend policy, returns on asset and company total asset on liability to total asset. Our research focus is on public companies which listing in Indonesia Stock Exchange along 5 consecutive years (2014 until 2018). Data collection used purposive sampling method by using 17 companies meet the criteria and take as sample. We use financial data acquired from stock exchange website. We used ordinary least square statistical analysis using statistical software to test our hypothesis. This study concluded that institutional share, dividend payment procedure, and company total asset have negative and not significant impact on company liabilities. Otherwise, profitability affect in opposite direction and significant to company liabilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document