scholarly journals Case Series of Pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 Infection

Author(s):  
Fakhreddine S ◽  
◽  
Jaber R ◽  
Skaff E ◽  
Salloum S ◽  
...  

Introduction: Pneumomediastinum is rare in viral infection of the lung however in COVID-19 patients it is more common. Study Design: Case series of 14 moderate to severe COVID cases complicated by Pneumomediastinum admitted to Saint George Hospital over 4 months. Data was collected retrospectively from medical charts of the patients. Results: Most of the patients were males. Average hospital stay was 15.21 days. Five patients (35.72%) developed pneumomediastinum without any kind of mechanical ventilation during hospitalization. Around 35.72% of the patients were discharged and the average time till death was 8.8 days. Conclusion: Pneumomediastinum can develop without any positive pressure ventilation in COVID-19 infection.

2021 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Sethi ◽  
A. S. Ahmed ◽  
S. Hanif ◽  
M. Aqeel ◽  
A. B. S. Zubairi

Abstract Since December 2019, the clinical symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its complications are evolving. As the number of COVID patients requiring positive pressure ventilation is increasing, so is the incidence of subcutaneous emphysema (SE). We report 10 patients of COVID-19, with SE and pneumomediastinum. The mean age of the patients was 59 ± 8 years (range, 23–75). Majority of them were men (80%), and common symptoms were dyspnoea (100%), fever (80%) and cough (80%). None of them had any underlying lung disorder. All patients had acute respiratory distress syndrome on admission, with a median PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 122.5. Eight out of ten patients had spontaneous pneumomediastinum on their initial chest x-ray in the emergency department. The median duration of assisted ventilation before the development of SE was 5.5 days (interquartile range, 5–10 days). The highest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was 10 cmH2O for patients recieving invasive mechanical ventilation, while 8 cmH2O was the average PEEP in patients who had developed subcutaneous emphysema on non-invasive ventilation. All patients received corticosteroids while six also received tocilizumab, and seven received convalescent plasma therapy, respectively. Seven patients died during their hospital stay. All patients either survivor or non-survivor had prolonged hospital stay with an average of 14 days (range 8−25 days). Our findings suggest that it is lung damage secondary to inflammatory response due to COVID-19 triggered by the use of positive pressure ventilation which resulted in this complication. We conclude that the development of spontaneous pneumomediastinum and SE whenever present, is associated with poor outcome in critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Ricafranca Castillo ◽  
Gino Rei A. Quizon ◽  
Mario Joselito M. Juco ◽  
Arthur Dessi E. Roman ◽  
Donnah G De Leon ◽  
...  

 Treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) pneumonia remains empirical and the search for therapies that can improve outcomes continues. Melatonin has been shown to have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immune-modulating effects that may address key pathophysiologic mechanisms in the development and progression of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which has been implicated as the likely cause of death in COVID19. We aimed to describe the observable clinical outcomes and tolerability of high-dose melatonin (hdM) given as adjuvant therapy in patients admitted with COVID19 pneumonia. We conducted a retrospective descriptive case series of patients who: 1) were admitted to the Manila Doctors Hospital in Manila, Philippines, between March 5, 2020 and April 4, 2020; 2) presented with history of typical symptoms (fever, cough, sore throat, loss of smell and/or taste, myalgia, fatigue); 3) had admitting impression of atypical pneumonia; 4) had history and chest imaging findings highly suggestive of COVID19 pneumonia, and, 5) were given hdM as adjuvant therapy, in addition to standard and/or empirical therapy. One patient admitted to another hospital, who one of the authors helped co-manage, was included. He was the lone patient given hdM in that hospital during the treatment period. Main outcomes described were: time to clinical improvement, duration of hospital stay from hdM initiation, need for mechanical ventilation (MV) prior to cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and final outcome (death or recovery/discharge). Of 10 patients given hdM at doses of 36-72mg/day per os (p.o.) in 4 divided doses as adjuvant therapy, 7 were confirmed COVID19 positive (+) by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and 3 tested negative  (-), which was deemed to be false (-) considering the patients’ typical history, symptomatology, chest imaging findings and elevated bio-inflammatory parameters.  In all 10 patients given hdM, clinical stabilization and/or improvement was noted within 4-5 days after initiation of hdM. All hdM patients, including 3 with moderately severe ARDS and 1 with mild ARDS, survived; none required MV. The 7 COVID19(+) patients were discharged at an average of 8.6 days after initiation of hdM. The 3 highly probable COVID19 patients on hdM were discharged at an average of 7.3 days after hdM initiation. Average hospital stay of those not given hdM (non-hdM) COVID19(+) patients who were admitted during the same period and recovered was 13 days. To provide perspective, although the groups are not comparable, 12 of the 34 (35.3%) COVID19(+) non-hdM patients admitted during the same period died, 7/34 (20.6%) required MV; while 6 of 15 (40%) non-hdM (-) by RT-PCR but highly probable COVID19 pneumonia patients also died, 4/15  (26.7%) required MV. No significant side-effects were noted with hdM except for sleepiness, which was deemed favorable by all patients, most of whom had anxiety- and symptom-related sleeping problems previously. HdM may have a beneficial role in patients treated for COVID19 pneumonia, in terms of shorter time to clinical improvement, less need for MV, shorter hospital stay, and possibly lower mortality. HdM was well tolerated. This is the first report describing the benefits of hdM in patients being treated for COVID19 pneumonia.  Being a commonly available and inexpensive sleep-aid supplement worldwide, melatonin may play a role as adjuvant therapy in the global war against COVID19. 


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed N Al Shafi'i ◽  
Doaa M. Kamal El-din ◽  
Mohammed A. Abdulnaiem Ismaiel ◽  
Hesham M Abotiba

Abstract Background Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been increasingly used in the management of respiratory failure in intensive care unit (ICU). Aim of the Work is to compare the efficacy and resource consumption of NIPPMV delivered through face mask against invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) delivered by endotracheal tube in the management of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Patients and Methods This prospective randomized controlled study included 78 adults with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to the intensive care unit. The enrolled patients were randomly allocated to receive either noninvasive ventilation or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Results Severity of illness, measured by the simplified acute physiologic score 3 (SAPS 3), were comparable between the two patient groups with no significant difference between them. Both study groups showed a comparable steady improvement in PaO2:FiO2 values, indicating that NIPPV is as effective as CMV in improving the oxygenation of patients with ARF. The PaCO2 and pH values gradually improved in both groups during the 48 hours of ventilation. 12 hours after ventilation, NIPPMV group showed significantly more improvement in PaCO2 and pH than the CMV group. The respiratory acidosis was corrected in the NIPPV group after 24 hours of ventilation compared with 36 hours in the CMV group. NIPPV in this study was associated with a lower frequency of complications than CMV, including ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP), sepsis, renal failure, pulmonary embolism, and pancreatitis. However, only VAP showed a statistically significant difference. Patients who underwent NIPPV in this study had lower mortality, and lower ventilation time and length of ICU stay, compared with patients on CMV. Intubation was required for less than a third of patients who initially underwent NIV. Conclusion Based on our study findings, NIPPV appears to be a potentially effective and safe therapeutic modality for managing patients with ARF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edison Vitório de Souza Júnior ◽  
Diego Pires Cruz ◽  
Gabriel Aguiar Nunes ◽  
Giovanna Maria Nascimento Caricchio ◽  
Sávio Luiz Ferreira Moreira ◽  
...  

Objetivo: descrever a morbimortalidade hospitalar e custos públicos relacionados à insuficiência renal aguda no Nordeste brasileiro. Método: trata-se de estudo quantitativo, ecológico e descritivo realizado com dados do Sistema de Informações Hospitalares. Coletaram-se as variáveis: internações; óbitos; mortalidade; valores dos serviços hospitalares; valores médios gastos com as internações e média de permanência hospitalar. Analisaram-se os dados com estatística descritiva, apresentando-os em tabelas elaboradas pelo software Excel. Resultados: registraram-se 21.100 internações, 4.460 óbitos e mortalidade de 21,1%. Destacaram-se a Bahia nas internações (28,6%) e óbitos (28,7%) e Sergipe na letalidade (35,6%). Gerou-se custo público superior a R$ 37,6 milhões e a Bahia responsabilizou-se por 32,1%. Revelou-se valor médio de R$ 1.969,97 para cada internação e a média de permanência hospitalar foi de 10,2 dias. Conclusão: conclui-se que as variáveis epidemiológicas apresentaram maior prevalência nos Estados da Bahia e Sergipe. Evidenciou-se, além disso, comportamento crescente das internações, implicando o incremento dos custos públicos. Descritores: Saúde Pública; Nefrologia; Nefropatias; Epidemiologia; Custos de Cuidados de Saúde; Sistemas de Informação. Abstract Objective: to describe hospital morbidity and mortality and public costs related to acute renal failure in northeastern Brazil. Method: this is a quantitative, ecological and descriptive study conducted with data from the Hospital Information System. The following variables were collected: hospitalizations; deaths; mortality; values of hospital services; average values spent on hospitalizations and average hospital stay. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics and presented in tables prepared by Excel software. Results: 21,100 hospitalizations, 4,460 deaths and 21.1% mortality were registered. Bahia stood out in hospitalizations (28.6%) and deaths (28.7%) and Sergipe in lethality (35.6%). It generated a public cost over R $ 37.6 million and Bahia accounted for 32.1%. An average value of R $ 1,969.97 was revealed for each hospitalization and the average hospital stay was 10.2 days. Conclusion: it is concluded that the epidemiological variables were more prevalent in the states of Bahia and Sergipe. In addition, the increasing behavior of hospitalizations was evidenced, implying an increase in public costs. Descriptors:  Public Health; Nephrology; Kidney Diseases; Epidemiology; Health Care Costs; Information Systems.Resumen Objetivo: describir la morbimortalidad hospitalaria y los costos públicos relacionados con la Insuficiencia Renal Aguda en el Noreste de Brasil. Método: se trata de un estudio cuantitativo, ecológico y descriptivo realizado con datos del Sistema de Informaciones Hospitalarias. Se recogieron las siguientes variables: hospitalizaciones; muertes, mortalidad, valores de los servicios hospitalarios; promedio de valores gastados en admisiones y promedio de permanencia hospitalaria. Los datos se analizaron con estadísticas descriptivas y se presentaron en tablas elaboradas por el software Excel. Resultados: se registraron 21.100 admisiones, 4.460 muertes y 21.1% de mortalidad. Bahía se destacó en hospitalizaciones (28.6%) y muertes (28.7%), y Sergipe en letalidad (35.6%). Se generó un costo público de más de R$ 37,6 millones y Bahía fue responsable del 32.1%. El valor medio de R $ 1,969.97 se reveló para cada hospitalización y la permanencia hospitalaria con promedio de 10,2 días. Conclusión: se concluye que las variables epidemiológicas presentaron mayor prevalencia en los Estados de Bahía y Sergipe. Además, hubo evidencia de un mayor comportamiento de hospitalización, lo que implica un aumento en los costos públicos. Descriptores: Salud Pública; Nefrología; Enfermedades Renales; Epidemiología; Costos de la Atención en Salud; Sistemas de Información.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 840-848
Author(s):  
Eli H. Newberger ◽  
John J. Hagenbuch ◽  
Nancy B. Ebeling ◽  
Elizabeth Pivchik Colligan ◽  
Jane S. Sheehan ◽  
...  

Social service personnel from one public and two voluntary agencies were integrated into a consultation group in an academic pediatric hospital, leading to a reduction in the actual cost of medical services and the risk of reinjury subsequent to the diagnosis of child abuse. In the 1969-1970 hospital year, 62 cases of child abuse were seen, of which 39 were hospitalized. The average hospital stay was 29 days; the average hospital cost $3,000. Total hospital costs for the 39 cases were $123,000, of which bed costs made up $95,000. There were at least three subsequent incidents of child abuse in these 39 cases, and there was one subsequent death; the reinjury rate was 10% for hospitalized cases. In September 1970 the Trauma X Group, an interdisciplinary, interagency consultation unit based in the hospital, was formed. With formal consultation and continued surveillance after discharge by the Trauma X Group, the following data were obtained from the 1970-1971 hospital year. Of 86 cases, 60 were hospitalized. The average hospital stay was 17 days; the average hospital cost $2,500. Total hospital costs for the 60 cases was $150,000, of which bed costs made up $101,000. There was one incident of reinjury and no deaths subsequent to diagnosis in these 60 cases; the reinjury rate was 1.7%. The risk of reinjury calculated from a modified life table was reduced from 8% in the year previous to the formation of the group to 7% and 2%, respectively, in the subsequent year and six-month periods, supporting the dollar-cost impression of effectiveness. Foster placement, furthermore, was infrequent and does not explain the differential impact of the Trauma X Group in the intervals under study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3285-3287
Author(s):  
Zubair Yousfani ◽  
Jabeen Atta ◽  
Khenpal Das ◽  
Madhu Bala ◽  
Shagufta Magsi ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the consequent outcomes in the patients with rectal cancer endured laparoscopic surgical excision at Department of Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences Jamshoro, Hyderabad and to review their curative resection and recurrence rates, postoperative morbidities and complete survival. Methods: This prospective case series study was done at the Department of General Surgery of Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan. All patients of 30-65 years ages with rectal cancer and underwent diagnostic laparoscopy either of gender were included. After removing the tumor, the specimen pinned out on a flat surface and placed in fixative solution to allow the orientation of the specimen and assessments of the exact margins. As the specimens had acceptable clear margins and limited invasion to the submucosa, no further surgical procedure was proceeded. Data was collected via study proforma. Results: A total of 40 patients were studied. Patients in the laparoscopic operation lost less blood with an amount of only 200mL during 190 minutes average operation time. The bowel functioning returned in 2 days averagely with 8 days average hospital stay. Conclusion: It is concluded that laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is an effective, safe and feasible approach in terms of less post-operative complications and recovery time as well as Hospital stay. Key words: Rectal Cancer, laparoscopic surgery


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 1382-1387 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pierce Ebaugh ◽  
Benjamin Umbel ◽  
David Goss ◽  
Benjamin C. Taylor

Background: Ankle fractures in patients with complicated diabetes have significantly increased the rates of complications and poorer functional outcomes when treated nonoperatively, and there have been only modest reductions when treated operatively. We hypothesized that the minimally invasive, robust construct that tibiotalocalcaneal fixation with an intramedullary nail offers would result in high rates of limb salvage, acceptable rates of complications, and less loss of function, in this difficult patient population. Methods: This was an institutional review board–approved retrospective study of 27 patients with complicated diabetes who underwent tibiotalocalcaneal nailing of their ankle fracture as a primary treatment without formal joint preparation. Patients with complicated diabetes were defined as having neuropathy, nephropathy, and/or peripheral vascular disease. The mean clinical follow-up was 888 days. Patients were screened for associated risk factors. Data were collected on surgical complications. The outcomes measured included length of hospital stay, loss of ambulatory level, amputation, and time to death. The mean age was 66 years with an average body mass index of 38 and hemoglobin A1c of 7.4. Six fractures were open. Results: The limb salvage rate was 96%. The average hospital stay was 6 days, and the mean time to weightbearing was 6.7 weeks. The fracture union rate was 88%. The surgical complication rate was 18.5%, with no instances of malunions, symptomatic nonunions, or Charcot arthropathy. Eight patients died by final follow-up (mean, 1048 days). An ambulatory level was maintained in 81% of the patients. Conclusion: With high limb salvage rates, relatively early weightbearing, maintained ambulatory level, and acceptable complication rates, we believe our technique can be considered an appropriate approach to increase the overall survivability of threatened limbs and lives in this patient population. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.


2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mesut Dursun ◽  
Sinan Uslu ◽  
Ali Bulbul ◽  
Muhittin Celik ◽  
Umut Zubarioglu ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims To compare the effect of early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in terms of the need for endotracheal ventilation in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants born between 24 and 32 gestational weeks. Methods This is a randomized, controlled, prospective, single-centered study. Forty-two infants were randomized to nIPPV and 42 comparable infants to nCPAP (birth weight 1356 ± 295 and 1359 ± 246 g and gestational age 29.2 ± 1.7 and 29.4 ± 1.5 weeks, respectively). Results The need for endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation was significantly lower in the nIPPV group than the nCPAP group (11.9% and 40.5%, respectively, p < 0.05). There were no differences in the duration of total nasal respiratory support, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia or other early morbidities. Conclusion nIPPV compared with nCPAP reduced the need for endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in premature infants with RDS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document