Compliance to antithrombotic therapy in elderly and senile patients with atrial fibrillation.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
М.В. Хруслов ◽  
М.А. Карпенко ◽  
Т.В. Вавилова ◽  
И.В. Пономарева
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Laboratory Model ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Effective Prevention ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Введение. Приверженность к приему антикоагулянтов является одним из ключевых компонентов эффективной профилактики тромбоэмболических осложнений. Цель исследования: оценка комплаентности пациентов пенсионного возраста, которым назначали прямые оральные антикоагулянты (ПОАК) по поводу неклапанной фибрилляции предсердий (ФП), и выяснение причин ее снижения. Материалы и методы. В ходе исследования осуществляли наблюдение за 244 пациентами с неклапанной ФП. В зависимости от вида принимаемых оральных антикоагулянтов все пациенты были разделены на 2 группы: 1я группа 124 человека, которые принимали ПОАК 2я группа 120 человек, которые принимали варфарин и наблюдались в системе централизованного мониторинга международного нормализованного отношения (МНО). Срок наблюдения составил 1 год. Результаты. Через 1 год от момента назначения препаратов назначения врача соблюдали только 22,6 пациентов 1й группы во 2й группе пациентов никто не прекратил прием варфарина, что указывало на более высокую приверженность к терапии. Заключение. Одним из способов повышения качества и безопасности антитромботической терапии у пациентов, принимающих антагонисты витамина К, является внедрение в клиническую практику системы централизованного мониторинга МНО, которая представляет собой новую клиниколабораторную Introduction. Adherence to anticoagulants is one of the key components of effective prevention of thromboembolic complications. Aim: to assess the compliance of patients of retirement age who were prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), and to determine the reasons for its reduction. Materials and methods. We monitored 244 patients with nonvalvular AF that were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 124 patients who took DOACs Group 2 120 patients who took warfarin and were observed in the system of centralized monitoring of international normalized ratio (INR). The observation period was 1 year. Results. After 1 year from the moment of drugs prescribing only 22.6 of patients from Group 1 followed the prescription no one patient from Group 2 stopped taking warfarin that indicated a higher adherence to therapy. Conclusion. One of the ways to improve the quality and safety of antithrombotic therapy in patients taking vitamin K antagonists is to introduce into the clinical practice a system of centralized monitoring of INR that is a new clinical and laboratory model of remote interaction between patient and medical specialist.

scholarly journals PRescriptiOn PattERns of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation (PROPER study)

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozcan Basaran ◽  
Nesrin Filiz Basaran ◽  
Edip Guvenc Cekic ◽  
Ibrahim Altun ◽  
Volkan Dogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Real World ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Inappropriate Drug ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Prescription Patterns ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Introduction: Inappropriate use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) have not been well investigatedand, however, may be frequent in real-world practice in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This study was designed to evaluate the prescription patterns and appropriateness of OACs in patients with NVAF in real-world clinical settings. Methods: We performed a prospective, observational study (NCT02366338). A total of 148 patients with NVAF were screened for OAC prescription. Appropriateness of prescribing was evaluated using 9 criteria of the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI): indication, choice, dosage, modalities and practicability of administration, drug–drug interactions, drug–disease interactions, duplication, and duration. For each criterion, the evaluator has to rate whether the medication is (A) appropriate, (B) inappropriate but with limited clinical importance, and (C) inappropriate. Results: Of 148 patients, 73 (50%) were on warfarin (group 1), 39 (26%) were on rivaroxaban (group 2), and 36 (24%) were on dabigatran therapy (group 3). The MAI showed that 83% of group 1, 28% of group 2, and 47% of group 3 patients had at least 1 inappropriate criterion. Moreover, according to the choice criterion, 37% of group 1, 8% of group 2 and 5% of group 3 were rated as inappropriate, and dosage was not appropriate in 77% of group 1, 23% of group 2, and 42% of group 3. Conclusion: Inappropriate drug use is frequent among patients with NVAF not only for warfarin but also for NOACs. Although there is an apparent improvement in thromboprophylaxis of NVAF, much more effort is needed for appropriate use of OACs.

scholarly journals Demographic, clinical, and functional determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose María Mostaza ◽  
Carmen Suarez ◽  
Jose María Cepeda ◽  
Luis Manzano ◽  
Demetrio Sánchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Antithrombotic Treatment ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract Background This study assessed the sociodemographic, functional, and clinical determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) attended in the internal medicine setting. Methods A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in NVAF patients who attended internal medicine departments for either a routine visit (outpatients) or hospitalization (inpatients). Results A total of 961 patients were evaluated. Their antithrombotic management included: no treatment (4.7%), vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (59.6%), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (21.6%), antiplatelets (6.6%), and antiplatelets plus anticoagulants (7.5%). Permanent NVAF and congestive heart failure were associated with preferential use of oral anticoagulation over antiplatelets, while intermediate-to high-mortality risk according to the PROFUND index was associated with a higher likelihood of using antiplatelet therapy instead of oral anticoagulation. Longer disease duration and institutionalization were identified as determinants of VKA use over DOACs. Female gender, higher education, and having suffered a stroke determined a preferential use of DOACs. Conclusions This real-world study showed that most elderly NVAF patients received oral anticoagulation, mainly VKAs, while DOACs remained underused. Antiplatelets were still offered to a proportion of patients. Longer duration of NVAF and institutionalization were identified as determinants of VKA use over DOACs. A poor prognosis according to the PROFUND index was identified as a factor preventing the use of oral anticoagulation.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in multimorbid patients

Kardiologiia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-68
Author(s):  
N. V. Izmozherova ◽  
A. A. Popov ◽  
V. M. Bakhtin
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulant Treatment ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
High Level ◽  
Multimorbid Patients ◽  
Group 1

Objective. Assessment of the safety and efficacy of anticoagulant treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) in a multimorbidity setting.Materials and Methods. The cross-sectional study included 104 patients diagnosed with nonvalvular AF and followed in the medical facilities of Yekaterinburg. The subjects were interviewed, anthropometric measurements were made, and the risk of thromboembolic complications was evaluated using the CHA2DS2-VASc score. The Charlson multimorbidity index was calculated, and patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 with a low level of multimorbidity (not more than 5 points) and Group 2 with a high level of multimorbidity (6 points or more). The data are presented as a median and interquartile range (25%; 75%).Results.The study population included 40 males and 64 females. The median age was 71 (62.5; 80) years. The level of multimorbidity was estimated as 5 (3; 6) points. Group 1 included 64 patients, and Group 2 included 40 patients. Thirty-nine percent of the sample patients had a paroxysmal form of AF, 10% had a persistent form, and 51% had permanent AF. The group of patients with a high level of multimorbidity included more patients with permanent AF and fewer patients with paroxysmal AF as compared with a moderate level of multimorbidity (p<0.01). Anticoagulant treatment was indicated for 92 (88.5%) patients. It was administered to 70.7% of patients; 29.3% did not receive it. Among patients receiving anticoagulants, warfarin was administered to 18.5%, and new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were administered to 81.5%. Complications were reported in 15.2% of anticoagulant treatment cases. Bleeding was reported in 21.7% of cases of warfarin administration and 12.5% of cases of NOAC treatment (p=0.32). The median number of risk factors for bleeding per patient was 5 (4; 5.5). The Charlson index and the total number of risk factors are significantly correlated (R=0.37, p<0.05).Conclusion. In real-world clinical practice in Ekaterinburg, Russia, 7 of 10 patients with AF for whom anticoagulant treatment was indicated actually received it; NOACs are prescribed four times more often than warfarin. With a higher level of multimorbidity, the risk of bleeding under the pressure of anticoagulant treatment increases; thus, NOACs should be preferred over warfarin for treatment of multimorbid patients.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in real-world patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The FANTASIIA study

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Manuel Anguita Sánchez ◽  
Vicente Bertomeu Martínez ◽  
Martín Ruiz Ortiz ◽  
Ángel Cequier Fillat ◽  
Inmaculada Roldán Rabadán ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Real World ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Patterns of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in cancer patients referred for cardio-oncological evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Toma ◽  
E Rrapaj ◽  
S Giovinazzo ◽  
M Sarocchi ◽  
G Stronati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Creatinine Concentration ◽  
Pharmacological Interactions ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the standard of care for the prophylaxis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF)-cardioembolism, but their use in oncological patients has been limited so far. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of the patients referred to two cardio-oncology outpatient units between January 2017 and July 2019, and selected those presenting with NVAF, CHA2DS2-VASc ≥1 for men and ≥2 for women, and cancer on active treatment. The following were considered as contraindications to DOAC: severe chronic kidney disease; anti-neoplastic therapy unknown or with potential moderate-to-severe adverse interactions; cirrhosis or liver metastases. Clinical characteristics of patients on DOAC (group 1), on VKA or LMWH with at least 1 contraindication to DOAC (group 2), and on VKA or LMWH despite not having contraindications to DOAC (group 3) were compared by chi-square or ANOVA. Results Of a total of 3,831 patients, 264 (6.9%) met the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). One-hundred fourteen (43.2%) were in group 1, 61 (23.1%) in group 2 (18 on VKA, 43 on LMWH), and 65 (24.6%) in group 3 (27 on VKA, 38 on LMWH). Anticoagulation was omitted in 24 (9.1%) cases for various reasons: spontaneous bleeding (5), anaemia and/or thrombocytopenia (5), frailty (4), CHA2DS2-VASc 1 (3), pharmacological interactions (1), single episode of NVAF (1); and not clearly motivated in 5 subjects. The only significant difference between the 3 groups was serum creatinine concentration (Table 1). Of note, only 10% of subjects in group 1 received an inappropriate DOAC dose, while LMWH was under-dosed for 18% of patients in group 2 and 31% of patients in group 3 (P=0.002). Conclusions In the setting of a dedicated cardio-oncology consultation, DOAC and VKA are most often appropriately prescribed to cancer patients with NVAF. However, there is residual use of LMWH, not infrequently at non-anticoagulant dosage. This is a non-evidence based common practice in clinical oncology that clearly must be abandoned Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Utilization of Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Before and After Catheter Ablation at Shanghai, China

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 107602961982626
Author(s):  
Chen Tingting ◽  
Wang Yuzhu ◽  
Zhang Lin ◽  
Li Ran ◽  
Li Jing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Prescription Data ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Before And After

Both vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. This study evaluated the utilization of VKA and NOACs in NVAF patients before and after catheter ablation in China. Prescription data were retrospectively collected between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2016, including indication of use, dose, renal function, and risk assessment (CHA2DS2-VASc score and HAS-BLED score) in Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University. Trends and factors associated with anticoagulants use before and after ablation were evaluated. A total of 475 patients with NVAF who received ablation were included in the analysis. Of all, 53.26% of them received antithrombotic therapy preablation. Warfarin was prescribed in 35.26%, with NOACs in 11.37%. Four hundred seventy-three patients received antithrombotic therapy (99.58%) postablation, 236 patients with NOACs (49.68%). CHA2DS2-VASc score, HAS-BLED score, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and alcohol were independently associated with anticoagulant utilization before catheter ablation. The higher CHA2DS2-VASc score was associated with less frequent prescription of NOACs postablation. The preablation anticoagulation use was still inadequate in China, and CHA2DS2-VASc score was a significant factor influencing the preablation anticoagulant utilization. The utilization rate of NOACs increased significantly postablation, especially for dabigatran, which implied that more physicians prefer to prescribe NOACs for NVAF patients after ablation in our country and may be attributed to the aspects such as ease of NOAC use but also possibly the greater safety and efficacy. Furthermore, the physicians may reluctant to use NOACs for high stroke risk atrial fibrillation patients after catheter ablation.

The Association between Oral Anticoagulants and Cancer Incidence among Individuals with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 120 (10) ◽  
pp. 1384-1394
Author(s):  
Devin Abrahami ◽  
Christel Renoux ◽  
Hui Yin ◽  
Jean-Pascal Fournier ◽  
Laurent Azoulay
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract Objective Existing evidence on the association between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and cancer is limited and contradictory. No observational studies have been conducted to simultaneously address the cancer safety of VKAs and DOACs. The objective of this study was to determine whether use of VKAs and DOACs, separately, when compared with nonuse, is associated with cancer overall and prespecified site-specific incidence. Methods Using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified patients newly diagnosed with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) between 2011 and 2017. Using a time-varying exposure definition, each person-day of follow-up was classified as use of (1) VKAs, (2) DOACs, (3) VKAs and DOACs (drug switchers), and (4) nonuse of anticoagulants (reference). We also conducted a head-to-head comparison of new users of DOACs versus VKAs using propensity score fine stratification weighting. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer overall and prespecified subtypes were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Compared with nonuse, use of VKAs was not associated with cancer overall (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.91–1.22) or cancer subtypes. Similarly, use of DOACs was not associated with cancer overall (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.93–1.37), but an association was observed for colorectal cancer (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.01–2.99), and pancreatic cancer generated an elevated, though nonsignificant HR (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 0.72–6.44). Results were consistent in the head-to-head comparison. Conclusion Use of oral anticoagulants is not associated with the incidence of cancer overall among patients with NVAF. Possible associations between DOACs and colorectal and pancreatic cancer warrant further study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document