Gene therapy for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moataz Dowaidar

The FDA has now approved three innovative gene targeting treatments for the treatment of individuals with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), each with its own unique delivery method. The need for therapy optimization is underlined by the variety in clinical outcomes, notwithstanding this remarkable success. More basic and translational research is needed to determine the factors that limit cell and tissue medication biodistribution and target engagement, as well as to assess long-term durability and potential toxicities. This research in SMA will be crucial in the development of successful gene-targeting therapeutics for other neurogenetic illnesses. The expensive expense of SMA therapies has received a lot of media attention. Nusinersen costs $125,000 each dose, with numerous treatments costing more than $1 million; while risdiplam is scheduled to be price-capped at up to $340,000 each year (91, 92). The cost of gene-targeting drugs is unsustainable, especially because the US Food and Drug Administration anticipates approving 10 to 20 cell or gene therapy products each year by 2025. Efforts must be taken to address these rising costs in order for all patients to benefit from precision medicine.

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Bhavya Ravi ◽  
Michelle Harran Chan-Cortés ◽  
Charlotte J. Sumner

The last few decades have seen an explosion in identification of genes that cause monogenetic neurological diseases, as well as advances in gene-targeting therapeutics. Neurological conditions that were once considered incurable are now increasingly tractable. At the forefront is the motor neuron disease spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), historically the leading inherited cause of infant mortality. In the last 5 years, three SMA treatments have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): intrathecally delivered splice-switching antisense oligonucleotide (nusinersen), systemically delivered AAV9-based gene replacement therapy (onasemnogene abeparvovec), and an orally bioavailable, small-molecule, splice-switching drug (risdiplam). Despite this remarkable progress, clinical outcomes in patients are variable. Therapeutic optimization will require improved understanding of drug pharmacokinetics and target engagement in neurons, potential toxicities, and long-term effects. We review current progress in SMA therapeutics, clinical trials, shortcomings of current treatments, and implications for the treatment of other neurogenetic diseases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 555-561
Author(s):  
Louise Rosenmayr-Templeton

This industry update features a round-up of pharmaceutical news in May 2019 based on press releases and websites. The month was characterized by the achievement of significant milestones in gene therapy. The biggest of these was the US FDA’s approval of Zolgensma®. This medicine sums up the promise and price of genetic medicine. On one hand the clinical results show Zolgensma can dramatically improve the prognosis for infants with spinal muscular atrophy after just one administration, while on the other, it has been priced at around US$2.1 million. With more such therapies likely to reach the market, the debate on Zolgensma goes beyond cost, to overall affordability, the true meaning of cost–effectiveness and how to reward companies for effective, innovative medicines.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgia Bruno ◽  
Bernadette Donnarumma ◽  
Alessia Inverardi ◽  
Paolo Buonpensiero ◽  
Angela Sepe ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Susan E. Matesanz ◽  
Vanessa Battista ◽  
Jean Flickinger ◽  
Jennifer N. Jones ◽  
Elizabeth A. Kichula

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad A. Bashiri ◽  
Mohamad-Hani Temsah ◽  
Khalid Hundallah ◽  
Fahad Alsohime ◽  
Yazed AlRuthia

Novel therapeutic strategies have shown some promise in treating spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). However, the outcomes and acceptance of these new strategies are yet to be explored. We aimed to investigate physicians' opinions and perceptions toward management strategies of SMA across Saudi Arabia. This is a cross-sectional survey using a self-administered, structured questionnaire sent to physicians who care for SMA patients during the Saudi Pediatric Neurology Society annual conference. A total of 72 clinicians of different neurological subspecialties were included. 48.6% prescribed nusinersen to their patients, with 39% of them having patients started on nusinersen. Though, 8.3% prescribed onasemnogene abeparvovec for 1–3 patients, while none of their patients started on the treatment. 64.3% stated that the only treatment available for SMA in their settings is supportive care. Around 69.4% described having a moderate to high knowledge on SMA gene therapy, and 79.2% would recommend it. 48.6% confirmed they would prescribe gene therapy at the age of 6 months, and 78.3% would prescribe it for type-I SMA. Pediatric neurologists are receptive to novel and innovative therapies for SMA in Saudi Arabia. However, the high treatment acquisition cost, strict regulations, logistical issues, and budget constraints delay their adoption and implementation.


2021 ◽  
pp. jnnp-2021-326344
Author(s):  
Sophy TF Shih ◽  
Michelle Anne Farrar ◽  
Veronica Wiley ◽  
Georgina Chambers

ObjectiveTo assess cost-effectiveness of newborn screening (NBS) for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and early treatment with nusinersen or onasemnogene abeparvovec (gene therapy), compared with nusinersen without SMA screening.MethodsInformed by an Australian state-wide SMA NBS programme, a decision analytical model nested with Markov models was constructed to evaluate costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from a societal perspective with sensitivity analyses.ResultsBy treating one presymptomatic SMA infant with nusinersen or gene therapy, an additional 9.93 QALYs were gained over 60 years compared with late treatment in clinically diagnosed SMA. The societal cost was $9.8 million for early nusinersen treatment, $4.4 million for early gene therapy and $4.8 million for late nusinersen treatment. Compared with late nusinersen treatment, early gene therapy would be dominant, gaining 9.93 QALYs while saving $360 000; whereas early nusinersen treatment would result in a discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $507 000/QALY.At a population level, compared with no screening and late treatment with nusinersen, NBS and early gene therapy resulted in 0.00085 QALY gained over 60 years and saving $24 per infant screened (85 QALYs gained and $2.4 million saving per 100 000 infants screened). More than three quarters of simulated ICERs by probability sensitivity analyses showed NBS and gene therapy would be dominant or less than $50 000/QALY, compared with no screening and late nusinersen treatment.ConclusionNBS coupled with gene therapy improves the quality and length of life for infants with SMA and would be considered value-for-money from an Australian clinical and policy context.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document