Chemical composition, protein quality, palatability, and digestibility of alternative protein sources for dogs

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (10) ◽  
pp. 2414-2422 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Dust ◽  
C. M. Grieshop ◽  
C. M. Parsons ◽  
L. K. Karr-Lilienthal ◽  
C. S. Schasteen ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Naomi Vita Venlet ◽  
Kasper Arthur Hettinga ◽  
Hanna Schebesta ◽  
Nadia Bernaz

ABSTRACT Infants are vulnerable consumers and highly depend on dietary proteins for growth and development during their first months of life. Infant formula (IF) and follow-on formula (FOF) have been developed to meet these requirements, although few protein sources are currently allowed to be used. At the same time, allergies to these available protein sources are becoming more frequent. There is thus a need to explore alternative protein sources for infant nutrition. One alternative could be quinoa, which is a pseudocereal that is naturally free from gluten and has a high protein content and quality. This review assessed the composition, nutritional properties, and applicability of quinoa proteins for IF and FOF as well as the legal framework for their use in the European Union (EU). The protein quality of isolated quinoa proteins (IQPs) is relatively high compared with other plant-based proteins like rice. Besides, during the protein isolation process, unfavorable compounds are mostly removed, ensuring that the final product can comply with the maximum residue concentrations allowed. Overall, IF and FOF are strictly regulated under the Foods for Specific Groups (FSG) Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 and more research is needed before the introduction of IQP in such products is considered, but this review shows it has several promising features that warrant further investigation.


1993 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 1573-1579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Watanabe ◽  
Juadee Pongmaneerat ◽  
Shuichi Sato ◽  
Toshio Takeuchi

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 63-64
Author(s):  
Maria R de Godoy

Abstract In the pet food industry, the popularity of plant-based protein sources has risen as consumer demand for grain-free and novel protein sources increase. However, minimal research has been conducted as regards use of pulses and their effects on acceptability and digestibility in canine and feline nutrition. In addition, market shift towards grain-free and pulse-rich diets has presented concerns about the suitability of pulses as viable protein sources. In July 2018, the FDA published a press release discussing a potential link between diets containing legumes and the development of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in dogs. As such, part of our research program has focused on the 1) characterization of the macronutrient composition and protein quality of plant-based protein sources, 2) evaluation of the effects of plant-based protein sources in extruded canine and feline diets on macronutrient digestibility, and modulation of fecal microbiota and metabolites, and 3) determination of the longitudinal effects of high pulse inclusion in diets on taurine status in dogs. Pulse ingredients contained approximately 20% crude protein, and had methionine or tryptophan as the first-limiting amino acids using the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay. When incorporated in canine and feline diets, pulses did not result in negative effects on macronutrient digestibility or fecal scores. However, shifts in fecal microbial and metabolites were observed in animals fed pulse-based in contrast with animal-based protein diets. The inclusion of 45% green lentils in extruded diets did not cause decreased plasma or whole blood taurine or methionine levels. Additionally, excess taurine was not depleted from these animals in the urine or feces. Taurine status was considered normal in these dogs, despite changes in fecal bile acid concentrations and microbiota. Although we are currently carrying out further research projects investigating potential association of pulse rich diets and canine DCM. Current research findings from our laboratory suggest the inclusion of pulses may not be the causative factor. The use of plant-based proteins as ingredients in canine and feline diets not only meet consumer demand but also provide a valuable, safe, and nutritionally adequate alternative to traditional protein sources.


2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (OCE8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Gonzalez Ronquillo ◽  
Esaul Jaramillo Lopez ◽  
Maria de la Salud Rubio-Lozano ◽  
Ignacio Dominguez Vara ◽  
Jose Romero Bernal

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 334-335
Author(s):  
Lauren Brewer ◽  
Matthew Panasevich ◽  
Nolan Frantz ◽  
Leighann Daristotle

Abstract The objectives of this study were to assess graded inclusions of sunflower protein meal (SPM; crude protein: 54%, crude fat: 11%, crude fiber: 4%) and dried yeast (DY; crude protein: 50%, crude fat: 3%, crude fiber: 2%) on nutrient digestibility, stool quality, and palatability in adult cats. Both SPM and DY were included at 5% and 10% in replacement of pea protein in a high-protein, chicken-based feline diet to maintain equal macronutrient concentrations across all test diets (formulated to 41% crude protein, 18% crude fat, 3% crude fiber). The study was approved and followed by the facility’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. A standard 2-bowl palatability test over a 2-day period was executed with adult cats (n = 30 each) to determine intake ratios between test diets (5% and 10% SPM or 5% and 10% DY), and test diets vs. control. Total tract nutrient digestibility was evaluated (n = 8 per diet) with 5 days of diet acclimation followed by 5 days of total fecal collection. Stool quality was evaluated on a 1–5 scale, where 1 = hard/formed and 5 = non-formed/diarrhea. All data were analyzed by ANOVA (SAS v9.4) and T-tests post-hoc (Minitab 18). Palatability and stool quality were similar (P > 0.05) between all diets. Protein digestibility was lower for DY-containing diets, compared with control (5% DY at P = 0.0083 and 10% DY at P = 0.0336), but not significantly different for SPM diets (P > 0.05). However, average protein digestibility was >88% across all diets. The alternative protein sources tested showed merit for inclusion to diversify ingredient sources while maintaining palatability in cat diets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document