scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN UJI KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT FLOWABLE DAN BAHAN LUTING SEMEN PADA PASAK POLYETHYLENE FIBER-REINFORCED (PFR)

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Malun Nasrudin ◽  
Dwi Warna Aju Fatmawati ◽  
FX Ady Soesetijo
Keyword(s):  
Zinc Phosphate ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Flowable Composite ◽  
Polyethylene Fiber ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Zinc Phosphate Glass ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Background: Zinc phosphate, glass-ionomer, and resin cement are the most commonly used as luting cements. Flowable composite resin could reduce restoration microleakage and provided better marginal seal in dentin. Purpose: The objective of the study was to compare microleakage between flowable composite resin and cement luting materials.Methods: The study was experimental laboratory by the post test only without control group design. The sample size was 18, which was divided into 3 groups. Each group consisted of 6 samples. Glass-ionomer cement and zinc phosphate were luting cement materials that used in the study. Microleakage measurement method used stereomicroscope after the samples were stored in methylen blue 0.25%.Results: The smallest average value of microleakage was in the flowable composite resin group (29,16%). One way ANOVA test results showed that there were significant differences between treatment groups (p=0.000). Conclusion: It was concluded that flowable composite resin have smaller microleakage average value than glass-ionomer cement and zinc phosphate.

Comparison of the Solubility of Conventional Luting Cements with that of the Polyacid Modified Composite Luting Cement and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1016-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew Thomas ◽  
Mohammed Mustafa ◽  
Reshma Karkera ◽  
AP Nirmal Raj ◽  
Lijo Isaac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Zinc Phosphate ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

ABSTRACT Introduction This study was planned to find the solubility of the conventional luting cements in comparison with that of the polyacid-modified composite luting cement and recently introduced resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) with exposure to water at early stages of mixing. Materials and methods An in vitro study of the solubility of the following five commercially available luting cements, viz., glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Fuji I, GC), zinc phosphate (Elite 100, GC), polyacid-modified resin cement (PMCR) (Principle, Dentsply), polycarboxylate cement (PC) (Poly - F, Dentsply), RMGIC (Vitremer, 3M), was conducted. For each of these groups of cements, three resin holders were prepared containing two circular cavities of 5 mm diameter and 2 mm depth. All the cements to be studied were mixed in 30 seconds and then placed in the prepared cavities in the resin cement holder for 30 seconds. Results From all of the observed luting cements, PMCR cement had shown the lowest mean loss of substance at all immersion times and RMGIC showed the highest mean loss of substance at all immersion times in water from 2 to 8 minutes. The solubility of cements decreased by 38% for GIC, 33% for ZnPO4, 50% for PMCR, 29% for PC, and 17% for RMGIC. Conclusion The PMCR cement (Principle-Dentsply) had shown lowest solubility to water at the given time intervals of immersion. This was followed by PC, zinc phosphate, and GIC to various time intervals of immersion. How to cite this article Karkera R, Nirmal Raj AP, Isaac L, Mustafa M, Reddy RN, Thomas M. Comparison of the Solubility of Conventional Luting Cements with that of the Polyacid Modified Composite Luting Cement and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(12):1016-1021.

scholarly journals Push-Out Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Composite Luting Systems on Glass Fiber Post of Root Canal

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (22) ◽  
pp. 6908
Author(s):  
Jalison Jacob Cheruvathoor ◽  
Lincy Rachel Thomas ◽  
Lirin Ann Thomas ◽  
Madhuniranjanswamy Mahalakshmamma Shivanna ◽  
Pramod Machani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Flowable Composite ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Background: Posts that have been properly fitted can withstand torsion forces and so provide better retention. The push-out bonding strength of glass fiber posts to the root canal was evaluated using resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and flowable composite (FC). Method: Forty single-rooted maxillary central incisors were used in the study. The samples were randomly divided into two groups of 20 teeth each. The crown-down procedure was used to clean and shape the pulp area. A Tenax fiber trans Coltene whaletene post was used by both groups. The first group utilized FC (Filtek Z 350 3M ESPE) to coat the post, whereas the second group used RMGIC (Rely X 3M ESPE). The specimens were cross-sectioned after 24 h. Specimens were cross-sectioned four millimeters thick into coronal and middle parts using a sectioning machine, yielding 40 specimens per group. The strength of the bond between the luting cement and the posts was measured using push-out bond strength testing. We loaded the components at a cross speed of 0.5 mm/min on a universal testing machine until the bond failed. Results: The FC group had a 4.80 N push-out bond strength, whereas the RMGIC group had a 7.11 N push-out bond strength. Conclusion: FC’s mean push-out bond strength score is lower than RMGIC’s.

scholarly journals Cuspal deflection of directly or indirectly restored teeth

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Daniel Maranha da Rocha ◽  
João Maurício Ferraz da Silva ◽  
Liliana Gressler May ◽  
Maria Amélia Máximo Araújo ◽  
Rebeca Di Nicoló ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Strain Gauges ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Flowable Composite ◽  
Base Materials ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Direct Restoration ◽  
Ionomer Cement

<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluatethe cuspal deflection of teeth restored directlyand indirectly. <strong>Material and Methods: </strong>Fortysound maxillary premolar teeth were restoredwith composite and different base materials. Widemesial-occlusal-distal cavity preparations wereperformed, with isthmus width of one third of thedistance between the cuspal tips, 3 mm occlusaland a 5 mm interproximal preparation height. Theteeth were divided into 4 groups (n = 10), accordingto the restoration type: G1) GIC-DCR (1 mm glassionomer cement base and direct restoration usingnanoparticulate composite); G2) FL-DCR (1 mm baseof flowable composite resin and direct restorationusing nanoparticulate composite); G3) GIC-ICR(1 mm glass ionomer cement base and indirectrestoration using nanoparticulate composite GICbase); G4) FL-ICR (1 mm base of flowable compositeresin and indirect restoration using nanoparticulatecomposite). The specimens were submitted tocompressive load of 50 N on the buccal and lingualcusps, in a universal testing machine. The lingualcusp microstrain (με) measurements were executedby strain gauges. <strong>Results: </strong>The Kruskal-Wallis (5%)test was used and showed there were no significantdifferences among the microstrain values for the fourstudy groups (G1 = 1250; G2 = 1075; G3 = 1279;G4 = 937). <strong>Conclusion: </strong>It could be concluded thatthe restorative techniques and the bases employeddid not show any influences in cuspal deflection.</p><p>Keywords<br />Base materials; Cuspal defection; Composite resin; Direct restoration; Indirect restoration.</p>

scholarly journals Evaluation of The Microleakage of Polyacid Modified Composite Compared to Hybrid Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Primary and Permanent Teeth Restoration (An in vitro study)

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-43
Author(s):  
Ayat F AL-Shimmary ◽  
Abeer M. Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Hybrid Composite ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
World Health ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Flowable Composite ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Background: Dental caries is one of the most significant problems in world health care. Restoring carious primary teeth is one of the major treatment goals for Children, and the light activated resin restoration materials like composite, resin-modified glass ionomer and polyacid-modified which was introduced in dentistry in 1970, widely used in clinical dentistry but its application increased dramatically in recent years because of its biocompatibility, color matching, good adhesive properties of its resemblance in physical and mechanical aspects to tooth. The aim of this study: To evaluate the microleakage of Polyacid-Modified Composite resin Compared to Flowable Hybrid Composite and Resin-Modified Glass ionomer cement. Materials and methods: Thirty extracted primary molar teeth and thirty extracted permenant premolar teeth were used in this study 20 for each material, then standardized Class V cavities of teeth was prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces. Using Polyacid-modified composite Resin (Compomer), flowable composite resin and Resin-modified glass Ionomer RMGI. The samples will be divided into three groups according to type of restorative material used and light cured with a light cure device (Ivoclar Vivadent Bluephace), after complete curing the sample will examined by Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and then measure the microleakage. Results: The RMGI shows the statistically significantly lowest mean value of microleakage, followed by Compomer shows statistically significantly lower mean value. Flowable Composite shows the statistically significantly highest mean microleakage. There is no statistically significant difference in microleakage values between the permanent and primary teeth. Conclusion: The Resin-modified glass Ionomer is better in term of microleakage than Polyacid-modified composite Resin and Flowable Composite.

scholarly journals Modified Technique of Porcelain Laminate Veneer in Premolars with Abfraction Lesions: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-126
Author(s):  
Larissa Marcia Martins Alves ◽  
Lisseth Patricia Claudio Contreras ◽  
João Paulo Mendes Tribst ◽  
Renata Marques de Melo ◽  
Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
3D Fea ◽  
Laminate Veneers ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The incidence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) has increased as populations are aging, and teeth are increasingly retained for life. Several materials are available to treat these lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the stress distribution of maxillary premolars with NCCLs using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA) according to different restorative techniques. A 3D FEA mathematical model simulating a sound premolar was initially modeled and replicated in 6 more models simulating a tooth with abfraction: G.1 tooth with abfraction; G.2 tooth with abfraction + composite resin restoration; G.3 tooth with abfraction + glass-ionomer cement restoration; G.4 tooth with abfraction + resin composite restoration + porcelain laminate veneers; G.5 tooth with abfraction + glass-ionomer cement + porcelain laminate veneers; and G.6 modified porcelain laminate veneers filling the lesion. All materials and structures were considered linear, elastic, homogeneous and isotropic and the results were expressed as maximum principal stress. Lower stress concentration in dentin was calculated when the tooth was restored with composite resin and glass-ionomer cement. Regarding the veneer techniques, no difference was found to dentin stress among the groups, but the modified veneer concentrated less stress in the restoration than other the techniques. The control group had the highest concentration of stress in the lesion. All techniques decreased the stress concentration inside the NCCLs and the indirect veneer filling the lesion presented better biomechanical behavior than the veneer cemented above direct restorations.  Keywords: Finite Element Analysis. Dental Veneers. Ceramics. Bicuspid. Resumo A incidência de lesões cervicais não-cariosas (LCNC) tem aumentado, uma vez que a população tem envelhecido com uma menor perda de elementos dentários. Diferentes materiais estão disponíveis para tratar dessas lesões. Este estudo objetivou avaliar a distribuição de tensão de pré-molares superiores com LCNC por meio da análise tridimensional (3D) de elementos finitos (FEA) de acordo com diferentes técnicas restauradoras. Um modelo matemático 3D FEA simulando um pré-molar íntegro foi modelado e replicado em mais 6 modelos simulando um dente com abfração: G.1 dente com abfração; G.2 dente com abfração + resina composta; G.3 dente com abfração + cimento de ionômero de vidro; G.4 dente com abfração + resina composta + faceta; G.5 dente com abfração + cimento de ionômero de vidro + faceta cerâmica e G.6 com faceta cerâmica modificada, preenchendo a lesão. Todos os materiais e estruturas foram considerados lineares, elásticos, homogêneos e isotrópicos e os resultados foram expressos como máxima tensão principal. Menor concentração de tensão na dentina foi calculada quando o dente foi restaurado com resina composta ou cimento de ionômero de vidro. Dentre os grupos com laminados, não houve diferença para a dentina, entretanto a faceta modificada apresentou menor concentração de tensão na restauração. O grupo controle apresentou a maior concentração de tensão na lesão. Todas as técnicas restauradoras diminuíram a concentração de tensão no interior das LCNCs e dentre as técnicas com laminados a faceta modificada apresentou o melhor comportamento biomecânico. Palavras-chave: Análise de Elementos Finitos. Facetas Dentárias. Cerâmica. Dente Pré-Molar.

scholarly journals Apexogenesis of traumatized maxillary right central incisor: Case report with 4years follow up

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hammo DDS ◽  
Mazen Doumani DDS. MSc. ◽  
Adnan Habib DDS. MSc. PhD
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Dental Materials ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Central Incisor ◽  
Vital Pulp Therapy ◽  
Open Apices ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The main goal of vital pulp therapy is to preserve and maintain pulpal health in teeth that have been exposed to caries, trauma, and restorative procedures. This type of endodontic treatment is very important in young permanent teeth that have not reached their complete length and exhibit thin-walled roots and wide open apices. The developments in knowledge of pulpal physiology and immunology, beside to newly introduced dental materials, have changed the treatment approaches for teeth with involved pulps. This report describes a case of a young patient in whom maxillary right central incisor suffered crown fractures because of a traumatic accident. Pulpotomy with MTA were performed in order to achieve apexogenesis and the tooth was restored with a glass ionomer cement and composite resin. The patient was reviewed over 4years. 

Effects of Cyclic Stressing on Attachment Bond Strength using Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite Resin

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. C. Moseley ◽  
E. N. Horrocks ◽  
G. J. Pearson ◽  
E. H. Davies
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document