First Successful Installation of Through-Tubing Ceramic Sand Screen in Seligi Oil Field, Offshore Peninsular Malaysia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masran Kadir ◽  
Muhammad Ruzwin Rusli ◽  
Bukhari Samsudin ◽  
Saim Rahman ◽  
Sheereen Norizan ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Seligi field, located 240 kilometers offshore peninsular Malaysia in the Malay basin was discovered in May 1971 and is one of the largest oil fields in Malaysia. Sand production in the Seligi field has been observed, especially from the J reservoirs group. Within the Seligi field, Well G was identified as one of the wells with sand production to surface that could lead to sand accumulation at surface facilities and erosion of equipment. Historically, there had been no in-situ sand control measures in the well. The default practice for sand control was to choke back the well, to prevent triggering of the surface sand probe (production with maximum sand-free rate). This approach however is a compromise, while it limits sand production, it also limits the production potential of the well (well technical potential). As part of the production enhancement assessment program, remedial sand-control methods were considered to increase the oil production while minimising sand production. Among the options considered was ceramic downhole sand screen installation. Ceramics have been used in many extreme erosion and corrosion applications, with ceramic sintered silicon carbide being 50 times harder than steel. Ceramic sand screens made with sintered silicon carbide offer much higher erosional resistance at speeds of 300ft/s sand impingement velocity. Due to the aggressive nature of the sands and high velocities of greater than 50ft/s in Well G, a through-tubing ceramic sand screen was selected. The ceramic sand screen served as a fit for purpose solution that allowed the well potential to be fully maximised, enabling a continuous production with minimal sand production at surface.This paper reviews the first successful pilot installation of through-tubing ceramic sand screen in Well G in the Seligi Oil Field, Offshore Peninsular Malaysia. Discussed are careful analysis and planning, i.e. velocity calculations, tool deployment simulations, tool inspections and detailed job procedure leading to a successful installation. With the ceramic sand screen installed, the well was able to produce at 100% production choke opening with lower tubing head pressure and has not produced sand at surface despite multiple shutdowns and well bean ups. The installation has also removed the need to have sand handling facilities at topside and has generated an implicated cost saving from expensive intervention programs. Given the success of this pilot installation, a baseline in sand control has been set for this field, with new well candidates being considered for future replication.

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalil Rahman ◽  
Abbas Khaksar ◽  
Toby Kayes

Mitigation of sand production is increasingly becoming an important and challenging issue in the petroleum industry. This is because the increasing demand for oil and gas resources is forcing the industry to expand its production operations in more challenging unconsolidated reservoir rocks and depleted sandstones with more complex well completion architecture. A sand production prediction study is now often an integral part of an overall field development planning study to see if and when sand production will be an issue over the life of the field. The appropriate type of sand control measures and a cost-effective sand management strategy are adopted for the field depending on timing and the severity of predicted sand production. This paper presents a geomechanical modelling approach that integrates production or flow tests history with information from drilling data, well logs and rock mechanics tests. The approach has been applied to three fields in the Australasia region, all with different geological settings. The studies resulted in recommendations for three different well completion and sand control approaches. This highlights that there is no unique solution for sand production problems, and that a robust geomechanical model is capable of finding a field-specific solution considering in-situ stresses, rock strength, well trajectory, reservoir depletion, drawdown and perforation strategy. The approach results in cost-effective decision making for appropriate well/perforation trajectory, completion type (e.g. cased hole, openhole or liner completion), drawdown control or delayed sand control installation. This type of timely decision making often turns what may be perceived as an economically marginal field development scenario into a profitable project. This paper presents three case studies to provide well engineers with guidelines to understanding the principles and overall workflow involved in sand production prediction and minimisation of sand production risk by optimising completion type.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babalola Daramola ◽  
Chidubem Martins Alinnor

Abstract This paper presents the lessons learned from optimising the sand control and management strategies of an oil field (Field E) after multiple sanding events and well failures. It presents how the old sand control solution was selected, the failure root causes, and the remediation options considered. The new sand control method, and the performance of two re-drilled wells after two years of production are also presented. Field E is a sandstone field with oil and gas-cap gas at initial conditions, and was initially developed with 5 production wells, 2 water injection wells, and 2 gas injection wells. The development wells were drilled from an offshore platform, and completed with stand-alone screens (SAS) in 2013. Oil production commenced in late 2013, and within three years, sand production was observed, and 4 of the 5 oil production wells had failed. The 4 wells were re-drilled in 2017, and the sand control strategy was changed from stand-alone screens to frac-packs. Key lessons learned include completing sand strength studies pre-development, avoiding off-the-shelf sand control solutions, and completing sand control design studies based on service contractor capability, fines control, oil production rates, and sand control as key selection factors. Nearby wells should be shut in during infill drilling operations to avoid short circuits, drilling mud losses, completions damage, and well integrity failures. It is recommended that the bean up procedures of wells with sanding events are changed to slow bean up to preserve well integrity, oil production, and cash revenues. The asset team should consider installing sliding sleeves or inflow control devices for zonal testing and to choke or close sand production zones if needed. The asset team should also consider installing a test pipeline and a test separator to allocate sand production volumes from each well, clean up new wells, sample the wells for water salinity measurements, and other benefits.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 965-969
Author(s):  
Xiao YANG ◽  
Xue-Jian LIU ◽  
Zheng-Ren HUANG ◽  
Gui-Ling LIU ◽  
Xiu-Min YAO

2005 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 1047-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tor Grande ◽  
Hkon Sommerset ◽  
Eirik Hagen ◽  
Kjell Wiik ◽  
Mari-Ann Einarsrud

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 841-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Yang ◽  
Xuejian Liu ◽  
Zhengren Huang ◽  
Xiuming Yao ◽  
Guiling Liu

2013 ◽  
Vol 701 ◽  
pp. 440-444
Author(s):  
Gang Liu ◽  
Peng Tao Liu ◽  
Bao Sheng He

Sand production is a serious problem during the exploitation of oil wells, and people put forward the concept of limited sand to alleviate this problem. Oil production with limited sanding is an efficient mod of production. In order to complete limited sand exploitation, improve the productivity of oil wells, a real-time sand monitoring system is needed to monitor the status of wells production. Besides acoustic sand monitoring and erosion-based sand monitoring, a vibration-based sand monitoring system with two installing styles is proposed recently. The paper points out the relationships between sand monitoring signals collected under intrusive and non-intrusive installing styles and sanding parameters, which lays a good foundation for further study and actual sand monitoring in oil field.


2000 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 706-709
Author(s):  
Kaoru Aoki ◽  
Hiroko Ida ◽  
Hiroyasu Tamai ◽  
Tetsuo Yoshio ◽  
Kohei Oda

2014 ◽  
Vol 455 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 73-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Koyanagi ◽  
K. Shimoda ◽  
S. Kondo ◽  
T. Hinoki ◽  
K. Ozawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document