scholarly journals Determinants of student interest in participating National Defense in the “Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka” Program

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-84
Author(s):  
Rahman Arifuddin ◽  
Subairi Subairi ◽  
Dwi Arman Prasetya ◽  
Wahyu Dirgantara
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Student Motivation ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
National Standards ◽  
Student Interest ◽  
National Defense

Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) was established through Permendikbud No. 3 of 2020 concerning National Standards for Higher Education (SN-Dikti). MBKM brings significant changes, where universities must make adjustments to these changes. The success of the implementation of MBKM in higher education is measured using 8 Key Performance Indicators (IKU). One of the 9 BKP that is quite interesting is the National Defense activity or Komponen Cadangan (Komcad). Currently, the Ministry of Defense is preparing derivative regulations from the RI Law Number 23 of 2019 concerning the Management of National Resources for National Defense relating to the formation of Reserve Components. Discipline and Honesty. Student motivation directly influences Interest in Enrolling in the MBKM: Komcad Program, meaning that each student's motivation greatly encourages student interest in enrolling in the MBKM: Komcad program. Indirectly, discipline through Student Motivation has a significant influence on Interest in Enrolling in the MBKM: Komcad Program, meaning that Interest in Enrolling in the MBKM: Komcad Program is strongly influenced by the discipline and motivation of the students themselves.

scholarly journals Designing key performance indicators for higher education programs in engineering and technology

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (Q3) ◽  
pp. 44-50
Author(s):  
Lam Ngoc Quynh Le ◽  
Dung The Vu ◽  
Hien Ngoc Do ◽  
Thoai Tuong Lam ◽  
Trang Thi Thuy Vuu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Global Integration ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Quality Of Higher Education ◽  
Statistical Measures ◽  
Engineering And Technology

Higher education plays a crucial role in the economic and social development. In order to fulfill its role, mission, and vision, as well as enhance competitive advantages in the global integration context, universities have to put quality as the top priority. Recently, many universities nationwide have been developing quality assurance system, conducting self assessment, and pursuing accreditation in both program and institutional levels. This process aims at developing suitable action plan for quality improvement based on determined strengths and weaknesses. However, this process requires a huge effort to collect and analyze data. In order to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency, the key performance indicators (KPIs) are proposed to evaluate the quality of higher education programs in many aspects. Those KPIs can be considered as a set of statistical measures of how higher education programs are performing. This paper, therefore, provides some general definitions and proposes some KPIs in order to measure the quality of higher education programs in engineering and technology. However, findings of this study can be used as references for other programs.

The Efficiency Of Higher Education Institutions: Evaluation And Management Of Managers

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olesia Tomchuk ◽  
Viktoriia Tserklevych ◽  
Olena Hurman ◽  
Valentin Petrenko ◽  
Kateryna Chymosh
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
University Professors ◽  
Business Entities ◽  
Management Functions ◽  
The University

The article discusses the potential opportunities for leaders of higher education to monitor and implement development management functions using a system of key performance indicators, which is often used by various business entities. The authors adapted it to the needs of higher education institutions, integrating them with their characteristics.The formation of a system of key performance indicators in the article is disclosed from the point of view of improving the management system and motivation of the management and teaching staff of higher education. Approbation of the proposed methodology was implemented in the Institution of Higher Education, where it showed its effectiveness. The new system allowed the university professors to influence directly on the bonus part of income through their own work and efficiency.

scholarly journals Creation of Value through the Transformation Program in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Ahmad Rahman Songip ◽  
Zaini Ujang
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Education System ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Higher Learning ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
Higher Education System ◽  
Institutions Of Higher Learning ◽  
Ministry Of Higher Education ◽  
World Ranking

The Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) of Malaysia has launched its transformationinitiative, called National Higher Education Strategic Plan (NHESP) that sets the foundationtowards attaining merit and sustainability for the higher education system beyond 2020. Oneof the initiatives is for one Malaysian university to be in the top 50 of world ranking. UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia (UTM) has decided to go for this challenge.To achieve this objective, UTMhas to set a very clear and tangible target by setting challenging Key Performance Indicators(KPI). This paper summarizes the transformation initiatives that UTM undertook since 2009,the lesson learnt and good practices that other institutions of higher learning could adopt.

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF STATE INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES AND GENERAL METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (37) ◽  
pp. 161-170
Author(s):  
W. Rudnytskyy ◽  
S. Svirko ◽  
A. Dykyi ◽  
O. Dyka ◽  
T. Trosteniuk
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Educational Research ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Public Higher Education ◽  
Institutions Of Higher Education ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Efficiency And Effectiveness ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
Complex Indicators

Abstract. The purpose of the article is to study the theoretical issues of determining the effectiveness of state higher educational institutions of Ukraine and the development of theoretical and methodological principles, as well as general methodological approaches to its evaluation. To implement it, the authors formed and proposed a supplement to the thesaurus of management of the concept of «key performance indicators» (Key Efficacy Indicators, KEI), which, in the context of the object of study, is proposed to understand a set of numerical indicators of public higher education. nature, which are the central element of the system of evaluation of its activities in terms of its effectiveness and efficiency in order to achieve certain goals of the state institution of higher education. In order to form a stable basis of the evaluation methodology, a classification of key performance indicators was formed according to 16 features, according to which the corresponding groups were identified and their characteristics were given. The outline of the methodology is based on the basic classification features of key performance indicators, in particular by: types (efficiency and effectiveness), degree of importance (major and minor) and areas of coverage (educational, research, financial, contingent, infrastructure, socio-ethical); it provides for the final definition of an integrated key performance indicator through the sum of complex indicators of efficiency and effectiveness or the sum of complex indicators of educational, research, financial, socio-ethical spheres, as well as areas of contingent and infrastructure. The final formation of the methodology for assessing the effectiveness of state institutions of higher education will optimally and deeply assess the activities of these entities, which will contribute to the actual implementation of all management functions in time and space to fulfill their mission, objectives and development goals. Keywords: key performance indicators, key еfficacy indicators, effectiveness, efficiency, public higher education institutions. JEL Classification M41, I23 Formulas: 11; fig.: 0; tabl.: 1; bibl.: 25.  

scholarly journals Pengaruh Dukungan Orang Tua dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Minat Siswa Melanjutkan Pendidikan ke Perguruan Tinggi

Jurnal Ecogen ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Indra Jannatul Addnin ◽  
Z. Mawardi Effendi
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Continuing Education ◽  
Student Motivation ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Parental Support ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Student Interest ◽  
Joint Influence

The purpose of this study was to see the effect of parental support and student motivation to continue their education to higher education at SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Padang. This type of research is descriptive quantitative. The population in this study were students of SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Padang. The number of research samples was 60 people and selected using saturated samples. The data used is the type of primary data obtained through distributing questionnaires to predefined students of SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Padang. The analytical method used is multiple regression analysis using SPSS 16. The results show that (1) parental support and learning motivation have a joint influence on students' interest in continuing education to higher education, (2) parental support has an influence on students' interest in continuing education to higher education, (3) learning motivation has an influence on students' interest in continuing education to higher education. interest of students to continue education to college. Keywords : : parental support, learning motivation, student interest

scholarly journals Advanced decision-making in higher education: learning analytics research and key performance indicators

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 937-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miltiadis D. Lytras ◽  
Naif Radi Aljohani ◽  
Anna Visvizi ◽  
Patricia Ordonez De Pablos ◽  
Dragan Gasevic
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Learning Analytics ◽  
Key Performance Indicators
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document