scholarly journals Comparison Between Early Appendicectomy and Delayed Appendicectomy in Treating Acute Appendicitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-217
Author(s):  
Deaa Abdulkhalik Raheem ◽  
◽  
Muqdad Fuad Abdulkareem ◽  
Humamalddin Edan Hussein
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Liquid Diet ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
P Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Wbc Count ◽  
Group B

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common emergency condition that faces the surgeon worldwide. The overall lifetime risk of having acute appendicitis is estimated to be 6–7 %, with a peak incidence between 10 and 30 years. Early and sometimes immediate appendicectomy is standard, fearing the risk of pathological progression into perforation, gangrenous appendicitis, and abscess formation. However, recently, this practice has been challenged by authors giving a suggestion that appendicectomies can be delayed in some cases and still devoid of adverse postoperative outcomes. Objective: This study aimed at comparing the two groups regarding the following postoperative outcomes: WBC count on a postoperative day one, time last to a soft liquid diet, rate of complication, length of in-hospital stay, and the need for admission within 30 days of doing the surgery. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective randomized study of 341 patients (196 male and 145 female) who underwent appendicectomy over a period of eleven months (May 2019- March 2020) in Baquba Teaching Hospital in Diyala Governorate. The patients categorized into two groups for making the comparison (all underwent appendectomy): group A: 181 patients (male 108, female 73) include those who are operated on within 8 hours of arrival to the hospital and group B: 160 patients (male 81, female 79) include those who are operated on after 8 hours of arrival to the hospital. The patients in the two groups were compared regarding the following postoperative outcomes as WBC count at day one postoperatively, time duration to a liquid diet, rate of complication, length of in-hospital stay, and finally, the need for readmission during the first 30 days of doing the surgery. Results: Regarding the mean white blood cell count at the first postoperative day, it was lower for group B. than that for group A (p-value 0.0018). With regard to the timing of starting having liquid diet, there was no significant difference, and the patients in the two groups started oral liquid diet within the first 24 hours (p-value 0.0715). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the immediate and early postoperative complication rate; 0.02% in group A and 0.37% for group B (p-value 0.4022), the length of postoperative hospital stay was the same for the two groups, ranging between 2 days and less than one day (p value 0.0826). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the need for readmission within 30 days, 0.016% in group A and 0.025% in group B (p-value 0.9984). Conclusion: This study concluded that delayed appendicectomy was safe and feasible for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. Despite that the clinical outcomes of delayed appendicectomy were not better than those with early appendicectomy. Also Delayed appendicectomy can improve the quality of care provided by the residents, surgeons, anesthetists and theater staff, enhance patient's quality of care, and it allows an increased efficient utilization of medical resources and theaters for other life-threatening emergency cases.

scholarly journals Outcome of thyroid lobectomies undergone with and without drains

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 2919
Author(s):  
Sahrish Bachani ◽  
Shahid N. Memon ◽  
Muhammad R. Pathan ◽  
Rehmat Sehrish Shah ◽  
Aneeta Kumari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Thyroid Lobectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Thyroid lobectomy is a common operative technique of management of benign solitary thyroid nodules in which drains are used routinely. Objective of this study to compare the outcome of thyroid lobectomies undergone with and without drains in patients of benign solitary thyroid nodules.Methods: A comparative cross-sectional research was completed on 98 patients of benign solitary thyroid nodules at surgery department of Liaquat University Hospital Jamshoro. Patients having age of 18-60 years underwent thyroid lobectomies were included and distributed in two groups A and B. Group A includes thyroid lobectomies with drain and Group B without drain. Postoperative outcomes including pain score assessed via visual analog score (VAS), hospital stay and complications including wound infection, seroma and hematoma.Results: Out of 98 cases, 49 underwent thyroid lobectomy with drain and 49 without a drain. Females patients were in majority in group A 42 (85.7%) and also in group B 47 (95.9%). No significant difference (p-value=0.674) was in mean age of group A 30.8±10.2 years and group B 31.8±12.2 years. Higher mean with significant difference (p-value=0.001) was in pain score of group A 5.61±1.25 as compared to group B 3.55±0.70. No significant difference was in complications; seroma 1 (2.04%) vs 5 (10.20%), hematoma 1 (2.04%) vs 1 (2.04%) and infection 3 (6.12%) vs 0 (0.0%) in group A and B respectively. Higher mean with significant difference (p-value=0.001) was in hospital stay of group A 2.40±1.57 days as compared to group B 1.42±0.54 days. No significant difference (p-value=0.748) was in overall rate of complications in group A 5 (10.20%) and B 6 (12.24%).Conclusions: Thyroid lobectomy with drain is not effective in lowering the postoperative complications whereas enhanced the risk of postoperative pain, wound infection and duration of hospital stay as compared to thyroid lobectomy without a drain.

scholarly journals Audit on the Management of Bronchiolitis: A Single Centre Real World Experience in Bangladesh Can We do Better ?

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzana Hamid ◽  
Syed Moosa MA Quaium ◽  
Azizur Rahman ◽  
AT Reza Ahmad ◽  
Shahariar Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
P Value ◽  
Supportive Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Syncytial Virus ◽  
Group B

Background: Bronchiolitis is the most common reason for hospitalization of children in many countries.Though Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is the most common organism causing bronchiolitis, but antibiotics are used widely.So the aim of the present study is to establish whether antibiotic has any role in bronchiolitis management along with supportive treatment. Methods:This retrospective study included 100 infants and children between 2-24 months of age admitted with clear cut sign symptoms of bronchiolitis. Patients were divided into Group A (supportive + antibiotic Rx) comprised 72 patients and group B (supportive Rx only) comprised 28 patients.After 3-5 days of hospital stay, clinical responses were evaluated in terms of improvement in symptoms and clinical parameters- respiratory rate, heart rate and oxygen saturation. Results: Mean age of patients was 6.6 (±5.6) months in Group A and 6.3 (±4.8) months in Group B. Most of the patients in both study groups were male (M: F=1.6:1). All the cases in both groups presented with cough, running nose, and respiratory distress. Fever and feeding difficulty were present in 83.3% & 90.3% in Group A and 82.1% & 89.3% in Group B respectively. Majority of cases were from lower socioeconomic status and lived in urban area. In Group A, after therapy mean respiratory rate 53.7 (±4.3) and oxygen saturation 97.9 (±1.9) had significantly improved in comparison to respiratory rate 65.6 (±4.8) and oxygen saturation 89.7 (±4.4) before therapy (p=<.001 in all parameter). Heart rate also significantly increased after therapy (149.4 ±10.2 versus 104.5 ±8.7) (p=<.001). In Group B, after therapy mean respiratory rate 53.5 (±4.1) and oxygen saturation 97.8 (±1.7) had also significantly improved in comparison to respiratory rate 65.3 (±4.1) and oxygen saturation 88.8 (±2.8) before therapy (p=<.001 in all parameter). Heart rate also significantly increased after therapy (150.8 ±9.8 versus 105.0 ±6.2) (p=<.001). In comparison between two modalities of treatment, no significant difference was found (p value=>.05 in all parameters). No statistical significant difference was observed in the length of hospital stay in two groups. Conclusion: The study highlighted the importance of supportive treatment in bronchiolitis management. Antibiotics should not be used without clinical and laboratory evidence of bacterial infection. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cmoshmcj.v14i1.22871 Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.14 (1); Jan 2015; Page 6-10

scholarly journals LAPROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Usman ◽  
Kaiser Saleem ◽  
Saddaqat Hayat
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
P Value ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Surgical Unit ◽  
Trial Setting

Objectives: Compare the efficacy in terms of mean pain score and mean duration of hospital stay in patients of symptomatic cholilithiasis undergoing laproscopic cholecystectomy with and without subhepatic drain insertion. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: Surgical unit –iii of Allied Hospital Faisalabad which is tertiary care unit. Duration of Study: 20-02-2013 to 20-08-2013. Results: Out of 150 cases (75 cases in two groups), mean+sd was calculated as 44.74+ 6.57 years, 80%(n=60) in Group-A and 82.66%(n=62) in Group-B were female, post- operative hospital stay was recorded which shows 3.16+0.463 in group-a and 2.32+0.569 days in group-b and it shows statistically significant difference between the two groups, similarly, on comparison of post-operative abdominal pain score at 24 hours in both groups 2.266+1.062 in Group-A and 1.8+0.90 in Group-B pain on vas was recorded at 24 hours which shows significantly lower in Group-B patients by calculating p value as 0.002348. Conclusion: No subhepatic drain insertion after laproscopic cholecystectomy is better when compared to those with subhepatic drain insertion in terms of mean pain score and mean duration of hospital stay in days post operatively.

scholarly journals Comparison between scalpel incision and electrocautery incision in midline abdominal surgery: a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507
Author(s):  
Amit Yadav ◽  
Lakshman Agarwal ◽  
Sumit A. Jain ◽  
Sanjay Kumawat ◽  
Sandeep Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
P Value ◽  
Wound Area ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Fear of poor wound healing have curtailed the use of diathermy for making skin incision. Scalpel produces little damage to surrounding tissue but causing more blood loss. Our aim of study was to compare electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in terms of incision time, blood loss, postoperative pain and wound infection.Methods: Total of 104 patients were included in the study undergoing midline abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized into electrocautery (group A) and scalpel (group B). The incision dimension, incision time and blood loss were noted intraoperatively. Postoperative pain was noted on postoperative day 2 using visual analog scale. Wound complications were recorded on every postoperative day till the patient was discharged.Results: 52 patients in each of the two groups were analyzed. There was significant difference found between group A and group B in terms of mean incision time per unit wound area, 8.16±1.59 s\cm2 and 11.02±1.72 s\cm2 respectively (p value=0.0001). The mean blood loss per unit wound area was found to be significantly lower in group A (0.31±0.04 ml\cm2) as compared to group B (1.21±0.21), p value=0.0001. There was no significant difference noted in terms of postoperative pain and wound infection between both groups.Conclusions: Electrocautery can be considered safe in making skin incision in midline laparotomy compared to scalpel incision with comparable postoperative pain and wound infection with less intraoperative blood loss and less time consuming.

scholarly journals Comparison of Recovery Time of Propofol and Midazolam with Propofol Alone for Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1024-1027
Author(s):  
Asma Samreen ◽  
Aamir Waseem ◽  
Muhammad Azam ◽  
Itrat Hussain Kazmi ◽  
Aamir Bashir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Intravenous Anesthetic ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Procedural sedation is required for multiple short duration procedures outside of the operating rooms especially in radiology and endoscopy suites. Intravenous anesthetic agent with rapid recovery profile is desirable in such circumstances. This study aims to compare two regimens of intravenous anesthetic agents. Aim: To compare the mean recovery time of propofol and midazolam with propofol alone for sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Settings: Department of Anesthesia, Shalamar Hospital, Lahore. Study Duration: June 2017 to December 2017. Methods: A total of 70 adult patients aged 20-60 years undergoing ERCP under sedation were included. Patients were given a combination of propofol and midazolam in group A while propofol alone was given in group B. After procedure, pts were transferred to recovery room and were followed for assessment of recovery time. Data were analyzed in SPSS vr 21, Independent t-test was applied & p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Significant difference was found in mean recovery time amongst both the groups. Mean recovery time in Group A (propofol and midazolam) was 19.29±4.50 minutes while in Group B (propofol alone) was 26.66±3.70 minutes showing statistically significant result with p-value = 0.0001. Conclusion: We conclude that mean recovery time with propofol plus midazolam is shorter as compared to propofol alone for sedation in ERCP. Keywords: Propofol, midazolam, sedation outside operation theatre.

Clinical Results Of A Lamina With Spinous Process And An Iliac Graft As Bone Grafts In The Surgical Treatment Of Single-Segment Lumbar Pyogenic Discitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiyang Zhong ◽  
Xinjie Liang ◽  
Xiaolin Wang ◽  
Ke Tang ◽  
Tianji Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Spinous Process ◽  
Bone Grafts ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Segmental Angle

Abstract Background: A retrospective study investigated and compared the results of a lamina withspinous process (LSP) and an iliac graft (IG) as bone grafts in single-segment lumbar pyogenic discitis (LPD) through one-stage-posterior-only approach with radical debridement and internal instrumentation.Methods: Data from 37 patients were reviewed. A LSP was placed in 17 patients (group A), and an IG was implemented in 20 patients (group B). The surgery time, surgery hemorrhage, hospital stay, drainage, and follow-up (FU) were reviewed. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, segmental angle, intervertebral height and bony fusion time were compared preoperatively and at the final FU.Results: All patients were followed-up for a mean of 27.94±2.35 months in group A and 30.29±1.89 months in group B, without a difference. The mean age was younger in group A than in group B (P<0.05). The surgery time, surgery hemorrhage, and hospitalization cost were lower in group A than in group B (P<0.05), except for the hospital stay and drainage time. Fever occurred in 10 patients in group A and 12 patients in group B. The ESR, CRP level, and VAS and ODI scores were significantly decreased, and there were no significant differences between the groups at the final FU. The distribution of bacterial agents in blood culture was 1 case of Aerobacter cloacae, 2 of Staphylococcus aureus, 2 of Escherichia coli, and 1 of Streptococcus viridis in group A and 1 of S. aureus，1 of Staphylococcus warneri and 2 of Klebsiella pneumoniae in group B. Pyogenic infection was observed in the pathological findings of all patients. No significant difference was found in the mean segmental angle or mean intervertebral height preoperation and at the final FU between the groups.Conclusion: The use of LSP as a new bone graft is reliable, safe, and effective for surgical management for the LPD while surgery is proposed as a good management strategy for LPD in carefully selected patients.

scholarly journals COMPARISON BETWEEN THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND AND SCAR MOBILIZATION OVER PERSISTENT POSTNATAL DYSPAREUNIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Mariyam Farzana Sf ◽  
Ponmathi P ◽  
Sivakumar Pvr
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Therapeutic Ultrasound ◽  
Ultrasound Therapy ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Functional Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

  Objective: Dyspareunia is known as the painful sexual intercourse. This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness between therapeutic ultrasound and scar mobilization in persistent postnatal dyspareunia.Methods: This is an experimental study. 30 subjects with superficial dyspareunia, age group between 25 and 35 years are taken in this study and 15 subjects in Group A were treated with ultrasound therapy, 15 subjects in Group B were treated with scar mobilization. Female sexual functional index questionnaire (FSFI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used as the outcome measure.Results: Results showed a significant difference in FSFI and VAS measurements in both the groups, but clinically Group A showed better improvement in pain and quality of life than Group B.Conclusion: There is no significant difference between ultrasound therapy and scar mobilization over the pain and quality of life in patients with persistent postnatal dyspareunia.

Combination Therapy Of Tadalafil And Pentoxifylline In Severe Erectile Dysfunction; A Prospective Randomized Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Santosh Kumar ◽  
Rajesh Roat ◽  
Swati Agrawal ◽  
Kumar Jayant ◽  
Ravimohan S. Mavuduru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Erectile Dysfunction ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Erectile Function ◽  
T Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstractwas to assess efficacy of Tadalafil alone versus Tadalafil plus Pentoxifylline in the treatment of erectile dysfunction by using self administered IIEF-5 questionnaire.Two hundred and thirty seven patients presenting with ED at andrology OPD were evaluated for ED by a self administered IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire. Patients were systematically randomized by computer generated random table into two groups groups namely, group A: Tadalafil only group, group B: combination of Tadalafil + Pentoxifyl-line. All the patients were re-assessed by IIEF-5 questionnaire after 8 weeks of medical therapy. Statistical analysis was performed using student’s unpaired t-test, paired t-test, chi square test. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Two hundred and thirty seven patients were included in the present study, in group A: 92 patients (78.6%) showed improvement in their IIEF score after 8 weeks of tadalafil treatment. While in group B, overall 104 patients(86.6%) showed improvement after combination of Tadalafil and Pentoxifylline. There was a statistically significant difference of percentage change in IIEF score was seen in group B (group A 90.7±15.2%, group B 95.6±13.4%; p value – 0.014). We found this difference even more statistically significant in patients with severe ED (group A 72.7±47.2%, group B 132.3±54.3%; p value – 0.000). There was no significant difference in between the two groups with regards to occur-rence of side effects.Both tadalafil and combination of Tadalafil + Pentoxifylline improve erectile function in patients of ED. Patients with severe ED showed much significant improvement in erectile function with combination therapy.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Efficiency between Povidone Iodine and Normal Saline Lavage in the Treatment of Acute Peritonitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Haridas Saha ◽  
Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil ◽  
Aminul Islam ◽  
Abdullah Al Mamun ◽  
Md Margub Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Acute Peritonitis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Saline Lavage

Background: Control of the primary site of sepsis is the main determinant of good surgical outcome. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficiency between povidone iodine and normal saline lavage in the treatment of acute peritonitis. Methodology: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the Department of Surgery at Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Patients with acute peritonitis due to gastrointestinal causes who were admitted in the different units of Dhaka Medical College Hospital during the study period were selected as study population. Among them patients who were treated with povidone iodine were enrolled in the present study in group A and patients who were treated with conventional normal saline were in group B. Results: A total number of 1050 patients were recruited for this study. Among them 100 patients were enrolled in the present study of which group A (50 patients) for povidone iodine and group B (50 patients) for conventional normal saline. On 7th POD wound infection was found in Group A and Group B were 11(22.4%) and 21(44.7%) respectively. Statistically significant difference in post operative complication of wound infection was observed on 7th POD between the groups (p<0.05). Post operative hospital stay in Group A and Group B were 11.50 ± 4.48 and 13.46 ± 5.13 days respectively. There is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Statistically significant difference observed in post operative complication of wound infection and burst abdomen on 7th POD between the groups. The present study there is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups also observed. Bangladesh Journal of Infectious Diseases 2017;4(1):15-20

scholarly journals The Effect on Performance Time and Quality of the Knots after Mono or Bimanual Training of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Knot Tying according to the Gladiator Rule Technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (05) ◽  
pp. 266-274
Author(s):  
Fernanda Asencio ◽  
Helizabet Ribeiro ◽  
Armando Romeo ◽  
Arnauld Wattiez ◽  
Paulo Ribeiro
Keyword(s):  
Dominant Hand ◽  
Resident Students ◽  
Performance Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Suture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bimanual Training ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intracorporeal Knot Tying

Objective To assess whether the monomanual or bimanual training of laparoscopic suture following the same technique may interfere with the knots' performance time and/or quality. Methods A prospective observational study involving 41 resident students of gynecology/obstetrics and general surgery who attended a laparoscopic suture training for 2 days. The participants were divided into two groups. Group A performed the training using exclusively their dominant hand, and group B performed the training using both hands to tie the intracorporeal knot. All participants followed the same technique, called Romeo Gladiator Rule. At the end of the course, the participants were asked to perform three exercises to assess the time it took them to tie the knots, as well as the quality of the knots. Results A comparative analysis of the groups showed that there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.334) between them regarding the length of time to tie one knot. However, when the time to tie 10 consecutive knots was compared, group A was faster than group B (p = 0.020). A comparison of the knot loosening average, in millimeters, revealed that the knots made by group B loosened less than those made by group A, but there was no statistically significant difference regarding the number of knots that became untied. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the knots from group B showed better quality than those from group A, with lower loosening measures and more strength necessary to untie the knots. The study also demonstrated that group A was faster than B when the time to tie ten consecutive knots was compared.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document