scholarly journals The effectiveness of the implementation of diversion on children who conflict with the law at the level of the state court in gorontalo province

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-69
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizal Lampatta ◽  
Herlina Sulaiman
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
District Court ◽  
State Court ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Psychological Condition ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
The Law

Diversion is a step or legal remedy aimed specifically at children who are in conflict with the law. As perpetrators of criminal acts, children need to be treated differently from adults. This is due to the psychological condition of children who are considered unable to accept criminal sanctions. Even children who have committed criminal acts, Act No. 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System Children continue to provide collateral in the form of diversion efforts so that children avoid criminal prosecution. Diversion is carried out at the police, attorney and court levels. Not all cases of child offenders who enter the PN level can be diversified because there are already rules in the SPPA Law, Perma No. 4 of 2014 and PP. 65 of 2015. Likewise in the implementation of diversion at the District Court level in Gorontalo Province, some were successful and some were not. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of diversion to child offenders at court level in Gorontalo Province. As well as to find out the obstacles in the implementation of diversion against child offenders at the District Court level in Gorontalo Province.

scholarly journals CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDREN UNDER 12 YEARS OF AGE IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW IN THE CHILD CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 252-260
Author(s):  
Eko Iswahyudi ◽  
◽  
I. Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Nurini Aprilianda ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Obligations ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In the Act No. 11 of 2012 about the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it explains the age limit for juvenile criminal responsibility for those who commit criminal acts, as regulated in Article 1 point 3. The children between 12 (twelve) years old and 18 (eighteen) years old are suspected of committing a crime. The purpose of this study was to analyze the construction of the regulation of children under the age of 12 in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. This type of normative legal research uses a statute approach and a case approach through a literature study. The results of the research on the Construction of Regulations for Children under the Age of 12 in Act Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as Children in Conflict with the Law. There is a need for additional rules or amendments to the provisions of criminal sanctions for children, where criminal sanctions will be given to children aged at least 10 years, where these rules consist of basic criminal sanctions, such as community service or supervision, job training, coaching in institutions. This sanction is carried out by considering the rights of children as perpetrators, children as victims and children as witnesses who are underage, without eliminating the implementation of applicable legal obligations.

scholarly journals PENGGANTIAN BIAYA KEPADA SAKSI ATAU AHLI DALAM RANGKA MEMBERIKAN KETERANGAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA (Studi Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Takengon)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Lisa Purba Hajini Purba ◽  
Sumiadi S ◽  
Yusrizal Y
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
District Court ◽  
Compensation Mechanism ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Cost

Summons of witnesses at each level of criminal case examination has consequences for the cost of attending the summons. So far, the provisions regarding the cost of summoning witnaesses and experts have been regulated in Article 229 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims and Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning Procedures for Protection of Witnesses and Victims in Human rights violations, however, in reality the fees that have been regulated in the law are not fully provided to all witnesses and even if there are costs they are not up to standard and not optimal. These costs include accommodation costs, consumption costs, transportation costs and costs of reimbursing lost income due to having to attend calls. The purpose of this research is to find out and explain the compensation mechanism to witnesses or experts in order to differentiate information in the criminal justice system in the jurisdiction of the Takengon District Court and what are the obstacles in reimbursing costs to witnesses or experts in order to provide information in the criminal justice system in the region. the law of the Takengon District Court. This type of research is juridical empirical, that is, approaching the problem through legal research by looking at the prevailing legal norms and relating them to the facts that exist in society in connection with the problems encountered in the research.

scholarly journals PRIMUM REMEDIUM ACTION SANCTIONS AGAINST CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW

Cepalo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-120
Author(s):  
Mashuril Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law

Criminal sanctions are more popular than action sanctions at the application level. Action sanctions formulation is regulated in Articles 82 and 83 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, while criminal sanctions are the last resort. However, criminal sanctions are still the "prima donna" in law enforcement practices against children in conflict. This condition raises various problems such as the overcapacity of correctional institutions, burdens the state budget, and creates a stigma against children in conflict with the law. Because the purpose of implementing the juvenile criminal justice system is in the child's best interests, action sanctions should be prioritised, even though criminal sanctions are needed in law enforcement against children in conflict with the law. Therefore, an idea emerged to restore criminal sanctions as ultimum remedium and strengthen action sanctions as primum remedium. The problem discussed in this study is how to implement primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? And how to strengthen primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? This study uses a normative juridical, an empirical juridical, and a comparative methods. The data in this article are sourced from primary and secondary data processed through description, prescription, and system. The results indicate that criminal sanctions still dominate judges' decisions in children in conflict with the law, and action sanctions are complementary sanctions because it is rarely applied.

scholarly journals DIVERSI TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
I Made Wiharsa
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Punishment ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Research Type

Diversion of narcotic crime in the criminal justice system for the children. Children in conflict with the law, especially in narcotic cases not specifically regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 on the Narcotics. During this time the children in conflict with the law that is drafted in the Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System for The Children. Criminal punishment against with a certain person started because that person has committed a crime. Children in the case of a criminal act of narcotics criminal sanctions will have a negative impact on a child's future. Referring to the criminal justice system for the children are known to attempt a diversion to divert the child's completion of the criminal case of the trial into a non-judicial process. This research with the normative methods research type, which aims to determine the impact of the imposition of criminal sanctions and diversion efforts for children in narcotic crime. Diversi tindak pidana narkotika dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak. Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum khususnya dalam tindak pidana narkotika belum diatur secara khusus dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Selama ini terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum mengacu pada Undang-Undang Nomor. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.  Penjatuhan pidana terhadap seseorang bermula karena seseorang tersebut telah melakukan suatu tindak pidana. Anak dalam hal melakukan tindak pidana narkotika yang dijatuhi sanksi pidana akan berdampak buruk pada masa depan anak. Mengacu pada sistem peradilan pidana anak yang dikenal upaya diversi untuk mengalihkan penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana anak dari proses peradilan ke proses non peradilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metoda penelitian hukum normatif, yang bertujuan untuk dapat mengetahui dampak penjatuhan sanksi pidana dan upaya diversi bagi anak dalam tindak pidana narkotika.

scholarly journals Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Peradilan Pidana Anak di Pengadilan Negeri Watansoppeng

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
A. Sudarman Kantao ◽  
Azwad Rachmat Hambali ◽  
Muh. Rinaldy Bima
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Cultural Factor ◽  
District Court ◽  
Trial Process ◽  
The Law

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dan memperoleh pemahaman terhadap penerapan nilai serta hambatan dalam penerapan keadilan restoratif pada perkara peradilan pidana anak sesuai dengan Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dalam rangka memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum dan kendala yang dihadapi majelis hakim pengadilan Negeri watansoppeng dalam menerapkan keadilan restoratif untuk mengadili tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terkait proses persidangan terhadap kasus anak, hakim Pengadilan Negeri Watansoppeng senantiasa mengupayakan penerapan restoratif justice dengan memberi saran kepada korban, terdakwa dan pihak keluarga untuk mengusahakan perdamaian sebagai upaya penyelesaian kasus di luar jalur persidangan, namun upaya tersebut seringkali ditolak oleh korban dan keluarganya dan menginginkan agar pelaku dihukum seberat-beratnya. Faktor Kebudayaan dari keluarga korban inilah yang tidak mendukung penyelesaian perkara di luar peradilan atau perdamaian. This study aims to analyze and gain an understanding of the application of values ​​and obstacles in the application of restorative justice in juvenile criminal justice cases in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children in order to provide legal protection for children who are in conflict with the law and the obstacles they face. watansoppeng District Court panel of judges in implementing restorative justice to adjudicate crimes committed by children. The results showed that in relation to the trial process for juvenile cases, the judges at the Watansoppeng District Court always tried to apply restorative justice by advising victims, defendants and their families to seek peace as an effort to resolve cases outside the court, but these efforts were often rejected by the victim and his family and wants the perpetrator to be punished as severely as possible. The cultural factor of the victim's family does not support the settlement of cases outside the court or peace.

scholarly journals RECONSTRUCTION OF CHILD CRIMINAL SANCTIONS IN PERSPECTIVE OF LAW NUMBER 11 THE YEAR 2012 CONCERNING JUSTICE CHILD CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM BASED ON JUSTICE VALUES

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (18) ◽  
pp. 68-81
Author(s):  
Akhmad Munawar ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto ◽  
Anis Mashdurohatun ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Law

Children who are in conflict with the law are seen to need to be given physical and spiritual protection. Bearing in mind, the Court's decision is more likely to impose imprisonment sanctions. The United Nations in several Congresses has criticized imprisonment sanctions, besides having the potential to cause stigmatization in children, it is also ineffective and does not create a deterrent effect. This study aims to examine and to analyze the implementation of Child Criminal sanctions in the perspective of Law Number 11-year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, to analyze the factors that influence child criminal sanctions that are not yet fair. The research question is how the reconstruction of child-based criminal sanctions based on justice is. This research is included in non-doctrinal research (empirical). It used three theories, namely the theory of criminal purpose to analyze the first problem, the dignified justice theory to analyze the second problem and progressive legal theory to analyze the third problem. The results found that the implementation of sanctions Crime against a child in conflict with a law imposed by a prison sentence, the Judge in his consideration emphasizes juridical considerations so that the criminal sanctions imposed on the child are not in accordance with teleological theory as the purpose of punishment. Criminal sanctions against children have not brought justice, among others, because several articles in Law Number 11-year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System still have weaknesses. Reconstruction of Articles that hinder the realization of fair criminal sanctions, namely Article 7 paragraph (2) Article 32 paragraph (2), Article 71 paragraph (1) letter e, Article 79 paragraph (1) and Article 81 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 11 the year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System.

scholarly journals PENGGANTIAN BIAYA KEPADA SAKSI ATAU AHLI DALAM RANGKA MEMBERIKAN KETERANGAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA (Studi Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Takengon)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Lisa Purba Hajini Purba ◽  
Sumiadi S ◽  
Yusrizal Y
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
District Court ◽  
Compensation Mechanism ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Cost

Summons of witnesses at each level of criminal case examination has consequences for the cost of attending the summons. So far, the provisions regarding the cost of summoning witnaesses and experts have been regulated in Article 229 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims and Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning Procedures for Protection of Witnesses and Victims in Human rights violations, however, in reality the fees that have been regulated in the law are not fully provided to all witnesses and even if there are costs they are not up to standard and not optimal. These costs include accommodation costs, consumption costs, transportation costs and costs of reimbursing lost income due to having to attend calls. The purpose of this research is to find out and explain the compensation mechanism to witnesses or experts in order to differentiate information in the criminal justice system in the jurisdiction of the Takengon District Court and what are the obstacles in reimbursing costs to witnesses or experts in order to provide information in the criminal justice system in the region. the law of the Takengon District Court. This type of research is juridical empirical, that is, approaching the problem through legal research by looking at the prevailing legal norms and relating them to the facts that exist in society in connection with the problems encountered in the research.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENETAPAN PENGADILAN TERHADAP ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA (STUDI KASUS: PENETAPAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA DAN 2 (DUA) PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA BARAT)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 724
Author(s):  
Lie Natania ◽  
Mety Rahmawati
Keyword(s):  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
The State ◽  
District Court ◽  
Strategic Position ◽  
The Law ◽  
Special Protection

Children are the future of  mankind, our nation and country. Based on this strategic position, the state and the law must provide special protection for children. However, in finding themselves,in some occasions children can stumble and make mistakes, which unfortunately can be in the form of run-ins with the law. Act Number 11 of Year 2012 regarding the Criminal Justice System for Juvenile presented the concept of diversion, which is an approach to resolve juvenile cases in order to achieve restorative justice. Diversion is the of process diverting child cases out of the usual system of criminal justice. However, diversion cannot be used to resolve all and every child cases. In a case of drug abuse, as seen in the Verdict of Surabaya District Court Number 111/Pid.Sus-Anak/2014/PN.Sby, diversion is attempted to resolve the case. But in two similar cases, namely in the Verdict of West Jakarta District Court Number 47/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN.Jkt.Brt and Number 53/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN.Jkt.Brt, diversion was not attempted resolve the children in those cases and as stated on the verdict, those children were convicted. Why is there a difference in the resolution of the court against children who committed drug abuse between the Verdict of Surabaya District Court Number 111/Pid.Sus-Anak/2014/PN.Sby, the Verdict of West Jakarta District Court Number 47/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN.Jkt.Brt and the Verdict of West Jakarta District Court Number 53/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN.Jkt.Brt?

scholarly journals RESTORATIVE JUSTICE HAKIM TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERKONFLIK DENGAN HUKUM DI PENGADILAN NEGERI LHOKSEUMAWE

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Sumiadi Sumiadi ◽  
Laila M Rasyid ◽  
Romi Asmara
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Human Resources ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
District Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Younger Generation

Children are part of the younger generation as one of the human resources as potential successors inthe future. Violation of law that occurs in the community not only done by adults but also by children,the implementation of the sentence would have been very different from adults. In children should morebe rehabilitation rather than punitive. The results showed that judge who examine and rule on cases ofchildren in conflict with the law in District Court Lhokseumawe still think positivistic/legalistic wheredecisions are decided by the judges commonly used approach based on the criminal justice system.

scholarly journals Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Anak Menurut Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-138
Author(s):  
Mustakim Mahmud
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Issues ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Alternative Solutions

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan sanksi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dengan permasalahan penelitian, Pertama, Bagaimana penerapan Sanksi Pidana dan Tindakan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak? Kedua, Bagaimanakah hambatan-hambatan apa yang ditemukan dalam penerapan Sanksi pidana dan Tindakan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dan penelitian hukum empirik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, Pertama, Penerapan sanksi pidana menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradila Pidana Anak bahwa Penegak mencari alternatif penyelesaian terbaik bagi kepentingan anak. Kedua, Hambatannya yaitu belum adanya persamaan persfektif dalam penanganan terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum di antara para penegak hukum serta hambatan dari faktor masyarakat yaitu banyak masyarakat yang belum mengerti tentang peraturan undang-undang yang berhubungan dengan anak. This study aims to analyze the application of sanctions based on the Child Criminal Justice System Law with research issues, First, How is the application of Criminal Sanctions and Actions According to Law Number 11 of 2012 Concerning the Child Criminal Justice System? Second, what are the obstacles found in the application of criminal sanctions and actions according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children. The research method uses normative legal research and empirical legal research. The results showed, First, the application of criminal sanctions according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children that the Enforcement Seekers seek the best alternative solutions for the interests of children. Second, the obstacle is the lack of equality in the perspective of handling children in conflict with the law among law enforcers as well as obstacles from community factors, namely that many people do not understand the laws relating to children

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document