scholarly journals PENGGANTIAN BIAYA KEPADA SAKSI ATAU AHLI DALAM RANGKA MEMBERIKAN KETERANGAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA (Studi Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Takengon)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Lisa Purba Hajini Purba ◽  
Sumiadi S ◽  
Yusrizal Y

Summons of witnesses at each level of criminal case examination has consequences for the cost of attending the summons. So far, the provisions regarding the cost of summoning witnaesses and experts have been regulated in Article 229 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims and Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning Procedures for Protection of Witnesses and Victims in Human rights violations, however, in reality the fees that have been regulated in the law are not fully provided to all witnesses and even if there are costs they are not up to standard and not optimal. These costs include accommodation costs, consumption costs, transportation costs and costs of reimbursing lost income due to having to attend calls. The purpose of this research is to find out and explain the compensation mechanism to witnesses or experts in order to differentiate information in the criminal justice system in the jurisdiction of the Takengon District Court and what are the obstacles in reimbursing costs to witnesses or experts in order to provide information in the criminal justice system in the region. the law of the Takengon District Court. This type of research is juridical empirical, that is, approaching the problem through legal research by looking at the prevailing legal norms and relating them to the facts that exist in society in connection with the problems encountered in the research.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Lisa Purba Hajini Purba ◽  
Sumiadi S ◽  
Yusrizal Y

Summons of witnesses at each level of criminal case examination has consequences for the cost of attending the summons. So far, the provisions regarding the cost of summoning witnaesses and experts have been regulated in Article 229 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims and Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning Procedures for Protection of Witnesses and Victims in Human rights violations, however, in reality the fees that have been regulated in the law are not fully provided to all witnesses and even if there are costs they are not up to standard and not optimal. These costs include accommodation costs, consumption costs, transportation costs and costs of reimbursing lost income due to having to attend calls. The purpose of this research is to find out and explain the compensation mechanism to witnesses or experts in order to differentiate information in the criminal justice system in the jurisdiction of the Takengon District Court and what are the obstacles in reimbursing costs to witnesses or experts in order to provide information in the criminal justice system in the region. the law of the Takengon District Court. This type of research is juridical empirical, that is, approaching the problem through legal research by looking at the prevailing legal norms and relating them to the facts that exist in society in connection with the problems encountered in the research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 374-378
Author(s):  
I Ketut Eka Yoga Juliantika ◽  
I Made Sepud ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana

Children are often victims of child trafficking crime. There are a lot of factors that support the crime of child trafficking, one of which is the lack of regulation on child trafficking. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the regulation of child trafficking and how the criminal law policy against child trafficking. This research was designed using a normative legal research method. The results of this study indicated that the regulation of child trafficking is regulated in Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, the Criminal Code (KUHP), namely Article 297, Article 301, Article 324, Article 328, and Article 330, RI Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law No. 35 of 2014 on Amendments to Law no. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, and Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Furthermore, the criminal law policy against child trafficking is regulated in the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Law no. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, and Law no. 35 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law no. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.


Author(s):  
I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana

The discussion on this journal raised regarding policy formulation RestorativeJustice in the Criminal Justice System Children . The objectives of this research thatin order to properly analyze the basic ideas contained in restorative justice , to dowith children in conflict with the law and to analyze policy formulation set forth in the Law. 112012 on the Criminal Justice System Kids for restorative justice to children inconflict with the law . While this type of research used in scientific journals this isthe kind of normative legal research , because it is based on the assessment thatthere is a conflict between the norms of Law. 11 of 2012 on the Criminal JusticeSystem Children with the norms contained in the draft - Criminal Code ( CriminalCode ) . In this case the unlawful act committed by the child who has not reached theage of 18 (eighteen years ) diversion efforts which have the purpose for the creationof a balance between the interests of focus and attention to the perpetrator and thevictim also impact the completion of the criminal case that happens in thecommunity to ensure and protecting children and their rights in order to live , grow,develop and participate optimally in accordance with the dignity of humanity , aswell as protection from violence and discrimination .


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
A. Sudarman Kantao ◽  
Azwad Rachmat Hambali ◽  
Muh. Rinaldy Bima

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dan memperoleh pemahaman terhadap penerapan nilai serta hambatan dalam penerapan keadilan restoratif pada perkara peradilan pidana anak sesuai dengan Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dalam rangka memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum dan kendala yang dihadapi majelis hakim pengadilan Negeri watansoppeng dalam menerapkan keadilan restoratif untuk mengadili tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terkait proses persidangan terhadap kasus anak, hakim Pengadilan Negeri Watansoppeng senantiasa mengupayakan penerapan restoratif justice dengan memberi saran kepada korban, terdakwa dan pihak keluarga untuk mengusahakan perdamaian sebagai upaya penyelesaian kasus di luar jalur persidangan, namun upaya tersebut seringkali ditolak oleh korban dan keluarganya dan menginginkan agar pelaku dihukum seberat-beratnya. Faktor Kebudayaan dari keluarga korban inilah yang tidak mendukung penyelesaian perkara di luar peradilan atau perdamaian. This study aims to analyze and gain an understanding of the application of values ​​and obstacles in the application of restorative justice in juvenile criminal justice cases in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children in order to provide legal protection for children who are in conflict with the law and the obstacles they face. watansoppeng District Court panel of judges in implementing restorative justice to adjudicate crimes committed by children. The results showed that in relation to the trial process for juvenile cases, the judges at the Watansoppeng District Court always tried to apply restorative justice by advising victims, defendants and their families to seek peace as an effort to resolve cases outside the court, but these efforts were often rejected by the victim and his family and wants the perpetrator to be punished as severely as possible. The cultural factor of the victim's family does not support the settlement of cases outside the court or peace.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-69
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizal Lampatta ◽  
Herlina Sulaiman

Diversion is a step or legal remedy aimed specifically at children who are in conflict with the law. As perpetrators of criminal acts, children need to be treated differently from adults. This is due to the psychological condition of children who are considered unable to accept criminal sanctions. Even children who have committed criminal acts, Act No. 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System Children continue to provide collateral in the form of diversion efforts so that children avoid criminal prosecution. Diversion is carried out at the police, attorney and court levels. Not all cases of child offenders who enter the PN level can be diversified because there are already rules in the SPPA Law, Perma No. 4 of 2014 and PP. 65 of 2015. Likewise in the implementation of diversion at the District Court level in Gorontalo Province, some were successful and some were not. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of diversion to child offenders at court level in Gorontalo Province. As well as to find out the obstacles in the implementation of diversion against child offenders at the District Court level in Gorontalo Province.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Imran Imran

ABSTRAKDalam sistem peradilan pidana penanganan suatu kasus dimulai sejak kasus itu muncul, kemudian ditangani oleh polisi, hingga proses akhir dari penegakan hukum terletak pada putusan hakim. Putusan hakim dapat berupa menjatuhkan hukuman ataupun membebaskan seorang terdakwa. Dalam putusan hakim akan terlihat kemampuan hakim dalam mengonstruksi kasus sejak dakwaan dibacakan hingga pledoi diucapkan. Semua konstruksi hakim tersebut akan tergambar dalam pertimbangan-pertimbangan. Dalam pertimbangan tersebut akan terlihat apakah suatu putusan tersebut melanggar kode etik atau tidak. Apa yang terlihat dalam dua putusan hakim yang dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Tobelo, mencerminkan adanya persoalan ketika seorang terdakwa dua kali dihukum oleh majelis hakim yang sama untuk perbuatan yang sama pula. Hal inilah yang kemudian menjadi rumusan masalah, apakah putusan tersebut melanggar Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim atau tidak? Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang memfokuskan kajian pada data sekunder, maka akan terlihat bagaimana sesungguhnya dua putusan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan telah terjadi pelanggaran Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim yang dilakukan oleh majelis hakim.Kata kunci: kode etik dan pedoman perilaku hakim; sistem peradilan pidana; profesionalisme.  ABSTRACT In the criminal justice system, the handling of a case starts since the claim arises, then is handled by the police, until the final process of law enforcement, which lies in the judge's decision. Judges' decisions can be in the form of sentencing or acquitting a defendant. The ability of a judge to construct a case will appear in the decision from the time the indictment is read until the plea is pronounced. In these considerations, it will be seen whether the judge's decision violates the code of ethics or not. Two judges' decisions issued by the Tobelo District Court reflect the problem in which a defendant was twice sentenced by the same panel of judges for violating the same law. This is what then becomes the formula of the problem, whether the decision violates the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges or not. By using normative legal research method focusing on secondary data construing, it will expose the fact of these two decisions. The results of this analysis indicate that there are violations of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges been committed by the panel of judges examining the case. Keywords: code of ethics and code of conduct of judges; criminal justice system; professionalism. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-56
Author(s):  
Bunyamin Muhammad Yafid ◽  
Abd. Kahar Muzakkir

Judicial institutions, as law enforcement agencies in the Criminal Justice System, are a foundation of hopes for justice seekers, as based on Article 2 section (4) of Law No. 48 of 2009, regulates that “the Court is done simply, quickly, and at a low cost”. Therefore, this study aims to determine the implementation of the Supervision and Observation Judge's role and the obstacles that affect the Supervision and Observation Judge's performance in implementing Court Decisions in the Penitentiary. This study uses two types of research, namely normative legal research and empirical legal research. This research was conducted at the Makassar Class I Penitentiary and the Makassar Class IA District Court. The types of data used in this study include primary data and secondary data. The data that has been collected is then processed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study concluded that the implementation of the role of the Supervision and Observation Judge in the implementation of the decision of the Makassar Class IA District Court at the Makassar Class I Penitentiary has not run optimally, because between The Supervision and Observation Judge and the Head of the Penitentiary rarely meet and discuss guidance issues for Inmates at the Penitentiary. The obstacles in implementing the role of the Supervision and Observation Judge at the Penitentiary include the problem of insufficient funds available for operational supervision and observation and the absence of special staff to assist the Supervision and Observation Judge in recording their Inmates. Therefore, more specific implementing regulations are needed to certify that the judgment is being properly executed and under the laws and regulations in Indonesia. Furthermore, there is a need for effective cooperation between the Supervision and Observation Judge and the Penitentiary Officers, who must always coordinate as one unit in an integrated Criminal Justice System.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-186
Author(s):  
Khairida Khairida ◽  
Syahrizal Syahrizal ◽  
Mohd. Din

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor  35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan dari Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak dimana dalam Undang-Undang tersebut menjelaskan kewajiban memberikan perlindungan kepada anak, namun ketentuan pidana bagi pelaku pelecehan terhadap anak dalam Undang-Undang tersebut masih sangat lemah sebagai dasar untuk menangani kasus pelecehan terhadap anak. Qanun  Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang  Hukum Jinayat, memberikan pengertian tentang Pelecehan Seksual pada Bab I ketentuan umum Pasal (1) ayat ke - 27 yaitu:  Pelecehan seksual adalah perbuatan asusila atau perbuatan cabul yang sengaja dilakukan seseorang didepan umum atau terhadap orang lain sebagai korban baik laki-laki maupun perempuan tanpa kerelaan korban. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana Penegakan Hukum Pelecehan Seksual pada Anak, dalam Sistem Peradilan Jinayat, hubungan sistem Peradilan Jinayat dengan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Penulisan karya ilmiah ini  menggunakan jenis  penelitian  hukum  normatif, di mana penelitian hukum yang menggunakan sumber data primernya merupakan norma-norma yang berlaku baik yang berupa Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Qanun, dengan pendekatan library research. Disarankan kepada Pemerintah perlu secepatnya membuat langkah-langkah strategis, rencana aksi dan penerapan sanksi yang tegas terhadap prilaku seks yang menyimpang. Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Aceh (DPRA) perlu membuat aturan lebih lanjut termasuk aturan acaranya agar permasalahan ini menjadi lebih jelas dan pasti sehingga terhdap korban mendapatkan suatu kepastian hukum dan nasibnya menjadi lebih jelas serta terpenuhi hak-haknya.The Act Number 35, 2014 which is the revision of the Act Number 23, 2002 on the Child Protection which in the Act explains the obligation to provide protection to children, but the criminal provisions for perpetrators of child abuse in the Act are still very weak as a basis for dealing with child abuse cases. The Law Number 11, 2012 on the Juvenile Justice System in the first chapter of the General Provision, precisely in Article (1) paragraph (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) states that; The Child Criminal Justice System is the whole process of settling children's cases against the law, from the investigation stage to the guidance stage after undergoing criminal. Qanun Aceh (local law) Number 6, 2014 on Jinayat Law (Islamic Criminal Law), provides understanding on Sexual Harassment in Chapter I general provisions of Article (1) of the 27th verse: Sexual harassment is an immoral act or obscene acts committed personally in public or against another person as a victim both men and women without the victim's willingness. This study aims to find out how Law Enforcement of Sexual Harassment in Children, in Jinayat Jurisdiction System, Relation of Jinayat Justice System with Child Criminal Justice System and To know the fulfillment of children. The paper applies normative legal research, in which legal research using its primary data sources are the norms that apply both in the form of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Laws and Regulations, Qanun, with the approach of library research. It is recommended that to the Government should establish strategic measures, action plans and the imposition of strict sanctions against deviant sexual behavior. The House of Representatives of Aceh (DPRA) needs to make further rules including the rules of the show so that this matter becomes clearer and more certain that the victim gets a legal certainty and his fate becomes clearer and fulfilled his rights.


Rechtidee ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
Atika Anggraini

<p align="center"><strong>ABSTRAK</strong></p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis Implementasi Konsep <em>Restorative Justice</em>Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Di Wilayah Bangkalan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Tulisan ini di buat berdasarkan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan utama yaitu yuridis normative (legal Research) dan yuridis Empiris sebagai penunjang pendekatan Normatif. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa konsep Restorative Justice dibangkalan telah efektif dilaksanakan oleh para penegak hukum meskipun banyak kekurangan tetapi tidak mengurangi pelaksanaan demi kepentingan Anak berhadapan hukum. Pendampingan Kasus ABH wajib didampingi oleh Keluarga, Pengacara, Bapas, LSM dan tokoh masyarakat. Pendamping terhadap ABH tidak hanya kasus yang dapat dilaksanakan Restorative Justice tetapi semua kasus yang melibatkan anak sebagai anak pelaku. Pendampingan ABH dimulai sejak tahap penyidikan hingga telah selesainya pidana yang harus ABH pertanggung jawabkan dan dikembalikannya ABH kepada masyrakat untuk bersosialisasi. Oleh karena itu, diharapkan putusan para penegak hukum yang menyangkut masa depan ABH lebih untuk diperhatikan masa depannya agar menjadi pribadi yang lebih baik.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Kata Kunci: Anak Berhadapan Hukum, <em>Restorative Justice, </em>Pendampingan</strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p align="center"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p>This reseach aims to analyze the Implementation of Restorative Justice Concept on Children Against the Law in Bangkalan Territory Based on Act No. 11 Year 2012 on the Criminal Justice System of Children. This paper is based on research using the main approach of normative juridical (Legal Research) and juridical Empirical as supporting Normative approach. The result of research is the concept of Restorative Justice has been effectively implemented by law enforcers despite many shortcomings but does not reduce the implementation in the interest of the Child in the against of law. Assistance of ABH Cases must be accompanied by Family, Lawyers, BAPAS (Balai Permasyarakatan), NGOs and community leaders. Companions to ABH are not the only cases that Restorative Justice can implement but all cases involving children as child offenders. ABH mentoring started from the investigation stage until the completion of the crime that should be ABH accountable and returned ABH to the community to socialize. Therefore, it is hoped that the decision of law enforcers concerning the future of ABH is more to be considered for the future to become a better person.</p><p> </p><strong>Keywords :</strong>Children Against the Law, Restorative Justice, Assistance


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 724
Author(s):  
Lie Natania ◽  
Mety Rahmawati

Children are the future of  mankind, our nation and country. Based on this strategic position, the state and the law must provide special protection for children. However, in finding themselves,in some occasions children can stumble and make mistakes, which unfortunately can be in the form of run-ins with the law. Act Number 11 of Year 2012 regarding the Criminal Justice System for Juvenile presented the concept of diversion, which is an approach to resolve juvenile cases in order to achieve restorative justice. Diversion is the of process diverting child cases out of the usual system of criminal justice. However, diversion cannot be used to resolve all and every child cases. In a case of drug abuse, as seen in the Verdict of Surabaya District Court Number 111/Pid.Sus-Anak/2014/PN.Sby, diversion is attempted to resolve the case. But in two similar cases, namely in the Verdict of West Jakarta District Court Number 47/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN.Jkt.Brt and Number 53/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN.Jkt.Brt, diversion was not attempted resolve the children in those cases and as stated on the verdict, those children were convicted. Why is there a difference in the resolution of the court against children who committed drug abuse between the Verdict of Surabaya District Court Number 111/Pid.Sus-Anak/2014/PN.Sby, the Verdict of West Jakarta District Court Number 47/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN.Jkt.Brt and the Verdict of West Jakarta District Court Number 53/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN.Jkt.Brt?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document