scholarly journals Fully automated anesthesia, analgesia and fluid management using physiologic closed-loop systems in high risk patients: a pilot study

Author(s):  
Vincent Jame
2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K. Rosner ◽  
Timothy R. Kuklo ◽  
Rabih Tawk ◽  
Ross Moquin ◽  
Stephen L. Ondra

Object The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in high-risk patients who undergo major spine reconstruction. Methods In the pilot study, 22 patients undergoing major spine reconstruction received prophylactic IVC filters. These patients were prospectively followed to evaluate complications related to the filter, the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) formation, and the rate of pulmonary embolism (PE). These data were compared with those obtained in a retrospective review for PE in a matched cohort treated at the same institution. At a second institution the treatment guidelines were implemented in 17 patients undergoing complex spine surgery with the same follow-up criteria. In the pilot study, no patient experienced PE (0%), whereas two had DVT (9%). Bilateral DVT developed postoperatively in one patient (associated morbidity rate 4.5%), who required thrombolytic therapy. One patient died of unrelated surgical complications. The PE rate in the matched cohort at the same institution was 12%. At the second institution, no patient had PE, and no complications were noted. Conclusions In this patient population, prophylactic IVC filter placement appears to decrease the PE rate substantially, from 12 to 0%. The placement of IVC filters appears to be a safe and efficacious intervention for prevention of PE in high-risk patients.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 554-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Guarracino ◽  
L. Cabrini ◽  
R. Baldassarri ◽  
C. Cariello ◽  
R. D. Covello ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 175114371989279
Author(s):  
Matthew Baldwin ◽  
Bruce McCormick ◽  
Mark Foale ◽  
Martha Belete ◽  
Connie Chen ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8560-8560
Author(s):  
Matias Emanuel Valsecchi ◽  
Nancy Shockley ◽  
Deborah Summers ◽  
Carol L Shields ◽  
Jerry A Shields ◽  
...  

8560 Background: Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular cancer in adults. Despite the successful treatments for primary tumors, up to 50% of the patients later die of distant metastases. Currently no effective adjuvant treatment is available for these patients. Our group previously reported that sunitinib stabilized systemic metastases in 65% of uveal melanoma patients who failed prior treatments. In this pilot study, we tested sunitinib in an adjuvant setting in high-risk patients with primary uveal melanoma. Methods: Patients with estimated metastatic death rate ≥ 50% based on the following criteria were eligible: (1) monosomy 3 and 8q amplification; (2) large tumor (≥ 15 mm in diameter and ≥7 mm in thickness); (3) monosomy 3 and other risk factors (large tumor, epithelioid dominant cell type, local recurrence, or extra-scleral extension). Sunitinib was given at 25 mg PO daily for at least 6 months. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis (SPSS 17.0). Secondary endpoint was safety. Results: A total of 23 Caucasian patients (median, 54 years; range: 25 – 77) were enrolled. All patients received sunitinib for at least 6 months (range: 6 – 12). Eighteen patients had confirmed monosomy 3, from whom 13 (72%) also showed 8q amplification. The median follow-up was 24 months (range 12 – 54 months). Only one patient died of unknown cause (OS: 30.4 months). A total of seven patients (30%) developed systemic metastases, all of which were liver metastases. The DFS and OS rates at 2 years were 70% (95% CI: 47 – 86%) and 100%, respectively. The OS rate at 2 years was better than historical control with monosomy 3 patients (51%, 95% CI: 31 – 71%) (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44:1008). In those patients who relapsed, the median time to progression after finishing sunitinib was 2 months (range: 0 – 8). The most common adverse events were: diarrhea (47%), fatigue (39%), dermatitis (30%), stomatitis (13%), leucopenia (8%), and nausea (4%). Most were grade 1 or 2 (88%) and only one was considered grade 4 (diarrhea). Conclusions: In high-risk uveal melanoma patients with estimated metastatic death rate of ≥ 50%, adjuvant sunitinib showed promising results and deserves further investigation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 227 ◽  
pp. 246-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haejin In ◽  
Marisa Langdon-Embry ◽  
Lauren Gordon ◽  
Clyde B. Schechter ◽  
Judith Wylie-Rosett ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document