scholarly journals HAK ANGKET SEBAGAI FUNGSI PENGAWASAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 385
Author(s):  
Mei Susanto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Privacy Rights ◽  
Policy Changes ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 menguji konstitusionalitas objek hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana hak angket menurut putusan a quo dikonstruksikan sebagai fungsi pengawasan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, dan bagaimana implikasinya terhadap objek hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dalam ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian doktrinal, dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang relevan dengan objek penelitian. Penelitian menyimpulkan, pertama, putusan a quo telah mengkonstruksikan hak angket tidak hanya dalam kerangka pengawasan yang hasilnya berujung pada penjatuhan sanksi bagi pejabat publik yang melanggar undang-undang, melainkan juga pengawasan pelaksanaan undang-undang yang hasilnya berupa perubahan kebijakan dalam rangka perubahan undang-undang (legislasi) maupun kebijakan lainnya. Putusan a quo juga mengkonstruksi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai lembaga negara penunjang dalam ranah eksekutif yang independen, namun tetap dapat menjadi objek hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Kedua, putusan a quo secara positif berimplikasi dapat digunakannya hak angket dalam rangka perubahan undang-undang sehingga dapat meningkatkan efektivitas legislasi, namun secara negatif berimplikasi dapat digunakannya hak angket secara eksesif terhadap kelembagaan yang dijamin independensinya dan terhadap objek yang seharusnya tidak dapat diselidiki karena dilindungi hukum, misalnya hak privasi dan penegakan hukum. Implikasi eksesif tersebut disebabkan putusan a quo tidak memberikan batasan terhadap penggunaan hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat.Kata kunci: Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, hak angket, pengawasan. ABSTRACTConstitutional Court Decision Number 36/PUUXV/2017 examines the constitutionality of the inquiry right’s object of the House of Representatives over the Corruption Eradication Commission. The problem in this study is how inquiry right is constructed as a supervisory function of the House based on decision a quo, and what the implications are for the object of the House’s inquiry right in Indonesian state administration. This doctrinal research uses primary and secondary legal materials relevant to the object of research. The study concludes that (1) the decision a quo constructs the right of inquiry not only within the framework of supervision which results in the imposition of sanctions on public officials violating the law, but also supervision of the implementation of laws resulting in policy changes in the terms of amendment of laws and other policies; (2) a quo ruling can positively imply the right of inquiry to be used in the context of amending the law to improve the effectiveness of legislation, but it can negatively have implications for inquiry rights that are excessively used against independency-guaranteed institutions and for objects that cannot be investigated because they are protected by the law, such as privacy rights and law enforcement. The excessive implication of this decision will happen as it does not define the limits on the House’s inquiry right to invesigate into a specific issue.Keywords: House of Representatives, inquiry right, supervision.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Hak Angket sebagai Fungsi Pengawasan terhadap Penyelenggaraan Negara

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-122
Author(s):  
Sri Amlinawaty Muin
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Results ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Council House

Tujuan Penelitian untuk menganalisis kedudukan hak angket sebagai fungsi pengawasan terhadap penyelenggaraan negara. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitan hukum mormatif. Hasil penelitian bahwa  Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (Pasal 20A ayat (2)) mengatur dan merekomendasikan diatur dengan Undang-Undang dengan asumsi dan dengan keinginan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensil adalah juga Parlemen harus punya hak sebagai bagian dari Fungsi Pengawasan yang dimiliki Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan penggunaannya cenderung royal bahkan sasarannya melebar menjadi alat penekan terhadap Pemerintah. Ini terjadi sebagai akibat belum diaturnya dalam Undang-Undang tentang Hak Angket. The purpose of the study was to analyze the position of the questionnaire right as a function of supervision of state administration. The research method used is a normative legal research method. The results of the study that the House of Representatives' Questioning Rights (Article 20A paragraph (2)) regulates and recommends are regulated by law with the assumption and with the wishes of the House of Representatives in the Presidential Government System that the Parliament must have the right as part of the Oversight Function owned by the Council House of Representatives. Research results show that their use tends to be royal even the target is widening to be a pressure tool on the Government. This happened as a result of not having been regulated in the Law on Questionnaire Rights.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Perempuan dalam Hukum Waris Adat Batak Toba

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elpina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Social Culture ◽  
Kinship System ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Political Economic

Customary law is the law of life (living low) that grow and develop in the midst of the community in accordancewith the development of society. Customary law who live in midst of ethnic Indonesia is very strategic to be knownand understood by law enforcement officials, legal observers and guidance in applying the appropriate legal andfair for Indonesian society. The common law does not give the right role and the same degree between men andwomen in life, social, culture, political, economic and domestic life and marriage property and inheritance.Landing directly above the law would cause problems among indigenous peoples, especially the indigenous peopleembrace patrilinieal or matrilineal kinship system, such as that experienced by the Batak people who mbracepatrilineal kindship systems knows in Toba Batak society is patrilineal system, which through the male lineage andis the next generation of his parents while girls not the generation of their parents, as a result of this system is veryinfluential on the position of girls in matters of inheritance.

scholarly journals Mekanisme Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Proses Penyadapan dilihat dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM)

JURNAL BELO ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-85
Author(s):  
Jennifer Ingelyne Nussy
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Privacy Rights ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Investigation Process ◽  
Do So

ABSTRACT Recognition and protection of a guarantee of human dignity to earn a respectable place in the eyes of the law and government. Related to the interests of law enforcement, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) for the purpose of wiretapping evidence in court, while will protecting the privacyrights of suspects. Legal protections for the accused to be seen as matter of law adopted. Therefore, the protection of the privacy rights of a person to be seen in the investigation process. For the Commission to conduct wiretaps should see privacy rights as stipulated in the law and the government should establish a special set of rules that intercepts, thus providing the possibility for law enforcement has the authority to do so does not conflict with human rights.

scholarly journals The Interior Appeal of the FAS of Russia: the Role of Legal Positions in the Development of Uniformity of Law Enforcement Practice

2019 ◽  
pp. 78-83
Author(s):  
O. A. Moskvitin ◽  
I. P. Bochinin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Antimonopoly Law ◽  
Uniform Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Compliance With The Law ◽  
The Right

The article discusses some problems of the formation of a uniform law enforcement practice on the example of specific decisions of the FAS Russia Board of Appeals on issues related to: the application of the rules for the qualification of antitrust violations provided for in part 1 of art. 10 of the Federal Law «On Protection of Competition»; the need to prove the fulfillment of an agreement prohibited by art.16 of the same Law; the exercise of the right of the FAS Russia collegial bodies to refer the matter for a new consideration to the territorial antimonopoly body. It is concluded that the legal positions of the Appeal Board of FAS Russia, being based on the law and applied only in compliance with the law, help to effectively resolve controversial problems of pre-trial Antimonopoly law enforcement and to develop uniform approaches to the interpretation of the rules of competition law.

scholarly journals Legal Liability of the Deputies to NPC for Selling Ballots

2020 ◽  
pp. 86-90
Author(s):  
Zhou Heng
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Standing Committee ◽  
The Status ◽  
Right To Vote ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
People's Congress

Deputies to people’s congresses enjoy the right to elect the personnel of a state organ, members of the Standing Committee of the People’s Congress at the same level and deputies to the People’s Congress at a higher level in accordance with the provisions of the law. Based on the official nature of the right to vote, deputies to NPC can not transfer their right to vote and sell votes. As selling ballots is an illegal exercise of their official duty, they should assume for corresponding criminal responsibility for the crime of undermining election and bribery provided in the Criminal Law of China. Moreover, delegates to NPC who have the status of public officials shall be included in the supervision , and strengthen the responsibility inquiry.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KELALAIAN PEMENUHAN PEMBAYARAN NAFKAH ANAK PASCA PERCERAIAN BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA BLITAR

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Rufia Wahyuning Pratiwi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Values ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Sense Of Justice

Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh adanya beberapa permasalahan yang ada di Pengadilan Agama Blitar, dengan beberapa pengaduan masyarakat terkait tentang lalainya mantan suami dalam kewajibannya memberikan nafkah kepada anaknya pasca perceraian.  Karena anak adalah manusia kecil yang butuh perlindungan dan butuh diperlakukan secara manusiawi, dan sila kemanuasian yang adil dan beradab maupun misi dalam maqoshidussyariah hifdhul nafsi dan hifdhul nasl (melindungi jiwa dan keturunan) dalam syariah Islam harus terwujud. Tujuan penelitian ini agar supaya para pencari keadilan cerdas dan paham akan hukum serta langkah-langkah yang harus ditempuh dalam menghadapi suatu permasalahan hukum guna tegaknya hukum dan terwujudnya keadilan. Hasil penelitian ini memperoleh bahwa hasil pertama mengetahui penyebab adanya kelalaian terhadap pemenuhan pembayaran nafkah anak pasca perceraian, sehingga perlu ditelaah ulang tentang putusan hakim yang bisa menjadi tolak ukur telah adanya jiwa kemanusian demi tegaknya hukum dan rasa keadilan yang dirasakan oleh pencari keadilan. Kedua, mencari solusi tepat agar produk pengadilan yang berupa putusan benar-benar bisa mencerminkan nilai-nilai kemanusiaan, keadilan yang benar-benar bisa melindungi kepentingan para pencari keadilan.Kata kunci: anak, perceraian, perlindungan, hukum This research is motivated by a number of problems that exist in the Blitar Religious Court, with some related public complaints about the negligence of ex-husband in his obligation to provide for their children after divorce. Because children are little people who need protection and need to be treated humanely, and the precepts of fair and civilized humanity and mission in maqoshidussyariah hifdhul nafsi and hifdhul nasl (protecting souls and offspring) in Islamic sharia must be realized. The purpose of this study is so that justice seekers are smart and understand the law and steps that must be taken in dealing with a legal problem in order to uphold the law and the realization of justice. The results of this study found that the first result found out the cause of negligence in fulfilling child income payments after divorce, so it was necessary to review the judge's decision that could become a benchmark for the existence of a humanitarian spirit for the sake of law enforcement and a sense of justice felt by justice seekers. Second, finding the right solution so that court products in the form of decisions can truly reflect human values, justice which can truly protect the interests of justice seekers.Keywords: child, divorce, protection, law

The Expressive Function of #VictimsLaw: Developing a Substantive and Enforceable Framework of Rights and Remedies in Response to Local Need and the Emerging forms of Victimization

2021 ◽  
pp. 251660692110546
Author(s):  
Tyrone Kirchengast
Keyword(s):  
International Standards ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Gendered Violence ◽  
Trial Process ◽  
Law And Policy ◽  
Modern Slavery ◽  
Abuse And Neglect ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Domestic Law

All too often, the law fails victims because it is placatory and unenforceable. The law fails to provide real support and redress when victims need it. Recent international attention has moved to consider the benefits of a victims’ law, one that provides for recognition, dignity and respect for victims by enhancing victim agency through a type of justice which is both substantive and enforceable. It aims to provide higher levels of transparency and accountability of public officials, including the police, prosecution and courts. Such a law builds upon previous attempts at enforceable rights by ascribing a more comprehensive human rights framework compatible with the fair trial process, by granting victims the right to be informed, present and heard within the investigative and trial process more broadly. This article will consider the feasibility of a victims’ law by examining what it offers the recently addressed or emerging forms of victimization. Three examples trending on the #victimslaw hashtag are selected for analysis—domestic and gendered violence; modern slavery and servitude; and coercive control, cyber-abuse and harm. The extent to which a victims’ law provides a meaningful way of ratifying international standards and norms against domestic law and policy is assessed against the needs of those most vulnerable victims of abuse and neglect.

Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan Regarding Criminal Infractions and the Law Enforcement Practice

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Aibar S. NURKHAN
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
World Economy ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Comparison Analysis ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Studying of issues regarding criminal infractions – whether intended or imprudent – plays quite a significant role. Fundamental changes taking part in world economy and politics, globalization processes, as well as internal dynamics of country development, undoubtedly, have impact on national legal framework, including criminal law. Therefore, the main goal of the present paper is the analysis of legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan regarding criminal infractions and the law enforcement practice. To reach this goal authors have used methods of comparison, analysis and data systematization. As a result it has been found that in Kazakhstan there are at average 4,3 registered criminal infractions per a convict. The term of criminal infraction has appeared in the Criminal Code in 2014 to cover offences of small gravity and administrative violations that cannot be referred to the sphere of state administration. Authors have revealed the punishment in the present day Kazakhstan is not a main form of criminal responsibility realization. In the majority of cases linked to criminal infractions the persons committed them are relieved from criminal responsibility at the stage of prejudicial inquiry.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document