Calculations of turbulent shear stress in supersonic turbulent boundary layer zero and adverse pressure gradient flow

1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. STUREK
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Gradient Flow ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Shear ◽  
Turbulent Shear Stress

scholarly journals Measurements in an incompressible three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer, under infinite swept-wing conditions, and comparison with theory

1975 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Van Den Berg ◽  
A. Elsenaar ◽  
J. P. F. Lindhout ◽  
P. Wesseling
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Shear ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Swept Wing ◽  
Test Plate ◽  
Turbulent Shear Stress

First a three-dimensional turbulent boundary-layer experiment is described. This has been carried out with the specific aim of providing a test-case for calculation methods. Much attention has been paid to the design of the test set-up. An infinite swept-wing flow has been simulated with good accuracy. The initially two-dimensional boundary layer on the test plate was subjected to an adverse pressure gradient, which led to three-dimensional separation near the trailing edge of the plate. Next, a calculation method for three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers is discussed. This solves the boundary-layer equations numerically by finite differences. The turbulent shear stress is obtained from a generalized version of Bradshaw's two-dimensional turbulent shear stress equation. The results of the calculations are compared with those of the experiment. Agreement is good over a considerable distance; but large discrepancies are apparent near the separation line.

scholarly journals A universal velocity profile for turbulent wall flows including adverse pressure gradient boundary layers

2021 ◽  
Vol 933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Subrahmanyam ◽  
Brian J. Cantwell ◽  
Juan J. Alonso
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Channel Flow ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Shear ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Mixing Length

A recently developed mixing length model of the turbulent shear stress in pipe flow is used to solve the streamwise momentum equation for fully developed channel flow. The solution for the velocity profile takes the form of an integral that is uniformly valid from the wall to the channel centreline at all Reynolds numbers from zero to infinity. The universal velocity profile accurately approximates channel flow direct numerical simulation (DNS) data taken from several sources. The universal velocity profile also provides a remarkably accurate fit to simulated and experimental flat plate turbulent boundary layer data including zero and adverse pressure gradient data. The mixing length model has five free parameters that are selected through an optimization process to provide an accurate fit to data in the range $R_\tau = 550$ to $R_\tau = 17\,207$ . Because the velocity profile is directly related to the Reynolds shear stress, certain statistical properties of the flow can be studied such as turbulent kinetic energy production. The examples presented here include numerically simulated channel flow data from $R_\tau = 550$ to $R_\tau =8016$ , zero pressure gradient (ZPG) boundary layer simulations from $R_\tau =1343$ to $R_\tau = 2571$ , zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer experimental data between $R_\tau = 2109$ and $R_\tau = 17\,207$ , and adverse pressure gradient boundary layer data in the range $R_\tau = 912$ to $R_\tau = 3587$ . An important finding is that the model parameters that characterize the near-wall flow do not depend on the pressure gradient. It is suggested that the new velocity profile provides a useful replacement for the classical wall-wake formulation.

A Superposition Analysis of the Turbulent Boundary Layer in an Adverse Pressure Gradient

1951 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-100
Author(s):  
Donald Ross ◽  
J. M. Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Wall Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Pressure Recovery ◽  
Stress Coefficient ◽  
Wall Shear

Abstract As an interim solution to the problem of the turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient, a super-position method of analysis has been developed. In this method, the velocity profile is considered to be the result of two effects: the wall shear stress and the pressure recovery. These are superimposed, yielding an expression for the velocity profiles which approximate measured distributions. The theory also leads to a more reasonable expression for the wall shear-stress coefficient.

Mechanisms of Turbulence Transport in a Turbine Blade Coolant Passage With a Rib Turbulator

1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Panigrahi ◽  
S. Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Layer ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Turbulent Shear ◽  
Large Scale Structures ◽  
Turbulent Shear Stress ◽  
Scale Structures

This paper provides detailed measurements of the flow in a ribbed coolant passage, and attempts to delineate the important mechanisms that contribute to the production of turbulent shear stress and the normal stresses. It is shown that the separated flow behind the rib is dictated by large-scale structures, and that the dynamics of the large-scale structures, associated with sweep, ejection, and inward and outward interactions, all play an important role in the production of the turbulent shear stress. Unlike the turbulent boundary layer, in a separated shear flow past the rib, the inward and outward interaction terms are both important, accounting for a negative stress production that is nearly half of the positive stress produced by the ejection and sweep mechanisms. It is further shown that the shear layer wake persists well past the re-attachment location of the shear layer, implying that the flow between ribbed passages never recovers to that of a turbulent boundary layer. Therefore, even past re-attachment, the use of statistical turbulence models that ignore coherent structure dynamics is inappropriate.

Experimental results for the transpired turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient

1975 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Andersen ◽  
W. M. Kays ◽  
R. J. Moffat
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layer Equation ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Stream Velocity ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Displacement Thickness

An experimental investigation of the fluid mechanics of the transpired turbulent boundary layer in zero and adverse pressure gradients was carried out on the Stanford Heat and Mass Transfer Apparatus. Profiles of (a) the mean velocity, (b) the intensities of the three components of the turbulent velocity fluctuations and (c) the Reynolds stress were obtained by hot-wire anemometry. The wall shear stress was measured by using an integrated form of the boundary-layer equation to ‘extrapolate’ the measured shear-stress profiles to the wall.The two experimental adverse pressure gradients corresponded to free-stream velocity distributions of the type u∞ ∞ xm, where m = −0·15 and −0·20, x being the streamwise co-ordinate. Equilibrium boundary layers (i.e. flows with velocity defect profile similarity) were obtained when the transpiration velocity v0 was varied such that the blowing parameter B = pv0u∞/τ0 and the Clauser pressure-gradient parameter $\beta\equiv\delta_1\tau_0^{-1}\,dp/dx $ were held constant. (τ0 is the shear stress at the wall and δ1 is the displacement thickness.)Tabular and graphical results are presented.

scholarly journals Mechanisms of Turbulence Transport in a Turbine Blade Coolant Passage With a Rib-Turbulator

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Panigrahi ◽  
S. Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Layer ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Turbulent Shear ◽  
Large Scale Structures ◽  
Turbulent Shear Stress ◽  
Scale Structures

This paper provides detailed measurements of the flow in a ribbed coolant passage, and attempts to delineate the important mechanisms that contribute to the production of turbulent shear stress and the normal stresses. It is shown that the separated flow behind the rib is dictated by large scale structures, and that the dynamics of the large scale structures, associated with sweep, ejection, and inward and outward interactions all play an important role in the production of the turbulent shear stress. Unlike the turbulent boundary layer, in a separated shear flow past the rib, the inward and outward interaction terms are both important accounting for a negative stress production that is nearly half of the positive stress produced by the ejection and sweep mechanisms. It is further shown, that the shear layer wake persists well past the re-attachment location of the shear layer, implying that the flow between ribbed passages never recovers to that of a turbulent boundary layer. Therefore, even past re-attachment, the use of statistical turbulence models that ignore coherent structure dynamics is inappropriate.

Reynolds-shear-stress measurements in a compressible boundary layer within a shock-wave-induced adverse pressure gradient

1974 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. C. Rose ◽  
M. E. Childs
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shock Wave ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Heat Transfer ◽  
Shear Stresses ◽  
Turbulent Heat ◽  
Wave Induced

The results of an experimental investigation of the mean- and fluctuating-flow properties of a compressible turbulent boundary layer in a shock-wave-induced adverse pressure gradient are presented. The turbulent boundary layer developed on the wall of an axially symmetric nozzle and test section whose nominal free-stream Mach number and boundary-layer-thickness Reynolds number were 4 and 105, respectively. The adverse pressure gradient was induced by an externally generated, conical shock wave.Mean and time-averaged fluctuating-flow data, including the experimental Reynolds shear stresses and experimental turbulent heat-transfer rates, are presented for the boundary layer and external flow, upstream, within and downstream of the pressure gradient. The turbulent mixing properties of the flow were determined experimentally with a hot-wire anemometer. The calibration of the wires and the interpretation of the data are discussed.From the results of the investigation, it is concluded that the shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction significantly alters the shear-stress characteristics of the boundary layer.

The accelerated fully rough turbulent boundary layer

1977 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh W. Coleman ◽  
Robert J. Moffat ◽  
William M. Kays
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Stress Tensor ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Shape Factor ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Smooth Wall ◽  
Mean Velocity

The behaviour of a fully rough turbulent boundary layer subjected to favourable pressure gradients both with and without blowing was investigated experimentally using a porous test surface composed of densely packed spheres of uniform size. Measurements of profiles of mean velocity and the components of the Reynolds-stress tensor are reported for both unblown and blown layers. Skin-friction coefficients were determined from measurements of the Reynolds shear stress and mean velocity.An appropriate acceleration parameterKrfor fully rough layers is defined which is dependent on a characteristic roughness dimension but independent of molecular viscosity. For a constant blowing fractionFgreater than or equal to zero, the fully rough turbulent boundary layer reaches an equilibrium state whenKris held constant. Profiles of the mean velocity and the components of the Reynolds-stress tensor are then similar in the flow direction and the skin-friction coefficient, momentum thickness, boundary-layer shape factor and the Clauser shape factor and pressure-gradient parameter all become constant.Acceleration of a fully rough layer decreases the normalized turbulent kinetic energy and makes the turbulence field much less isotropic in the inner region (forFequal to zero) compared with zero-pressure-gradient fully rough layers. The values of the Reynolds-shear-stress correlation coefficients, however, are unaffected by acceleration or blowing and are identical with values previously reported for smooth-wall and zero-pressure-gradient rough-wall flows. Increasing values of the roughness Reynolds number with acceleration indicate that the fully rough layer does not tend towards the transitionally rough or smooth-wall state when accelerated.

Boundary Layer Flashback Model for Hydrogen Flames in Confined Geometries Including the Effect of Adverse Pressure Gradient

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ólafur H. Björnsson ◽  
Sikke A. Klein ◽  
Joeri Tober
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Flow Separation ◽  
Gradient Flow ◽  
Lewis Number ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Diffuser Flow ◽  
Combustion Properties ◽  
Quenching Distance

Abstract The combustion properties of hydrogen make premixed hydrogen-air flames very prone to boundary layer flashback. This paper describes the improvement and extension of a boundary layer flashback model from Hoferichter [1] for flames confined in burner ducts. The original model did not perform well at higher preheat temperatures and overpredicted the backpressure of the flame at flashback by 4–5x. By simplifying the Lewis number dependent flame speed computation and by applying a generalized version of Stratford’s flow separation criterion [2], the prediction accuracy is improved significantly. The effect of adverse pressure gradient flow on the flashback limits in 2° and 4° diffusers is also captured adequately by coupling the model to flow simulations and taking into account the increased flow separation tendency in diffuser flow. Future research will focus on further experimental validation and direct numerical simulations to gain better insight into the role of the quenching distance and turbulence statistics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document