scholarly journals On the need to amend the sanction of the Article 235 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Unlawful practice of medical and pharmaceutical activity”

2021 ◽  
pp. 61-73
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Dmitrievna Sungurova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
The Social ◽  
Pharmaceutical Activity ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Cis Countries ◽  
Domestic Law

The study of educational, monographic, and other specialized literature testifies ti the fact that questions of imposition of penalty for committing an offence stipulated by the Article 235 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation have not been comprehensively examined. This article analyzes the practice of imposition of penalty under the Article 235 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The object of this research is the social relations arising in the context of imposition of penalty for unlawful practice of medical and pharmaceutical activity. The subject of this research is the sanction of the Article 235 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The author considers the coercive measures applied to persons found guilty of committing an offence under the Article 235 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The acquired results contain scientific novelty and practical significance, and can be used for improving the criminal law. The author determines the following relevant issues associated with imposition of penalty under the Article 235 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: high instance of inflicting a fine as a form of punishment; absence of practice of imposition of punishment in form of restriction of freedom or forfeiture to hold certain posts or carry out particular activity. The makes recommendations for improving the sanction of the Article 235 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, taking into consideration the analysis of the legislation of CIS countries and domestic law enforcement practice.

scholarly journals On violation of the procedure for transaction of punishments in the sanctions of norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
pp. 49-58
Author(s):  
Mikhail Aleksandrovich Prostoserdov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
The Social ◽  
Special Part ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article provides the results of research of the system of sanctions of the Special Part of the effective Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The object of this study is the social relations arising in temrs of infliction of criminal punishment. The subject of is sanctions of the norms of the Special Part of the effective Criminal Law of the Russian Federation. The goal consists in identification of flaws in establishment of such sanctions, substantiation of the negative impact of these flaws, and development of recommendations for their eliminations. Particular attention is given to the rules for establishment of sanctions of the norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, namely the procedure for the transaction punishments in the sanctions of norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and consequences of violating this order. The scientific novelty of this research consists in identification of violations in the sanctions of norms that have recently come into legal force. The author also determines the violations that create internal contradictions within the effective criminal law. The three groups of violations of the procedure for transaction of punishments in the sanctions of norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on various grounds have been distinguished. In the course of this study, the author detected fifteen violations of the rules for establishment of the sanctions of norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as offered solutions for their eliminations. The acquired results are of practical significance and can contribute to the improvement of the Russian criminal law.

scholarly journals Concerning the Legal Regulation of the Order of Weapon Issue to Judges in the Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
pp. 12-20
Author(s):  
Rinat Mikhailovich Karimov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Safety Measures ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Social ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

In this article Karimov analyzes whether it is necessary to amend available safety measures in relation to judicial authorities of the Russian Federation. The aim of the research is to analyze the current order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federation. The object of the research is the social relations rising in the process of implementation of legal provisions about the order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federation. The subject of the research is the legal acts that regulate the order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federaton. The researcher analyzes kinds of weapons that can be issued to a judge upon his or her written inquiry. The research is based on the comparative legal analysis of previous provisions about the order of weapon issue to judges and legal provisions that have been implemented just lately. The analysis is also based on the use of such research methods as analysis and synthesis, generalisation and logical research method. The author of the article proves the idea that the legal specificiation of the order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federation will eliminate possibility of attacking judges or their family members. The author focuses on the gaps in relevant legal regulations and suggests to review and make changes in the current law that regulates the order of weapon issue to judges. 

The Subject of a Crime Under Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
E. G. Bykova ◽  
◽  
A. A. Kazakov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Code

The change in the disposition of Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation led to questions from law enforcement officers about from what moment a person is considered to be held administratively liable and what to mean by the commission of a similar act. The article carries out a systematic legal analysis of the provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in order to formulate proposals for solving the indicated problems. The fundamental method was dialectical. The formal legal method was used in the study of regulations governing certain aspects of the legal assessment of unlawful acts that take into account administrative precedence. Using a comparative legal method, a distinction was made between situations where a person was ordered to be held administratively liable and an administrative penalty was imposed. Scientific publications on the subject were analyzed. It was concluded that the current version of Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, containing a formally indefinite legal category, raises the problem of calculating the one-year period during which a person can be prosecuted under this norm if there is an administrative precedence. In addition, it is justified that a «similar act» should be understood only as an administrative offense, responsibility for which is provided for in Art. 20.3.1 Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. The use of criminal law by analogy is unacceptable, therefore, it is proposed to amend the disposition of Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code to eliminate the identified gap. The problem identified could be the basis for further scientific research. The practical significance is due to the fact that the positions formulated by the authors can be taken into account in the process of improving criminal law, when amending the relevant explanations of the highest court in this category of cases in order to form a unified practice of applying criminal law.

scholarly journals Features of signs of the crime object provided by article 166 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-198
Author(s):  
Алена Харламова ◽  
Alena Kharlamova ◽  
Юлия Белик ◽  
Yuliya Belik
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Direct Object ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the problematic theoretical and practical issues of the content of the signs of the object of the crimes under Art. 166 of the Criminal Code. The authors determined the main direct object, revealed the essence of the right of ownership, use and disposal. Marked social relations that can act as an optional direct object. Particular attention is paid in the article to the subject of the crime. Attempts have been made to establish criteria that are crucial for the recognition of any vehicle as the subject of theft. The content of the terms “automobile” and “other vehicle” is disclosed. The analysis of the conformity of the literal interpretation of the criminal law to the interpretation of the law enforcer is carried out. It is summarized that the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation narrows the meaning of the term “other vehicle”, including in it only vehicles for the management of which, in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, is granted a special right. The authors provide a list of such vehicles and formulate a conclusion on the advisability of specifying them as the subject of a crime. The narration of the article is accompanied by examples of decisions of courts of various instances in cases of crimes under Art. 166 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

scholarly journals Procedural problems in cases of tax violations discovered in the course of tax audits (Article 101 of the Taxation Code of the Russian Federation)

2020 ◽  
pp. 46-57
Author(s):  
Konstantin Evgenevich Shilekhin
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Document Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Empirical Material

The goal of this article lies in studying the problems of administration of law in the course of brining taxpayers to tax liability and formulation of recommendations of their elimination. The object of this research is the social relations characterizing tax liability and procedural order in this regard. The subject is the legal norms establishing liability for tax violations, as well as regulation the activity of tax and judicial bodies pertinent to application of the fiscal legislation of the Russian Federation. Research methodology is based on the dialectical method of cognition of social reality. For collection, processing, generalization, analysis and interpretation of empirical material, the author uses the methods of induction and deduction, statistical analysis and document analysis. The conclusion is made on the weakness of normative legal regulation of separate procedures of legal investigation on tax violation in terms of the Article 101 of the Taxation Code of the Russian Federation. The author suggest making a number of amendments to the fiscal legislation to improve the mechanism of holding the taxpayers liable.

Optional signs of the subjective part in crimes against life and health in russian legislation: psychological and criminological aspects

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3B) ◽  
pp. 105-115
Author(s):  
Marina Leonidovna Prokhorova ◽  
Elena Vladimirovna Silchenko ◽  
Elena Anatolyevna Elets ◽  
Ilya Nikolaevich Ulitin
Keyword(s):  
Social Behavior ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Behavior ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Forming Process ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation

Within the scope of the current research, the analysis of the psychological and criminological aspect of the optional signs of the subjective part in crimes against life and health has been conducted. Within the scope of the psychological and criminological features, stated patterns can be disclosed through the forming process of the criminal behavior mechanism.  Within the framework of the current research it has been established that individual determinant which can help to differentiate related elements of crime are common to each premeditated crime against life and health. Mental derangements, irritation, anti-social behavior, depreciation of the social relations, indifference to others and other negative emotional patterns are often common to the criminals committing premeditated crimes which are punishable under Chapter 16 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Discovered patterns can be useful for the development of new investigation techniques, for the prevention of the stated crimes and legislation improvement.

scholarly journals The Signs of the Subject of a Crime under Article 243.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-127
Author(s):  
Iskander A. Khalikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Professional History ◽  
Domestic Law ◽  
Private Collections

Introduction. When studying history, the results of the work of archaeologists play a significant role. At the same time, for science, only those studies that are conducted by scientists on the basis of a state-issued permit (the so called open sheet) are of value. In accordance with the permit, scientists are required to provide reports on the excavations carried out and information about the objects found. This is what distinguishes professional archaeologists from non- professional history enthusiasts. Such enthusiasts dig atr archaeological sites because of their interest, to create private collections and to sell items of historical value in antique markets. By their actions, they commit crimes against cultural heritage. This makes it necessary to study the characteristics of the subject of the crime provided for in art. 243.2 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation in order for criminal officers to properly deal with crimes in the field of archeology. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The research is based on general scientific and special research methods. The theoretical base consists of the works of domestic and foreign scientists in the field of law, history, archaeology, as well as the experience of competent authorities in the field of cultural heritage preservation. Results. The analysis of the work of the competent authorities and the study of legal literature led to the conclusion about the problems associated with the attribution to the subject of crime of persons searching for archaeological objects without obtaining a state permit. Discussion and Conclusion. Taking into account the accumulated international experience of countering illegal archaeology, studying domestic law enforcement practice, it is concluded that it is necessary to clarify the characteristics of the subject of the crime by making changes to the disposition of part 1 of art. 243.2 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals The concept of significance of violation of procedural norms of legislation of the Russian Federation on taxes and fees in terms of appointing an on-site tax audit

2021 ◽  
pp. 60-69
Author(s):  
Maksim Igorevich Zimulkin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
The Social ◽  
Relevant Case ◽  
Tax Audit ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is the legislation of the Russian Federation, case law, as well as domestic and foreign doctrine, which allow establishing the essence of legal relations for the purpose of appointment of on-site tax audit. The object of this research is the social relations in terms of appointing an on-site tax audit. The author considers legal aspects associated with the procedural issues of appointing an on-site tax audit, and violations committed by tax officials in appointing an audit. Special attention is given to the problems of qualification of procedural violations as significant, i.e. entailing cancellation of the decision of tax authority, acknowledgement of actions (or inaction) of tax officials as unlawful. The scientific novelty of this work consist in formulation of the criterion of significance of violation of procedural norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation on taxes and fees in terms of appointing an on-site tax audit. Leaning on the results of research of the Russian and foreign doctrine, as well as the analysis of the relevant case law, the author determines the procedural violations of tax officials committed in appointing tax audit, which should result in cancellation of the decisions of tax authorities, an acknowledgement of the actions (or inactions) of tax officials as unlawful. The conclusion is made on the content of the criterion of significance of violation of procedural norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation on taxes and fees in terms of appointing an on-site tax audit.

scholarly journals Problems of the mechanism for challenging of transactions of the debtor in bankruptcy case

2021 ◽  
pp. 30-45
Author(s):  
Viktoriya Viktorovna Kalinkina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is a set of legal norms that regulate relations in the sphere of challenging of transactions of the debtor, as well as the law enforcement practice. The object of this research is the social relations that develop in the context of challenging of transactions of the debtor in bankruptcy case. The article discusses the problems faced by the arbitration and financial executives at the stage of claim preparation for challenging of transactions of the debtor, i.e. formation of evidence, as well as at the stage of execution of the corresponding court ruling. The purpose goal of this article lies in articulation of the problem, substantiation of the need for legislative regulation, and formulation of recommendation for the improvement of current legislation on the subject matter. The scientific novelty consists in addressed the issues that have not previously become the subject of separate research; as well as in the author’s conclusions and recommendations aimed at the improvement of the Federal Law No. 127-FZ of. October 26, 2002 “On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)” and other normative legal acts regulating this field. The acquired results can also be used in the Russian legal science for further elaboration on the issues related to the effectiveness of the mechanism for challenging of transactions of the debtor, and as well  as improvement of the current legislation of the Russian Federation and law enforcement practice that regulate this field.

scholarly journals Causal link in iatrogenic crimes: problems of correlation of the categories of causality in forensic examination and Russian criminal law

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-51
Author(s):  
Kirill Alekseevich Berchanskiy
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Causal Link ◽  
Medical Examination ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Forensic Practice ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is the Russian case law of conducting legal proceedings against the representatives of medical sphere based on the constituent elements of crime established by the Part 2 of the Article 109 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation – infliction of death by negligence due to improper discharge of professional duties. The subject of this research also includes legal norms that regulate the procedure of forensic medical examination in the Russian Federation, norms of medical legislation, as well as corresponding provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The object of this research is the social relations emerging in the event of causing death due to improper provision of medical care, conduct of forensic medical examination, as well as consideration of such cases by the courts. The scientific novelty consists in comprehensive approach towards its implementation that would include the analysis of relevant practice of Russian courts on iatrogenic crimes. As a result of this research, the author outlines the key problems faced by the Russian courts in assessment of causal link in iatrogenic crimes, first and foremost committed by medical negligence. The detailed analysis of legal norms that regulate the procedure forensic medical examination allowed determining the possible reasons for discrepancies in forensic practice, which, in turn, lead to discrepancies in judicial practice. Based on the historical method of interpretation, the author detected the presence and origins of fundamental contradictions in the relevant legislation. The comparative-analytical method applied to the Russian criminal and forensic legislation allowed identifying the key issued that currently impede the efficient and just consideration of iatrogenic cases; the solution approach depending on priorities of the government in criminal law policy is proposed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document