scholarly journals Pretrial procedure for disputes settlement associated with challenging transactions of the debtor within the framework of the case of insolvency (bankruptcy)

2021 ◽  
pp. 38-47
Author(s):  
Viktoriya Viktorovna Kalinkina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Pretrial Procedure

The object this research is the social relations developed in terms of the mandatory pretrial of disputes settlement associated with challenging transactions of the debtor. Subject of this research is the set of legal norms regulating the relations in the area of challenging transactions of the debtor, as well as the law enforcement practice. The research is carried out through the prism of consideration of such problem as the absence in the current legislation of the Russian Federation of the norm that establishes compliance with the pretrial procedure for dispute settlement associated with challenging transactions of the debtor. Special attention is given to analysis of the norms of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 127-FZ of 10.26.2002 “On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)” and the law enforcement practice. The goal of this work consists in articulation of the problem, substantiation of the need for legislative regulation in the indicated field, as well as development of proposals on improvement of the Bankruptcy Act. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that the field of this research has not yet acted as an independent subject of scientific understanding. The scientific novelty is defined by the fact that this topic has not previously become a subject of a separate scientific research, as well as in systemic and comparative legal approach, analysis and criticism of legal sources. The conclusion is made on the need for legislative consolidation of the mandatory pretrial disputes settlement associated with challenging transactions of the debtor. The acquired may be valuable in further formulation of the proposals on improvement of legislation and law enforcement practice within the science of Russian law.

scholarly journals Problems of the mechanism for challenging of transactions of the debtor in bankruptcy case

2021 ◽  
pp. 30-45
Author(s):  
Viktoriya Viktorovna Kalinkina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is a set of legal norms that regulate relations in the sphere of challenging of transactions of the debtor, as well as the law enforcement practice. The object of this research is the social relations that develop in the context of challenging of transactions of the debtor in bankruptcy case. The article discusses the problems faced by the arbitration and financial executives at the stage of claim preparation for challenging of transactions of the debtor, i.e. formation of evidence, as well as at the stage of execution of the corresponding court ruling. The purpose goal of this article lies in articulation of the problem, substantiation of the need for legislative regulation, and formulation of recommendation for the improvement of current legislation on the subject matter. The scientific novelty consists in addressed the issues that have not previously become the subject of separate research; as well as in the author’s conclusions and recommendations aimed at the improvement of the Federal Law No. 127-FZ of. October 26, 2002 “On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)” and other normative legal acts regulating this field. The acquired results can also be used in the Russian legal science for further elaboration on the issues related to the effectiveness of the mechanism for challenging of transactions of the debtor, and as well  as improvement of the current legislation of the Russian Federation and law enforcement practice that regulate this field.

Trends in the Legislation of the Russian Federation in the Sphere of Regulated Procurements

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 0-0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ольга Беляева ◽  
Olga Byelyayeva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Specific Group ◽  
Uniform Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Entities ◽  
The Way

The article contains the analysis of the Russian legislation on regulated purchases during the period starting the year 2012. It contains substantiated civil nature of purchasing relations, the circle of people whose purchasing activities are subordinated to the effects of legislation regulating the contractual system and to the Federal law “Of purchase of goods, works and services by certain types of legal entities”. The author traces the trends that are relevant to the development of legislation on purchasing practices. Specially outlined is the trend of extrapolation of the law when this law has no specific group of participants to regulate, and the tendency of creating “the purchasing code”, in other words, to eliminate differentiated legal regulation and to establish common purchase standards to be applied to the whole of contract system. The article describes the possible pending changes in the contract legislation. Also, an attempt is made to assess the effectiveness of the regulated procurements legislation which helps to identify problem areas such as distortions in the meaning of the law the way it is interpreted in by-laws, existence of legal gaps and collisions, lack of uniform law-enforcement standards.

scholarly journals Protection of consumer rights from unfair online advertising: certain theoretical and practical aspects

2021 ◽  
pp. 29-47
Author(s):  
Irina Viktorovna Ermakova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Online Advertising ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Telecommunication Networks ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Consumer Rights ◽  
Written Form ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is the legal norms aimed at regulation of relations in the sphere of protection of consumer rights with regards to online advertising, including contextual and targeted advertising, as well as other type advertising distributed over telecommunication networks. The object of this research is the social relations arising in the process of creation, placement, and consumer perception of the aforementioned types of advertising. Special attention is given to the theoretical and practical aspects of protecting the basic consumer rights in the context of distribution of the indicated types of advertising, as well as compliance to the corresponding legislative prescriptions by the advertisers, including prohibition to mislead consumers, requirement to distribute advertising over telecommunication networks after receiving advance consent of the consumer, etc. The article provides the examples of court decisions and decisions of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation on consideration of the this category of cases. The novelty of this research consists in outlining the effective approaches of the courts and the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation applicable to the essence, concept and relevant issues of legal regulation of online advertising in the context of protection of consumer rights, including controversial aspects of qualification of online advertising in accordance with the criteria of misleading or deception, as well as questions on due processing of consumer consent to distribution of advertising over telecommunication networks. The author makes recommendations for the improvement of corresponding norms of the Federal Law “On Advertising” and the Federal Law “On The Protection of Competition”, namely to stipulate on the legislative level the provisions that qualify advertising as inappropriate if contains potentially misleading or deceptive content, as well as that consent to receive advertising through telecommunication networks should be in a written form and contain the signature of the consumer.

scholarly journals Administrative Restraint Measures Applied by Employees of the Penal System of the Russian Federation in Connection with the Commission of an Administrative Offense

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 650-658
Author(s):  
Sergei A. Starostin ◽  
Nadezhda V. Aniskina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Physical Force ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: the article considers the theory and practice of applying administrative restraint measures implemented by employees of the penal system of the Russian Federation in case of the commission of an administrative offense. We substantiate an idea concerning the impact of the effectiveness of the use of administrative coercion measures by employees of the penal system not only on the overall level of penitentiary security, but also on state security in general. Aim: to reveal the specifics of application of administrative restraint measures in the penal system, taking into account the specifics of the law enforcement sphere. Methods: our research is based on the dialectical method of scientific cognition. The article uses general scientific (analysis, synthesis, induction, etc.), specific scientific and special methods of cognition (comparative legal, formal legal, statistical). Results: we reveal the essence of application of administrative restraint measures in the penal system; we study the practice of implementing the norms concerning the use of administrative restraint measures by employees of the penal system; we reveal the features of their application, taking into account the specifics of the sphere of law enforcement sphere, such as focusing on ensuring penitentiary security, preventing administrative offenses and crimes, application on the territory of penitentiary institutions in most cases, etc. We find out that the legal basis for the application of administrative restraint measures in the penal system of the Russian Federation needs to be improved. Conclusions: in order to increase the effectiveness of the practice of implementing administrative enforcement measures in the penal system, we formulate proposals to improve the norms of the current legislation: namely, Section V of the Law of the Russian Federation of July 21, 993 no. 5473-1 should contain definitions of the terms “use of physical force”, “use of special means”; the terms such as application and use of firearms should be distinguished; the wording “provision of medical first aid” should be replaced with “immediate provision of premedical aid to victims”. We also present arguments in favor of the expediency of supplementing Federal Law 197-FZ of July 19, 2018 “About the service in the Penal System of the Russian Federation...” with a provision that assigns to the employees of the penal system the duty to comply with the norms of criminal legislation (on necessary defense, extreme necessity and other circumstances excluding the criminality of the act) in cases of the implementation of administrative restraint measures.

scholarly journals Aggregate as a type of multiplicity of administrative offences: concept and legal formalization

2020 ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
Natal'ya Anatol'evna Akhtanina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Law Schools ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Administrative Legislation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

The object of this research is social relations emerged on the basis of administrative-legal norms, which regulate the aggregate of administrative offences. The subject of this research is the scientific literature, normative legal acts and law enforcement practice related to the concept of the aggregate of administrative offences. The author examines approaches of the scientists of various law schools to the concept of aggregate of administrative offences, its development and transformation in time. The author indicated the flaws in the current administrative legislation in part of the absence of legislative consolidation of the concept of “aggregate” of offence, which results in occurrence of a number of problems. The article explores the legal norms that regulate aggregate of offences in administrative legislation of the Russian Federation. A comparative analysis is conducted on consolidation of the aggregate of offences in administrative and criminal law. The scientific novelty is defined by upcoming changes in administrative legislation. This is the reason why improvement of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation with regards to regulation of the question of the aggregate of administrative offences gains more relevance. A conclusion is made on the need for establishing in law the unified detailed definition of the “aggregate” of administrative offences, which would allow ensuring more effective application of legal norms. A need is also underlined for the need of legislative consolidation of such feature of offences that are a part of the aggregate as “absence of bringing to accountability for earlier commission of an unlawful act”.  

scholarly journals Imposition of cumulative administrative penalty: technical-legal defects and law enforcement problems in the sphere of forest conservation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Anna Viktorovna Korepina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Simplified Approach ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Penalty ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The subject of this research is the social relations arising in the context of application of administrative sanctions for violating forestry legislation. The object of this research is the legislation on administrative offenses of the Russian Federation and foreign countries, law enforcement and judicial practice. The author observes the ambiguity of application of legislation on administrative offences by the state forestry departments in some constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Therefore, this scientific article indicates one of the relevant issues that stir up disputes among the law enforcement agencies – imposition of cumulative administrative penalty for violating forestry legislation. Using the universal dialectical, descriptive, and hermeneutical methods, the author analyzes the current administrative legal norms that regulate the procedure for imposition of cumulative administrative penalty. Special attention is given to the factors of ambiguity in law enforcement practice in terms of imposition of cumulative administrative penalty, which has developed due to the flaws in legal writing: 1) the absence of conceptual scientific developments dedicated to imposition of administrative penalty for cumulative administrative offenses; 2) simplified approach towards legal regulation of certain institutions of administrative responsibility that generates gaps in the legislation on administrative responsibility, which must filled in by law enforcement practice; 3) inappropriate interpretation of norms of the Article 4.4. of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences by the law enforcement, and namely, judicial bodies. The scientific novelty consists in recommendations for improving the provisions of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses in this sphere. The conclusions are based on the formal-legal and logical methods of research.

scholarly journals CIVIL AND TAX LAW: VICE VERSA

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-74
Author(s):  
Marina V. Sentsova (Karaseva)
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Tax Law ◽  
Tax Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Law Making

The subject of the research is the correlation of civil and tax law institutions in the scope of legal nature of such social relations. The purpose of the article is to confirm or refute the hypothesis that when qualifying civil legal relations with tax elements, the law enforcement officer should proceed from the priority of analysis of tax legislation over civil legislation. Methodology. Methods of analysis and synthesis are used. The scientific analysis focuses on decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and courts of general jurisdiction. The main results and scope of their application. The influence of civil law on tax law is carried out at the level of law-making and law enforcement. We study the law enforcement paradigms that are relevant for law enforcement activities. The current tasks of tax law-making are emphasized. Establishing the influence of tax law institutions on civil law allows us to improve some civil law institutions, create a comprehensive theory of the relationship of these legal phenomena, see trends in their development and, of course, outline ways to develop tax legislation in the aspect of tax law autonomy. The legislator should strive for maximum unification of legal terminology in tax and civil legislation so that subjects of legal relations feel legally comfortable and easily construct civil transactions based on the predicted tax consequences. Subjects of civil legal relations, before entering into certain civil transactions, should already plan their tax consequences in advance focusing not only on civil legislation, but also on tax legislation, in particular, on the classification of transactions as investment or non-investment. Conclusions. The impact of tax law on civil law is multidimensional. At least, we can talk about the impact on the levels of law-making, law enforcement, and the use of civil law institutions. When qualifying civil legal relations with tax elements, the analysis of tax legislation in comparison with civil legislation has priority.

scholarly journals The Prosecutor as a Coordinator of the Law Enforcement Activities in the Fight Against Crime

Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Anatoly Kruglikov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
National Guard ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

Introduction: the paper analyzes some problems of coordinating the activities of the law enforcement agencies in the fight against crime, and the role of the prosecutor in this activity. The author notes that the achievement of significant positive results in the fight against crime is only possible with a clear coordination of the actions of the law enforcement agencies carried out in accordance with the law. These bodies are named in the Regulation on the coordination of the activities of law enforcement agencies in the fight against crime approved by Presidential Decree No. 567 of April 18, 1996, with the subsequent amendments by other Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, the latest of which is Decree No. 640 of December 31, 2019. Such bodies are: the bodies of internal affairs of the Russian Federation, bodies of the Federal Security Service, troops of the National Guard of the Russian Federation, bodies of the criminal executive system of the Russian Federation, bodies of compulsory enforcement of the Russian Federation, customs bodies of the Russian Federation, investigative bodies of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and some other bodies. In accordance with Part 1 of Article 8 of the Federal Law “On the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation”, the activities of the law enforcement agencies to combat crime are coordinated by the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation, the prosecutors of the subjects of the Russian Federation, cities, districts and other territorial prosecutors, as well as military and other specialized prosecutors equated to them. In accordance with the above-mentioned Provision, the objectives of coordination are to increase the efficiency of fight against crime by developing and implementing coordinated measures by these bodies for the timely detection, solving, suppression and prevention of crimes, eliminating the causes and conditions that contribute to their commission. When writing the work, various methods of scientific knowledge were used: systematicity, analysis, synthesis, the formal-legal one, etc. Results: the author considers the basic principles of coordination of the activities of the law enforcement agencies, its main directions and forms. Conclusions: the practice of coordinating the activities of the law enforcement agencies should be constantly analyzed to study the best practices in the prevention and detection of crimes, the protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens in criminal proceedings, and to take into account the essence of court decisions made based on the results of the reviewed activities.

Human Rights Activities as a Function of the Prosecutor’s Office

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
K.N. Golikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The subject of this article is the problems of the nature, essence and purpose of prosecutorial activity. The purpose of the article is to study and justify the role of the human rights function in prosecutorial activities in the concept of a modern legal state. At the heart of prosecutorial activity is the implementation of the main function of the Prosecutor’s office – its rights and freedoms, their protection. This means that any type (branch) of Prosecutor's supervision is permeated with human rights content in relation to a citizen, society, or the state. This is confirmed by the fact that the Federal law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation” establishes an independent type of Prosecutor's supervision-supervision over the observance of human and civil rights and freedoms. It is argued that the legislation enshrines the human rights activities of the Prosecutor's office as its most important function. It is proposed to add this to the Law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation”.

Law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on tax disputes

2021 ◽  
pp. 550-563
Author(s):  
Alexandr V. Izmalkov ◽  
Alexander A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Pavel A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Ella Y. Kuzmenko
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Effect Relationship ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Qualitative Characteristics ◽  
State Body

We analyze the law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on taxes and fees, since the Tax Code of the Russian Federation is a rather controversial regulatory legal act. Tax disputes arise both at the initiative of tax authorities and at the initiative of taxpayers. Purpose: to determine the main directions of law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes. We use general scientific and specially legal methods as research methods. The focus is on the method of analysis. In the course of the research, we analyze the con-sideration of cases by judicial authorities on tax disputes, their quantitative and qualitative characteristics. We conclude that the emergence of disagree-ments between taxpayers and the state body when resolving the issue of the legality of their actions (inaction), as well as the legality of a non-normative legal act is the main reason for the formation of law enforcement practice in tax disputes. During the passage of all stages of the application of the law, it is also necessary to establish the existence of a cause-and-effect relationship between the actions of the taxpayer and the resulting consequences. The main points of this process go through several stages. We define the main directions of the law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document