scholarly journals Heavy resistance training and lymphedema: Prevalence of breast cancer-related lymphedema in participants of an exercise intervention utilizing heavy load resistance training

2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kira Bloomquist ◽  
Tonny Karlsmark ◽  
Karl Bang Christensen ◽  
Lis Adamsen

Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (10) ◽  
pp. e24960
Author(s):  
Emelie Strandberg ◽  
Karianne Vassbakk-Svindland ◽  
Anna Henriksson ◽  
Birgitta Johansson ◽  
Olav Vikmoen ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Kira B.N. Bloomquist ◽  
Lis Adamsen ◽  
Sandra C. Hayes ◽  
Christian Lillelund ◽  
Christina Andersen ◽  
...  


2007 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Battaglini ◽  
Martim Bottaro ◽  
Carolyn Dennehy ◽  
Logan Rae ◽  
Edgar Shields ◽  
...  

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Changes in metabolism have been reported in the majority of patients undergoing cancer treatment, and these are usually characterized by progressive change in body composition. The effects of aerobic exercise programs to combat the cancer and cancer treatment-related side effects, which include the negative changes in body composition, have been extensively reported in the literature. However, few resistance exercise intervention studies have hypothesized that breast cancer patients might benefit from this type of exercise. The purpose of this study was to determine whether exercise protocols that emphasize resistance training would change body composition and strength in breast cancer patients undergoing treatment. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized controlled trial, at the Campus Recreation Center and Rocky Mountain Cancer Rehabilitation Institute of the University of Northern Colorado, and the North Colorado Medical Center. METHODS: Twenty inactive breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to a 21-week exercise group (n = 10) or a control group (n = 10). The exercise group trained at low to moderate intensity for 60 minutes on two days/week. The primary outcome measurements included body composition (skinfold method) and muscle strength (one repetition maximum). RESULTS: Significant differences in lean body mass, body fat and strength (p = 0.004, p = 0.004, p = 0.025, respectively) were observed between the groups at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that exercise emphasizing resistance training promotes positive changes in body composition and strength in breast cancer patients undergoing treatment.



2020 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 1523-1532 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Hansen ◽  
J. Ratzer ◽  
J. L. Nielsen ◽  
C. Suetta ◽  
A. Karlsen ◽  
...  

The present data demonstrate that periodically substituting heavy-load resistance training (HL-RT) with low-load blood flow restricted resistance training (BFR-RT) leads to similar gains in type II myofiber CSA and muscle strength as achieved by HL-RT alone. Furthermore, we have for the first time evaluated myonuclear content and myonuclear domain size before and after training intervention across separate fiber size clusters and found no within-cluster changes for these parameters with training.



2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 1667-1675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kira Bloomquist ◽  
Lis Adamsen ◽  
Sandra C. Hayes ◽  
Christian Lillelund ◽  
Christina Andersen ◽  
...  


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Singh ◽  
Jena Buchan ◽  
Robyn Box ◽  
Monika Janda ◽  
Jonathan Peake ◽  
...  


Breast Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Lars Gerland ◽  
Freerk T. Baumann ◽  
Timo Niels

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Breast cancer is associated with many therapy-induced side effects that impact patients’ lives from diagnosis to long-term survivorship. Physical activity has become an important and proven supportive measure in treating side effects like loss of muscle strength, fatigue, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, lymphedema, and loss of quality of life. Resistance training (RT) is an established exercise intervention for breast cancer patients, but the correct type, timing, intensity, and duration of exercise remain unclear. It is necessary to investigate different resistance training interventions and their effects on breast cancer patients by covering all stages of treatment, beginning with prehabilitation, through the period of acute therapy, to long-term survivorship. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Upon evaluation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the past decade, RT was found to be feasible and safe. Furthermore, there is evidence on the impact of RT on muscle strength, CRF and QoL amongst other factors. Studies implementing mixes of aerobic and strength exercises are rather common, but RCTs of RT-only protocols remain scarce. Different strength training protocols at distinct stages of breast cancer treatment have been conducted, but with the complexity of treatments and the variety of training styles, a large field of study remains. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> Although the overall data on RT for breast cancer patients has increased, there are many different methodological approaches and testing measures as well as gaps in study documentation. There is still very little of the evidence that would facilitate the compilation of standardized and individualized guidelines.



2008 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 1454-1461 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Holm ◽  
S. Reitelseder ◽  
T. G. Pedersen ◽  
S. Doessing ◽  
S. G. Petersen ◽  
...  

Muscle mass accretion is accomplished by heavy-load resistance training. The effect of light-load resistance exercise has been far more sparsely investigated with regard to potential effect on muscle size and contractile strength. We applied a resistance exercise protocol in which the same individual trained one leg at 70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) (heavy load, HL) while training the other leg at 15.5% 1RM (light load, LL). Eleven sedentary men (age 25 ± 1 yr) trained for 12 wk at three times/week. Before and after the intervention muscle hypertrophy was determined by magnetic resonance imaging, muscle biopsies were obtained bilaterally from vastus lateralis for determination of myosin heavy chain (MHC) composition, and maximal muscle strength was assessed by 1RM testing and in an isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/s. Quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area increased ( P < 0.05) 8 ± 1% and 3 ± 1% in HL and LL legs, respectively, with a greater gain in HL than LL ( P < 0.05). Likewise, 1RM strength increased ( P < 0.001) in both legs (HL: 36 ± 5%, LL: 19 ± 2%), albeit more so with HL ( P < 0.01). Isokinetic 60°/s muscle strength improved by 13 ± 5% ( P < 0.05) in HL but remained unchanged in LL (4 ± 5%, not significant). Finally, MHC IIX protein expression was decreased with HL but not LL, despite identical total workload in HL and LL. Our main finding was that LL resistance training was sufficient to induce a small but significant muscle hypertrophy in healthy young men. However, LL resistance training was inferior to HL training in evoking adaptive changes in muscle size and contractile strength and was insufficient to induce changes in MHC composition.



2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 035003 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Grant Mouser ◽  
Kevin T Mattocks ◽  
Samuel L Buckner ◽  
Scott J Dankel ◽  
Matthew B Jessee ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document