scholarly journals Chromosome instability induced by a single defined sister chromatid fusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. e202000911
Author(s):  
Katsushi Kagaya ◽  
Naoto Noma-Takayasu ◽  
Io Yamamoto ◽  
Sanki Tashiro ◽  
Fuyuki Ishikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Chromosome Instability ◽  
Chromosome Fusion ◽  
Visualization System ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Experimental Systems ◽  
Chromosome Fusions ◽  
Fusion Visualization

Chromosome fusion is a frequent intermediate in oncogenic chromosome rearrangements and has been proposed to cause multiple tumor-driving abnormalities. In conventional experimental systems, however, these abnormalities were often induced by randomly induced chromosome fusions involving multiple different chromosomes. It was therefore not well understood whether a single defined type of chromosome fusion, which is reminiscent of a sporadic fusion in tumor cells, has the potential to cause chromosome instabilities. Here, we developed a human cell-based sister chromatid fusion visualization system (FuVis), in which a single defined sister chromatid fusion is induced by CRISPR/Cas9 concomitantly with mCitrine expression. The fused chromosome subsequently developed extra-acentric chromosomes, including chromosome scattering, indicative of chromothripsis. Live-cell imaging and statistical modeling indicated that sister chromatid fusion generated micronuclei (MN) in the first few cell cycles and that cells with MN tend to display cell cycle abnormalities. The powerful FuVis system thus demonstrates that even a single sporadic sister chromatid fusion can induce chromosome instability and destabilize the cell cycle through MN formation.

scholarly journals A Single Defined Sister Chromatid Fusion Destabilizes Cell Cycle through Micronuclei Formation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsushi Kagaya ◽  
Naoto Noma ◽  
Io Yamamoto ◽  
Sanki Tashiro ◽  
Fuyuki Ishikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Chromosome Fusion ◽  
Visualization System ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Chromosome Fragmentation ◽  
Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling ◽  
Structural Abnormalities ◽  
Fusion Visualization ◽  
Exact Timing

AbstractChromosome fusion is deleterious among oncogenic chromosome rearrangements, and has been proposed to cause multiple tumor-driving abnormalities. Conventional methodologies, however, lack the strictness of the experimental controls on the fusion such as the exact timing, the number and the types of fusion in a given cell. Here, we developed a human cell-based sister chromatid fusion visualization system (FuVis), in which a single defined sister chromatid fusion is induced by CRISPR/Cas9 concomitantly with mCitrine expression. Fused chromosome developed numerical and structural abnormalities, including chromosome fragmentation, an indicative of eventual chromothripsis. Live cell imaging and hierarchical Bayesian modeling indicated that micronucleus (MN) is generated in the first few cell cycle, and that cells with MN tend to possess cell cycle abnormalities. These results demonstrate that, although most cells can tolerate a single fusion, even a single sister chromatid fusion destabilizes cell cycle through MN formation.

scholarly journals PRESENCE OF A BASE LINE LEVEL OF SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN SOMATIC CELLS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER IN VIVO AND IN VITRO

Genetics ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-278
Author(s):  
Hideo Tsuji
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Sister Chromatid Exchanges ◽  
Base Line ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Chromatid Exchanges ◽  
Third Instar Larvae

ABSTRACT Sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) under in vivo and in vitro conditions were examined in ganglion cells of third-instar larvae of Drosophila melanogaster (Oregon-R). In the in vivo experiment, third-instar larvae were fed on synthetic media containing 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdUrd). After two cell cycles, ganglia were dissected and treated with colchicine. In the in vitro experiment, the ganglia were also incubated in media containing BrdUrd for two cell cycles, and treated with colchicine. SCEs were scored in metaphase stained with Hoechst 33258 plus Giemsa. The frequencies of SCEs stayed constant in the range of 25-150 vg/ml and 0.25-2.5 vg/ml of BrdUrd in vivo and in vitro, respectively. SCEs gradually increased at higher concentrations, strongly suggesting that at least a fraction of the detected SCEs are spontaneous. The constant levels of SCE frequency were estimated, on the average, at 0.103 per cell per two cell cycles for females and 0.101 for males in vivo and at 0.096 for females and 0.091 for males in vitro. No difference was found in the SCE frequency between sexes at any of the BrdUrd concentrations. The analysis for the distribution of SCEs within chromosomes revealed an extraordinarily high proportion of the SCEs at the junctions between euchromatin and heterochromatin; the remaining SCEs were preferentially localized in the euchromatic regions of the chromosomes and in the heterochromatic Y chromosome. These results were largely inconsistent with those of Gatti et al. (1979).

scholarly journals Positive Feedback Between PU.1 and the Cell Cycle Controls Myeloid Differentiation

Science ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 341 (6146) ◽  
pp. 670-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Yuan Kueh ◽  
Ameya Champhekar ◽  
Stephen L. Nutt ◽  
Michael B. Elowitz ◽  
Ellen V. Rothenberg
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Positive Feedback ◽  
Regulatory Gene ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Differentiation ◽  
Myeloid Differentiation ◽  
Cycle Duration ◽  
Gene Circuits ◽  
Cell Cycles

Regulatory gene circuits with positive-feedback loops control stem cell differentiation, but several mechanisms can contribute to positive feedback. Here, we dissect feedback mechanisms through which the transcription factor PU.1 controls lymphoid and myeloid differentiation. Quantitative live-cell imaging revealed that developing B cells decrease PU.1 levels by reducing PU.1 transcription, whereas developing macrophages increase PU.1 levels by lengthening their cell cycles, which causes stable PU.1 accumulation. Exogenous PU.1 expression in progenitors increases endogenous PU.1 levels by inducing cell cycle lengthening, implying positive feedback between a regulatory factor and the cell cycle. Mathematical modeling showed that this cell cycle–coupled feedback architecture effectively stabilizes a slow-dividing differentiated state. These results show that cell cycle duration functions as an integral part of a positive autoregulatory circuit to control cell fate.

Anti-glioma Efficacy and Mechanism of Action of Tripolinolate A from Tripolium pannonicum

Planta Medica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (11) ◽  
pp. 786-794
Author(s):  
Weiyun Chai ◽  
Lu Chen ◽  
Xiao-Yuan Lian ◽  
Zhizhen Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Glioma Cells ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Glioma Growth

AbstractTripolinolate A as a new bioactive phenolic ester was previously isolated from a halophyte of Tripolium pannonicum. However, the in vitro and in vivo anti-glioma effects and mechanism of tripolinolate A have not been investigated. This study has demonstrated that (1) tripolinolate A inhibited the proliferation of different glioma cells with IC50 values of 7.97 to 14.02 µM and had a significant inhibitory effect on the glioma growth in U87MG xenograft nude mice, (2) tripolinolate A induced apoptosis in glioma cells by downregulating the expressions of antiapoptotic proteins and arrested glioma cell cycle at the G2/M phase by reducing the expression levels of cell cycle regulators, and (3) tripolinolate A also remarkably reduced the expression levels of several glioma metabolic enzymes and transcription factors. All data together suggested that tripolinolate A had significant in vitro and in vivo anti-glioma effects and the regulation of multiple tumor-related regulators and transcription factors might be responsible for the activities of tripolinolate A against glioma.

scholarly journals A Genetic Screen for Suppressors and Enhancers of the Drosophila Cdk1-Cyclin B Identifies Maternal Factors That Regulate Microtubule and Microfilament Stability

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 162 (3) ◽  
pp. 1179-1195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Yuan Ji ◽  
Marjan Haghnia ◽  
Cory Trusty ◽  
Lawrence S B Goldstein ◽  
Gerold Schubiger
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genetic Screen ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Nuclear Movement ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Major Mechanism ◽  
Cytoskeletal Dynamics ◽  
Chromosome Bridges

Abstract Coordination between cell-cycle progression and cytoskeletal dynamics is important for faithful transmission of genetic information. In early Drosophila embryos, increasing maternal cyclin B leads to higher Cdk1-CycB activity, shorter microtubules, and slower nuclear movement during cycles 5-7 and delays in nuclear migration to the cortex at cycle 10. Later during cycle 14 interphase of six cycB embryos, we observed patches of mitotic nuclei, chromosome bridges, abnormal nuclear distribution, and small and large nuclei. These phenotypes indicate disrupted coordination between the cell-cycle machinery and cytoskeletal function. Using these sensitized phenotypes, we performed a dosage-sensitive genetic screen to identify maternal proteins involved in this process. We identified 10 suppressors classified into three groups: (1) gene products regulating Cdk1 activities, cdk1 and cyclin A; (2) gene products interacting with both microtubules and microfilaments, Actin-related protein 87C; and (3) gene products interacting with microfilaments, chickadee, diaphanous, Cdc42, quail, spaghetti-squash, zipper, and scrambled. Interestingly, most of the suppressors that rescue the astral microtubule phenotype also reduce Cdk1-CycB activities and are microfilament-related genes. This suggests that the major mechanism of suppression relies on the interactions among Cdk1-CycB, microtubule, and microfilament networks. Our results indicate that the balance among these different components is vital for normal early cell cycles and for embryonic development. Our observations also indicate that microtubules and cortical microfilaments antagonize each other during the preblastoderm stage.

scholarly journals Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of Cell Cycle Genes in Birch

Forests ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Yijie Li ◽  
Song Chen ◽  
Yuhang Liu ◽  
Haijiao Huang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth And Development ◽  
Betula Pendula ◽  
Cell Cycle Gene ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Cell Cycle Genes ◽  
Genome Wide

Research Highlights: This study identified the cell cycle genes in birch that likely play important roles during the plant’s growth and development. This analysis provides a basis for understanding the regulatory mechanism of various cell cycles in Betula pendula Roth. Background and Objectives: The cell cycle factors not only influence cell cycles progression together, but also regulate accretion, division, and differentiation of cells, and then regulate growth and development of the plant. In this study, we identified the putative cell cycle genes in the B. pendula genome, based on the annotated cell cycle genes in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. It can be used as a basis for further functional research. Materials and Methods: RNA-seq technology was used to determine the transcription abundance of all cell cycle genes in xylem, roots, leaves, and floral tissues. Results: We identified 59 cell cycle gene models in the genome of B. pendula, with 17 highly expression genes among them. These genes were BpCDKA.1, BpCDKB1.1, BpCDKB2.1, BpCKS1.2, BpCYCB1.1, BpCYCB1.2, BpCYCB2.1, BpCYCD3.1, BpCYCD3.5, BpDEL1, BpDpa2, BpE2Fa, BpE2Fb, BpKRP1, BpKRP2, BpRb1, and BpWEE1. Conclusions: By combining phylogenetic analysis and tissue-specific expression data, we identified 17 core cell cycle genes in the Betulapendula genome.

scholarly journals Long-range memory of growth and cycle progression correlates cell cycles in lineage trees

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika E Kuchen ◽  
Nils Becker ◽  
Nina Claudino ◽  
Thomas Höfer
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Mammalian Cell ◽  
Latent Variable ◽  
Cycle Length ◽  
Growth Control ◽  
Minimum Size ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Lineage Trees

Mammalian cell proliferation is controlled by mitogens. However, how proliferation is coordinated with cell growth is poorly understood. Here we show that statistical properties of cell lineage trees – the cell-cycle length correlations within and across generations – reveal how cell growth controls proliferation. Analyzing extended lineage trees with latent-variable models, we find that two antagonistic heritable variables account for the observed cycle-length correlations. Using molecular perturbations of mTOR and MYC we identify these variables as cell size and regulatory license to divide, which are coupled through a minimum-size checkpoint. The checkpoint is relevant only for fast cell cycles, explaining why growth control of mammalian cell proliferation has remained elusive. Thus, correlated fluctuations of the cell cycle encode its regulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document