A Study of Stock Market Fluctuations and their Relations to Business Conditions

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man Fu
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 395-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreyoshi Das ◽  
Camelia M Kuhnen ◽  
Stefan Nagel

Abstract We show that individuals’ macroeconomic expectations are influenced by their socioeconomic status (SES). People with higher income or higher education are more optimistic about future macroeconomic developments, including business conditions, the national unemployment rate, and stock market returns. The spread in beliefs between high- and low-SES individuals diminishes significantly during recessions. A comparison with professional forecasters and historical data reveals that the beliefs wedge reflects excessive pessimism on the part of low-SES individuals. SES-driven expectations help explain why higher-SES individuals are more inclined to invest in the stock market and more likely to consider purchasing homes, durable goods, or cars. Received November 13, 2017; editorial decision February 12, 2019 by Editor Wei Jiang. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riza Demirer ◽  
Rangan Gupta ◽  
Zhihui Lv ◽  
Wing-Keung Wong

We employ bivariate and multivariate nonlinear causality tests to document causality from equity return dispersion to stock market volatility and excess returns, even after controlling for the state of the economy. Expansionary (contractionary) market states are associated with a low (high) level of equity return dispersion, indicating asymmetries in the relationship between return dispersion and economic conditions. Our findings indicate that both return dispersion and business conditions are valid joint forecasters of stock market volatility and excess returns and that return dispersion possesses incremental information regarding future stock return dynamics beyond that which can be explained by the state of the economy.


Author(s):  
Javed Iqbal ◽  
Mariam Javed

<span>Emerging markets are characterized by higher volatility and higher associated returns as<span> compared to developed markets. The excessive volatility in emerging markets is often<span> considered a result of inherent instability and unpredictability of country’s political,<span> institutional and macroeconomic environment. Increasing globalization and integration of<span> financial markets imply that volatility of emerging markets may also be affected by<span> global macroeconomic and business conditions. We investigate this issue for an emerging<span> market namely Pakistan. An important objective of this research is to provide empirical<span> evidence on whether local and global macroeconomic variables help forecast volatility of<span> this market over and above the GARCH models which predict volatility on the basis of<span> past shocks and past accumulated variance. Using monthly data over the post<span> liberalization period from early 1990 to 2010 we show that global variables have higher<span> explanatory power to affect Pakistani stock market volatility compared to the global<span> information variables.<br /><br class="Apple-interchange-newline" /></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 132-142
Author(s):  
Nuno Silva

Various studies report that the ability of industry indexes to predict the broad market disappeared during the most recent years. I revisit this theme using more flexible switching models and imposing economically motivated constraints on the predictions. My results show that traditional constant coefficients linear models are unable to forecast the stock market over the period considered, but restricting the equity premium to be non-negative, five industries predict the market. I also show that the Markov-switching models exhibit a dismal performance, which is even worse than the ones from the constant coefficients model. Finally, I test a model with two regimes- recession and expansion- which are identified in real-time through the Arouba-Diebold-Scotti Business Conditions Index. Using this model, I find that 8 out of 33 industries can successfully forecast the market. Furthermore, a mean-variance investor who bases his decisions on it obtains sizeable utility gains, relative to another investor who uses, exclusively, the historical returns.


2022 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 129-139
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Managi ◽  
Mohamed Yousfi ◽  
Younes Ben Zaied ◽  
Nejah Ben Mabrouk ◽  
Béchir Ben Lahouel

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 464-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halil D. Kaya ◽  
Nancy L. Lumpkin-Sowers

In this study, we examine the impact of business conditions and stock market conditions on blockholders’ ownership in U.S. firms. We expect that in periods when the general interest in the stock market goes up, blockholders’ interest and participation in the market will also increase (i.e. there are more blockholders per firm and the percentage share of blockholder ownership in each corporation is higher). We use the Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti (i.e. ADS) Business Conditions Index and the S&P 500 Index as proxies for business conditions and stock market conditions, respectively. We find that blockholders’ investments more closely track stock market conditions than business conditions. Our nonparametric tests show that there are more blockholders per firm when stock market conditions are better.


Author(s):  
Thomas Plieger ◽  
Thomas Grünhage ◽  
Éilish Duke ◽  
Martin Reuter

Abstract. Gender and personality traits influence risk proneness in the context of financial decisions. However, most studies on this topic have relied on either self-report data or on artificial measures of financial risk-taking behavior. Our study aimed to identify relevant trading behaviors and personal characteristics related to trading success. N = 108 Caucasians took part in a three-week stock market simulation paradigm, in which they traded shares of eight fictional companies that differed in issue price, volatility, and outcome. Participants also completed questionnaires measuring personality, risk-taking behavior, and life stress. Our model showed that being male and scoring high on self-directedness led to more risky financial behavior, which in turn positively predicted success in the stock market simulation. The total model explained 39% of the variance in trading success, indicating a role for other factors in influencing trading behavior. Future studies should try to enrich our model to get a more accurate impression of the associations between individual characteristics and financially successful behavior in context of stock trading.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document