scholarly journals Psoriasis: clinical and epidemiological features and therapy issues

2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 67-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Bakulev ◽  
T. V. Fitileva ◽  
E. А. Novodezerkina ◽  
I. Gilloteau ◽  
Н. Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Treatment Satisfaction ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Work Productivity ◽  
Severe Psoriasis ◽  
Activity Impairment ◽  
Psoriasis Severity

Aim. This study sets out to establish the demographic and clinical features of psoriasis and its co-morbidities; to describe approaches to treating patients in Russia, to whom the systemic therapy of drugs has been recommended; to assess the effects of this dermatosis on the patients' quality of life and work productivity; to assess the degree of consistency between dermatologists' and patients' estimates concerning the severity of the disease, complaints/objective manifestations and treatment satisfaction.Methods. Data from the GfK Disease Atlas was used. This ATLAS was filed within a global programme Growth from Knowledge that collected reliable data in the context of everyday clinical practice in 9 countries. The paper presents the results solely for the Russian sample. The study involved patients with moderate or severe psoriasis who were receiving systemic therapy for this disease. Using specially developed forms, ATLAS specialists registered data about patients, their disease and received treatment. The patients affected by psoriasis, who participated in the study, were questioned about their disease. Dermatologists assessed the severity of psoriasis, the patients' complaints, co-morbidities and received treatment. The patients completed questionnaires aimed at assessing the quality of their life [Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQI] and their work productivity [Work Productivity and Activity Impairment, WPAI]. The concordance between the patients' and the dermatologists' estimates was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient.Results. Overall, 3,821 patients participated in the ATLAS programme, out of whom 300 patients were Russians. The average time since psoriasis diagnosis amounted to 9.9 years. 51 % of the patients complained about itching in the lesion areas. Psoriatic arthritis was registered in 19 % of the cases. Among co-morbidities, anxiety or depression was most often recorded (11 %, respectively). The proportion of patients with pruritus and related comorbid conditions increased with psoriasis severity. The disease negatively affected the quality of patients’ life (the average value of DLQI was 7.1) and their work productivity (a decrease in the work productivity reached 33.2 %), with these indicators deteriorating with psoriasis severity. Despite the dominance of moderate and severe psoriasis forms among the participants, 60 % of the patients received therapy only with topical medications. The concordance rate between the patients and the dermatologists concerning the estimation of psoriasis severity and treatment satisfaction was low.Conclusion. Despite the therapy with systemic drugs, the patients' quality of life affected by severe or moderate psoriasis forms remained low. The consistency between the views on the treatment success between the patients and the dermatologists was low.

Loss of Work Productivity and Quality of Life in Patients With Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 546-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Heelan ◽  
S. L. Hitzig ◽  
S. Knowles ◽  
A. M. Drucker ◽  
N. Mittmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Dermatology Life Quality Index ◽  
Quality Index ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Work Productivity ◽  
Activity Impairment ◽  
Work Impairment ◽  
Life Quality Index ◽  
The Impact

Background: Little is known about quality of life and work productivity in autoimmune bullous dermatoses (AIBDs). Objective: To determine the impact of AIBDs on quality of life and work productivity. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study took place between February and May 2013 at an AIBD tertiary referral centre. Ninety-four patients were included. All participants completed the Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment–Specific Health Problem questionnaires. Results: Responders to treatment had less impairment ( P < .001) than nonresponders. Patients with severe AIBD had significantly more impairment that those with mild ( P < .001) and moderate ( P = .002) AIBD. Greater impairment was associated with higher percentage of work missed. Those with a higher Dermatology Life Quality Index score had greater work impairment and overall activity impairment ( P = .041, P = .024). Nonresponders had increased impairment while working ( P < .001), overall work impairment ( P < .001), and activity impairment ( P < .001). Severely affected patients had worse impairment in all Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire domains. Conclusions: AIBD has the potential to be a large burden on ability to work and quality of life. Larger studies are needed to clarify how these domains change over time and whether or not they improve with treatment.

Impact of constipation on opioid therapy management among long-term opioid users, based on a patient survey

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaloo Gupta, MS ◽  
Haridarshan Patel, PharmD ◽  
Justin Scopel, MD, MBA ◽  
Reema R. Mody, MBA, PhD
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Treatment Satisfaction ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Productivity Loss ◽  
Work Productivity ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Activity Impairment ◽  
Cross Sectional

Objective: The authors sought to characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL), medication adherence, productivity losses, and treatment satisfaction associated with modifications to opioid therapy due to opioid-induced constipation (OIC).Design: A cross-sectional, between-subjects design was used to examine health outcomes among US noncancer participants currently taking opioids.Patients, participants: Participants were adults in the 2012 US National Health and Wellness Survey, who reported currently using opioids (>30 days) and experiencing constipation. Respondents were categorized as making modifications to opioid therapy due to OIC (modifiers, n = 244) or making no modifications (nonmodifiers, n = 247).Main outcome measures: Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) and Symptoms (PAC-Sym), Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment, and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM II) for OIC treatment were administered. Generalized linear models were adjusted to control for baseline characteristics (age, gender, comorbidities, opioid strength, etc). Results: Modifiers reported poorer HRQoL (PAC-QoL total: 1.74 vs 1.44, p < 0.001), worse constipation (PAC-Sym total: 1.56 vs 1.35, p = 0.003), more pain-related resource use (surgery: odds ratio (OR) = 3.72, p = 0.002; emergency room visits: OR = 1.88, p = 0.049; hospitalizations: OR = 2.47, p = 0.033), and lower adherence (MMAS-4 pain: OR = 0.12, p < 0.001; MMAS-4 OIC: OR = 0.39, p < 0.001) than nonmodifiers. Modifiers reported greater presenteeism (49.75 percent vs 38.28 percent, p = 0.038), but no significant differences were found for activity impairment or OIC treatment satisfaction.Conclusions: Treating OIC effectively may help prevent inadequate pain management secondary to opioid therapy modification, help increase HRQoL, lessen OIC symptoms, decrease productivity loss, and improve adherence to opioid and OIC treatments.

scholarly journals AB0727 WORK OUTCOMES AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS IN ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS PATIENTS IN CHINA

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1658.1-1658
Author(s):  
L. Tu ◽  
Y. Xie ◽  
Q. Lv ◽  
M. Yang ◽  
Z. Liao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Productivity Loss ◽  
Work Productivity ◽  
Work Outcomes ◽  
Activity Impairment ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
The Impact

Background:Poorer work productivity due to pain and functional impairment is commonly seen in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, which may contribute to huge social economic burden. However, data about work outcomes and associated factors in Chinese AS patients were barely reported.Objectives:To assess work outcomes and identify factors associated with poor work productivity in patients with AS in China.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted in China. Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) fulfilled the 1984 New York modified criteria of AS were enrolled from rheumatology center from Jan 2017 to Aug 2017. All participants completed questionnaires about socio-demographic characteristics, disease characteristics, quality of life and the Work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire in AS (WPAI:SpA) to accesses the impact of chronic health conditions on job performance and productivity. Factors associated with work outcomes were evaluated.Results:A total of 91 patients with AS were included: 87.8% males, 78.02% employed, mean age and disease duration of 30 and 10 years respectively. The mean (SD) activity impairment of all patients was 48.57% (22.02%). For patients with employed work, mean (SD) absenteeism, presenteeism and work productivity loss were 10.22% (19.44%), 43.86% (22.48%) and 47.92% (25.81%) respectively. In multivariable analysis, activity impairment was associated with Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) (P<0.01) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) (P<0.01). Absenteeism was associated with disease duration (P=0.03). Presenteeism was associated with disease duration (P=0.04), BASFI (P<0.01) and ASQoL (P<0.01). Work productivity loss was associated with BASFI (P<0.01) and ASQoL (P<0.01).Conclusion:Longer disease duration, reduced physical function and poorer quality of life are associated with reduced work productivity in Chinese AS patients.References:[1]Boonen A, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Spoorenberg A, Schouten H, Rutten-van Molken M, et al. Work status and productivity costs due to ankylosing spondylitis: comparison of three European countries. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2002;61(5):429-37.[2]Martindale J, Shukla R, Goodacre J. The impact of ankylosing spondylitis/axial spondyloarthritis on work productivity. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29(3):512-23.[3]Castillo-Ortiz JD, Ramiro S, Landewe R, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, van den Bosch F, et al. Work Outcome in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Results From a 12-Year Followup of an International Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016;68(4):544-52.[4]Sag S, Nas K, Sag MS, Tekeoglu I, Kamanli A. Relationship of work disability between the disease activity, depression and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(3):499-505.[5]Goh Y, Kwan YH, Leung YY, Fong W, Cheung PP. A cross-sectional study on factors associated with poor work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis in Singapore. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019;22(11):2001-8.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals AB0814 SUSTAINED IMPROVEMENTS IN PHYSICAL FUNCTION, QUALITY OF LIFE, AND WORK PRODUCTIVITY WITH IXEKIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS AND PREVIOUS INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO TUMOUR NECROSIS FACTOR-INHIBITORS: 3-YEAR RESULTS FROM SPIRIT-P2 TRIAL

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1709-1710
Author(s):  
A. M. Orbai ◽  
J. Gratacos-Masmitja ◽  
E. Dokoupilova ◽  
B. Combe ◽  
A. Constantin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Work Productivity ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Activity Impairment ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
Treat Population

Background:Ixekizumab (IXE), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets IL-17A, has shown improvements compared to placebo (PBO) not only in disease activity but also in various patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessing physical function, quality of life (QoL), and work productivity in PsA patients treated for 24 weeks and sustained up to 52 weeks.1, 2Objectives:To report the effects of treatment with IXE on these PROs after up to 3 years of treatment.Methods:In SPIRIT-P2 (NCT02349295), a Phase 3 trial, 363 adult patients with active PsA and prior inadequate response or intolerance to 1 or 2 TNF inhibitors (TNFis) were randomized 1:1:1 to IXE 80 mg every 4 weeks (IXEQ4W; N=122) or every 2 weeks (IXEQ2W; N=123), or PBO (N=118) in the double-blind treatment period (Weeks 0-24). Both IXE regimens had a starting dose of 160 mg. Results are reported from a subset of the intent-to-treat population who were randomized to IXE at baseline (Week 0). The following PROs were assessed during Weeks 0-156: HAQ-DI (minimally clinically important difference [MCID] an improvement ≥0.35), medical outcomes survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS), European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP; absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity, and activity impairment). Missing values were imputed by observed analysis and modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) for continuous data or by modified non-responder imputation (mNRI) for categorical data.Results:Mean baseline scores for SF-36 (PCS and MCS), EQ-5D VAS, and WPAI-SHP (Figure 1) and HAQ-DI (mean [SD]: IXEQ4W=1.2 [0.6]; IXEQ2W=1.2 [0.6]), indicated impaired physical function and QoL. The percentage of patients of who completed 156 weeks of the study in IXEQ4W and IXEQ2W arms were 57.4% (n=70) and 44.7% (n=55), respectively. Patients receiving IXE treatment up to 3 years reported sustained improvements in SF-36 (PCS and MCS), EQ-5D VAS, and WPAI-SHP (presenteeism, work productivity, and activity impairment) (Figure 1). Observed HAQ-DI mean change from baseline in IXEQ4W: -0.46 (0.62) and IXEQ2W: -0.48 (0.55). The percentage of IXE treated patients achieving MCID for HAQ-DI (improvement ≥0.35) was sustained at 3 years (Figure 2).Figure 1.Summary of Patient-Reported Outcomes presented as change from baseline at Week 156 (Observed and mBOCF): Intent-to-Treat Population (Patients Randomized to IXE at Baseline)Figure 2.Patients achieving HAQ-DI MCID Response up to Week 156 (Observed) and at Week 156 (mNRI) among patients with HAQ-DI≥0.35 at baseline: Intent-to-Treat Population (Patients Randomized to IXE at Baseline)Conclusion:Improvements in PROs, measuring physical and mental function, quality of life, and work productivity are maintained up to 3 years with IXE treatment in patients with active PsA who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to 1 or 2 TNFis.References:[1]Nash P, et al. Lancet. 2017;389(10086):2317-2327.[2]Genovese MC, et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(11):2001-2011.Disclosure of Interests:Ana-Maria Orbai Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Company, Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, Horizon, Consultant of: Eli Lilly; Janssen; Novartis; Pfizer; UCB. Ana-Maria Orbai was a private consultant or advisor for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, not in her capacity as a Johns Hopkins faculty member and was not compensated for this service., Jordi Gratacos-Masmitja Grant/research support from: a grant from Pfizzer to study implementation of multidisciplinary units to manage PSA in SPAIN, Consultant of: Pfizzer, MSD, ABBVIE, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Lilly, Speakers bureau: Pfizzer, MSD, ABBVIE, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Lilly, Eva Dokoupilova Grant/research support from: Eli Lilly and Abbvie, Bernard Combe Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: AbbVie; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen; Eli Lilly and Company; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; UCB, Arnaud Constantin Grant/research support from: Study was sponsored by Sanofi Genzyme, Consultant of: Consulting fees from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Amanda M. Gellett Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and company, Aubrey Trevelin Sprabery Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Julie Birt Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Vladimir Geneus Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Peter Nash Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, UCB

Descriptive study on the lost productivity in breast cancer patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6542-6542
Author(s):  
L. Bordeleau ◽  
D. Warr ◽  
P. Goodwin ◽  
N. Lathia ◽  
O. Jugovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Work Productivity ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Activity Impairment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Breast Cancer Chemotherapy ◽  
Lost Productivity

6542 Background: There is a paucity of data assessing the potential impact of breast cancer diagnosis on the productivity of affected women. The objective was to identify and quantify lost productivity, health utilities and quality of life experienced in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Methods: A consecutive cross-sectional cohort of women with breast cancer (at any stage) attending outpatient clinics at Mount Sinai Hospital/Princess Margaret Hospital were eligible and consented to participate in the study. Women completed questionnaires assessing demographic and disease related information, work productivity and activity impairment utility (EQ5D VAS) and quality of life (FACT-B). Results: Data from 103 patients age 56.5 ± 11.9 years (mean +SD) were collection. Distribution of stage at diagnosis was as follows: 0 (31%), I (26%), II (10%), III (5%), IV (17%), unknown (11%). Time since diagnosis was 30.0 ± 39.1 months. Most women had recently been on active treatment for their breast cancer: chemotherapy (47%), hormone manipulation (23%), herceptin (6%), radiation (27%) and unknown (15%). 9% of women had metastatic disease, 35% had an income between $0 and $30,000. 58% of women were working full time for pay before their diagnosis, whereas only 19% were working full time for pay at the time of the assessment. At the time of the assessment, 18% were on disability leave. 8.7% of the women retired between the times of their diagnosis to the current assessment. Of those still working, a mean of 8.7 ± 11.6 days were missed from work in the previous 30 days due to problems related to breast cancer. The average number of days that employed patients actually worked (N=27) was 16.0 ± 9.0 days (range 4–30 days). 8% of patients required paid health care assistance during the past 4 weeks. 44% of patients had a spouse as an unpaid caregiver, followed by child/parent (20%) and friend (13%). Mean overall health rated by the respondents using the EQ5D VAS was 73.2 ± 16.3. The FACT-B mean was 68.0 ± 12.5 (range 27 to 98). Conclusion: Breast cancer negatively impacts work productivity and overall activity. The significant use of both paid and unpaid assistance would amount to significant societal costs which are currently not included in most cost-effectiveness analyses. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document