scholarly journals Development of the Commercial Manufacturing Process for Ipatasertib

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 605-613
Author(s):  
Stephan Bachmann ◽  
Hans Iding ◽  
Christian Lautz ◽  
Isabelle Thomé-Pfeiffer ◽  
Caroline Maierhofer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Manufacturing Process ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metal Catalysis ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Complex Drug

Ipatasertib is a potent small molecule Akt kinase inhibitor currently being tested in Phase III clinical trials for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and triple negative metastatic breast cancer. In this paper an overview of the development achievements towards the commercial manufacturing process is given. The convergent synthesis consists of ten steps with eight isolated intermediates and utilizes a wide range of chemical techniques and technologies to build-up this complex drug. All three stereocenters are introduced using enzyme or metal catalysis.

Recent Developments in Treatments for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer—A Mechanistic Perspective

2012 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
E David Crawford ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Microtubule Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223

Over the past decade, the treatment landscape in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has markedly changed, with the introduction of three new chemotherapeutic agents. The mechanism of CRPC is not fully understood, but it may result from multiple pathways, including a loss or androgen receptor (AR) specificity and increased downstream signalling activity that provide multiple targets for therapeutic agents. For some years, docetaxel was the mainstay of treatment in CRPC, but recently, cabazitaxel (a microtubule inhibitor), sipuleucel-T (a cancer vaccine), and abiraterone acetate (a CYP17 inhibitor) were approved for CRPC treatment. In Phase III clinical trials, these agents have shown significant improvements in survival—over mitoxantrone (for cabazitaxel) and over placebo (for sipuleucel-T and abiraterone acetate)—and were well tolerated. There are also two treatments in late-stage development, MDV3100 (an oral AR antagonist) and radium-223 (an isotope that creates breaks in double-stranded DNA). These have also shown improvements in survival in Phase III trials; their regulatory approval is expected soon. The modes of actions of the existing and new drugs in CRPC are varied, but some are complementary and investigations of different combinations of these medications are much needed; they may enhance efficacy, further extend survival, and improve outcomes in this formerly untreatable disease.

scholarly journals A predictive model of overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2674
Author(s):  
Mehrad Mahmoudian ◽  
Fatemeh Seyednasrollah ◽  
Liisa Koivu ◽  
Outi Hirvonen ◽  
Sirkku Jyrkkiö ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Prognostic Models ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Improved Performance

Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is one of the most common cancers with a poor prognosis. To improve prognostic models of mCRPC, the Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM) Consortium organized a crowdsourced competition known as the Prostate Cancer DREAM Challenge. In the competition, data from four phase III clinical trials were utilized. A total of 1600 patients’ clinical information across three of the trials was used to generate prognostic models, whereas one of the datasets (313 patients) was held out for blinded validation. The previously introduced prognostic model of overall survival of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel or prednisone (so called Halabi model) was used as a performance baseline. This paper presents the model developed by the team TYTDreamChallenge and its improved version to predict the prognosis of mCRPC patients within the first 30 months after starting the treatment based on available clinical features of each patient. In particular, by replacing our original larger set of eleven features with a smaller more carefully selected set of only five features the prediction performance on the independent validation cohort increased up to 5.4 percent. While the original TYTDreamChallenge model (iAUC=0.748) performed similarly as the performance-baseline model developed by Halabi et al. (iAUC=0.743), the improved post-challenge model (iAUC=0.779) showed markedly improved performance by using only PSA, ALP, AST, HB, and LESIONS as features. This highlights the importance of the selection of the clinical features when developing the predictive models.

scholarly journals Treatment Landscape of Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Window of Opportunity

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1190
Author(s):  
Fernando López-Campos ◽  
Antonio Conde-Moreno ◽  
Marta Barrado Los Arcos ◽  
Antonio Gómez-Caamaño ◽  
Raquel García-Gómez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Progression ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Medical Need ◽  
Clinical Benefits

The treatment for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is a highly unmet medical need. The classic treatment approach for these patients—androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone—until metastatic progression is now considered suboptimal. Several randomized phase III clinical trials have demonstrated significant clinical benefits—including significantly better overall survival (OS)—for treatments that combine ADT with apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide. As a result, these approaches are now included in treatment guidelines and are considered a standard of care. In the present article, we discuss the changing landscape of the management of patients with nmCRPC.

Apalutamide, darolutamide and enzalutamide in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Roumiguié ◽  
Xavier Paoletti ◽  
Yann Neuzillet ◽  
Romain Mathieu ◽  
Sebastien Vincendeau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Aim: Comparison of the efficacy/safety/health-related quality of life of apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide in Phase III clinical trials involving patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was performed. Materials & methods: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed as well as conference abstracts reporting updated overall survival. Three pivotal trials were identified, SPARTAN (apalutamide), PROSPER (enzalutamide) and ARAMIS (darolutamide), and form the basis of this analysis. Results: All three drugs significantly prolonged metastasis-free survival, prostate-specific antigen response and overall survival versus placebo, and were generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Drug selection will likely be influenced by tolerability/safety and other factors, such as the propensity for drug–drug interactions and the presence of comorbidities, that affect the risk–benefit balance in individual patients.

Decreased fracture rate by mandating bone protecting agents in the EORTC 1333/PEACEIII trial combining Ra223 with enzalutamide versus enzalutamide alone: An updated safety analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5002-5002
Author(s):  
Silke Gillessen ◽  
Ananya Choudhury ◽  
Alejo Rodriguez-Vida ◽  
Franco Nole ◽  
Enrique Gallardo Diaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Continuous Administration ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Safety Population

5002 Background: The randomized phase III EORTC-1333-GUCG (NCT02194842) trial compares enzalutamide vs. a combination of Radium 223 and enzalutamide in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. The premature unblinding of ERA223 (NCT02043678) in Nov 2017 due to a significant increase in the rate of fractures in the combination of abiraterone and Ra223 arm led to the implementation of the mandatory use of bone protecting agents (BPA) in the EORTC-1333-GUCG trial. Skeletal fractures, pathological or not, are a frequent and underestimated adverse event of systemic treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Whether this mandated use of BPA (zoledronic acid or denosumab) would mitigate the risk of fractures in this patient population was unclear. An early safety analysis (Tombal, ASCO, 2019) suggested that the risk of fractures was well controlled in both arms when patients receive BPA. We present here an updated analysis of fracture incidence with longer follow-up. Methods: As of 28/01/2021, a total of 253 patients (134 after making BPA mandatory) were randomized between enzalutamide/Ra223 and enzalutamide. The fracture rate was estimated with the cumulative incidence method in the safety population of 237 (122 after making BPA mandatory) treated patients. Death in absence of fracture was analyzed as competing risk and censoring was applied at last follow-up. Results: Overall, 69.5% of enzalutamide/Ra223 patients (95.2% after making BPA mandatory) and 73.1% of enzalutamide patients (95% after making BPA mandatory) received BPA on treatment: 13.6% in the enzalutamide/Ra223 arm and 21.8% in the enzalutamide arm did not use BPA at registration, but started during protocol treatment and 55.9% and 51.3% respectively, received BPA since entry. At 36.7 months median follow-up in patients without BPA and 23.1 months median follow-up in patients receiving BPA, a total of 39 patients reported a fracture. Among them, 30 patients (20 in enzalutamide/Ra223 arm) did not receive BPA and 9 (4 in the enzalutamide/Ra223 arm) received BPA (see table). Conclusions: The updated safety analysis confirms the early fracture rate results. In the absence of BPA, the risk of fracture is increased when RA223 is added to enzalutamide. Strikingly, in both arms, the risk remains almost abolished by a preventive continuous administration of BPA, thus stressing the importance of complying to international recommendations in terms of giving BPA to mCRPC patients. This study is sponsored by EORTC and supported by Bayer and Astellas. Clinical trial information: NCT02194842. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Heterogeneous ensembles for predicting survival of metastatic, castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Pölsterl ◽  
Pankaj Gupta ◽  
Lichao Wang ◽  
Sailesh Conjeti ◽  
Amin Katouzian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Ensemble Methods ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Models ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castrate Resistant ◽  
Heterogeneous Ensemble

Ensemble methods have been successfully applied in a wide range of scenarios, including survival analysis. However, most ensemble models for survival analysis consist of models that all optimize the same loss function and do not fully utilize the diversity in available models. We propose heterogeneous survival ensembles that combine several survival models, each optimizing a different loss during training. We evaluated our proposed technique in the context of the Prostate Cancer DREAM Challenge, where the objective was to predict survival of patients with metastatic, castrate-resistant prostate cancer from patient records of four phase III clinical trials. Results demonstrate that a diverse set of survival models were preferred over a single model and that our heterogeneous ensemble of survival models outperformed all competing methods with respect to predicting the exact time of death in the Prostate Cancer DREAM Challenge.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of the Prolactin Receptor Antagonist LFA102 in Metastatic Breast and Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Jean‐Pascal Machiels ◽  
Cristina Suárez ◽  
Nancy Lewis ◽  
Michaela Higgins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Prolactin Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document