KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK

The discussion on this journal raised regarding policy formulation RestorativeJustice in the Criminal Justice System Children . The objectives of this research thatin order to properly analyze the basic ideas contained in restorative justice , to dowith children in conflict with the law and to analyze policy formulation set forth in the Law. 112012 on the Criminal Justice System Kids for restorative justice to children inconflict with the law . While this type of research used in scientific journals this isthe kind of normative legal research , because it is based on the assessment thatthere is a conflict between the norms of Law. 11 of 2012 on the Criminal JusticeSystem Children with the norms contained in the draft - Criminal Code ( CriminalCode ) . In this case the unlawful act committed by the child who has not reached theage of 18 (eighteen years ) diversion efforts which have the purpose for the creationof a balance between the interests of focus and attention to the perpetrator and thevictim also impact the completion of the criminal case that happens in thecommunity to ensure and protecting children and their rights in order to live , grow,develop and participate optimally in accordance with the dignity of humanity , aswell as protection from violence and discrimination .

Download Full-text

Model Penegakan Hukum Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum dalam Proses Penyidikan

Pandecta Research Law Journal ◽

10.15294/pandecta.v10i2.4951 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 167

Author(s):

Hamidah Abdurrachman ◽

Fajar Ari Sudewo ◽

Dyah Irma Permanasari

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Criminal Justice System ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Child Protection ◽

Justice System ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Criminal Court ◽

Central Java ◽

The Law ◽

Pass Through

Upaya memberikan perlindungan terhadap Anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak menunjukkan perkembangan yang sangat berarti. Selama ini terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum, ditangani secara umum seperti orang dewasa. Anak-anak tersebut melewati proses hukum tanpa ada pendampingan bahkan segera dilakukan upaya paksa berupa penangkapan dan penahanan sehingga anak mengalami putus sekolah. Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak meletakkan fondasi perlindungan anak dengan pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif yaitu dalam penyelesaian perkara melibatkan pelaku, korban, keluarga pelaku/korban dan pihak lain yang terkait untuk bersama-sama mencari penyelesaian yang adil dengan menekankan pemulihan kembali pada keadaan semula dan bukan pembalasan. Keadilan restoratif ini diwujudkan melalui Diversi yaitu pengalihan penyelesaian perkara anak dari proses peradilan pidana ke proses ke luar pengadilan pidana. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa di Jawa Tengah kasus anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum secara umum diselesaikan melalui jalur diversi dan sebagian lainnya diproses menggunakan berdasarkan KUHAP atau jalur pidana. Hal lainnya meskipun sudah menerapkan jalur diversi terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum namun belum ada keseragaman atau kesamaan model diversi sebagaimana yang diamanatkan di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Efforts to provide protection against Children in conflict with the law in the Criminal Justice System Child shows a very significant development. During against children in conflict with the law, generally handled as an adult. These children pass through the legal process without immediate assistance even forceful measures in the form of arrest and detention so that children have dropped out of school. Law No. 11 Year 2012 on the Criminal Justice System Child laid the foundation of child protection approach Restorative Justice that in settling disputes involving offenders, victims, family offender/victim and other relevant parties to work together to find a fair settlement with the emphasis on restoring back to its original state and not retaliation. Restorative justice is realized through the transfer of settling disputes Diversion namely children from the criminal justice process to a process outside the criminal court. The results of this research showed that in Central Java case of children in conflict with the law are generally resolved through the diversion and some processed using by the Criminal Code or the criminal path. Another thing despite applying diversion path towards children in conflict with the law but there is no uniformity or sameness models of diversion as mandated in Law No. 11 Year 2012 on Child Criminal Justice System

Download Full-text

IMPLEMENTASI KONSEP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM DI WILAYAH BANGKALAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK

Rechtidee ◽

10.21107/ri.v13i2.3992 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 13 (2) ◽

pp. 219

Author(s):

Atika Anggraini

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Criminal Justice System ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Justice System ◽

Community Leaders ◽

Legal Research ◽

Main Approach ◽

Normative Approach ◽

The Future ◽

The Law

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis Implementasi Konsep Restorative JusticeTerhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Di Wilayah Bangkalan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Tulisan ini di buat berdasarkan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan utama yaitu yuridis normative (legal Research) dan yuridis Empiris sebagai penunjang pendekatan Normatif. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa konsep Restorative Justice dibangkalan telah efektif dilaksanakan oleh para penegak hukum meskipun banyak kekurangan tetapi tidak mengurangi pelaksanaan demi kepentingan Anak berhadapan hukum. Pendampingan Kasus ABH wajib didampingi oleh Keluarga, Pengacara, Bapas, LSM dan tokoh masyarakat. Pendamping terhadap ABH tidak hanya kasus yang dapat dilaksanakan Restorative Justice tetapi semua kasus yang melibatkan anak sebagai anak pelaku. Pendampingan ABH dimulai sejak tahap penyidikan hingga telah selesainya pidana yang harus ABH pertanggung jawabkan dan dikembalikannya ABH kepada masyrakat untuk bersosialisasi. Oleh karena itu, diharapkan putusan para penegak hukum yang menyangkut masa depan ABH lebih untuk diperhatikan masa depannya agar menjadi pribadi yang lebih baik. Kata Kunci: Anak Berhadapan Hukum, Restorative Justice, Pendampingan ABSTRACT This reseach aims to analyze the Implementation of Restorative Justice Concept on Children Against the Law in Bangkalan Territory Based on Act No. 11 Year 2012 on the Criminal Justice System of Children. This paper is based on research using the main approach of normative juridical (Legal Research) and juridical Empirical as supporting Normative approach. The result of research is the concept of Restorative Justice has been effectively implemented by law enforcers despite many shortcomings but does not reduce the implementation in the interest of the Child in the against of law. Assistance of ABH Cases must be accompanied by Family, Lawyers, BAPAS (Balai Permasyarakatan), NGOs and community leaders. Companions to ABH are not the only cases that Restorative Justice can implement but all cases involving children as child offenders. ABH mentoring started from the investigation stage until the completion of the crime that should be ABH accountable and returned ABH to the community to socialize. Therefore, it is hoped that the decision of law enforcers concerning the future of ABH is more to be considered for the future to become a better person. Keywords :Children Against the Law, Restorative Justice, Assistance

Download Full-text

PENAL MEDIATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION IN THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (A DIGNIFIED JUSTICE JURISPRUDENCE)

International Journal of Advanced Research ◽

10.21474/ijar01/11817 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (10) ◽

pp. 12-21

Author(s):

Yoyok Ucuk Suyono , SH. , MHum ◽

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Criminal Justice System ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Justice System ◽

Due Process ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Human Beings ◽

Discretionary Power ◽

Criminal Cases ◽

The Law

Restorative justice perspective in this paper sees a penal mediation as a non-penal means within the Law. This institution has been utilised as an alternative in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System to deliver dignified justice in criminal cases. Although this model appeared as vague, since stipulated only between the lines in the Indonesia Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the concept of restorativejustice has been existing in the Indonesian Volksgeist (the Spirit of the Indonesian, i.e. Pancasila) from the begining of time. This author would argue bellow that penal mediation has been used to mitigate penal cases by law enforcement institutions in order to achieve dignified justice in the concept of restorative justice, to serve human as human beings recognised by the Law in the Pancasila Legal System. The police may use penal mediation basing upon their discretionary power and the public prosecutors may also use their own prerogative power or the what so called prosecutors power of opportunity in place of the due process and make creative innovations, beginign from misdemeanor or complaint offenses. Even Indonesian judges have broad discretionary authority to use penal mediation in solving criminal cases so that the dignified justice, can be obtained, particularly by victims de lege lata.

Download Full-text

Presidential Permit to Summon Suspect of Corruption of the Member of the House of Representatives

Sriwijaya Law Review ◽

10.28946/slrev.vol2.iss2.128.pp203-214 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 203

Author(s):

Ramiyanto Ramiyanto

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Criminal Justice System ◽

House Of Representatives ◽

Justice System ◽

Criminal Code ◽

One Step ◽

The Law ◽

Code Procedure

Summoning the suspect is one step in the process of investigation in the criminal justice system which had been regulated in the Criminal Code Procedure and in other special laws. However, presenting the suspect of the member of the Parliament before the Court is the problematic one. This is because in reality, it does not need a President permit but legally it does. The problem is whether pre-senting the suspect before the court without a Presidential Permit is not against the law. The findings showed that the regulation dealing with the summoning of the parliament member suspected of cor-ruption is not necessarily required. It is because the crime suspected to the members of House of Rep-resentative is included in the special crime which is stipulated the 2002 Law Number 30 deals with Corruption Eradication Commission Article 46 paragraph (1) with the elucidation in junction to Arti-cle 245 paragraph (3) sub paragraph c.

Download Full-text

Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Anak

Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jkh.2.1.2546.374-378 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 374-378

Author(s):

I Ketut Eka Yoga Juliantika ◽

I Made Sepud ◽

I Ketut Sukadana

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Criminal Justice System ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Child Protection ◽

Justice System ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Trafficking In Persons ◽

Legal Research ◽

Child Trafficking ◽

Procedure Code

Children are often victims of child trafficking crime. There are a lot of factors that support the crime of child trafficking, one of which is the lack of regulation on child trafficking. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the regulation of child trafficking and how the criminal law policy against child trafficking. This research was designed using a normative legal research method. The results of this study indicated that the regulation of child trafficking is regulated in Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, the Criminal Code (KUHP), namely Article 297, Article 301, Article 324, Article 328, and Article 330, RI Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law No. 35 of 2014 on Amendments to Law no. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, and Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Furthermore, the criminal law policy against child trafficking is regulated in the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Law no. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, and Law no. 35 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law no. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.

Download Full-text

KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum ◽

10.26532/jph.v4i1.1644 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 57

Author(s):

Andri Winjaya Laksana

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Criminal Justice System ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Justice System ◽

Recovery Process ◽

The Public ◽

Criminal Offenses ◽

The Law ◽

Court Proceedings ◽

Perpetrators And Victims

Restorative justice in the settlement of cases of off-the-shelf criminal offenses emphasizing the rearation of the consequences caused by criminal acts by empowering the recovery process and the interests of all involved both perpetrators and victims, as well as the public. The caseresolution model outside the court proceedings is a method that is expected to be undertaken to protect the psychology of a child facing the law in the criminal justice system

Download Full-text

PENGGANTIAN BIAYA KEPADA SAKSI ATAU AHLI DALAM RANGKA MEMBERIKAN KETERANGAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA (Studi Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Takengon)

REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.29103/reusam.v8i2.3866 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 128

Author(s):

Lisa Purba Hajini Purba ◽

Sumiadi S ◽

Yusrizal Y

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Criminal Justice System ◽

Justice System ◽

District Court ◽

Compensation Mechanism ◽

Legal Research ◽

Legal Norms ◽

Procedure Code ◽

The Law ◽

The Cost

Summons of witnesses at each level of criminal case examination has consequences for the cost of attending the summons. So far, the provisions regarding the cost of summoning witnaesses and experts have been regulated in Article 229 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims and Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning Procedures for Protection of Witnesses and Victims in Human rights violations, however, in reality the fees that have been regulated in the law are not fully provided to all witnesses and even if there are costs they are not up to standard and not optimal. These costs include accommodation costs, consumption costs, transportation costs and costs of reimbursing lost income due to having to attend calls. The purpose of this research is to find out and explain the compensation mechanism to witnesses or experts in order to differentiate information in the criminal justice system in the jurisdiction of the Takengon District Court and what are the obstacles in reimbursing costs to witnesses or experts in order to provide information in the criminal justice system in the region. the law of the Takengon District Court. This type of research is juridical empirical, that is, approaching the problem through legal research by looking at the prevailing legal norms and relating them to the facts that exist in society in connection with the problems encountered in the research.

Download Full-text

Pendekatan dalam Penanganan Sengketa Pilkada Menunjang Kinerja Kepolisian dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Sebagai Pelindung, Pengayom dan Pelayan Masyarakat

10.31219/osf.io/buw3p ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

husain kasim

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Law Enforcement ◽

Criminal Justice System ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Police Officers ◽

Justice System ◽

Descriptive Analysis ◽

Mass Violence ◽

Basic Law ◽

The Law

This study aims to: 1) knowing the basic law enforcement restorative justice approach in handling criminal acts riots, 2) to know how to implement a restorative justice approach and the factors that influenceThe experiment was conducted at the Police Resort Ternate, North Maluku province, with a population of security officers who work directly handling and protection against acts of mass violence with less sampling as many as 50 people through random sampling techniques. Data were collected by questionnaire and interview techniques. Data analysis was performed using qualitative descriptive analysis and interpretation.The results showed that: 1) The perpetrator of criminal acts of rioting should be avoided from the formal criminal justice system. The best solution that must be done is through the act of diversion (transfer) the completion of its case outside the criminal justice system, but there is no definite legal basis for implementing diversion measures in addition to referring to the Law 2 of 2002, which only specifies that police officers have the authority of police discretion. 2) Treatment of the criminal action in a dispute over the election unrest in North Maluku, which was held on Sat. Criminal Police Ternate is through mediation. This means that the principle of restorative justice has been implemented on Sat. Criminal Police Ternate, however, efforts to address criminal acts there are influences from the substance of the law, law enforcement officers, legal culture of society and their own community.

Download Full-text

Reconstruction of the Diversion Concept in a Child Criminal Jurisdiction System Based on Dignified Justice

Prizren Social Science Journal ◽

10.32936/pssj.v5i1.210 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 104-112

Author(s):

I Nyoman DIPA RUDIANA ◽

I Ketut RAI SETIABUDHI

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Criminal Justice System ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Justice System ◽

Retributive Justice ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Criminal Jurisdiction ◽

The Law ◽

The Right ◽

Sense Of Justice

The renewal of the orientation of punishment for children in conflict with the law from a retributive justice approach to restorative justice is a good start for efforts to restore a victim-oriented situation by giving the perpetrator the opportunity to express his regret to the victim with the concept of diversion. However, not all cases of children are entitled to diversion. In accordance with Article 7 paragraph (2) of the SPPA Law, the requirement for diversion is a criminal act punishable by imprisonment of under 7 (seven) years and not a repetition of a criminal act. Meanwhile, criminal acts that are punishable by more than 7 (seven) years and repetition of criminal acts are not entitled to diversion. The concept of diversion and the terms of diversion are interpreted very narrowly so that they do not reflect dignified justice. The law cannot only regulate legal certainty. The law must provide a sense of justice with dignity and justice that humanize humans. This writing aims to determine the concept of diversion of the juvenile criminal justice system based on dignified justice. The type of research used is literature, the nature of this research is descriptive, the results of the research are the reconstruction of the concept of diversion based on dignified justice must be reconstructed by expanding the concept of diversion so that every child without exception has the right to get diversion.

Download Full-text

Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Peradilan Pidana Anak di Pengadilan Negeri Watansoppeng

Kalabbirang Law Journal ◽

10.35877/454ri.kalabbirang166 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

A. Sudarman Kantao ◽

Azwad Rachmat Hambali ◽

Muh. Rinaldy Bima

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Criminal Justice System ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Justice System ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Cultural Factor ◽

District Court ◽

Trial Process ◽

The Law

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dan memperoleh pemahaman terhadap penerapan nilai serta hambatan dalam penerapan keadilan restoratif pada perkara peradilan pidana anak sesuai dengan Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dalam rangka memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum dan kendala yang dihadapi majelis hakim pengadilan Negeri watansoppeng dalam menerapkan keadilan restoratif untuk mengadili tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terkait proses persidangan terhadap kasus anak, hakim Pengadilan Negeri Watansoppeng senantiasa mengupayakan penerapan restoratif justice dengan memberi saran kepada korban, terdakwa dan pihak keluarga untuk mengusahakan perdamaian sebagai upaya penyelesaian kasus di luar jalur persidangan, namun upaya tersebut seringkali ditolak oleh korban dan keluarganya dan menginginkan agar pelaku dihukum seberat-beratnya. Faktor Kebudayaan dari keluarga korban inilah yang tidak mendukung penyelesaian perkara di luar peradilan atau perdamaian. This study aims to analyze and gain an understanding of the application of values and obstacles in the application of restorative justice in juvenile criminal justice cases in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children in order to provide legal protection for children who are in conflict with the law and the obstacles they face. watansoppeng District Court panel of judges in implementing restorative justice to adjudicate crimes committed by children. The results showed that in relation to the trial process for juvenile cases, the judges at the Watansoppeng District Court always tried to apply restorative justice by advising victims, defendants and their families to seek peace as an effort to resolve cases outside the court, but these efforts were often rejected by the victim and his family and wants the perpetrator to be punished as severely as possible. The cultural factor of the victim's family does not support the settlement of cases outside the court or peace.

Download Full-text