scholarly journals Hubungan Beban Kerja Fisik dengan Kejadian Low Back Pain (LBP) pada Kuli Panggul Beras di Pasar Induk Gedebage

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilda Hanifa ◽  
Deddy Koesmayadi ◽  
Yuli Susanti

Prevalensi low back pain (LBP) di Indonesia 85–95% terjadi karena penyebab non-spesifik, di antaranya aktivitas fisik yang berat, mengangkat beban terlalu berat, postur tubuh statis saat bekerja, posisi bekerja, faktor gaya hidup, dan faktor psikologis. Tujuan penelitian ini mengetahui hubungan beban kerja fisik dengan kejadian low back pain (LBP) pada kuli panggul beras di Pasar Induk Gedebage. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analitik observasional dengan pendekatan cross-sectional. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas 33 responden. Pengambilan data dilakukan menggunakan kuesioner dan observasi. Hasil penelitian didapatkan bahwa sebagian besar responden mengalami kejadian LBP sebanyak 29 orang. Responden yang memiliki beban kerja fisik dengan beban 33–52 kg/angkat adalah sebanyak 23 orang dan kejadian LBP sebanyak 19 orang. Hasil ananisis statistik menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat hubungan yang bermakna antara beban kerja fisik dan kejadian low back pain (p=0,372), namun terdapat faktor lain yang terkait dengan kejadian LBP, di antaranya usia, masa kerja, posisi angkat, dan skala nyeri. THE RELATIONSHIP OF PHYSICAL WORKLOAD WITH THE INCIDENCE OF LOW BACK PAIN (LBP) IN RICE HIP COOLIES AT PASAR INDUK GEDEBAGEThe prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in Indonesia is about 85–95%, it occurs due to non-specific causes, including heavy physical activity, lifting weights too heavy, static posture at work, working position, lifestyle factors, and psychological factors. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of physical workload with the incidence of low back pain (LBP) in rice hip coolies at Pasar Induk Gedebage. This research used observational analytic method with cross sectional approach. The research subjects consisted of 33 respondents. Data were collected by using questionnaires and observations. The results showed that the majority of respondents experienced LBP events as many as 29 people. Respondents who had a physical workload with a load of 33–52 kg/lift were 23 people, and LBP events were 19 people. Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant relationship between physical workload and the incidence of low back pain (p=0.372). Conclusion, there is no relationship between physical workload and the incidence of low back pain in rice hip coolies at Pasar Induk Gedebage, but there are other factors associated with LBP events, including age, work period, lifting position, and pain scale.

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e032297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiko Yoshimoto ◽  
Hiroyuki Oka ◽  
Shuhei Ishikawa ◽  
Akatsuki Kokaze ◽  
Shingo Muranaga ◽  
...  

ObjectivesLow back pain (LBP) is a common cause of disability among nursing personnel. Although many studies regarding the risk factors for LBP among nursing staff have focused on the physical load at work, multidimensional assessments of risk factors are essential to identify appropriate preventive strategies. We aimed to investigate the association of multidimensional factors (individual, physical, psychological and occupational) with disabling LBP among nursing personnel in Japan.DesignObservational study with comparative cross-sectional design.SettingData were collected using the self-administered questionnaire at a tertiary medical centre.ParticipantsAfter excluding participants with missing variables, 718 nursing personnel were included in the analysis.Outcome measuresA self-administered questionnaire assessed individual characteristics, rotating night shift data, severity of LBP, previous episode of LBP, sleep problem, kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), depressive condition (K6), physical flexibility and frequency of lifting at work. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the factors associated with disabling LBP (LBP interfering with work) among nursing personnel.ResultsOf all participants, 110 (15.3%) reported having disabling LBP. The multivariable logistic regression analysis after adjustment for several confounding factors showed that kinesiophobia (highest tertile, adjusted OR (aOR): 6.13, 95% CI : 3.34 to 11.27), previous episode of LBP (aOR: 4.31, 95% CI: 1.50 to 12.41) and insomnia (aOR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.05 to 2.62) were significantly associated with disabling LBP.ConclusionsThe present study indicated that kinesiophobia, a previous episode of LBP, and sleep problems were associated with disabling LBP among nursing personnel. In the future, workplace interventions considering assessments of these factors may reduce the incidence of disabling LBP in nursing staff, although further prospective studies are needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 739-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Angarita-Fonseca ◽  
Milena Boneth-Collante ◽  
Claudia Lucia Ariza-Garcia ◽  
Javier Parra-Patiño ◽  
Julian David Corredor-Vargas ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 371-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
HANS-OLOF SVENSSON ◽  
GUNNAR B. J. ANDERSSON ◽  
ANITA HAGSTAD ◽  
PER-OLOF JANSSON

Spine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (17) ◽  
pp. 1417-1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Hebert ◽  
Per Kjaer ◽  
Julie M. Fritz ◽  
Bruce F. Walker

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thembelihle Dlungwane ◽  
Anna Voce ◽  
Stephen Knight

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a public health problem worldwide and is a common cause of work-related disorder among workers, especially in the nursing profession. Recruitment and retention of nurses is a challenge, and the nursing shortage has been exacerbated by the burden of occupational injuries such as LBP and related disabilities. The physiotherapy clinical records revealed that caseload of nurses presenting for the management of LBP was increasing. The prevalence and factors associated with LBP were unclear.Methods: A cross-sectional study design with an analytic component was implemented. Data were collected utilising a self-administered questionnaire to determine the prevalence and factors associated with LBP among nurses at a regional hospital. Bivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with LBP.Results: The point prevalence of current LBP in nurses was 59%. The highest prevalence was recorded among enrolled nurses (54%), respondents aged 30–39 (46%), overweight respondents (58%) and those working in obstetrics and gynaecology (49%). Bending (p = 0.002), prolonged position (p = 0.03) and transferring patients (p = 0.004) were strongly associated with LBP. Nurses with more than 20 years in the profession reported a high prevalence of LBP. The prevalence of LBP was higher among the participants who were on six-month rotations (76%) compared with those on yearly rotation (16%).Conclusion: A high proportion of nurses reported to have LBP. Occupational factors are strongly associated with LBP. Education programmes on prevention and workplace interventions are required in order to reduce occupational injuries.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252564
Author(s):  
Bikram Adhikari ◽  
Anup Ghimire ◽  
Nilambar Jha ◽  
Rajendra Karkee ◽  
Archana Shrestha ◽  
...  

Background Low back pain (LBP) is the commonest cause of disability throughout the world. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with LBP among the construction workers in Nepal. Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among the construction workers working in Banepa and Panauti municipalities of Kavre district, from September 2019 to February 2020. Data was collected purposively by face-to-face interview from 402 eligible participants from the both municipalities using semi-structured questionnaire. Mobile-based data collection was done using KoboCollect. Data were exported to and analysed using R-programming software (R-3.6.2). Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. All tests were two tailed and performed at 95% confidence interval (CI). Result One-year prevalence of LBP among construction workers were 52.0% (95%CI: 47.0–57.0). The higher odds of LBP was reported among females [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.42; 95%CI: 1.12–5.23], those living below poverty-line (aOR = 2.35; 95%CI: 1.32–4.19), participants with more than five years of work experience (aOR = 1.66; 95%CI: 1.01–2.73) and those with intermediate sleep quality (aOR = 2.06; CI: 1.03–4.11). About 80.0% of construction workers with LBP never seek healthcare services due to: a) time constraints (90.9%), b) financial constraints (18.1%) and c) fear of losing wages on seeking healthcare services (40.9%). The majority of the participants (94.8% among those without LBP and 72.3% among those with LBP) did nothing to prevent or manage LBP. Conclusion The prevalence of LBP in the past one year was high among construction workers where majority of workers never did anything to prevent or manage LBP. Therefore, the public health professionals should set up the health promotion, education, and interventions aimed at increasing awareness on preventive techniques and predisposing factors of LBP.


Biomechanics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 358-370
Author(s):  
Lars Dijk ◽  
Marika T. Leving ◽  
Michiel F. Reneman ◽  
Claudine J. C. Lamoth

The identification of homogeneous subgroups of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), based on distinct patterns of motor control, could support the tailoring of therapy and improve the effectiveness of rehabilitation. The purpose of this review was (1) to assess if there are differences in motor variability between patients with CLBP and pain-free controls, as well as inter-individually among patients with CLBP, during the performance of functional tasks; and (2) to examine the relationship between motor variability and CLBP across time. A literature search was conducted on the electronic databases Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, including papers published any time up to September 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the search results, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted the data. Twenty-two cross-sectional and three longitudinal studies investigating motor variability during functional tasks were examined. There are differences in motor variability between patients with CLBP and pain-free controls during the performance of functional tasks, albeit with discrepant results between tasks and among studies. The longitudinal studies revealed the persistence of motor control changes following interventions, but the relationship between changes in motor variability and reduction in pain intensity was inconclusive. Based on the reviewed literature, no stratification of homogeneous subgroups into distinct patterns of motor variability in the CLBP population could be made. Studies diverged in methodologies and theoretical frameworks and in metrics used to assess and interpret motor variability. In the future, more large-sample studies, including longitudinal designs, are needed, with standardized metrics that quantify motor variability to fill the identified evidence gaps.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document