scholarly journals PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (SURVEI PADA PERUSAHAAN YANG TERMASUK DALAM INDEKS SRI KEHATI)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
H. Akram ◽  
Animah Animah ◽  
Prayitno Basuki

The objective of this study is to examine the influence of corporate governance mechanism on the disclosure of CSR. Studies conducted on the companies included in the SRI KEHATI index during 2011-2014. The study obtained 18 companies as sample of this study. The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed  that  the  audit  committee  and independent commissioner have no influence on the disclosure of CSR, while institutional ownership was found to have influence on the disclosure of CSR. The study implies that the stakeholders are able to change the dimensions of CSR implementation, whereby previously it was only for humanitarian and environmental aspects, CSR is now able to increase its profit and finally the goal to sustainability can be manifested

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivi Andayani ◽  
Irdha Yusra

This research as a purpose to know what influence of institutional ownership and audit committee on the disclosure of corporate social responsibility. Sample from this research is five enterprises in Indonesian Stock Exchange. The data analysis technique used multiple linear regression analysis using Eviews. From the results of tests performed showed that institutional ownership is statistically not significant affect disclosure of corporate social responsibility, as indicated by the probability of > 0,05 is 0.1948. And the audit committee statistically not significantly affect the disclosure of corporate social responsibility


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-88
Author(s):  
Gustita Arnawati Putri

The delay of audit report being able to mislead stakeholders, especially investors in taking decision is the main issue of the research. The research objective is to prove empirically contribution of good corporate governance mechanism to decrease the audit delay. Banking companies listed in Indonesia stock exchange within 2011-2013 are the samples of the research. Multiple regression analysis, preceded by classical assumption test is used as analysis tool in the research. The research findings partially showed that managerial and institutional ownership did not affect to audit delay, while proportion of independent commissionairy boards significantly affected to audit delay. Nevertheless, simultaneously managerial and institutional ownership as well as proportion of independent commissionary boards and the number of audit committee significantly affected to audit delay.


Telaah Bisnis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Meindarto ◽  
Fitri Lukiastuti

Abstract This study aims to determine the effect of corporate governance on corporate value with the quality of earnings as an intervening variable. Corporate governance mechanism uses four variables managerial: ownership, institutional ownership, the proportion of independent directors and audit committee. The sample consist of 28 banking companies in 2011-2014. The research used Multiple Linear Regression Analysis to test the influence of in­dependent variables on dependent variable. Varible of earnings quality that measured by DA (Discretionary Accrual) has effect on firm value. Institutional ownership of independent board and audit committee have effect on earning quality. Other variables such managerial owner­ship and institutional ownership have no effect on earnings quality. Institutional ownership and independent board have effect on firm value, meanwhile managerial ownership and the audit committee have no effect on firm value. The value of adjusted R2 for the effect of corporate gov­ernance mechanisms on the quality of earnings was 0.170 or 17%. While the value of adjusted R2 for the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on firm value with the quality of earnings as an intervening variable was 0.311 or 31.1%.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elvia Launa ◽  
Novita Weningtyas Respati

The purpose of this research is to examine the influence of the corporate governance mechanism and firm size concerning to the earnings management. Corporate governance mechanism in this study include managerial ownership, independent commissioner and audit committee. The samples of this research are 7 real estate companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange period 2009-2013. This study using a purposive sampling method to determining the number of samples used. The method of analysis on this research is using multiple linear regression analysis. The result of the study shows that managerial ownership, independent commissioner, auditcommittee and firm size are not influence to earnings management. Managerial ownership has no influence to earnings management due to low managerial ownership owned by the samplecompany, while the independent commissioner has no influence because the placement of theindependent commissioner only act to fulfill the formal provisions. Audit committee has noinfluence to earnings management because the member size of audit committee still relativelystandard with the Capital Market Supervisory Agency regulation and firm size has no influenceto earnings management because earnings management’s action not influenced by the firm size.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Putri Nurmala ◽  
Akhmad Sigit Adiwibowo

<em>Bond ratings are a scale of risk of all bonds traded, which indicates how safe a bond is. The security of a bond is indicated by its ability to pay interest and repay the loan principal. The purpose of this study is to find out empirical evidence that good corporate governance has an effect on bond ratings. This study uses secondary data. The population in this study are non-financial companies listed on the IDX in 2014-2018. The research sample was selected using purposive sampling method. After subtraction with several criteria, as many as 20 companies were set as the sample. The analysis technique in this study uses multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that institutional ownership and audit committee have a significant effect on bond ratings. Meanwhile, the independent board of commissioners has no significant effect on bond ratings</em>


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Aina Zahra Parinduri ◽  
Risma Koeshartanti Pratiwi ◽  
Oktavina Ika Purwaningtyas

<p>The purpose of this study is to find empirical evidence of the effect of good corporate governance (Independent Board of Commissioners, Audit Committee, managerial ownership, institutional ownership), Leverage and Company Size on the integrity of financial statements. The sample used in the study was 33 companies listed in the LQ45 category on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2015-2017 period. This study uses the method of multiple linear regression analysis. The analytical tool used for hypothesis testing is SPSS 25. The results of this study indicate that the independent board of commissioners has a positive effect on the integrity of financial statements, institutional ownership has a positive effect on the integrity of financial statements. However, the audit committee, managerial ownership, leverage and company size have no influence on the integrity of financial statements.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Novi Prasanti ◽  
Tatang Ary Gumanti ◽  
Lilik Farida

AbstractThis study aims to examine and analyze the effect of company size, audit committee, and institutional ownership on the level of Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure. The objects of this research are the manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange years 2015- 2017. The study employes multiple regression analysis to examine the effect of the independent variables on the dependent variable. The samples comprise a total of 93 companies that have met the predetermined criteria. The hypotheses were tested using multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the study show that only company size has a positive and significant effect on the level of CSR disclosure. Meanwhile, audit committees and institutional ownership do not have significant effect on the level of CSR disclosure.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh ukuran perusahaan, komite audit dan kepemilikan institusional terhadap derajat pengungkapan tangung jawab social perusahaan (Corporate Social Responsibility = CSR). Objek penelitian ini adalah  perusahaan manufatur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2015-2017. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi berganda untuk menguji pengaruh variabel-variabel bebas terhadap variabel terikat. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 93 perusahaan yang memenuhi ketentuan kriteria. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi linier beganda.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hanya ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap pengungkapan CSR. Sedangkan, komite audit dan kepemilikan institusional tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap pengungkapan CSR.Kata Kunci: kepemilikan institusional; komite audit; pengungkapan csr; ukuran perusahaan


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurnika Asri Dewi

AbstractThis study aims to analyze the effect of corporate governance, profitability, and leverage on social and environmental disclosure. The data in this study are 40 property, real estate, and building construction companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2014-2016, so there are 120 observational data. The hypothesis in this study was tested using multiple linear regression analysis with the application of SPSS version 23. The results of this study indicate that institutional ownership, audit committee, and leverage have an effect on social and environmental disclosure. Meanwhile, the independent board of commissioners and profitability has no effect on social and environmental disclosure. Keywords : corporate governance. profitability, leverage, Social and Environment Disclosure Index (SEDI)


Author(s):  
Yeterina Widi Nugrahanti

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of political connection and corporate governance mechanisms (independent board of commissioner, institutional ownership, and board of commissioner size) toward Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosures using Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Guidelines. Purposive sampling technique was conducted and 272 non-financial companies listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange during 2015-2017 were acquired as the samples (816 firm-years). For testing the hypotheses, unbalanced Generalized Least Square panel data regression was employed. The finding shows that political connection and board of commissioner size have a positive impact on CSR disclosures while independent board of commissioner and institutional ownership do not. This study contributes to political connection, corporate governance mechanism, and CSR disclosure literature by identifying CSR disclosure based on GRI guidelines up to the most detailed level, which are 77 disclosure items indicators and 254 sub-indicators. Meanwhile, previous research only identify CSR disclosure up to 77 GRI indicators without paying attention to the sub-indicators in detail.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Natalia Natalia ◽  
Herlina Lusmeida

<p>The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of good corporate governance on stock returns. Return is the level of profit obtained by investors on investment activities. Good corporate governance used in this study is an independent board of commissioners, audit committee, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership. This research was conducted using the annual report documentation method of banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2016 to 2019. The sampling method in this study was purposive sampling with the number of samples obtained is 106 samples. Data processing is done by quantitative method using multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the study show that the audit committee and institutional ownership have a negative and significant effect on stock returns, while independent commissioners and managerial ownership have no effect on stock returns.<em></em></p><p><strong>BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRAK</strong></p><p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh <em>good corporate governance</em> terhadap pengembalian saham. <em>Return</em> adalah tingkat keuntungan yang diperoleh investor atas kegiatan investasi. <em>Good corporate governance </em>yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dewan komisaris independen, komite audit, kepemilikan manajerial dan kepemilikan institusional. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode dokumentasi laporan tahunan perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) 2016–2019. Metode pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah <em>purposive sampling</em> dengan jumlah sampel yang diperoleh sebanyak 106 sampel. Pengolahan data dilakukan dengan metode kuantitatif dengan menggunakan analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan variabel komite audit dan kepemilikan institusional berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap <em>return</em> saham, sedangkan dewan komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial tidak berpengaruh terhadap <em>return</em> saham.</p><p><strong><br /></strong></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document