scholarly journals Tradisi Buru Babi Masyarakat Minangkabau: Proses, Makna, dan Drama Sosial

SUAR BETANG ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-263
Author(s):  
Eva Yenita Syam

Pig hunting in Minangkabau is a rite of passage which is carried out in a gradual ritual process. The rite of pig hunting is a sign that involves various social aspects of the community, including economy, religion, and culture. There are two questions to be answered in this research. Firstly, what is the meaning of the rite in the society and, secondly, how does the community's traditional pig hunting construct a social drama. To answer those questions, the author uses Victor Turner's ritual theory and Max Weber's theory of social drama. The results of this study indicate two main things. First, the pig hunting, which was originally an attempt to eliminate pests, later developed into a social drama. The rite of hunting as a social drama has four functions, namely (1) eliminating conflict; (2) limiting divisions and building community solidarity; (3) unites two opposing principles; and (4) provides new strength and motivation to live in everyday society. Second, as a social drama, the tradition forms a social construction. In this social process, there are four phases of social drama, (1) violation of social norms which invites the community to unite in eradicating pests; (2) wild pests pose a real threat, which can make the life of the farming community miserable (crisis) so that the community unites and holds various ceremonies to prepare for the implementation of hunting; (3) crisis recovery measures by carrying out a pig hunting ceremony; and (4) returns society with its entire social order to a normal situation.AbstrakBuru babi dalam masyarakat Minangkabau merupakan sebuah ritus yang dilaksanakan dalam sebuah proses ritual yang bertahap. Ritus buru babi menjadi sebuah penanda yang melibatkan berbagai aspek sosial masyarakat Minangkabau, termasuk ekonomi, religi, dan budaya. Ada dua pertanyaan yang hendak dijawab di dalam penelitian ini. Pertama, apa makna ritus buru babi dalam masyarakat Minangkabau dan bagaimana konstruksi sosial dari proses ritual tradisi buru babi sebagai sebuah drama sosial? Untuk menjawab kedua pertanyaan tersebut, penulis menggunakan teori ritual Victor Turner dan teori drama sosial Max Weber. Hasi penelitian ini menunjukkan dua hal pokok. Pertama, peristiwa buru babi yang awalnya hanya merupakan upaya para petani menghilangkan hama tanaman  berkembang menjadi sebuah drama sosial. Ritus buru babi sebagai drama sosial ternyata memiliki empat fungsi, yaitu (1) menghilangkan konflik; (2) membatasi perpecahan dan membangun solidaritas masyarakat; (3) mempersatukan dua prinsip yang bertentangan; dan (4) memberikan kekuatan dan motivasi baru untuk hidup dalam masyarakat sehari-hari. Kedua, sebagai drama sosial, tradisi buru babi membentuk sebuah konstruksi sosial. Di dalam proses sosial itu terdapat empat fase drama sosial yang terdiri atas (1) pelanggaran norma sosial oleh hama yang mengundang masyarakat untuk bersatu melakukan pembasmian; (2) hama babi mendatangkan ancaman yang nyata yang dapat menyengsarakan kehidupan masyarakat petani (krisis) sehingga masyarakat bersatu dan mengadakan berbagai upacara persiapan pelaksanaan berburu; (3) tindakan pemulihan krisis dengan melaksanakan upacara berburu babi; dan (4) mengembalikan masyarakat dengan seluruh tatanan sosialnya ke situasi normal.

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 35-59
Author(s):  
Irina Shmerlina

The article outlines the author’s vision of the formation and development of “intersubjectivity” as a concept of socially oriented thought. Introduced into sociohumanitarian knowledge by E. Husserl’s phenomenology, this notion initially possessed powerful sociological potential and was called to explain on an abstract-philosophical level the existence of social order from an egological perspective (which is the perspective of a subject with a sphere of consciousness that other participants of interaction have no access to). The main tendency inherent to the post-Husserlian change in the concept’s semantic profile is linked to the gradual loss of its metaphysical potential, as well as its psychologization and instrumentalization. Intersubjectivity — which is something that was brought into sociology by A. Schütz’s social phenomenology — gained a pragmatic interpretation, effectively becoming an axiomatically presupposed attribute of the “life world”. Constructivist semantic valences of the analyzed concept were implemented in the social constructivism of P. Berger and T. Lukman, and at this point said concept had pretty much exhausted its initial analytical potential. The reinvigoration of sociological interest towards this category is associated with a postclassical redirection of attention towards interactive processes of generating meanings within situations of the “life world”, processes that are multidimensional, conditioned by context and cannot be fully reduced to just the subject. The matter of whether returning to Husserl’s intuitions is appropriate demands further consideration, in order to consider other interpretations of intersubjectivity, including those that focus on the historical course of the social process.


Sociologija ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-236
Author(s):  
Ana Petrov

In this article, I deal with nostalgia as an implicit category in the 19th-century German sociological discourses. I draw on the approaches that argue that sociology can be seen as a nostalgic social science since the sociologists? discourses were focused on the issues of causes, characteristics, and consequences of the modern age for individuals and society. Trying to explicate modern society, usually by comparing it to the premodern forms of social order, modern sociologists shaped dichotomous categories that were used for the definition of basic sociological concepts, one of the typical ones being the dichotomy between modern society and traditional communities. I here argue that modern sociologists constructed their theories in relation to the idea of a lack or loss, i.e. in relation to the question of what the modern society left behind during its growth: community, spirit or freedom. An alternative, a solution, or simply a utopian object for making comparison are found exactly in the object that is lost - in the nostalgic reflection on those aspects of humanity that were no longer possible in the modern age. Hence, I argue that modern sociology can be defined as a certain discourse on social loss. This will be elaborated on the examples of theories of Ferdinand Tonnies, Max Weber, and Georg Simmel.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-271
Author(s):  
Hugh D. Hudson

For Russian subjects not locked away in their villages and thereby subject almost exclusively to landlord control, administration in the eighteenth century increasingly took the form of the police. And as part of the bureaucracy of governance, the police existed within the constructions of the social order—as part of social relations and their manifestations through political control. This article investigates the social and mental structures—the habitus—in which the actions of policing took place to provide a better appreciation of the difficulties of reform and modernization. Eighteenth-century Russia shared in the European discourse on the common good, the police, and social order. But whereas Michel Foucault and Michael Ignatieff see police development in Europe with its concern to surveil and discipline emerging from incipient capitalism and thus a product of new, post-Enlightenment social forces, the Russian example demonstrates the power of the past, of a habitus rooted in Muscovy. Despite Peter’s and especially Catherine’s well-intended efforts, Russia could not succeed in modernization, for police reforms left the enserfed part of the population subject to the whims of landlord violence, a reflection, in part, of Russia having yet to make the transition from the feudal manorial economy based on extra-economic compulsion to the capitalist hired-labor estate economy. The creation of true centralized political organization—the creation of the modern state as defined by Max Weber—would require the state’s domination over patrimonial jurisdiction and landlord control over the police. That necessitated the reforms of Alexander II.


PMLA ◽  
1935 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
A. E. Sokol

It is not a matter of mere chance that the conception of a “calling” or “profession” is meeting with special interest in Germany. Several books have been written on the subject, some with the intention of showing that a better understanding of the idea of a “calling” would contribute considerably toward the building up of a new and improved social order. While thus practical and political interests are debating the problem, an attempt to reach the root of the question has been made by the German sociologist, Max Weber, who in his work Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism,1 undertook to answer the question, Why does Protestantism seem to be particularly congenial to the capitalistic type of civilization? According to him, it is the conception of a “calling” as a God-given task, developed by Luther and incorporated into Calvin's religious system, which is responsible for this fact. The word Beruf, English “calling,” itself in its present meaning, originated, he asserts, in Luther's translation of the Bible, and from that source it spread throughout the Germanic world.


Author(s):  
Zhanna V. Chashina

Introduction. The problem of the search for the ways of understanding of the picture of the world and, as a consequence, the development of an approach to the social management is relevant for all times of the existence of mankind. A human is basically a biological phenomenon, therefore, the natural order should be regarded as the basis of the social order. Having in mind this formulation of the question, it becomes necessary to analyze modern concepts of natural science in understanding not only ontological vision of human society, but also developing new ways of its understanding. Materials and Methods. The theoretical and methodological approach was based on the concepts of natural science including the theories of evolutionism, quantum mechanics and synergetics. Using the model transfer of these theories to the idea of social development, the author proposes the methodology based on the principle of interdependence of the theories analyzed in the article. Results. An analysis within the framework of the described theories has shown that according to the evolutionary model, progress is assumed to be taken for granted. Linear scenarios are useful only at the stage of forecasting and provoke a passivity of existence, which leads to deadlocks in development. In the synergetic model, society is represented as a complex open system characterized by opposite trends: destruction, manifesting itself as entropy, and creation, or negentropy. Progress depends on changes that help to survive. If the synergistic picture of the world appears in the form of an order that is formed from chaos, then in a quantum one – society is chaos in the originally existing order. Consequently, the presence of a goal-oriented vector compels a person to move towards the restoration of the system, in particular society, to its initial or even higher level of organization. Discussion and Conclusion. A progressive evolutionary model is manifested in the form of successful adaptation, synergetic combines the idea of evolutionism with the idea of multivariance of the historical process. The quantum approach continues the idea of multivariance, but unlike classical synergetics, it assumes a goal-oriented nature of development. In fact, these approaches do not express contradiction, but the disclosure of the multidimensional development of being, therefore, it is necessary to take into account their interdependence, which allows a more productive cognition of reality in order to manage it.


2019 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 02072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aigul Klychova ◽  
Guzaliya Klychova ◽  
Alsou Zakirova ◽  
Rashida Sungatullina ◽  
Kamil Mukhamedzyanov ◽  
...  

The object of the research is to determine the major lines in forming the social process mechanism and elaborate the recommendations on improving the social policy of agricultural farming community. The article examines the social factors, indicates the trends of making management decisions on the social process of agricultural enterprise, reviews the theoretical aspects and outlines the basic arrangements of forming the social process mechanism, proposes the milestones of forming and implementing the social policy system, as well as defines the method of analyzing social process. The elaborated recommendations on improving the social policy of agricultural farming community, which consist in selecting effective forms and methods of satisfying the demands of different social groups and their sources of financing, are of practical importance.


Thesis Eleven ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-51
Author(s):  
Anthony King

Sociology today faces a number of serious challenges to its integrity as a discipline. As a synthesis of Weberian and Durkheimian traditions, the work of Randall Collins represents an innovative vindication of sociology in the early 21st century. This article explores Collins’s interaction ritual theory to demonstrate its contemporary utility. However, to highlight the importance of Collins’s work, it seeks to advance and refine it theoretically. Specifically, it seeks to develop Collins’s argument about the role of emotions and, specifically, effervescence, in rituals. This paper argues that, while important, effervescence alone cannot be sufficient to ensure the conformity which is a typical feature of interaction and essential to explaining social order. Drawing on Goffman, Asch and Scheff, the paper argues that effervescence is underpinned by more robust mechanisms of honour and shame, themselves immediately connected to access to collective goods. In this way, the paper affirms the importance of Randall Collins’s work for sociology today.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document