2018 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 771-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanheng Wu ◽  
Sisi Chao ◽  
Tianhua Zhou ◽  
Yunxiao Liu

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeong Huei Lee ◽  
Cher Siang Tan ◽  
Shahrin Mohammad ◽  
Mahmood Md Tahir ◽  
Poi Ngian Shek

The concept of cold-formed light steel framing construction has been widespread after understanding its structural characteristics with massive research works over the years. Connection serves as one of the important elements for light steel framing in order to achieve its structural stability. Compared to hot-rolled steel sections, cold-formed steel connections perform dissimilarity due to the thin-walled behaviour. This paper aims to review current researches on cold-formed steel connections, particularly for screw connections, storage rack connections, welded connections, and bolted connections. The performance of these connections in the design of cold-formed steel structures is discussed.


10.29007/pn7x ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vidal Paton-Cole ◽  
Emad Gad

Constructing residential houses with cold-formed steel in Australia dates back to the 1940’s when there was a shortage of timber for use in the industry. Subsequently, this led to the formation of the National Association of Steel-Framed Housing (NASH) in 1982 with the objective of promoting the use of cold-formed steel in the construction industry, in particular for application to construction of low-rise residential houses. Over the last few decades, NASH has made significant progress in promoting steel and has led to the inclusion of steel-framed housing in the BCA and the development of a standard on residential and low-rise steel framing. Conventional detached housing is the largest single form of residential construction in Australia with approximately 120,000 built in 2015 (ABS, 2015). Therefore, the safety, durability, performance and long-term low operational costs over the 50-year design life of a typical residential house are of significance. Constructed residential houses satisfying these requirements would not only translate to significant savings to homeowners personally but also to the nation. This paper discusses the benefits of using cold-formed steel for constructing low-rise residential structures. Based on a full-scale experimental study that was undertaken to assess the overall performance of a brick veneer steel-framed structure, the performance-based requirements of residential houses built of cold-formed steel framing are evaluated and discussed


2021 ◽  
Vol 350 ◽  
pp. 00014
Author(s):  
Vasili Stsepaniuk ◽  
Andrei Shuryn ◽  
Dmitry Zhdanov ◽  
Pavel Tsikhanchuk

The main advantages and disadvantages of cold-formed steel framed structures are discussed, and the basic principles for their analysis and design are considered. Some specific structural features of the thinwalled cold-formed steel framing of a dairy warehouse designed by Proektnauka LLC (Brest, RB), are described, and several recommendations so as to improve its structural design are given.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (08) ◽  
pp. 2050087
Author(s):  
Xi Zhang ◽  
Qing Li ◽  
Yousan Wang ◽  
Qiming Wang

The U-shaped steel-concrete composite hollow waffle (CHW) floor is an innovative slender large-span floor composed of a thin slab and bidirectional orthogonal steel-concrete composite hollow beams. Large vibrations may occur under human excitations, and vibration guidelines for CHW floors are still lacking. Thus, this paper undertook a parametric and experimental study to explore the vibration performance of the CHW floors. First, the modal properties and vibration response under walking tests considering the varying frequencies and routes were obtained from the measurements, which validated the accuracy of the finite element analysis (FEA). Then, the influence of the structural parameters on the floor vibration was investigated by numerical modeling. The parametric study shows that the medium-sized long-span (MLS) (28[Formula: see text]m) CHW floors present the best vibration serviceability, the small-sized long-span (SLS) (14[Formula: see text]m) CHW floors vibrate substantially under walking excitation, and the large-sized long-span (LLS) (42[Formula: see text]m) CHW floors are vulnerable to resonance. Finally, this paper provides recommendations for design guidelines for CHW floors and indicates that controlling the span-to-height (SH) value and beam spacing (BS) at a small value are the most effective methods of vibration control.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1238-1255
Author(s):  
Márcio S Gonçalves ◽  
Aleksandar Pavic ◽  
Roberto L Pimentel

Over the last two decades, office floors have been built progressively lightweight with increasing spans and slenderness. Therefore, vibration performance of office floors due to walking dynamic loads is becoming their governing design criterion, determining their size and shape, and therefore overall weight and embodied energy of the building. To date, floor design guidelines around the world recommend walking load scenarios in offices featuring some or all of the following standard characteristics: (a) walking loads are assumed to be periodic dynamic excitation represented by the Fourier series, including harmonics corresponding to up to the first four integer multiples of the pacing frequency of which at least one is exciting the floor at a resonant frequency and (b) single person walking. However, the literature surveyed provides evidence that such assessment methodology is potentially an over-simplification which does not reflect real walking load scenarios, since crucial features of the floor vibration source, path and receiver are missing. First, in terms of vibration source, realistic scenarios need to feature (a) moving rather than stationary walking forces, (b) stochastic nature of human gait, (c) simultaneous multi-person walking and (d) human–structure interaction. Second, for the transmission path (i.e. office floor structure), two features are needed to consider: (a) realistic office floor layouts and (b) presence, or absence, of non-structural elements. Finally, for the vibration receivers (i.e. floor occupants), (a) vibrations calculated at floor locations occupied by users (instead of at the potential highest response location which may not be occupied), (b) actual period over which occupants feel vibration due to such excitation and (c) assessment of vibration levels based on their probability of occurrence. This study therefore addresses these seldom considered but increasingly important features and discusses realistic approaches to floor design for vibration serviceability.


Masonry 2018 ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 158-182
Author(s):  
Charles B. Clark ◽  
Cortney L. Fried ◽  
James Bryja

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document