scholarly journals Effects of Exercise Using a Stick on Muscle Activity of Gluteus Maximus and Erector Spinae during Backward Return from Forward Bending

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-43
Author(s):  
Won-hwee Lee
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (01) ◽  
pp. 29-37
Author(s):  
Peemongkon Wattananon ◽  
Komsak Sinsurin ◽  
Sirikarn Somprasong

Background: Evidence suggests patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) have altered lumbar and pelvic movement patterns. These changes could be associated with altered patterns of muscle activation. Objective: The study aimed to determine: (1) differences in the relative contributions and velocity of lumbar and pelvic movements between people with and without NSLBP, (2) the differences in lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns between people with and without NSLBP, and (3) the association between lumbar and pelvic movements and lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns. Methods: Subjects (8 healthy individuals and 8 patients with NSLBP) performed 2 sets of 3 repetitions of active forward bending, while motion and muscle activity data were collected simultaneously. Data derived were lumbar and pelvic ranges of motion and velocity, and ipsilateral and contralateral lumbopelvic muscle activities (internal oblique[Formula: see text]transverse abdominis (IO[Formula: see text]TA), lumbar multifidus (LM), erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) muscles). Results: Lumbar and pelvic motions showed trends, but exceeded 95% confidence minimal detectable difference (MDD[Formula: see text]), for greater pelvic motion [Formula: see text], less lumbar motion [Formula: see text] among patients with NSLBP. Significantly less activity was observed in the GM muscles bilaterally [Formula: see text] in the NSLBP group. A significant association [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] was found between ipsilateral ES muscle activity and lumbar motion, while moderate, but statistically non-significant associations, were found between GM muscle activity bilaterally and lumbar velocity [Formula: see text]ipsilateral: [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]; contralateral: [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] in the NSLBP group. Conclusion: Findings indicated patients had greater pelvic contribution, but less lumbar contribution which was associated with less activation of the GM bilaterally.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
In-cheol Jeon ◽  
Oh-yun Kwon ◽  
Jong-hyuck Weon ◽  
Ui-jae Hwang ◽  
Sung-hoon Jung

Context:Prone hip extension has been recommended for strengthening the back and hip muscles. Previous studies have investigated prone hip extension conducted with subjects on the floor in the prone position. However, no study has compared 3 different table hip-extension (THE) positions in terms of the activities of the back- and hip-joint muscles with lumbopelvic motion.Objective:To identify more effective exercises for strengthening the gluteus maximus (GM) by comparing 3 different exercises (THE alone, THE with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver [THEA], and THEA with chair support under the knee [THEAC]) based on electromyographic muscle activity and pelvic compensation.Design:Repeated-measure within-subject intervention.Setting:University research laboratory.Participants:16 healthy men.Main Outcome Measures:Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to obtain data on the GM, erector spinae (ES), multifidus, biceps femoris (BF), and semitendinosus (ST). Pelvic compensation was monitored using an electromagnetic motion-tracking device. Exertion during each exercise was recorded. Any significant difference in electromyographic muscle activity and pelvic motion among the 3 conditions (THE vs THEA vs THEAC) was assessed using a 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc test.Results:The muscle activities recorded by EMG differed significantly among the 3 exercises (P < .01). GM activity was increased significantly during THEAC (P < .01). There was a significant difference in lumbopelvic kinematics in terms of anterior tilting (F = 19.49, P < .01) and rotation (F= 27.38, P < .01) among the 3 exercises.Conclusions:The THEAC exercise was the most effective for strengthening the GM without overactivity of the ES, BF, and ST muscles and lumbopelvic compensation compared with THE and THEA.


Author(s):  
Jim T. C. Luk ◽  
Freeman K. C. Kwok ◽  
Indy M. K. Ho ◽  
Del P. Wong

This study aimed to compare the neuromuscular activation of selected core musculature in supine and prone bridge exercises under stable versus suspended conditions. Forty-three healthy male participants were recruited to measure the electromyographic activities of the rectus abdominis (RA), lumbar multifidus (LM), thoracic erector spinae (TES), rectus femoris (RF), gluteus maximus (GM), and biceps femoris (BF) during supine and prone bridge exercises under six conditions: control, both arms and feet on the floor (Pronecon and Supinecon); arms on the floor and feet on the suspension system (Prone-Feetsuspension and Supine-Feetsuspension); and arms on the suspension system and feet on the floor (Prone-Armsuspension and Supine-Armsuspension). Prone-Armsuspension yielded significantly higher activities in the RA, RF, TES, and LM than Prone-Feetsuspension (p < 0.01) and Pronecon (p < 0.001). Moreover, Supine-Feetsuspension elicited significantly higher activities in the RA, RF, TES, LM, and BF than Supine-Armsuspension (p < 0.01) and Supinecon (p < 0.001). Furthermore, Supine-Feetsuspension elicited significantly higher activities in the RF, TES, and BF than Supinecon (p < 0.01). Therefore, if the RA and/or RF were the target training muscles, then Prone-Armsuspension was recommended. However, if the TES, LM, and/or BF were the target training muscles, then Supine-Feetsuspension was recommended.


2021 ◽  
pp. 181-187
Author(s):  
Vidar Andersen ◽  
Helene Pedersen ◽  
Marius Steiro Fimland ◽  
Matthew Shaw ◽  
Tom Erik Jorung Solstad ◽  
...  

The aim of the study was to compare neuromuscular activation in the gluteus maximus, the biceps femoris and the erector spinae from the Romanian deadlift, the 45-degree Roman chair back extension and the seated machine back extension. Fifteen resistance-trained females performed three repetitions with 6-RM loading in all exercises in a randomized and counterbalanced order. The activation in the whole movement as well as its lower and upper parts were analyzed. The results showed that the Romanian deadlift and the Roman chair back extension activated the gluteus maximus more than the seated machine back extension (94-140%, p < 0.01). For the biceps femoris the Roman chair elicited higher activation compared to both the Romanian deadlift and the seated machine back extension (71-174%). Further, the Romanian deadlift activated the biceps femoris more compared to the seated machine back extension (61%, p < 0.01). The analyses of the different parts of the movement showed that the Roman chair produced higher levels of activation in the upper part for both the gluteus maximus and the biceps femoris, compared to the other exercises. There were no differences in activation of the erector spinae between the three exercises (p = 1.00). In conclusion, both the Roman deadlift and the Roman chair back extension would be preferable to the seated machine back extension in regards to gluteus maximus activation. The Roman chair was superior in activating the biceps femoris compared to the two other exercises. All three exercises are appropriate selections for activating the lower back muscles. For overall lower limb activation, the Roman chair was the best exercise.


Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 8366
Author(s):  
Ahmad Zahid Rao ◽  
Muhammad Abul Hasan

Trunk stability is important for adequate arm function due to their kinematic linkage. People with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) can benefit from trunk-assistive devices for seated daily activities, but existing devices limit trunk movement to forward bending. We developed a new trunk orthosis that has spring and pulley design. This study evaluated orthosis performance with 40 able-bodied subjects under with and without orthosis condition in 20 seated tasks for trunk rotation, forward bending, and side bending movements. Subjects adopted static posture in specific trunk orientation while their muscle activity was recorded. They also rated the subjective scales of perceived exertion and usability. A percent change in muscle activity for each task, due to orthosis use, is reported. Significant muscle activity reductions up to 31% and 65% were observed in lumbar and thoracic erector spinae muscles, respectively. Using three-way ANOVA, we found these reductions to be specific to the task direction and the choice of upper limb that is used to perform the asymmetric tasks. A total of 70% participants reported acceptable usability and ~1-point increase in exertion was found for maximum voluntary reaching with the orthosis. The outcomes of this study are promising, though tested on able-bodied subjects. Hence, orthosis mounted on wheelchairs should be further evaluated on DMD patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Valentin ◽  
T.F. Licka

Sheep are commonly used as an animal model for the human lumbar spine, but similarities in trunk muscle activity of humans and sheep during functional tasks, such as locomotion have not been investigated. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate trunk and pelvic limb muscle activity during walk and run/trot gaits in man and sheep. Electromyography of the muscles erector spinae (ES), gluteus maximus (GM), rectus abdominis (RA), obliquus externus (OE) and obliquus internus (OI) were collected in 24 humans and 15 sheep during treadmill walk and run/trot. Kinematic data from the tarsus (human) or metatarsus (sheep) were obtained to define motion cycles and determine stride characteristics. Mean and range of normalised muscle activity were calculated. In phasic muscles, the occurrence of the maximum was reported. At walk, mean activity was greater in humans for all three abdominal muscles (all P<0.01). At the run/trot, mean activity of ES was significantly greater in sheep (P<0.05) and mean activity of right OI was greater in humans (P=0.016). At the walk, range of ES activity was significantly greater in humans compared to sheep (P<0.01), but significantly smaller in humans in RA and right OE (P<0.05). At the run/trot, range of activity was significantly greater in humans compared to sheep in all muscles (P<0.05), except right RA and OI. Compared to humans, occurrence of maximum activity was earlier in sheep for ES right during walk (P=0.005), and later for GM during walk and run/trot (P<0.001). The results suggest that numerous differences in trunk muscle activity exist between man and sheep during treadmill walk and run/trot, and that these differences are muscle-and gait-specific. Trunk muscle activity should therefore be regarded as species-specific which suggests differences in stabilisation strategies. This should be taken into consideration when extrapolating animal model findings to the human spine.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao Renato Silva ◽  
Vasileios Sideris ◽  
Bryna C.R. Chrismas ◽  
Paul J. Read

ABSTRACTThis study compared force-time characteristics and muscle activity between the isometric squat (ISQ) and mid-thigh pull (IMTP) in both bilateral (ISQBI and IMTPBI) and unilateral (ISQUNI and IMTPUNI) stance. Peak force (PF), rate-of-force (RFD) (e.g. 0-300ms) and EMG of the multifidus, erector spinae (ES), gluteus maximus (GM), biceps femoris (BF), semitendinosus (ST), vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL) and soleus were recorded in ten recreationally trained males. PF was significantly greater during the ISQBI vs. IMTPBI (p=0.016, ES=1.08) but not in the unilateral test mode although effects remained moderate (ES=0.62). A trend indicated heightened RFD300ms (p = 0.083; ES=0.81) during the IMTPBI vs. the ISQBI, but these effects were smaller in the unilateral test (ES = 0.51). Greater (p<0.0001) EMG for VL (ES=1.00-1.13) and VM were recorded during the ISQ compared to IMTP modes in both modes (ES = 0.97 – 1.18). Greater BF EMG (p = 0.030, ES = 0.31) was shown in IMTPBI vs. ISQBI and these effects were stronger in the unilateral modes (p = < 0.05; ES = 0.81 – 0.83). Significantly greater ST activation was shown in both IMTPUNI (p < 0.05; ES = 0.69-0.76) and IMTPBI (p < 0.001; ES = 1.08). These findings indicate that ISQ results in elevated PF, whereas, RFD is heightened during the IMTP and these differences are more pronounced in bilateral modes. Greater activation of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles are expected in ISQ and IMPT respectively.


Author(s):  
Roland van den Tillaar ◽  
Eirik Lindset Kristiansen ◽  
Stian Larsen

This study compared the kinetics, barbell, and joint kinematics and muscle activation patterns between a one-repetition maximum (1-RM) Smith machine squat and isometric squats performed at 10 different heights from the lowest barbell height. The aim was to investigate if force output is lowest in the sticking region, indicating that this is a poor biomechanical region. Twelve resistance trained males (age: 22 ± 5 years, mass: 83.5 ± 39 kg, height: 1.81 ± 0.20 m) were tested. A repeated two-way analysis of variance showed that Force output decreased in the sticking region for the 1-RM trial, while for the isometric trials, force output was lowest between 0–15 cm from the lowest barbell height, data that support the sticking region is a poor biomechanical region. Almost all muscles showed higher activity at 1-RM compared with isometric attempts (p < 0.05). The quadriceps activity decreased, and the gluteus maximus and shank muscle activity increased with increasing height (p ≤ 0.024). Moreover, the vastus muscles decreased only for the 1-RM trial while remaining stable at the same positions in the isometric trials (p = 0.04), indicating that potentiation occurs. Our findings suggest that a co-contraction between the hip and knee extensors, together with potentiation from the vastus muscles during ascent, creates a poor biomechanical region for force output, and thereby the sticking region among recreationally resistance trained males during 1-RM Smith machine squats.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document