scholarly journals ANALISA KERUSAKAN PART RETAINING RING PADA MESIN DECANTER PANX 650

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunarto Gunarto ◽  
Endro Nasnaim Masput ◽  
Eko Sarwono
Keyword(s):  
1990 ◽  
Vol 26 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.C. Sun ◽  
C.H. Guo ◽  
Z.Z. Zheng ◽  
Z.M. Ma

Author(s):  
Jason W. Melvin ◽  
Nam P. Suh

Axiomatic Design was used to develop a complete platform for chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) of silicon wafers. A functional requirement of the machine emerging from the axiomatic design process is the control of the wafer-scale polishing uniformity. Mechanisms to maintain control of the uniformity were designed, and integrated into a wafer carrier, which holds the wafer during polishing and applies normal pressure to the polishing interface. The wafer carrier is capable of controlling the pressure in four annular zones on a 200 mm wafer, as well as the pressure of the surrounding retaining ring. Initial testing of the wafer carrier indicates a successful design, offering removal non-uniformity of 1.7% after polishing 5,700 Å of SiO2 from the surface of a silicon wafer.


2004 ◽  
Vol 58 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1340-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.C. Sun ◽  
Y.H. Sun ◽  
R.K. Wang

2000 ◽  
Vol 613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huey-Ming Wang ◽  
Gerry Moloney ◽  
Mario Stella ◽  
Sesinando Deguzman

ABSTRACTThe dependence of IC fabrication on the Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) process increases as the device features go down to 0.25 micron or beyond. Due to the tighter CMP process spec, it is very important to reduce the within wafer non-uniformity (WIWNU%) to achieve higher process yield. The symmetrical increment of linear velocity at wafer edge is not sufficient to change wafer edge profile by breaking the matched speed rule. A better solution is through the change of head design for a fixed platen from the polisher design point of view. This study demonstrates the improvement of the CMP process performance, especially at the wafer edge, from the modification of the floating type polish head. The best WIWNU% from a single air chamber head is about 5.12% at 6-mm edge exclusion (EE). In order to obtain better pad deformation control, the retaining-ring pressure chamber is separated from that of the sub-carrier. The average WIWNU% is about 4% for 3-mm and 5-mm EE from two-pressure-chamber head. Due to the limitation of retaining-ring pressure effect, a third pressure chamber is further added that can be extended the edge control up to 1 inch from the wafer edge. The WIWNU% is about 3.8% at 5-mm edge exclusion with low down forces. The slurry and insert types also show effect on the wafer edge profile. It has been also proven that this three-pressure-chamber head is able to reduce the post-CMP thickness variation from the ILD production wafer, especially at wafer edges. More detailed information and CMP mechanism will be discussed in this paper.


2010 ◽  
Vol 126-128 ◽  
pp. 305-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Hu ◽  
Tian Shiang Yang ◽  
Kuo Shen Chen

Here we use 2-D models of fluid film lubrication and contact mechanics to calculate the contact stress and fluid (i.e., slurry) pressure distributions on the wafer–pad interface in CMP. In particular, the effective rigidity of the wafer (determined by the wafer carrier structure), the retaining ring width and its back pressure are taken to be the design parameters. The purpose is to study the synergetic effects of such parameters on the contact stress non-uniformity (NU), which directly affects the spatial non-uniformity of the material removal rate on the wafer surface. Our numerical results indicate that, for a given wafer rigidity, one may choose a particular combination of the retaining ring parameters to minimize NU. Also, the corresponding minimum NU decreases with the effective wafer rigidity, suggesting that it is beneficial to use a soft (e.g., floating-type) wafer carrier. Moreover, for a soft wafer carrier, the presence of the retaining ring also reduces NU to some extent, but the use of a multi-zone wafer-back pressure profile would be more effective in this regard.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 1513-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeongbong Park ◽  
Hyunseop Lee ◽  
Youngkyun Lee ◽  
Sunjoon Park ◽  
Haedo Jeong

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 869-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. McGrory ◽  
Joseph R. Cass ◽  
Omar D. Crothers ◽  
Clifford W. Colwell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document