scholarly journals Efficient targeted degradation via reversible and irreversible covalent PROTACs

Author(s):  
Ronen Gabizon ◽  
Amit Shraga ◽  
Paul Gehrtz ◽  
Ella Livnah ◽  
Yamit Shorer ◽  
...  

<p>PROteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) represent an exciting inhibitory modality with many advantages, including sub-stoichiometric degradation of targets. Their scope, though, is still limited to-date by the requirement for a sufficiently potent target binder. A solution that proved useful in tackling challenging targets is the use of electrophiles to allow irreversible binding to the target. However, such binding will negate the catalytic nature of PROTACs. Reversible covalent PROTACs potentially offer the best of both worlds. They possess the potency and selectivity associated with the formation of the covalent bond, while being able to dissociate and regenerate once the protein target is degraded. Using Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) as a clinically relevant model system, we show efficient covalent degradation by non-covalent, irreversible covalent and reversible covalent PROTACs, with <10 nM DC50’s and >85% degradation. Our data suggests that part of the degradation by our irreversible covalent PROTACs is driven by reversible binding prior to covalent bond formation, while the reversible covalent PROTACs drive degradation primarily by covalent engagement. The PROTACs showed enhanced inhibition of B cell activation compared to Ibrutinib, and exhibit potent degradation of BTK in patients-derived primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. The most potent reversible covalent PROTAC, RC-3, exhibited enhanced selectivity towards BTK compared to non-covalent and irreversible covalent PROTACs. These compounds may pave the way for the design of covalent PROTACs for a wide variety of challenging targets.</p>

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronen Gabizon ◽  
Amit Shraga ◽  
Paul Gehrtz ◽  
Ella Livnah ◽  
Yamit Shorer ◽  
...  

<p>PROteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) represent an exciting inhibitory modality with many advantages, including sub-stoichiometric degradation of targets. Their scope, though, is still limited to-date by the requirement for a sufficiently potent target binder. A solution that proved useful in tackling challenging targets is the use of electrophiles to allow irreversible binding to the target. However, such binding will negate the catalytic nature of PROTACs. Reversible covalent PROTACs potentially offer the best of both worlds. They possess the potency and selectivity associated with the formation of the covalent bond, while being able to dissociate and regenerate once the protein target is degraded. Using Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) as a clinically relevant model system, we show efficient covalent degradation by non-covalent, irreversible covalent and reversible covalent PROTACs, with <10 nM DC50’s and >85% degradation. Our data suggests that part of the degradation by our irreversible covalent PROTACs is driven by reversible binding prior to covalent bond formation, while the reversible covalent PROTACs drive degradation primarily by covalent engagement. The PROTACs showed enhanced inhibition of B cell activation compared to Ibrutinib, and exhibit potent degradation of BTK in patients-derived primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. The most potent reversible covalent PROTAC, RC-3, exhibited enhanced selectivity towards BTK compared to non-covalent and irreversible covalent PROTACs. These compounds may pave the way for the design of covalent PROTACs for a wide variety of challenging targets.</p>


Author(s):  
Ronen Gabizon ◽  
Amit Shraga ◽  
Paul Gehrtz ◽  
Ella Livnah ◽  
Neta Gurwicz ◽  
...  

<p>PROteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) represent an exciting inhibitory modality with many advantages, including sub-stoichiometric degradation of targets. Their scope, though, is still limited to-date by the requirement for a sufficiently potent target binder. A solution that proved useful in tackling challenging targets is the use of electrophiles to allow irreversible binding to the target. However, such binding will negate the catalytic nature of PROTACs. Reversible covalent PROTACs offer the best of both worlds. They possess the potency and selectivity associated with the formation of the covalent bond, while being able to dissociate and regenerate once the protein target is degraded. Using Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) as a clinically relevant model system, we present a proof-of concept for the first in class cyanoacrylamide reversible covalent PROTACs. We show efficient degradation with reversible covalent PROTACs, as well as their non-covalent and irreversible counterparts. The latter are amongst the most efficient PROTACs reported for BTK. They display single digit nM DC50, full degradation within 2-4 hours, proteome wide selectivity and show ~10-fold better inhibition of B cell activation than Ibrutinib. These examples refute the notion that covalent binders are not suitable as the basis for PROTACs, and may pave the way for the design of covalent PROTACs for a wide variety of challenging targets.</p>


Author(s):  
Andreas Späth ◽  
Burkhard König

Ammonium ions are ubiquitous in chemistry and molecular biology. Considerable efforts have been undertaken to develop synthetic receptors for their selective molecular recognition. The type of host compounds for organic ammonium ion binding span a wide range from crown ethers to calixarenes to metal complexes. Typical intermolecular interactions are hydrogen bonds, electrostatic and cation–π interactions, hydrophobic interactions or reversible covalent bond formation. In this review we discuss the different classes of synthetic receptors for organic ammonium ion recognition and illustrate the scope and limitations of each class with selected examples from the recent literature. The molecular recognition of ammonium ions in amino acids is included and the enantioselective binding of chiral ammonium ions by synthetic receptors is also covered. In our conclusion we compare the strengths and weaknesses of the different types of ammonium ion receptors which may help to select the best approach for specific applications.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Hanyin Wang ◽  
Shulan Tian ◽  
Qing Zhao ◽  
Wendy Blumenschein ◽  
Jennifer H. Yearley ◽  
...  

Introduction: Richter's syndrome (RS) represents transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) into a highly aggressive lymphoma with dismal prognosis. Transcriptomic alterations have been described in CLL but most studies focused on peripheral blood samples with minimal data on RS-involved tissue. Moreover, transcriptomic features of RS have not been well defined in the era of CLL novel therapies. In this study we investigated transcriptomic profiles of CLL/RS-involved nodal tissue using samples from a clinical trial cohort of refractory CLL and RS patients treated with Pembrolizumab (NCT02332980). Methods: Nodal samples from 9 RS and 4 CLL patients in MC1485 trial cohort were reviewed and classified as previously published (Ding et al, Blood 2017). All samples were collected prior to Pembrolizumab treatment. Targeted gene expression profiling of 789 immune-related genes were performed on FFPE nodal samples using Nanostring nCounter® Analysis System (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA). Differential expression analysis was performed using NanoStringDiff. Genes with 2 fold-change in expression with a false-discovery rate less than 5% were considered differentially expressed. Results: The details for the therapy history of this cohort were illustrated in Figure 1a. All patients exposed to prior ibrutinib before the tissue biopsy had developed clinical progression while receiving ibrutinib. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering using the 300 most variable genes in expression revealed two clusters: C1 and C2 (Figure 1b). C1 included 4 RS and 3 CLL treated with prior chemotherapy without prior ibrutinib, and 1 RS treated with prior ibrutinib. C2 included 1 CLL and 3 RS received prior ibrutinib, and 1 RS treated with chemotherapy. The segregation of gene expression profiles in samples was largely driven by recent exposure to ibrutinib. In C1 cluster (majority had no prior ibrutinb), RS and CLL samples were clearly separated into two subgroups (Figure 1b). In C2 cluster, CLL 8 treated with ibrutinib showed more similarity in gene expression to RS, than to other CLL samples treated with chemotherapy. In comparison of C2 to C1, we identified 71 differentially expressed genes, of which 34 genes were downregulated and 37 were upregulated in C2. Among the upregulated genes in C2 (majority had prior ibrutinib) are known immune modulating genes including LILRA6, FCGR3A, IL-10, CD163, CD14, IL-2RB (figure 1c). Downregulated genes in C2 are involved in B cell activation including CD40LG, CD22, CD79A, MS4A1 (CD20), and LTB, reflecting the expected biological effect of ibrutinib in reducing B cell activation. Among the 9 RS samples, we compared gene profiles between the two groups of RS with or without prior ibrutinib therapy. 38 downregulated genes and 10 upregulated genes were found in the 4 RS treated with ibrutinib in comparison with 5 RS treated with chemotherapy. The top upregulated genes in the ibrutinib-exposed group included PTHLH, S100A8, IGSF3, TERT, and PRKCB, while the downregulated genes in these samples included MS4A1, LTB and CD38 (figure 1d). In order to delineate the differences of RS vs CLL, we compared gene expression profiles between 5 RS samples and 3 CLL samples that were treated with only chemotherapy. RS samples showed significant upregulation of 129 genes and downregulation of 7 genes. Among the most significantly upregulated genes are multiple genes involved in monocyte and myeloid lineage regulation including TNFSF13, S100A9, FCN1, LGALS2, CD14, FCGR2A, SERPINA1, and LILRB3. Conclusion: Our study indicates that ibrutinib-resistant, RS-involved tissues are characterized by downregulation of genes in B cell activation, but with PRKCB and TERT upregulation. Furthermore, RS-involved nodal tissues display the increased expression of genes involved in myeloid/monocytic regulation in comparison with CLL-involved nodal tissues. These findings implicate that differential therapies for RS and CLL patients need to be adopted based on their prior therapy and gene expression signatures. Studies using large sample size will be needed to verify this hypothesis. Figure Disclosures Zhao: Merck: Current Employment. Blumenschein:Merck: Current Employment. Yearley:Merck: Current Employment. Wang:Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding. Parikh:Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kenderian:Sunesis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Torque: Consultancy; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kay:Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Ding:DTRM: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 1448-1465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Heinig ◽  
Marcel Gätjen ◽  
Michael Grau ◽  
Vanessa Stache ◽  
Ioannis Anagnostopoulos ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 1881-1886 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Fournier ◽  
M Rubio ◽  
G Delespesse ◽  
M Sarfati

Abstract CD23 gene is overexpressed and abnormally regulated in the most frequent adult leukemic disorder, B chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B- CLL). Switch on and off in the upregulation of surface CD23 expression consistently occurs in the early stage of normal B-cell activation, suggesting a key role for CD23 in this process. We show here that, after ligation of mlg in the presence of interleukin-4, the increase of CD23 protein precedes B-cell DNA synthesis and mainly results from the strong induction of CD23 type-B isoform. Exposure of normal B cells to conventional or phosphorothioate-derivatized CD23 antisense oligonucleotides (predominantly type B) significantly augments B-cell proliferation induced by antigen receptor stimulation or direct contact with activated T cells. Unexpectedly, CD23 antisense, but not sense, oligonucleotides specifically enhance rather than suppress CD23 expression on B cells. Finally, a selective increase in CD23 type-B expression provokes the entry of resting (Go) CLL B cells into G1 and S phase of the cell cycle in the absence of any other stimulus, whereas it synergizes with tumor necrosis factor-alpha to increase the number of activated B cells. These results provide compelling evidence that CD23 represents an important molecule directly involved in the process of normal or leukemic B-cell activation and growth.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1135-1135
Author(s):  
Renee C. Tschumper ◽  
Jaime R. Darce ◽  
Xiaosheng Wu ◽  
Stephen A. Mihalcik ◽  
Diane F. Jelinek

Abstract B cell-activating factor (BAFF) is known to regulate normal B cell development and homeostasis primarily by signaling through the high affinity receptor, BAFF-R, one of three BAFF binding receptors (BBRs). BAFF also binds two other receptors, BCMA and TACI with lesser affinity. We have recently shown that normal peripheral blood (PB) B cells express high levels of prebound soluble BAFF, which is lost upon B cell activation. Because of BAFF’s activity on normal B cells, we have been interested in the roles of BAFF and BBRs in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). We and others have demonstrated that BAFF promotes primary CLL B cell survival and that serum BAFF levels are elevated in some patients. Although CLL B cells are known to express BBRs, a comprehensive and quantitative analysis of BBR levels and CLL B cell capacity to bind BAFF has not yet been done. We began this study by characterizing the level of soluble BAFF bound to freshly isolated CLL B cells, measured by both western blot analysis and flow cytometry. To assess receptor occupancy, cells were incubated with or without exogenous BAFF before assessing anti-BAFF reactivity and changes in median fluorescence intensity (ΔMFI; defined by dividing the MFI of the anti-BAFF antibody by the MFI of the isotype matched control antibody) were calculated. Normal B cells have higher detectable levels of bound BAFF with a ΔMFI ranging from 16 to 35 (mean=22.2). Upon addition of exogenous BAFF, the ΔMFI range increased to 27–96.6 (mean=49.1; n=8). Thus, despite evidence of prebound BAFF, clearly not all BBRs were occupied on normal PB B cells. By contrast, the levels of prebound BAFF on CLL B cells were significantly lower with a ΔMFI ranging from 1 to 13.1 (mean=2.7; n=36). Of note, 10/36 patients did not exhibit increased anti-BAFF reactivity upon incubation with exogenous BAFF (mean fold induction=0.8) whereas 26/36 patients displayed a mean fold induction of anti-BAFF reactivity of 3.5. These observations prompted us to next quantitate CLL B cell BBR expression. All patient CLL B cells expressed BAFF-R but at significantly lower levels than observed in normal B cells (p=0.0009). When CLL patients were categorized into IGHV mutated (M; n=22) and unmutated (UM; n=24), UM patients were observed to express higher levels of BAFF-R (ΔMFI =8.9) than M patients (ΔMFI =5.24). Regarding TACI, we previously demonstrated that normal memory B cells uniformly express TACI (ΔMFI =12.7; n=10) and there is a small population of activated naïve B cells that express TACI at lower levels (ΔMFI =8.3; n=10). In our CLL cohort, 14/22 M patients were TACI+ (ΔMFI =7.0) and 19/24 UM patients were TACI+ (ΔMFI =4.7). Finally, whereas normal PB B cells completely lack BCMA expression, 7/22 M and 4/22 UM patients expressed BCMA. Thus, using the BBR profile and analysis of expression levels relative to normal PB B cells, the following subgroups of B-CLL can be defined: BAFF-R+; BAFF-R/TACI+; BAFF-R/BCMA+; BAFF-R/TACI/BCMA+. It remains to be determined if these BBR profiles correlate with aspects of clinical disease. In addition, given the putative importance of BAFF in this disease, it is interesting to note that in general, CLL B cells display overall lower levels of prebound BAFF. Current studies are focused on determining whether this reflects CLL B cell activation status, increased competition for BAFF, and/or reduced levels of BBR expression.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3582-3582
Author(s):  
Nino Porakishvili ◽  
Peter Lydyard ◽  
Anna Bremser ◽  
Ketki Vispute ◽  
Azka Memon ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3582 Introduction: We have demonstrated that CD180, an orphan receptor of the Toll-like receptor family, is expressed heterogeneously on B-CLL cells, mainly on those with mutated IGVH genes. We further showed that specific ligation of CD180 with mAbs induced activation and cycling of only ~50% CD180+ B-CLL clones (“R”: responders), while CD180+ B-CLL cells unresponsive to CD180 ligation (“NR”: non-responders) or CD180− B-CLL cells could not be activated through either CD40 or IL-4 suggesting anergy. Because CD180 has a short intracellular domain, it presumably, signals through pathways associated with other receptors, such as smIgM. Indeed, engagement of smIgM or CD180 induces Lyn and Syk phosphorylation. Here we compare activation, cycling and phosphorylation of intracellular protein kinases in R and NR and CD180− B-CLL clones and B lymphocytes from healthy subjects upon ligation of smIgM. Methods: B-CLL cells were analyzed for smCD180 and smIgM, and sm CD180+IgM+ B-CLL clones were categorized as R and NR by responsiveness to CD180 ligation. Leukemic clones from 15 smCD180+IgM+R, 14 smCD180+IgM+NR, 12 smCD180−IgM+ untreated B-CLL patients and 14 healthy age-matched individuals were stimulated with goat F(ab’)2 anti-human IgM pAbs for 72h, and stained with PE~anti-CD86 mAbs, or fixed, permeabilized and stained with PE~anti-Ki-67 to assess B-cell activation and cycling, respectively. In order to study early intracellular signalling events, cells were stimulated with the same antibodies for 20 min, fixed, permeabilized and stained with Alexa Fluor~rabbit/mouse antibodies to phospho-Akt, phospho-ERK, phospho-p38MAPK, and phospho-ZAP70/Syk. Unstimulated cells in medium were used as controls. Results were assessed by flow cytometry and analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test and paired t-test where appropriate. Results: ligation of sIgM on smCD180+IgM+R B-CLL cells resulted in a significant increase in CD86+ cells (66.3±21.7% vs 18.7±12.0%, p=0.00004) and Ki-67+ cells (38.9±10.5% vs 11.1±5.9%, p=0.0001) compared to medium controls; this was not different from the increase in activation and cycling of normal B cells (not shown). In contrast, smCD180+IgM+NR B-CLL cells failed to significantly upregulate CD86 in response to anti-IgM pAbs (20.6±13.8% vs 17.6±13.7%, p=0.334) and Ki-67 (8.4±4.6% vs 5.3±1.4%, p=0.063). Interestingly, smCD180−IgM+ B-CLL cells demonstrated diminished CD86 upregulation following sIgM ligation: 36.9±21.7% vs 11.0±4.7% in medium, p=0.058 (difference with smCD180+IgM+R B-CLL, p=0.0069). Cell cycling was also decreased: 9.7±4.1% vs 5.4±3.6% in medium, p=0.015 (difference with smCD180+IgM+R, p=0.0022). The proximal stages of anti-smIgM responses were further studied by intracellular signalling of protein kinases associated with the IgM-signalling pathway. While ligation of sIgM on control B cells and smCD180+IgM+R B-CLL cells resulted in phosphorylation of all four enzymes studied, smCD180+IgM+NR cells failed to signal downstream from ZAP70/Syk following sIgM ligation (Table 1), although there was a greater heterogeneity in smCD180+IgM+R B-CLL responses, compared to normal B cells. Importantly, smIgM ligation of smCD180−IgM+ B-CLL cells did not increase phosphorylation of Erk or p38MAPK, although some such clones responded to smIgM ligation by phosphorylation of ZAP70/Syk and Akt (data not shown). Conclusions: B-CLL clones that are smCD180+IgM+ but unresponsive to CD180 ligation (~30% of all B-CLL cases) are also unresponsive (anergic) to smIgM ligation measured by intracellular signalling, cell activation and cycling. Meanwhile, smCD180−IgM+ B-CLL clones respond heterogeneously to IgM crosslinking. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document